SNGN Romgaz SA
SNGN Romgaz SA (SLTQY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLTQY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLTQY | $0.90 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 5.29 | $0.17 | N/A |
| PCCYF | $1.23 | +1.65% | 302.3B | 10.25 | $0.12 | +5.34% |
| RYDAF | $39.25 | -2.24% | 228.8B | 13.43 | $3.00 | +3.56% |
| TTFNF | $77.88 | +0.06% | 173.4B | 12.58 | $6.19 | +4.90% |
| SNPMF | $0.69 | -1.55% | 114.5B | 16.70 | $0.04 | +4.61% |
| BPAQF | $6.33 | +0.00% | 97.3B | 63.30 | $0.10 | +5.18% |
| OMVKY | $16.44 | -0.18% | 84.4B | 22.79 | $0.71 | +8.15% |
| STOHF | $28.45 | +3.45% | 71B | 14.66 | $1.94 | +5.31% |
| EIPAF | $22.39 | +0.00% | 65.9B | 23.08 | $0.97 | +5.16% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SLTQY vs PCCYF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 302.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while PCCYF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check PCCYF's competition here
SLTQY vs RYDAF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 228.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while RYDAF trades at $39.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check RYDAF's competition here
SLTQY vs TTFNF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 173.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while TTFNF trades at $77.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check TTFNF's competition here
SLTQY vs SNPMF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 114.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while SNPMF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check SNPMF's competition here
SLTQY vs BPAQF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while BPAQF trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is 63.30. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check BPAQF's competition here
SLTQY vs OMVKY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 84.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while OMVKY trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check OMVKY's competition here
SLTQY vs STOHF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while STOHF trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check STOHF's competition here
SLTQY vs EIPAF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while EIPAF trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check EIPAF's competition here
SLTQY vs RNFTF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check RNFTF's competition here
SLTQY vs LUKOY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check LUKOY's competition here
SLTQY vs PUTRY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while PUTRY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check PUTRY's competition here
SLTQY vs PSKOF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while PSKOF trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check PSKOF's competition here
SLTQY vs PETFF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while PETFF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check PETFF's competition here
SLTQY vs GLPEY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while GLPEY trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check GLPEY's competition here
SLTQY vs PUTRF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while PUTRF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check PUTRF's competition here
SLTQY vs REPYY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while REPYY trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check REPYY's competition here
SLTQY vs REPYF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while REPYF trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check REPYF's competition here
SLTQY vs OMVJF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while OMVJF trades at $59.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check OMVJF's competition here
SLTQY vs GLPEF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while GLPEF trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check GLPEF's competition here
SLTQY vs OGFGF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while OGFGF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check OGFGF's competition here
SLTQY vs OGFGY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while OGFGY trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check OGFGY's competition here
SLTQY vs MGYOY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while MGYOY trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check MGYOY's competition here
SLTQY vs ZNOGW Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ZNOGW has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while ZNOGW trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ZNOGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZNOGW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to ZNOGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check ZNOGW's competition here
SLTQY vs OAOFY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check OAOFY's competition here
SLTQY vs HLPMF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while HLPMF trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check HLPMF's competition here
SLTQY vs ISRMF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check ISRMF's competition here
SLTQY vs RTEXF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check RTEXF's competition here
SLTQY vs WDGJY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 345.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check WDGJY's competition here
SLTQY vs UNTC Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while UNTC trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check UNTC's competition here
SLTQY vs WDGJF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while WDGJF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check WDGJF's competition here
SLTQY vs PXPEF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 85M. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check PXPEF's competition here
SLTQY vs SEGYY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while SEGYY trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check SEGYY's competition here
SLTQY vs UNTCW Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while UNTCW trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check UNTCW's competition here
SLTQY vs ECTM Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while ECTM trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check ECTM's competition here
SLTQY vs OKMN Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while OKMN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check OKMN's competition here
SLTQY vs GRGUF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check GRGUF's competition here
SLTQY vs PEMC Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 966.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while PEMC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check PEMC's competition here
SLTQY vs POGS Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 920.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while POGS trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check POGS's competition here
SLTQY vs AEDC Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check AEDC's competition here
SLTQY vs TRNX Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check TRNX's competition here
SLTQY vs RRRI Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 22K. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check RRRI's competition here
SLTQY vs SNVP Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check SNVP's competition here
SLTQY vs FRMC Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check FRMC's competition here
SLTQY vs PGAS Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PGAS's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check PGAS's competition here
SLTQY vs BNXR Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check BNXR's competition here
SLTQY vs AMNE Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check AMNE's competition here
SLTQY vs NUSPQ Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check NUSPQ's competition here
SLTQY vs SNPTY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check SNPTY's competition here
SLTQY vs SGTZY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check SGTZY's competition here
SLTQY vs OJSCY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check OJSCY's competition here
SLTQY vs POGWY Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check POGWY's competition here
SLTQY vs VCOGF Comparison February 2026
SLTQY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLTQY stands at 3.5B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLTQY is priced at $0.90, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLTQY currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, SLTQY's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLTQY is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLTQY.Check VCOGF's competition here