Silverlake Axis Ltd

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 230.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while SAPGF trades at $205.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check SAPGF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while INVUP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1666.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INVUP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check INVUP's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while CNSWF trades at $1,881.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check CNSWF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while DASTY trades at $21.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check DASTY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while DASTF trades at $21.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check DASTF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while DIDIY trades at $4.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is -223.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check DIDIY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while OBIIF trades at $32.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check OBIIF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while WIGBY trades at $31.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 56.67. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check WIGBY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while WTCHF trades at $31.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 52.25. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check WTCHF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while SGPYY trades at $44.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check SGPYY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while SGGEF trades at $10.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check SGGEF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while NEMTF trades at $78.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 37.14. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check NEMTF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while NEMKY trades at $15.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check NEMKY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while XROLF trades at $48.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 45.42. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check XROLF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while OCLCF trades at $60.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check OCLCF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while TMSNY trades at $91.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check TMSNY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check ALMFF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while NCSYF trades at $95.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check NCSYF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while TMNSF trades at $82.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check TMNSF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check FNOXF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while THNOF trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check THNOF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while LIFX trades at $22.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 190.92. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check LIFX's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while KGDEY trades at $133.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -1245.95. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check KGDEY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check SMCYY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while SICRF trades at $103.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check SICRF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while IPEU trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check IPEU's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while ASOZY trades at $49.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check ASOZY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while ASOZF trades at $49.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check ASOZF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while KXSCF trades at $94.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 73.48. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check KXSCF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while BCTCF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check BCTCF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while SRBEF trades at $136.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -141.72. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check SRBEF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while SWONF trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -51.26. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWONF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check SWONF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check KHOTF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check ESKEF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while TMOAY trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -101.67. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check TMOAY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while VOBIF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 56.22. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check VOBIF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check MAGTF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while WEMXF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check WEMXF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while KNNNF trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check KNNNF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while ABXXF trades at $30.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -24.84. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check ABXXF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while TMVWF trades at $6.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check TMVWF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check LTTHF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check ESIGF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 901.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while TMOAF trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -120.67. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check TMOAF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while BHPA trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check BHPA's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 813.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while TMVWY trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check TMVWY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 786.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while QTGPF trades at $30.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check QTGPF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 784.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while PXPHF trades at $7.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check PXPHF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 747.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while FREKF trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is 126.20. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FREKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check FREKF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 686M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while EGHSF trades at $12.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check EGHSF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 681.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while BTRCF trades at $11.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check BTRCF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, IRLTF has a market cap of 664.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while IRLTF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas IRLTF's P/E ratio is -110.01. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IRLTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to IRLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check IRLTF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check XMMRF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 617.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while GBGPF trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 52.40. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check GBGPF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while CHNVF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check CHNVF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 549.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while NPACF trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check NPACF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 538.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while RWWI trades at $16.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check RWWI's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 493M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while NPACY trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check NPACY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check TSVNF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check NSWEF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check BRDLF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 448.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while BVSFF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check BVSFF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, CRSM has a market cap of 428.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while CRSM trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas CRSM's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to CRSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check CRSM's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 424.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while BLKLF trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -71.43. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check BLKLF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check IQGLF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while JAPPF trades at $15.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check JAPPF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check RPGHF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check PSSWF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while RTME trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check RTME's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check ELMFF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 334.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while NXLLF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check NXLLF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while RLLMF trades at $4.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check RLLMF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check IVUFF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check CIGMF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while LCHTF trades at $11.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check LCHTF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, TZROP has a market cap of 276.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while TZROP trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas TZROP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TZROP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to TZROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check TZROP's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check EXMXF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 268.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while TCYSF trades at $18.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 69.49. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check TCYSF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 255.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while SMTEF trades at $6.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check SMTEF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, PSHPF has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while PSHPF trades at $9.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas PSHPF's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSHPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to PSHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check PSHPF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 236.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while IARGF trades at $18.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check IARGF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while CMDXF trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check CMDXF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while DOTDF trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check DOTDF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 230.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while BAINF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check BAINF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while EXSPF trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check EXSPF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check DAHLF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while PLDIF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check PLDIF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check FXSRF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while FBSFF trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check FBSFF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while MCAP trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check MCAP's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while TCIIF trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check TCIIF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while LOQPF trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check LOQPF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while NEOJF trades at $11.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check NEOJF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while WONDF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check WONDF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check CBSZF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while WECMF trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to WECMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check WECMF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, DLEXY has a market cap of 135.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while DLEXY trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas DLEXY's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLEXY's ROE of +8.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to DLEXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check DLEXY's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, URLOF has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while URLOF trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas URLOF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to URLOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is more volatile compared to URLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check URLOF's competition here

SLVFF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVFF stands at 723.2M. In comparison, VCTTF has a market cap of 125M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVFF is priced at $0.29, while VCTTF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVFF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.76, whereas VCTTF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SLVFF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VCTTF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVFF is less volatile compared to VCTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVFF.Check VCTTF's competition here