Slave Lake Zinc Corp.
Slave Lake Zinc Corp. SLZNF Peers
See (SLZNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLZNF | $0.01 | N/A | 561272.00 | -1.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.01 | -1.22% | 121.84B | 10.72 | $2.24 | +4.96% |
| RTPPF | $62.13 | +0.58% | 106.63B | 8.79 | $7.07 | +6.47% |
| RTNTF | $75.63 | N/A | 103.98B | 10.70 | $7.07 | +3.11% |
| GLNCY | $7.21 | +2.59% | 43.95B | -27.73 | -$0.26 | +3.00% |
| GLCNF | $3.61 | +2.67% | 43.38B | -27.77 | -$0.13 | +3.14% |
| GMBXF | $5.33 | +0.19% | 41.49B | 11.59 | $0.46 | +2.43% |
| NGLOY | $14.01 | +1.19% | 34.00B | -11.03 | -$1.27 | +2.29% |
| AAUKF | $27.71 | N/A | 33.62B | -10.95 | -$2.53 | +2.29% |
| FSUMF | $10.80 | +4.85% | 33.20B | 8.57 | $1.26 | +8.19% |
Stock Comparison
SLZNF vs BHPLF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 121.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while BHPLF trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs RTPPF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 106.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while RTPPF trades at $62.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs RTNTF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 103.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while RTNTF trades at $75.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs GLNCY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 43.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while GLNCY trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs GLCNF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 43.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while GLCNF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.77. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs GMBXF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 41.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while GMBXF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs NGLOY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while NGLOY trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.03. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs AAUKF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 33.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while AAUKF trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs FSUMF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 33.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while FSUMF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs FSUGY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 32.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while FSUGY trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs CMCLF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 20.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while CMCLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs TCKRF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 17.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs IVPAF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 12.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while IVPAF trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs SHTLF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs BOLIF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs BDNNY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while BDNNY trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs JXMNF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs IPOAF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 7.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while IPOAF trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 110.83. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ABML Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs SMMYY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while SMMYY trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 54.25. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs STMNF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs PUTKF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs PUTKY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while PUTKY trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs NILSY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs LYSCF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while LYSCF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 163.50. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs LYSDY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while LYSDY trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 163.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs PAEKY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs MALRY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while MALRY trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs MALRF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs FLMMF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs PILBF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while PILBF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -90.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs CHZQ Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs MIMTF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs IPGDF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs AZZVF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs DWMNF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs NGXXF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while NGXXF trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -30.96. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs IIDDY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs SOUHY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while SOUHY trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.69. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs NICMF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while NICMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ERMAF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ERMAY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ERMAY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs PTNDY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs AFBOF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs PTNDF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs DETRF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while DETRF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ILKAY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ILKAY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs AZRMF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs LINRF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while LINRF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -44.07. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ADTLF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ADTLF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ILKAF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ILKAF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ADMLF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 984.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ADMLF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs BQSSF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 966.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while BQSSF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -58.21. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs FMCXF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 920.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while FMCXF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -54.67. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs STTSY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ATUSF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 913.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ATUSF trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs AUSDF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs JMXXF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs AFMJF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 832.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while AFMJF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs VULNF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 704.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while VULNF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs AMVMF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs MFRVF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs CTJHF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs TAOFF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ALMTF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 502.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ALMTF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -43.95. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs MJDLF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 494.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while MJDLF trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs TTNNF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs OSTTF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs MCRZF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs BIRNF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs LLLAF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 387.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while LLLAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to LLLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs NQMIY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs PXMFF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 379.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs FGOVF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 370.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while FGOVF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -70.20. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs REEMF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 362.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while REEMF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -23.40. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs MCHHF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs CTJHY Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs MNXMF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 344.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while MNXMF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs KMRPF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ERLFF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 331.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ERLFF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs MLYF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 326.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs AUMTF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs SLGGF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ARAFF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 290.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs MLXEF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 283.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while MLXEF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs CGMLF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 272.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while CGMLF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs SVMLF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 271.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while SVMLF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs FWEDF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 263.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while FWEDF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs LTSRF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 260.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while LTSRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs LRSRF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs STQNF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs SYAAF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 240.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while SYAAF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs ERDCF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 240.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while ERDCF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -66.13. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs PMETF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 239.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while PMETF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -50.90. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs RXRLF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs LTHHF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs BSRUF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs PTTMF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.
SLZNF vs CILLF Comparison
SLZNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLZNF stands at 561272.00. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SLZNF is priced at $0.01, while CILLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLZNF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, SLZNF's ROE is -0.67%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLZNF is more volatile compared to CILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLZNF.