Siemens AG
Siemens AG SMAWF Peers
See (SMAWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMAWF | $257.32 | +1.69% | 206.7B | 23.29 | $11.31 | +2.07% |
| SIEGY | $130.59 | +3.19% | 204.4B | 23.05 | $5.66 | +1.54% |
| SBGSY | $53.96 | +5.91% | 150.9B | 29.49 | $1.82 | +1.56% |
| SBGSF | $267.84 | +3.45% | 150.3B | 29.43 | $9.10 | +1.05% |
| RCIT | $2,144.21 | +53605150.00% | 133.4B | -214421.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SMEGF | $112.00 | +2.28% | 89.1B | 466.67 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SMNEY | $111.62 | +2.04% | 88.8B | 465.00 | $0.24 | N/A |
| MHVYF | $25.47 | +3.49% | 85.5B | 50.94 | $0.50 | +0.61% |
| ATLKY | $16.31 | +4.02% | 75.9B | 26.20 | $0.62 | +1.79% |
| ATLCY | $14.25 | +3.64% | 75.1B | 22.90 | $0.62 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
SMAWF vs SIEGY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 204.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SIEGY trades at $130.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SBGSY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 150.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SBGSY trades at $53.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SBGSF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 150.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SBGSF trades at $267.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RCIT Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while RCIT trades at $2,144.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -214421.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMEGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SMEGF trades at $112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 466.67. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMNEY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SMNEY trades at $111.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 465.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MHVYF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while MHVYF trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 50.94. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLKY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while ATLKY trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while ATLCY trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLFF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while ATLFF trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLPF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while ATLPF trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KNYJY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while KNYJY trades at $32.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 30.61. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WRTBY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while WRTBY trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SHLRF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SHLRF trades at $367.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SHLAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SHLAF trades at $373.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEGZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while WEGZY trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KNYJF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while KNYJF trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SDVKY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SDVKY trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SDVKF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SDVKF trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FANUY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while FANUY trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FANUF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while FANUF trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NNDNF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while NNDNF trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMCAY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SMCAY trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NJDCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while NJDCY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMECF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SMECF trades at $363.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEICF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while WEICF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ALFVY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while ALFVY trades at $42.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IHICY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while IHICY trades at $28.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VWSYF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while VWSYF trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VWDRY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while VWDRY trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ALFVF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IHICF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while IHICF trades at $99.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEICY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SIELF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SIELF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KWHIY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while KWHIY trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WRTBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while WRTBF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs GCTAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to GCTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs GCTAY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VACNY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while VACNY trades at $42.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 48.18. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs GEAGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while GEAGF trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RATIY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while RATIY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMGZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SMGZY trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VTTGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while VTTGF trades at $341.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs DFKCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while DFKCY trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KWHIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while KWHIF trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs DAIUF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while DAIUF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MLSPF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while MLSPF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is -147.98. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RTLLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while RTLLF trades at $828.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEGRY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while WEGRY trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs EBCOY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while EBCOY trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEIGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while WEIGF trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs TBABF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMGKF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SMGKF trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs JPSWY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while JPSWY trades at $27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IMIAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while IMIAF trades at $27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SULZF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SULZF trades at $188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FCHRF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while FCHRF trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YOKEY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while YOKEY trades at $48.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SPXSY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SPXSY trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SPXSF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SPXSF trades at $83.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VLMTY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while VLMTY trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs XJNGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while XJNGF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs EBCOF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HAIIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to HAIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HSHZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while HSHZY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs BCHHF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while BCHHF trades at $495.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YOKEF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while YOKEF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs DNGFF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NRXXY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while NRXXY trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 128.75. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NRDXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while NRDXF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HSHIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while HSHIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FLUIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while FLUIF trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs JGHAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while JGHAF trades at $44.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YMATF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while YMATF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VOYJF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while VOYJF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SFSLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SFSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KRNNF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs AALBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while AALBF trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATSAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NGKIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while NGKIF trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MRRLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MICLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FLIDY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while FLIDY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FJTCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while FJTCY trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs CYJBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RTOXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while RTOXF trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs THKLY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while THKLY trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 55.39. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KUKAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KUKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs AMDWF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while AMDWF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FLIDF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while FLIDF trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SOHVF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SOHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs THKLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MIURF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while MIURF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to MIURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SOHVY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SOHVY trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 501.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KRDXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while KRDXF trades at $307.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs JGHHY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to JGHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SUZRY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, SUZRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while SUZRY trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas SUZRY's P/E ratio is 73.22. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUZRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SUZRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NCTKY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while NCTKY trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NCTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MLSYY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 206.7B. In comparison, MLSYY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $257.32, while MLSYY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.29, whereas MLSYY's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLSYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to MLSYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.