Sylvania Platinum Limited
Sylvania Platinum Limited (SLP.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLP.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLP.L | £68.00 | -3.13% | 176.9M | 22.67 | £0.03 | +2.55% |
| FRES.L | £1,429.00 | +2.07% | 10.5B | 102.07 | £0.14 | +1.42% |
| POLY.L | £215.00 | +30.30% | 1B | -4.48 | -£0.48 | N/A |
| THS.L | £87.00 | -3.33% | 256.8M | 6.69 | £0.13 | +3.84% |
| EEE.L | £27.75 | -1.77% | 191.6M | -27.75 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| EUA.L | £4.30 | +2.99% | 126.9M | -4.30 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| GEM.L | £5.80 | +0.87% | 100M | -1.16 | -£0.05 | N/A |
| GMET.L | £55.60 | -0.71% | 83.9M | -55.60 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| HEX.L | £24.00 | +1.05% | 44.7M | -24.00 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| 0V7B.L | £0.40 | +9.72% | 29.5M | -3.91 | -£0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SLP.L vs FRES.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, FRES.L has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while FRES.L trades at £1,429.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas FRES.L's P/E ratio is 102.07. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRES.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to FRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check FRES.L's competition here
SLP.L vs POLY.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, POLY.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while POLY.L trades at £215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas POLY.L's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POLY.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLP.L has daily volatility of 7.30 and POLY.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check POLY.L's competition here
SLP.L vs THS.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, THS.L has a market cap of 256.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while THS.L trades at £87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas THS.L's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THS.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to THS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check THS.L's competition here
SLP.L vs EEE.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, EEE.L has a market cap of 191.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while EEE.L trades at £27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas EEE.L's P/E ratio is -27.75. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EEE.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to EEE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check EEE.L's competition here
SLP.L vs EUA.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, EUA.L has a market cap of 126.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while EUA.L trades at £4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas EUA.L's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EUA.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to EUA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check EUA.L's competition here
SLP.L vs GEM.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, GEM.L has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while GEM.L trades at £5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GEM.L's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEM.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to GEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check GEM.L's competition here
SLP.L vs GMET.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, GMET.L has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while GMET.L trades at £55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GMET.L's P/E ratio is -55.60. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GMET.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to GMET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check GMET.L's competition here
SLP.L vs HEX.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, HEX.L has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while HEX.L trades at £24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas HEX.L's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HEX.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to HEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check HEX.L's competition here
SLP.L vs 0V7B.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, 0V7B.L has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while 0V7B.L trades at £0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas 0V7B.L's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0V7B.L's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to 0V7B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check 0V7B.L's competition here
SLP.L vs PDL.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, PDL.L has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while PDL.L trades at £12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas PDL.L's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDL.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to PDL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check PDL.L's competition here
SLP.L vs COBR.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, COBR.L has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while COBR.L trades at £2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas COBR.L's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COBR.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to COBR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check COBR.L's competition here
SLP.L vs 0V6Y.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, 0V6Y.L has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while 0V6Y.L trades at £0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas 0V6Y.L's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0V6Y.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to 0V6Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check 0V6Y.L's competition here
SLP.L vs 0A4V.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, 0A4V.L has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while 0A4V.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas 0A4V.L's P/E ratio is -104.55. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0A4V.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to 0A4V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check 0A4V.L's competition here
SLP.L vs UFO.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, UFO.L has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while UFO.L trades at £0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas UFO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UFO.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to UFO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check UFO.L's competition here
SLP.L vs GEMD.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, GEMD.L has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while GEMD.L trades at £6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GEMD.L's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEMD.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to GEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check GEMD.L's competition here
SLP.L vs FME.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, FME.L has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while FME.L trades at £0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas FME.L's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FME.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to FME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check FME.L's competition here
SLP.L vs ROCK.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, ROCK.L has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while ROCK.L trades at £0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas ROCK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROCK.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to ROCK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check ROCK.L's competition here
SLP.L vs BOD.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, BOD.L has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while BOD.L trades at £0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas BOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOD.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to BOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check BOD.L's competition here
SLP.L vs FMET.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, FMET.L has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while FMET.L trades at £3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas FMET.L's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMET.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to FMET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check FMET.L's competition here
SLP.L vs URAH.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, URAH.L has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while URAH.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas URAH.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to URAH.L's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to URAH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check URAH.L's competition here
SLP.L vs SEFA.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, SEFA.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while SEFA.L trades at £0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas SEFA.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEFA.L's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to SEFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check SEFA.L's competition here
SLP.L vs CMRS.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, CMRS.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while CMRS.L trades at £1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas CMRS.L's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMRS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to CMRS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check CMRS.L's competition here
SLP.L vs KDR.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, KDR.L has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while KDR.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas KDR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KDR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to KDR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check KDR.L's competition here
SLP.L vs BRD.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, BRD.L has a market cap of 929.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while BRD.L trades at £2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas BRD.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRD.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLP.L has daily volatility of 7.30 and BRD.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check BRD.L's competition here
SLP.L vs GEMR.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, GEMR.L has a market cap of 765.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while GEMR.L trades at £0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GEMR.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEMR.L's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to GEMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check GEMR.L's competition here
SLP.L vs NTVO.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, NTVO.L has a market cap of 616.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while NTVO.L trades at £0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas NTVO.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTVO.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to NTVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check NTVO.L's competition here
SLP.L vs PERE.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, PERE.L has a market cap of 218.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while PERE.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas PERE.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PERE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to PERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check PERE.L's competition here
SLP.L vs GPSS.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, GPSS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while GPSS.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GPSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPSS.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to GPSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check GPSS.L's competition here
SLP.L vs ALS.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, ALS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while ALS.L trades at £46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas ALS.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALS.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is less volatile compared to ALS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check ALS.L's competition here
SLP.L vs DNK.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, DNK.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while DNK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas DNK.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNK.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to DNK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check DNK.L's competition here
SLP.L vs 0UH1.L Comparison August 2025
SLP.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLP.L stands at 176.9M. In comparison, 0UH1.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLP.L is priced at £68.00, while 0UH1.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLP.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas 0UH1.L's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, SLP.L's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0UH1.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLP.L is more volatile compared to 0UH1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLP.L.Check 0UH1.L's competition here