ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN SMHB Peers
See (SMHB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMHB | $4.74 | +8.65% | 24.3M | N/A | N/A | +21.31% |
| FIYY | $103.26 | -0.72% | 241.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FFEU | $90.85 | +0.48% | 212.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTIP | $49.84 | -0.86% | 58.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.77% |
| VTAPX | $24.98 | +0.01% | 58.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.74% |
| VFSTX | $10.46 | +0.10% | 52.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.26% |
| VFSUX | $10.46 | +0.10% | 52.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.36% |
| VGSH | $58.52 | -0.44% | 27.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.17% |
| VSBSX | $19.52 | -0.03% | 27B | N/A | N/A | +4.14% |
| VWSTX | $15.82 | +0.06% | 15.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
SMHB vs FIYY Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FIYY trades at $103.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FFEU Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FFEU trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs VTIP Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while VTIP trades at $49.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs VTAPX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while VTAPX trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs VFSTX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while VFSTX trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs VFSUX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while VFSUX trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs VGSH Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while VGSH trades at $58.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs VSBSX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while VSBSX trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs VWSTX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while VWSTX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs MINT Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while MINT trades at $100.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs ASBFX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while ASBFX trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SCHO Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SCHO trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs PTSHX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while PTSHX trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FTSM Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FTSM trades at $59.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs VFISX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while VFISX trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SPTS Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SPTS trades at $29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SPXL Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SPXL trades at $175.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs TMF Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while TMF trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs VSGBX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while VSGBX trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs VSGDX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while VSGDX trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs JSDHX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while JSDHX trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FLVCX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FLVCX trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs TECL Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while TECL trades at $93.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs BITX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while BITX trades at $55.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FAS Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FAS trades at $170.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs TBLL Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while TBLL trades at $105.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FSTTX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FSTTX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs PAIAX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while PAIAX trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs DHLSX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while DHLSX trades at $29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs DIAYX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while DIAYX trades at $29.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs DHFCX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FNGU Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FNGU trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs DWT Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while DWT trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs ORSTX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while ORSTX trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs PRFSX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while PRFSX trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SH Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SH trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs BULZ Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while BULZ trades at $169.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 55.06. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs BASOX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while BASOX trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs ACSNX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while ACSNX trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs RYVLX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while RYVLX trades at $587.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs RYVYX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while RYVYX trades at $587.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs CPLSX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while CPLSX trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs RYCCX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while RYCCX trades at $411.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SOXS Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 850.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SOXS trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs TAFI Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 783.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while TAFI trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs EMAIX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while EMAIX trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs EXMAX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while EXMAX trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs NVDX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 682.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while NVDX trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 46.79. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs TUA Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 676.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while TUA trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs DPST Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 636.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while DPST trades at $100.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs JSCP Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 617.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while JSCP trades at $47.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs GDXU Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 561.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while GDXU trades at $74.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs NUGT Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 540M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while NUGT trades at $76.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs BPIRX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 522M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while BPIRX trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs BPRRX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 521.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while BPRRX trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SPXU Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 515.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SPXU trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs PSQ Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 511.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while PSQ trades at $33.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FNGO Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 507.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FNGO trades at $108.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 41.11. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs GIYAX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 505.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while GIYAX trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs DGAZ Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs DXQLX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 478.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while DXQLX trades at $98.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FSMB Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 455.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FSMB trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SDHY Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 416.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SDHY trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SDS Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 405.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SDS trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDS's ROE of +5.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs KOLD Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 398.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while KOLD trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SEMRX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SEMRX trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SPXS Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SPXS trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FSHSX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FSHSX trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs UVXY Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 344.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while UVXY trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs DUST Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while DUST trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SVIX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 330.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SVIX trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs GGLL Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 326.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while GGLL trades at $35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SVXY Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SVXY trades at $42.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs MRRL Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while MRRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FLGE Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FLGE trades at $809.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs MORL Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while MORL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs NAIL Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 278.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while NAIL trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs JNUG Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 277M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while JNUG trades at $80.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SMB Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 272.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SMB trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs UUP Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 262.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while UUP trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs TZA Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while TZA trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs QID Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 246.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while QID trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs STOT Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 235.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while STOT trades at $47.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs DFEN Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 233M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while DFEN trades at $48.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs AMZU Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 232.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while AMZU trades at $36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 37.51. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs GUSH Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 231M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while GUSH trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs TENG Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while TENG trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FTSD Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FTSD trades at $90.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs AAPU Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, AAPU has a market cap of 210.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while AAPU trades at $23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPU's P/E ratio is 35.87. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to AAPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs ERX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 207.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while ERX trades at $53.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is less volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs REML Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while REML trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs TWUSX Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 204M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while TWUSX trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs FUMB Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while FUMB trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs SDOW Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 191.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while SDOW trades at $40.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs EMNT Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 186.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while EMNT trades at $98.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs CLSE Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 185.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while CLSE trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs RWM Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, RWM has a market cap of 177.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while RWM trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to RWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs CVSB Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while CVSB trades at $50.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.
SMHB vs TMV Comparison
SMHB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMHB stands at 24.3M. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 169.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMHB is priced at $4.74, while TMV trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMHB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMHB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMHB is more volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMHB.