Siemens AG
Siemens AG SMAWF Peers
See (SMAWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMAWF | $250.00 | -1.29% | 196.2B | 22.36 | $11.18 | +2.18% |
| RATIY | $46.03 | N/A | 209.3B | 37.12 | $1.24 | +1.76% |
| SIEGY | $124.97 | +0.65% | 195.8B | 22.36 | $5.59 | +1.83% |
| SBGSY | $51.43 | +0.18% | 144.5B | 29.06 | $1.77 | +1.63% |
| SBGSF | $257.00 | +0.73% | 144.2B | 28.68 | $8.96 | +1.26% |
| RCIT | $2,160.19 | +12.30% | 134.4B | -216019.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ATLFF | $17.00 | +14.48% | 89.9B | 27.42 | $0.62 | +1.69% |
| SMEGF | $101.00 | +0.44% | 80.3B | 420.83 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SMNEY | $100.75 | -0.42% | 80.2B | 438.04 | $0.23 | N/A |
| MHVYF | $23.66 | -1.43% | 79.4B | 46.39 | $0.51 | +0.66% |
Stock Comparison
SMAWF vs RATIY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 209.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while RATIY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SIEGY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 195.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SIEGY trades at $124.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SBGSY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 144.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SBGSY trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SBGSF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 144.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SBGSF trades at $257.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RCIT Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 134.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while RCIT trades at $2,160.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -216019.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLFF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 89.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while ATLFF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and ATLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs SMEGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 80.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SMEGF trades at $101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 420.83. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMNEY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 80.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SMNEY trades at $100.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 438.04. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MHVYF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while MHVYF trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLPF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while ATLPF trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLKY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while ATLKY trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while ATLCY trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KNYJY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while KNYJY trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WRTBY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while WRTBY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SHLRF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SHLRF trades at $341.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SHLAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SHLAF trades at $348.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and SHLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs WEGZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while WEGZY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KNYJF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while KNYJF trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SDVKY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SDVKY trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SDVKF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SDVKF trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and SDVKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs FANUY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while FANUY trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMCAY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SMCAY trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FANUF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while FANUF trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMECF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SMECF trades at $374.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NJDCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while NJDCY trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NNDNF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while NNDNF trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and NNDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs WEICF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while WEICF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ALFVY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while ALFVY trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IHICY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while IHICY trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VWSYF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while VWSYF trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VWDRY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while VWDRY trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ALFVF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEICY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and WEICY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs SIELF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SIELF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs GCTAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and GCTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs GCTAY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WRTBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while WRTBF trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KWHIY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while KWHIY trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VACNY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while VACNY trades at $39.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 44.69. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs GEAGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while GEAGF trades at $69.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IHICF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while IHICF trades at $68.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VTTGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while VTTGF trades at $341.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMGZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SMGZY trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs DFKCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while DFKCY trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KWHIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while KWHIF trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs DAIUF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while DAIUF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and DAIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs RTLLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while RTLLF trades at $828.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEIGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while WEIGF trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and WEIGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs TBABF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEGRY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while WEGRY trades at $16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MLSPF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while MLSPF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is -129.60. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMGKF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SMGKF trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs EBCOY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while EBCOY trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs JPSWY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while JPSWY trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IMIAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while IMIAF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SULZF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SULZF trades at $188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and SULZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs FCHRF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while FCHRF trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YOKEY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while YOKEY trades at $48.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HSHZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while HSHZY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and HSHZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs VLMTY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while VLMTY trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and VLMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs SPXSY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SPXSY trades at $39.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SPXSF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SPXSF trades at $77.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs EBCOF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs XJNGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while XJNGF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and XJNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs BCHHF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while BCHHF trades at $505.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HAIIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and HAIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs DNGFF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YOKEF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while YOKEF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NRXXY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while NRXXY trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 147.14. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and NRXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs HSHIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while HSHIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FLUIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while FLUIF trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YMATF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while YMATF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VOYJF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while VOYJF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and VOYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs SFSLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and SFSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs KRNNF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs JGHAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while JGHAF trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and JGHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs ATSAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and ATSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs NGKIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while NGKIF trades at $13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and NGKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs AALBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while AALBF trades at $35.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RTOXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while RTOXF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and RTOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs MRRLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MICLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NRDXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while NRDXF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 98.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs CYJBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs THKLY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while THKLY trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 55.96. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KUKAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and KUKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs FJTCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while FJTCY trades at $38.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs AMDWF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while AMDWF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FLIDF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while FLIDF trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SOHVF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and SOHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs FLIDY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while FLIDY trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs THKLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KRNTY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, KRNTY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while KRNTY trades at $81.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas KRNTY's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRNTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and KRNTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs SOHVY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while SOHVY trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 516.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MIURF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while MIURF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and MIURF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs JGHHY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF and JGHHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SMAWF vs NCTKY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while NCTKY trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to NCTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KRDXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while KRDXF trades at $281.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HSYDF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 196.2B. In comparison, HSYDF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $250.00, while HSYDF trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.36, whereas HSYDF's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSYDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to HSYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.