Sylvania Platinum Limited

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, FRES.L has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while FRES.L trades at $1,030.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas FRES.L's P/E ratio is 73.57. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRES.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to FRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, POLY.L has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while POLY.L trades at $215.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas POLY.L's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POLY.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLP.L has daily volatility of 6.06 and POLY.L has daily volatility of N/A.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, THS.L has a market cap of 165.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while THS.L trades at $56.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas THS.L's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THS.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to THS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, EUA.L has a market cap of 123.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while EUA.L trades at $4.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas EUA.L's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EUA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to EUA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, EEE.L has a market cap of 70.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while EEE.L trades at $10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas EEE.L's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EEE.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to EEE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, GMET.L has a market cap of 53.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while GMET.L trades at $41.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas GMET.L's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GMET.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to GMET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, GEM.L has a market cap of 49.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while GEM.L trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas GEM.L's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEM.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to GEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, PDL.L has a market cap of 47.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while PDL.L trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas PDL.L's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDL.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to PDL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, 0V7B.L has a market cap of 29.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while 0V7B.L trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas 0V7B.L's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0V7B.L's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to 0V7B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, HEX.L has a market cap of 23.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while HEX.L trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas HEX.L's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HEX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to HEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, 0V6Y.L has a market cap of 16.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while 0V6Y.L trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas 0V6Y.L's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0V6Y.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to 0V6Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, 0A4V.L has a market cap of 16.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while 0A4V.L trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas 0A4V.L's P/E ratio is -104.55. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0A4V.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to 0A4V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, GEMD.L has a market cap of 11.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while GEMD.L trades at $8.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas GEMD.L's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEMD.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to GEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, COBR.L has a market cap of 10.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while COBR.L trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas COBR.L's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COBR.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to COBR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, UFO.L has a market cap of 6.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while UFO.L trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas UFO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UFO.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to UFO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, FME.L has a market cap of 3.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while FME.L trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas FME.L's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FME.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to FME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, ROCK.L has a market cap of 3.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while ROCK.L trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas ROCK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROCK.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to ROCK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, URAH.L has a market cap of 3.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while URAH.L trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas URAH.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to URAH.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to URAH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, FMET.L has a market cap of 2.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while FMET.L trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas FMET.L's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMET.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to FMET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, SEFA.L has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while SEFA.L trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas SEFA.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEFA.L's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to SEFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, BOD.L has a market cap of 1.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while BOD.L trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas BOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOD.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to BOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, CMRS.L has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while CMRS.L trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas CMRS.L's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMRS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to CMRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, KDR.L has a market cap of 987672.00. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while KDR.L trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas KDR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KDR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to KDR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, BRD.L has a market cap of 929180.00. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while BRD.L trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas BRD.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRD.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLP.L has daily volatility of 6.06 and BRD.L has daily volatility of N/A.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, NTVO.L has a market cap of 583554.00. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while NTVO.L trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas NTVO.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTVO.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to NTVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, PERE.L has a market cap of 218172.00. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while PERE.L trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas PERE.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PERE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to PERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, DNK.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while DNK.L trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas DNK.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNK.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to DNK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, GPSS.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while GPSS.L trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas GPSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPSS.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to GPSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, ALS.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while ALS.L trades at $46.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas ALS.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALS.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to ALS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.

SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 128.75M. In comparison, 0UH1.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at $49.50, while 0UH1.L trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas 0UH1.L's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0UH1.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to 0UH1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.