Siemens AG
Siemens AG (SMAWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMAWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMAWF | $268.42 | -0.00% | 214.8B | 23.80 | $11.50 | +1.99% |
| SIEGY | $135.80 | +0.00% | 214.1B | 23.81 | $5.74 | +2.08% |
| SBGSF | $256.87 | +0.00% | 145.8B | 27.55 | $9.40 | +1.09% |
| SBGSY | $51.95 | +0.00% | 145.2B | 27.43 | $1.88 | +1.62% |
| RCIT | $2,142.81 | -0.79% | 133.3B | -214281.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SMNEY | $114.28 | +0.00% | 96.5B | 89.21 | $1.25 | N/A |
| SMEGF | $110.75 | +0.00% | 90.7B | 90.48 | $1.26 | N/A |
| MHVYF | $26.90 | +0.00% | 89.7B | 54.53 | $0.49 | +0.58% |
| WRTBY | $5.70 | +0.00% | 82.8B | 25.59 | $0.22 | +1.47% |
| ATLPF | $14.94 | +0.00% | 74B | 26.27 | $0.60 | +1.82% |
Stock Comparison
SMAWF vs SIEGY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 214.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SIEGY trades at $135.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SIEGY's competition here
SMAWF vs SBGSF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 145.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SBGSF trades at $256.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SBGSF's competition here
SMAWF vs SBGSY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 145.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SBGSY trades at $51.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SBGSY's competition here
SMAWF vs RCIT Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while RCIT trades at $2,142.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -214281.00. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check RCIT's competition here
SMAWF vs SMNEY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 96.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SMNEY trades at $114.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 89.21. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SMNEY's competition here
SMAWF vs SMEGF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SMEGF trades at $110.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 90.48. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SMEGF's competition here
SMAWF vs MHVYF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while MHVYF trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 54.53. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check MHVYF's competition here
SMAWF vs WRTBY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 82.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while WRTBY trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check WRTBY's competition here
SMAWF vs ATLPF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while ATLPF trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check ATLPF's competition here
SMAWF vs ATLKY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while ATLKY trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check ATLKY's competition here
SMAWF vs ATLCY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while ATLCY trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check ATLCY's competition here
SMAWF vs ATLFF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while ATLFF trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check ATLFF's competition here
SMAWF vs KNYJY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while KNYJY trades at $30.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check KNYJY's competition here
SMAWF vs SHLAF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SHLAF trades at $376.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SHLAF's competition here
SMAWF vs SHLRF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SHLRF trades at $354.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SHLRF's competition here
SMAWF vs SDVKY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SDVKY trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SDVKY's competition here
SMAWF vs KNYJF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while KNYJF trades at $60.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check KNYJF's competition here
SMAWF vs SDVKF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SDVKF trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SDVKF's competition here
SMAWF vs FANUY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while FANUY trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check FANUY's competition here
SMAWF vs FANUF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while FANUF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check FANUF's competition here
SMAWF vs WEGZY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while WEGZY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check WEGZY's competition here
SMAWF vs NNDNF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while NNDNF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check NNDNF's competition here
SMAWF vs NJDCY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while NJDCY trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check NJDCY's competition here
SMAWF vs SMECF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SMECF trades at $340.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SMECF's competition here
SMAWF vs SMCAY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SMCAY trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SMCAY's competition here
SMAWF vs VWSYF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while VWSYF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check VWSYF's competition here
SMAWF vs ALFVY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while ALFVY trades at $43.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check ALFVY's competition here
SMAWF vs VWDRY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while VWDRY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check VWDRY's competition here
SMAWF vs WEICF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while WEICF trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check WEICF's competition here
SMAWF vs IHICY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while IHICY trades at $30.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check IHICY's competition here
SMAWF vs WRTBF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while WRTBF trades at $27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check WRTBF's competition here
SMAWF vs IHICF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while IHICF trades at $106.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check IHICF's competition here
SMAWF vs ALFVF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check ALFVF's competition here
SMAWF vs WEICY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check WEICY's competition here
SMAWF vs SIELF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SIELF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SIELF's competition here
SMAWF vs GCTAF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to GCTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check GCTAF's competition here
SMAWF vs GCTAY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check GCTAY's competition here
SMAWF vs GEAGF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while GEAGF trades at $75.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check GEAGF's competition here
SMAWF vs KWHIF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while KWHIF trades at $70.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check KWHIF's competition here
SMAWF vs KWHIY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while KWHIY trades at $28.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check KWHIY's competition here
SMAWF vs DFKCY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while DFKCY trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check DFKCY's competition here
SMAWF vs SMGZY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SMGZY trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SMGZY's competition here
SMAWF vs VTTGF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while VTTGF trades at $355.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check VTTGF's competition here
SMAWF vs MLSPF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while MLSPF trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check MLSPF's competition here
SMAWF vs RATIY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while RATIY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check RATIY's competition here
SMAWF vs DAIUF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while DAIUF trades at $28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check DAIUF's competition here
SMAWF vs SMGKF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SMGKF trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SMGKF's competition here
SMAWF vs VACNY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while VACNY trades at $34.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 36.77. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check VACNY's competition here
SMAWF vs EBCOY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while EBCOY trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check EBCOY's competition here
SMAWF vs JPSWY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while JPSWY trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check JPSWY's competition here
SMAWF vs RTLLF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while RTLLF trades at $759.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check RTLLF's competition here
SMAWF vs WEGRY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while WEGRY trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check WEGRY's competition here
SMAWF vs TBABF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check TBABF's competition here
SMAWF vs WEIGF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while WEIGF trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check WEIGF's competition here
SMAWF vs IMIAF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while IMIAF trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check IMIAF's competition here
SMAWF vs YOKEY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while YOKEY trades at $55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check YOKEY's competition here
SMAWF vs SPXSY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SPXSY trades at $47.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SPXSY's competition here
SMAWF vs SPXSF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SPXSF trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 31.65. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SPXSF's competition here
SMAWF vs VLMTY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while VLMTY trades at $37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check VLMTY's competition here
SMAWF vs SULZF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SULZF trades at $199.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SULZF's competition here
SMAWF vs VOYJF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while VOYJF trades at $36.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to VOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check VOYJF's competition here
SMAWF vs NRXXY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while NRXXY trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 198.11. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check NRXXY's competition here
SMAWF vs FCHRF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while FCHRF trades at $78.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +6.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check FCHRF's competition here
SMAWF vs NRDXF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while NRDXF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 166.67. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check NRDXF's competition here
SMAWF vs XJNGF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while XJNGF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check XJNGF's competition here
SMAWF vs EBCOF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check EBCOF's competition here
SMAWF vs HSHZY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while HSHZY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check HSHZY's competition here
SMAWF vs HAIIF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to HAIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check HAIIF's competition here
SMAWF vs FLUIF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while FLUIF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check FLUIF's competition here
SMAWF vs BCHHF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while BCHHF trades at $495.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check BCHHF's competition here
SMAWF vs YOKEF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while YOKEF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check YOKEF's competition here
SMAWF vs HSHIF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while HSHIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check HSHIF's competition here
SMAWF vs YMATF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while YMATF trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check YMATF's competition here
SMAWF vs SFSLF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SFSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SFSLF's competition here
SMAWF vs NGKIF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while NGKIF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check NGKIF's competition here
SMAWF vs DNGFF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check DNGFF's competition here
SMAWF vs KRNNF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check KRNNF's competition here
SMAWF vs ATSAF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to ATSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check ATSAF's competition here
SMAWF vs JGHAF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while JGHAF trades at $39.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check JGHAF's competition here
SMAWF vs AALBF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while AALBF trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check AALBF's competition here
SMAWF vs RTOXF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while RTOXF trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check RTOXF's competition here
SMAWF vs MRRLF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check MRRLF's competition here
SMAWF vs MICLF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while MICLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check MICLF's competition here
SMAWF vs FLIDY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while FLIDY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check FLIDY's competition here
SMAWF vs CYJBF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check CYJBF's competition here
SMAWF vs THKLY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while THKLY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 68.88. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check THKLY's competition here
SMAWF vs KRDXF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while KRDXF trades at $421.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 35.45. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check KRDXF's competition here
SMAWF vs FLIDF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while FLIDF trades at $56.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check FLIDF's competition here
SMAWF vs KUKAF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to KUKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check KUKAF's competition here
SMAWF vs AMDWF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while AMDWF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check AMDWF's competition here
SMAWF vs NCTKY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while NCTKY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NCTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check NCTKY's competition here
SMAWF vs FJTCY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while FJTCY trades at $38.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check FJTCY's competition here
SMAWF vs SOHVF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SOHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SOHVF's competition here
SMAWF vs NCTKF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, NCTKF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while NCTKF trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas NCTKF's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCTKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to NCTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check NCTKF's competition here
SMAWF vs THKLF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check THKLF's competition here
SMAWF vs SOHVY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SOHVY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is -132.50. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SOHVY's competition here
SMAWF vs MIURF Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while MIURF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to MIURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check MIURF's competition here
SMAWF vs JGHHY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to JGHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check JGHHY's competition here
SMAWF vs SUZRY Comparison August 2025
SMAWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAWF stands at 214.8B. In comparison, SUZRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAWF is priced at $268.42, while SUZRY trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAWF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.80, whereas SUZRY's P/E ratio is 73.22. In terms of profitability, SMAWF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUZRY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAWF is more volatile compared to SUZRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAWF.Check SUZRY's competition here