Siemens AG
Siemens AG SMAWF Peers
See (SMAWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMAWF | $259.04 | -0.92% | 203.3B | 22.51 | $11.51 | +2.14% |
| SIEGY | $130.22 | -0.57% | 203.5B | 22.48 | $5.78 | +1.54% |
| SBGSY | $54.65 | -0.22% | 153.7B | 29.66 | $1.84 | +1.53% |
| SBGSF | $270.60 | -2.15% | 151.8B | 29.25 | $9.25 | +1.03% |
| RCIT | $2,187.08 | +54676900.00% | 136.1B | -218708.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SMNEY | $107.48 | -1.65% | 85.5B | 429.92 | $0.25 | N/A |
| SMEGF | $105.69 | -3.01% | 84.1B | 422.74 | $0.25 | N/A |
| WRTBY | $5.31 | +0.82% | 78.1B | 24.11 | $0.22 | +1.45% |
| MHVYF | $23.25 | +6.15% | 78.1B | 47.45 | $0.49 | +0.67% |
| ATLFF | $14.46 | +0.00% | 76.5B | 24.51 | $0.59 | +0.21% |
Stock Comparison
SMAWF vs SIEGY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SIEGY trades at $130.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SBGSY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 153.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SBGSY trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SBGSF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 151.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SBGSF trades at $270.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RCIT Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while RCIT trades at $2,187.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -218708.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMNEY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SMNEY trades at $107.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 429.92. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMEGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SMEGF trades at $105.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 422.74. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WRTBY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while WRTBY trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MHVYF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while MHVYF trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 47.45. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLFF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while ATLFF trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLKY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while ATLKY trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLPF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while ATLPF trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATLCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while ATLCY trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KNYJY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while KNYJY trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SHLAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SHLAF trades at $379.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 33.16. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SHLRF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SHLRF trades at $362.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 31.72. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KNYJF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while KNYJF trades at $64.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SDVKF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SDVKF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEGZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while WEGZY trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SDVKY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SDVKY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FANUY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while FANUY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FANUF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while FANUF trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMCAY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SMCAY trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NJDCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while NJDCY trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMECF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SMECF trades at $340.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NNDNF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while NNDNF trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VWDRY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while VWDRY trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEICF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while WEICF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VWSYF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while VWSYF trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ALFVY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while ALFVY trades at $43.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ALFVF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IHICY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while IHICY trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IHICF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while IHICF trades at $99.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEICY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WRTBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while WRTBF trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SIELF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SIELF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs GCTAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to GCTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs GCTAY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VACNY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while VACNY trades at $41.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 47.33. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KWHIY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while KWHIY trades at $28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KWHIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while KWHIF trades at $69.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs GEAGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while GEAGF trades at $68.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMGZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SMGZY trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RATIY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while RATIY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VTTGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while VTTGF trades at $341.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 38.76. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs DAIUF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while DAIUF trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RTLLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while RTLLF trades at $831.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEGRY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while WEGRY trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs JPSWY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while JPSWY trades at $31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs DFKCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while DFKCY trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MLSPF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while MLSPF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is -143.16. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs WEIGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while WEIGF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs EBCOY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while EBCOY trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs TBABF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SMGKF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SMGKF trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IMIAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while IMIAF trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FCHRF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while FCHRF trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YOKEY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while YOKEY trades at $48.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SPXSF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SPXSF trades at $83.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SPXSY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SPXSY trades at $41.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VLMTY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while VLMTY trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SULZF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SULZF trades at $177.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs EBCOF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs XJNGF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while XJNGF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NRXXY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while NRXXY trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 138.75. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NRDXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while NRDXF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 147.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HAIIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to HAIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs BCHHF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while BCHHF trades at $495.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HSHZY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while HSHZY trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs DNGFF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YOKEF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while YOKEF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs YMATF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while YMATF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FLUIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while FLUIF trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs HSHIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while HSHIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs VOYJF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while VOYJF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SFSLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SFSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KRNNF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs AALBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while AALBF trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs ATSAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs JGHAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while JGHAF trades at $44.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs NGKIF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while NGKIF trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MRRLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MICLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FLIDY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while FLIDY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FJTCY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while FJTCY trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs CYJBF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs RTOXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while RTOXF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KUKAF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KUKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs AMDWF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while AMDWF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs THKLY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while THKLY trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 52.44. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs FLIDF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while FLIDF trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs KRDXF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while KRDXF trades at $368.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SOHVF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SOHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs THKLF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MIURF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while MIURF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to MIURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SOHVY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SOHVY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 495.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs JGHHY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to JGHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs SUZRY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, SUZRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while SUZRY trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SUZRY's P/E ratio is 73.22. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUZRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SUZRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs MLSYY Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, MLSYY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while MLSYY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MLSYY's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLSYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to MLSYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.
SMAWF vs IRRHF Comparison
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 203.3B. In comparison, IRRHF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $259.04, while IRRHF trades at $2,389.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas IRRHF's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IRRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to IRRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.