Solutions 30 SE
Solutions 30 SE (SLUNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLUNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLUNF | $2.84 | +0.00% | 304M | -12.35 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| FJTSF | $22.16 | -3.34% | 43.7B | 31.90 | $0.77 | +0.89% |
| NTTDF | $29.51 | +10.24% | 41.4B | 42.77 | $0.69 | +0.58% |
| FJTSY | $22.20 | +1.09% | 39.9B | 28.82 | $0.77 | +0.47% |
| NTDTY | $26.98 | -1.26% | 37.8B | 39.68 | $0.68 | N/A |
| NIPNF | $27.85 | +1.59% | 37.1B | 31.29 | $0.89 | +0.67% |
| CAPMF | $154.01 | -1.22% | 27.5B | 14.71 | $11.01 | +2.44% |
| CGEMY | $31.50 | -0.51% | 27.1B | 14.22 | $2.22 | +2.37% |
| NURAF | $37.61 | +6.17% | 22.5B | 35.80 | $1.10 | +1.09% |
| NRILY | $37.33 | +1.08% | 21.6B | 33.63 | $1.11 | +0.70% |
Stock Comparison
SLUNF vs FJTSF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while FJTSF trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check FJTSF's competition here
SLUNF vs NTTDF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NTTDF trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 42.77. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NTTDF's competition here
SLUNF vs FJTSY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while FJTSY trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check FJTSY's competition here
SLUNF vs NTDTY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NTDTY trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 39.68. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NTDTY's competition here
SLUNF vs NIPNF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NIPNF trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NIPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NIPNF's competition here
SLUNF vs CAPMF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CAPMF trades at $154.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CAPMF's competition here
SLUNF vs CGEMY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CGEMY trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CGEMY's competition here
SLUNF vs NURAF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NURAF trades at $37.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NURAF's competition here
SLUNF vs NRILY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NRILY trades at $37.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NRILY's competition here
SLUNF vs WIZEY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while WIZEY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check WIZEY's competition here
SLUNF vs WPLCF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while WPLCF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check WPLCF's competition here
SLUNF vs ISMAF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while ISMAF trades at $43.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check ISMAF's competition here
SLUNF vs TISNF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while TISNF trades at $31.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check TISNF's competition here
SLUNF vs RPYTF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is less volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check RPYTF's competition here
SLUNF vs DUSXF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check DUSXF's competition here
SLUNF vs BECTY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while BECTY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check BECTY's competition here
SLUNF vs BHTLF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while BHTLF trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check BHTLF's competition here
SLUNF vs TSYHY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while TSYHY trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check TSYHY's competition here
SLUNF vs TSYHF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while TSYHF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check TSYHF's competition here
SLUNF vs CTLPP Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CTLPP trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1993.00. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CTLPP's competition here
SLUNF vs SPSAF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while SPSAF trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check SPSAF's competition here
SLUNF vs ISMAY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while ISMAY trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check ISMAY's competition here
SLUNF vs AEXAY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while AEXAY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check AEXAY's competition here
SLUNF vs NWITY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NWITY's competition here
SLUNF vs NWKLF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NWKLF's competition here
SLUNF vs NSSXF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NSSXF trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NSSXF's competition here
SLUNF vs NCRRP Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NCRRP's competition here
SLUNF vs SLNTY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check SLNTY's competition here
SLUNF vs NTCYF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NTCYF's competition here
SLUNF vs HLTEF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while HLTEF trades at $85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check HLTEF's competition here
SLUNF vs NDTAF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NDTAF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NDTAF's competition here
SLUNF vs SESPF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while SESPF trades at $121.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check SESPF's competition here
SLUNF vs CFTLF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CFTLF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CFTLF's competition here
SLUNF vs ATEAY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while ATEAY trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check ATEAY's competition here
SLUNF vs DLGEF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while DLGEF trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is -29.43. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check DLGEF's competition here
SLUNF vs ATAZF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check ATAZF's competition here
SLUNF vs CRAYF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CRAYF trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 49.46. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CRAYF's competition here
SLUNF vs CCCMF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CCCMF's competition here
SLUNF vs DTSOF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while DTSOF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check DTSOF's competition here
SLUNF vs KSUEF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check KSUEF's competition here
SLUNF vs KAHTY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check KAHTY's competition here
SLUNF vs NGRRF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 882.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NGRRF trades at $67.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NGRRF's competition here
SLUNF vs ADSGF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check ADSGF's competition here
SLUNF vs CTSDF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CTSDF's competition here
SLUNF vs FDRVF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 770.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -25.90. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check FDRVF's competition here
SLUNF vs TRCLF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check TRCLF's competition here
SLUNF vs DTATF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while DTATF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check DTATF's competition here
SLUNF vs AEXAF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 616.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while AEXAF trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check AEXAF's competition here
SLUNF vs DCHIF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 580.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while DCHIF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check DCHIF's competition here
SLUNF vs GBDMF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check GBDMF's competition here
SLUNF vs CMTUF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CMTUF's competition here
SLUNF vs DTTLY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 421.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while DTTLY trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check DTTLY's competition here
SLUNF vs CEJOF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CEJOF's competition here
SLUNF vs APMRF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while APMRF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check APMRF's competition here
SLUNF vs CSYJF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 343.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CSYJF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CSYJF's competition here
SLUNF vs FDDMF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 303.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while FDDMF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check FDDMF's competition here
SLUNF vs SVPLF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check SVPLF's competition here
SLUNF vs EMCHF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 267.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while EMCHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check EMCHF's competition here
SLUNF vs CSYJY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CSYJY's competition here
SLUNF vs SSCC Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while SSCC trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check SSCC's competition here
SLUNF vs ITFRF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check ITFRF's competition here
SLUNF vs APXYY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 211.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while APXYY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check APXYY's competition here
SLUNF vs APPEF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 197.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while APPEF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is less volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check APPEF's competition here
SLUNF vs ALYAF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while ALYAF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is 189.00. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check ALYAF's competition here
SLUNF vs ALVNF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check ALVNF's competition here
SLUNF vs FCCN Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while FCCN trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -33.57. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +8.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is less volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check FCCN's competition here
SLUNF vs ULPRF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check ULPRF's competition here
SLUNF vs WYLDF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, WYLDF has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while WYLDF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas WYLDF's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WYLDF's ROE of +8.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to WYLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check WYLDF's competition here
SLUNF vs DCHIY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 121.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while DCHIY trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check DCHIY's competition here
SLUNF vs GSDT Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while GSDT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GSDT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check GSDT's competition here
SLUNF vs QUISF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check QUISF's competition here
SLUNF vs QSCGF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -26.53. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check QSCGF's competition here
SLUNF vs NONEY Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, NONEY has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while NONEY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas NONEY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NONEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to NONEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check NONEY's competition here
SLUNF vs KDCXF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check KDCXF's competition here
SLUNF vs EAXR Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while EAXR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check EAXR's competition here
SLUNF vs CXGEF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CXGEF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CXGEF's competition here
SLUNF vs SEBFF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check SEBFF's competition here
SLUNF vs BNXAF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while BNXAF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check BNXAF's competition here
SLUNF vs CNGFF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CNGFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is less volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CNGFF's competition here
SLUNF vs HLEO Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while HLEO trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HLEO's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check HLEO's competition here
SLUNF vs SNELF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check SNELF's competition here
SLUNF vs MLBEF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while MLBEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check MLBEF's competition here
SLUNF vs SPOFF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while SPOFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check SPOFF's competition here
SLUNF vs CPIHF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CPIHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is less volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CPIHF's competition here
SLUNF vs FUUN Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while FUUN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check FUUN's competition here
SLUNF vs KTHGF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is less volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check KTHGF's competition here
SLUNF vs XTMIF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while XTMIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check XTMIF's competition here
SLUNF vs DRGV Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while DRGV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check DRGV's competition here
SLUNF vs VSSSF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while VSSSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of -4.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is less volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check VSSSF's competition here
SLUNF vs KNRLF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while KNRLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.88. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check KNRLF's competition here
SLUNF vs DVRNF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check DVRNF's competition here
SLUNF vs DCSX Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while DCSX trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to DCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check DCSX's competition here
SLUNF vs POSAF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while POSAF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to POSAF's ROE of -3.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check POSAF's competition here
SLUNF vs BRQSF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while BRQSF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check BRQSF's competition here
SLUNF vs SKTCF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check SKTCF's competition here
SLUNF vs CRCW Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check CRCW's competition here
SLUNF vs SNOIF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is more volatile compared to SNOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check SNOIF's competition here
SLUNF vs HWNI Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, HWNI has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while HWNI trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas HWNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HWNI's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is less volatile compared to HWNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check HWNI's competition here
SLUNF vs MOBIF Comparison July 2025
SLUNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLUNF stands at 304M. In comparison, MOBIF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLUNF is priced at $2.84, while MOBIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.35, whereas MOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SLUNF's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MOBIF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SLUNF is less volatile compared to MOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLUNF.Check MOBIF's competition here