J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC
J. Smart & Co. (Contractors) PLC SMJ.L Peers
See (SMJ.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMJ.L | $120.00 | +4.55% | 46.78M | 30.00 | $0.04 | +1.90% |
| 0KSR.L | $343.87 | +3.25% | 50.96B | 104.71 | $3.28 | +0.11% |
| LTOD.L | $22.20 | +0.45% | 30.53B | 18.50 | $1.20 | +1.51% |
| 0DH7.L | $156.20 | +0.13% | 17.05B | 16.61 | $9.40 | +2.26% |
| 0OFP.IL | $180.35 | +0.70% | 16.41B | 13.05 | $13.82 | +4.70% |
| 0H9N.L | $107.14 | +0.08% | 14.17B | 73.89 | $1.45 | +0.89% |
| 0MKP.L | $80.20 | +0.50% | 9.74B | 14.05 | $5.71 | +2.76% |
| 0IQC.L | $39.14 | +4.90% | 6.24B | -16.31 | -$2.40 | N/A |
| BAB.L | $825.00 | -0.60% | 4.16B | 21.71 | $0.38 | +0.64% |
| BBY.L | $483.60 | +0.62% | 2.43B | 14.22 | $0.34 | +2.44% |
Stock Comparison
SMJ.L vs 0KSR.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0KSR.L has a market cap of 50.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0KSR.L trades at $343.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0KSR.L's P/E ratio is 104.71. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0KSR.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0KSR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs LTOD.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, LTOD.L has a market cap of 30.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while LTOD.L trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas LTOD.L's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LTOD.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L and LTOD.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMJ.L vs 0DH7.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0DH7.L has a market cap of 17.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0DH7.L trades at $156.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0DH7.L's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0DH7.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L and 0DH7.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMJ.L vs 0OFP.IL Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0OFP.IL has a market cap of 16.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0OFP.IL trades at $180.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0OFP.IL's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0OFP.IL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0OFP.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs 0H9N.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0H9N.L has a market cap of 14.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0H9N.L trades at $107.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0H9N.L's P/E ratio is 73.89. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0H9N.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0H9N.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs 0MKP.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0MKP.L has a market cap of 9.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0MKP.L trades at $80.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0MKP.L's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0MKP.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0MKP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs 0IQC.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0IQC.L has a market cap of 6.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0IQC.L trades at $39.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0IQC.L's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0IQC.L's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0IQC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs BAB.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, BAB.L has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while BAB.L trades at $825.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BAB.L's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAB.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to BAB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs BBY.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, BBY.L has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while BBY.L trades at $483.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BBY.L's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BBY.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to BBY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs MGNS.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, MGNS.L has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while MGNS.L trades at $3,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MGNS.L's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MGNS.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to MGNS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs HILS.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, HILS.L has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while HILS.L trades at $1,928.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HILS.L's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HILS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to HILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs 0R53.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0R53.L has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0R53.L trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0R53.L's P/E ratio is 538.75. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R53.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0R53.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs 0M6I.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0M6I.L has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0M6I.L trades at $48.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0M6I.L's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0M6I.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0M6I.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs 0QO2.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0QO2.L has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0QO2.L trades at $126.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0QO2.L's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QO2.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0QO2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs 0R8F.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0R8F.L has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0R8F.L trades at $55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0R8F.L's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0R8F.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0R8F.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs KLR.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, KLR.L has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while KLR.L trades at $1,544.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas KLR.L's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KLR.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to KLR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs KIE.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, KIE.L has a market cap of 674.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while KIE.L trades at $158.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas KIE.L's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KIE.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to KIE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs RNWH.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, RNWH.L has a market cap of 650.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while RNWH.L trades at $822.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RNWH.L's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNWH.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to RNWH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs 0OA7.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0OA7.L has a market cap of 586.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0OA7.L trades at $40.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0OA7.L's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0OA7.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0OA7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs 0QNT.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0QNT.L has a market cap of 436.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0QNT.L trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0QNT.L's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QNT.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0QNT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs GFRD.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, GFRD.L has a market cap of 401.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while GFRD.L trades at $410.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas GFRD.L's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GFRD.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to GFRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs COST.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, COST.L has a market cap of 322.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while COST.L trades at $118.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas COST.L's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COST.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to COST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs SUR.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, SUR.L has a market cap of 212.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while SUR.L trades at $124.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SUR.L's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUR.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to SUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs SFR.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, SFR.L has a market cap of 94.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while SFR.L trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SFR.L's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SFR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to SFR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs CTO.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, CTO.L has a market cap of 88.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while CTO.L trades at $159.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CTO.L's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTO.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to CTO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs 0F7F.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0F7F.L has a market cap of 59.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0F7F.L trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0F7F.L's P/E ratio is 1.26. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0F7F.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0F7F.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs 0QIH.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, 0QIH.L has a market cap of 59.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while 0QIH.L trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas 0QIH.L's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QIH.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0QIH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs KINO.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, KINO.L has a market cap of 49.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while KINO.L trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas KINO.L's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KINO.L's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to KINO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs BILN.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, BILN.L has a market cap of 47.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while BILN.L trades at $380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BILN.L's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BILN.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to BILN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs VANL.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, VANL.L has a market cap of 42.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while VANL.L trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VANL.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VANL.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to VANL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs HERC.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, HERC.L has a market cap of 39.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while HERC.L trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HERC.L's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HERC.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to HERC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs NEXS.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, NEXS.L has a market cap of 14.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while NEXS.L trades at $157.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NEXS.L's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEXS.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L and NEXS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMJ.L vs TGP.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, TGP.L has a market cap of 6.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while TGP.L trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas TGP.L's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TGP.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to TGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs AUK.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, AUK.L has a market cap of 5.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while AUK.L trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas AUK.L's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AUK.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to AUK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs RAI.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, RAI.L has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while RAI.L trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RAI.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAI.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMJ.L is less volatile compared to RAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMJ.L.
SMJ.L vs FCRM.L Comparison
SMJ.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMJ.L stands at 46.78M. In comparison, FCRM.L has a market cap of 718764.00. Regarding current trading prices, SMJ.L is priced at $120.00, while FCRM.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FCRM.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SMJ.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCRM.L's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SMJ.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and FCRM.L has daily volatility of N/A.