Silver Lake Resources Limited
Silver Lake Resources Limited SLR.AX Peers
See (SLR.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLR.AX | $1.57 | +0.32% | 1.50B | 15.65 | $0.10 | N/A |
| NEM.AX | $77.42 | +3.60% | 86.17B | 11.34 | $6.83 | +1.96% |
| NST.AX | $18.53 | +2.72% | 26.49B | 22.60 | $0.82 | +2.70% |
| NCM.AX | $23.35 | -1.27% | 20.88B | 17.56 | $1.33 | N/A |
| EVN.AX | $7.87 | +3.55% | 15.66B | 22.49 | $0.35 | +1.52% |
| AGG.AX | $6.51 | -3.27% | 13.94B | 50.08 | $0.13 | N/A |
| DEG.AX | $2.46 | -8.21% | 5.92B | -246.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PRU.AX | $3.36 | +3.70% | 4.59B | 8.40 | $0.40 | +1.86% |
| GMD.AX | $3.84 | +4.35% | 4.34B | 34.91 | $0.11 | N/A |
| CMM.AX | $8.42 | +0.36% | 3.63B | 42.10 | $0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SLR.AX vs NEM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, NEM.AX has a market cap of 86.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while NEM.AX trades at $77.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas NEM.AX's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEM.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to NEM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs NST.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, NST.AX has a market cap of 26.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while NST.AX trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas NST.AX's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NST.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to NST.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs NCM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, NCM.AX has a market cap of 20.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while NCM.AX trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas NCM.AX's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCM.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to NCM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs EVN.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, EVN.AX has a market cap of 15.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while EVN.AX trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas EVN.AX's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVN.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to EVN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs AGG.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AGG.AX has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while AGG.AX trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas AGG.AX's P/E ratio is 50.08. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGG.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to AGG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs DEG.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, DEG.AX has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while DEG.AX trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas DEG.AX's P/E ratio is -246.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DEG.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to DEG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs PRU.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, PRU.AX has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while PRU.AX trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas PRU.AX's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRU.AX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to PRU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs GMD.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, GMD.AX has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while GMD.AX trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas GMD.AX's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GMD.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to GMD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs CMM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CMM.AX has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while CMM.AX trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas CMM.AX's P/E ratio is 42.10. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMM.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to CMM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs GOR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, GOR.AX has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while GOR.AX trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas GOR.AX's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GOR.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to GOR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs RRL.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, RRL.AX has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while RRL.AX trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas RRL.AX's P/E ratio is -445.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RRL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to RRL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs SSR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, SSR.AX has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while SSR.AX trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas SSR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSR.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to SSR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs RMS.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, RMS.AX has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while RMS.AX trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas RMS.AX's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RMS.AX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to RMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs VAU.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, VAU.AX has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while VAU.AX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas VAU.AX's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VAU.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to VAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs EMR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, EMR.AX has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while EMR.AX trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas EMR.AX's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EMR.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to EMR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs WAF.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, WAF.AX has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while WAF.AX trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas WAF.AX's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WAF.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to WAF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs SPR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, SPR.AX has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while SPR.AX trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas SPR.AX's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPR.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to SPR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs WGX.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, WGX.AX has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while WGX.AX trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas WGX.AX's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WGX.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to WGX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs RED.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, RED.AX has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while RED.AX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas RED.AX's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RED.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to RED.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs OBM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, OBM.AX has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while OBM.AX trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas OBM.AX's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OBM.AX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to OBM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs CYL.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CYL.AX has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while CYL.AX trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas CYL.AX's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CYL.AX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to CYL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs BGL.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, BGL.AX has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while BGL.AX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas BGL.AX's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BGL.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to BGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs PNR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, PNR.AX has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while PNR.AX trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas PNR.AX's P/E ratio is -35.67. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PNR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to PNR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs RSG.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, RSG.AX has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while RSG.AX trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas RSG.AX's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RSG.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to RSG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs PDI.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, PDI.AX has a market cap of 995.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while PDI.AX trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas PDI.AX's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PDI.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to PDI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs TIE.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, TIE.AX has a market cap of 776.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while TIE.AX trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TIE.AX's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TIE.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to TIE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs SXG.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, SXG.AX has a market cap of 764.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while SXG.AX trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas SXG.AX's P/E ratio is -86.25. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SXG.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to SXG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs BC8.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, BC8.AX has a market cap of 580.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while BC8.AX trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas BC8.AX's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BC8.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to BC8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs KCN.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, KCN.AX has a market cap of 500.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while KCN.AX trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas KCN.AX's P/E ratio is 2.31. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KCN.AX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to KCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs ALK.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, ALK.AX has a market cap of 435.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while ALK.AX trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas ALK.AX's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALK.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to ALK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs TCG.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, TCG.AX has a market cap of 356.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while TCG.AX trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TCG.AX's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCG.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to TCG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs DCN.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, DCN.AX has a market cap of 346.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while DCN.AX trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas DCN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DCN.AX's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to DCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs BTR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, BTR.AX has a market cap of 326.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while BTR.AX trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas BTR.AX's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTR.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to BTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs MEK.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, MEK.AX has a market cap of 314.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while MEK.AX trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas MEK.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MEK.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to MEK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs SBM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, SBM.AX has a market cap of 314.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while SBM.AX trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas SBM.AX's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBM.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to SBM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs ORR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, ORR.AX has a market cap of 267.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while ORR.AX trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas ORR.AX's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORR.AX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to ORR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs WIA.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, WIA.AX has a market cap of 265.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while WIA.AX trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas WIA.AX's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WIA.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to WIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs TBR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, TBR.AX has a market cap of 260.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while TBR.AX trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TBR.AX's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TBR.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to TBR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs GCY.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, GCY.AX has a market cap of 245.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while GCY.AX trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas GCY.AX's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GCY.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to GCY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs FFX.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, FFX.AX has a market cap of 236.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while FFX.AX trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas FFX.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FFX.AX's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to FFX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs WC8.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, WC8.AX has a market cap of 235.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while WC8.AX trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas WC8.AX's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WC8.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to WC8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs MGV.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, MGV.AX has a market cap of 227.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while MGV.AX trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas MGV.AX's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MGV.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to MGV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs AUC.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AUC.AX has a market cap of 217.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while AUC.AX trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas AUC.AX's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUC.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to AUC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs RXL.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, RXL.AX has a market cap of 215.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while RXL.AX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas RXL.AX's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RXL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to RXL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs AAR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AAR.AX has a market cap of 212.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while AAR.AX trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas AAR.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AAR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to AAR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs POL.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, POL.AX has a market cap of 206.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while POL.AX trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas POL.AX's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to POL.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to POL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs LLO.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, LLO.AX has a market cap of 162.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while LLO.AX trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas LLO.AX's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LLO.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to LLO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs MDX.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, MDX.AX has a market cap of 158.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while MDX.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas MDX.AX's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDX.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to MDX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs BRB.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, BRB.AX has a market cap of 158.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while BRB.AX trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas BRB.AX's P/E ratio is 3.65. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRB.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to BRB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs BGD.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, BGD.AX has a market cap of 155.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while BGD.AX trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas BGD.AX's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BGD.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to BGD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs DLI.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, DLI.AX has a market cap of 146.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while DLI.AX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas DLI.AX's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DLI.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to DLI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs X64.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, X64.AX has a market cap of 129.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while X64.AX trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas X64.AX's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to X64.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to X64.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs LRL.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, LRL.AX has a market cap of 125.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while LRL.AX trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas LRL.AX's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LRL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to LRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs STN.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, STN.AX has a market cap of 120.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while STN.AX trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas STN.AX's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STN.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to STN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs TUL.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, TUL.AX has a market cap of 116.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while TUL.AX trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TUL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TUL.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to TUL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs MMC.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, MMC.AX has a market cap of 115.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while MMC.AX trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas MMC.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MMC.AX's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to MMC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs BCN.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, BCN.AX has a market cap of 114.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while BCN.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas BCN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCN.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to BCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs HRZ.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, HRZ.AX has a market cap of 111.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while HRZ.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas HRZ.AX's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HRZ.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to HRZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs DTR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, DTR.AX has a market cap of 107.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while DTR.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas DTR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DTR.AX's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to DTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs RND.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, RND.AX has a market cap of 105.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while RND.AX trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas RND.AX's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RND.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to RND.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs TGM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, TGM.AX has a market cap of 101.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while TGM.AX trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TGM.AX's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TGM.AX's ROE of -4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to TGM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs LSX.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, LSX.AX has a market cap of 99.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while LSX.AX trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas LSX.AX's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LSX.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to LSX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs TTM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, TTM.AX has a market cap of 97.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while TTM.AX trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TTM.AX's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTM.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to TTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs CAI.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CAI.AX has a market cap of 93.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while CAI.AX trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas CAI.AX's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAI.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to CAI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs ERM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, ERM.AX has a market cap of 82.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while ERM.AX trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas ERM.AX's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ERM.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to ERM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs TRY.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, TRY.AX has a market cap of 78.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while TRY.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TRY.AX's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRY.AX's ROE of +4.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to TRY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs VTM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, VTM.AX has a market cap of 77.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while VTM.AX trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas VTM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VTM.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to VTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs HRN.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, HRN.AX has a market cap of 76.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while HRN.AX trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas HRN.AX's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HRN.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to HRN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs KSN.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, KSN.AX has a market cap of 75.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while KSN.AX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas KSN.AX's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KSN.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to KSN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs KAI.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, KAI.AX has a market cap of 73.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while KAI.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas KAI.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KAI.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to KAI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs WMC.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, WMC.AX has a market cap of 72.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while WMC.AX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas WMC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WMC.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to WMC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs KNB.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, KNB.AX has a market cap of 69.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while KNB.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas KNB.AX's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KNB.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to KNB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs AME.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AME.AX has a market cap of 69.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while AME.AX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas AME.AX's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AME.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to AME.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs FML.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, FML.AX has a market cap of 67.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while FML.AX trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas FML.AX's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FML.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to FML.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs KIN.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, KIN.AX has a market cap of 67.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while KIN.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas KIN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KIN.AX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to KIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs GPR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, GPR.AX has a market cap of 66.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while GPR.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas GPR.AX's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GPR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to GPR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs CHZ.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CHZ.AX has a market cap of 65.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while CHZ.AX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas CHZ.AX's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHZ.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to CHZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs GHM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, GHM.AX has a market cap of 63.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while GHM.AX trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas GHM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GHM.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to GHM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs CY5.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, CY5.AX has a market cap of 61.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while CY5.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas CY5.AX's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CY5.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to CY5.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs FXG.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, FXG.AX has a market cap of 59.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while FXG.AX trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas FXG.AX's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FXG.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to FXG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs HAV.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, HAV.AX has a market cap of 59.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while HAV.AX trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas HAV.AX's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HAV.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to HAV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs VAN.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, VAN.AX has a market cap of 59.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while VAN.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas VAN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VAN.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to VAN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs WCN.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, WCN.AX has a market cap of 56.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while WCN.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas WCN.AX's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WCN.AX's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to WCN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs YRL.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, YRL.AX has a market cap of 55.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while YRL.AX trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas YRL.AX's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YRL.AX's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to YRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs WWI.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, WWI.AX has a market cap of 55.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while WWI.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas WWI.AX's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WWI.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to WWI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs TSO.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, TSO.AX has a market cap of 54.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while TSO.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TSO.AX's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TSO.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to TSO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs KAU.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, KAU.AX has a market cap of 53.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while KAU.AX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas KAU.AX's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KAU.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to KAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs MAT.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, MAT.AX has a market cap of 51.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while MAT.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas MAT.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAT.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to MAT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs VTX.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, VTX.AX has a market cap of 49.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while VTX.AX trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas VTX.AX's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VTX.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to VTX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs TAM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, TAM.AX has a market cap of 42.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while TAM.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TAM.AX's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TAM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to TAM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs NXM.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, NXM.AX has a market cap of 42.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while NXM.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas NXM.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NXM.AX's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to NXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs IXR.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, IXR.AX has a market cap of 41.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while IXR.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas IXR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IXR.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to IXR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs AUN.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AUN.AX has a market cap of 38.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while AUN.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas AUN.AX's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUN.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to AUN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs AGC.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AGC.AX has a market cap of 38.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while AGC.AX trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas AGC.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGC.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to AGC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs TRE.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, TRE.AX has a market cap of 36.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while TRE.AX trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TRE.AX's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRE.AX's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is more volatile compared to TRE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs SKY.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, SKY.AX has a market cap of 34.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while SKY.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas SKY.AX's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SKY.AX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to SKY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs AWJ.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AWJ.AX has a market cap of 32.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while AWJ.AX trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas AWJ.AX's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AWJ.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to AWJ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs MZZ.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, MZZ.AX has a market cap of 29.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while MZZ.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas MZZ.AX's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MZZ.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to MZZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.
SLR.AX vs AOU.AX Comparison
SLR.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLR.AX stands at 1.50B. In comparison, AOU.AX has a market cap of 28.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SLR.AX is priced at $1.57, while AOU.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLR.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas AOU.AX's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, SLR.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AOU.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLR.AX is less volatile compared to AOU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLR.AX.