DS Smith Plc
DS Smith Plc SMDS.L Peers
See (SMDS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMDS.L | $582.50 | -1.02% | 8.06B | 36.41 | $0.16 | +3.12% |
| 0JCB.L | $55.48 | -0.08% | 22.91B | 12.23 | $4.54 | +3.88% |
| SKG.L | $4,180.00 | +4.32% | 21.92B | 16.99 | $2.46 | N/A |
| IPC.L | $3,520.00 | -2.22% | 18.58B | 40.46 | $0.87 | +1.45% |
| 0KEZ.L | $190.34 | +0.19% | 17.13B | 19.47 | $9.78 | +2.61% |
| SWR.L | $3,261.00 | -1.18% | 17.02B | 53.46 | $0.61 | +3.50% |
| 0HL5.L | $52.19 | -1.92% | 14.48B | 15.29 | $3.41 | +1.53% |
| 0HJR.L | $177.44 | -0.72% | 13.87B | 20.35 | $8.72 | +1.98% |
| 0LW9.L | $51.64 | +4.37% | 13.09B | 17.39 | $2.97 | N/A |
| 0I4X.L | $97.37 | -0.41% | 11.33B | -22.44 | -$4.34 | +1.31% |
Stock Comparison
SMDS.L vs 0JCB.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0JCB.L has a market cap of 22.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0JCB.L trades at $55.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0JCB.L's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0JCB.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0JCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs SKG.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, SKG.L has a market cap of 21.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while SKG.L trades at $4,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas SKG.L's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKG.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to SKG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs IPC.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, IPC.L has a market cap of 18.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while IPC.L trades at $3,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas IPC.L's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPC.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to IPC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0KEZ.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0KEZ.L has a market cap of 17.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0KEZ.L trades at $190.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0KEZ.L's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0KEZ.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0KEZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs SWR.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, SWR.L has a market cap of 17.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while SWR.L trades at $3,261.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas SWR.L's P/E ratio is 53.46. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWR.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L and SWR.L have similar daily volatility (4.42).
SMDS.L vs 0HL5.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0HL5.L has a market cap of 14.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0HL5.L trades at $52.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0HL5.L's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0HL5.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0HL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0HJR.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0HJR.L has a market cap of 13.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0HJR.L trades at $177.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0HJR.L's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0HJR.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0HJR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0LW9.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0LW9.L has a market cap of 13.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0LW9.L trades at $51.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0LW9.L's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0LW9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0LW9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0I4X.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0I4X.L has a market cap of 11.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0I4X.L trades at $97.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0I4X.L's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0I4X.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0I4X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0HN1.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0HN1.L has a market cap of 7.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0HN1.L trades at $68.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0HN1.L's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0HN1.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0HN1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0CX9.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0CX9.L has a market cap of 7.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0CX9.L trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0CX9.L's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0CX9.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0CX9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0L4F.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0L4F.L has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0L4F.L trades at $32.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0L4F.L's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0L4F.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0L4F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0EOF.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0EOF.L has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0EOF.L trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0EOF.L's P/E ratio is -23.34. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0EOF.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0EOF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0K9W.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0K9W.L has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0K9W.L trades at $36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0K9W.L's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0K9W.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0K9W.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0K9W.IL Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0K9W.IL has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0K9W.IL trades at $32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0K9W.IL's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0K9W.IL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0K9W.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0O7A.IL Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0O7A.IL has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0O7A.IL trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0O7A.IL's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0O7A.IL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is less volatile compared to 0O7A.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0NNC.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0NNC.L has a market cap of 757.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0NNC.L trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0NNC.L's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0NNC.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0NNC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0O33.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0O33.L has a market cap of 603.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0O33.L trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0O33.L's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0O33.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0O33.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs 0D1X.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, 0D1X.L has a market cap of 540.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while 0D1X.L trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas 0D1X.L's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0D1X.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to 0D1X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs MACF.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, MACF.L has a market cap of 178.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while MACF.L trades at $112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas MACF.L's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MACF.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is less volatile compared to MACF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs RBN.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, RBN.L has a market cap of 21.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while RBN.L trades at $127.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas RBN.L's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBN.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is less volatile compared to RBN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs SYM.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, SYM.L has a market cap of 17.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while SYM.L trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas SYM.L's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYM.L's ROE of +326.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is less volatile compared to SYM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.
SMDS.L vs CRU.L Comparison
SMDS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMDS.L stands at 8.06B. In comparison, CRU.L has a market cap of 6.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SMDS.L is priced at $582.50, while CRU.L trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMDS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.41, whereas CRU.L's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, SMDS.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRU.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMDS.L is more volatile compared to CRU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMDS.L.