Solution Financial Inc.
Solution Financial Inc. (SLNFF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLNFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Rental & Leasing Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLNFF | $0.21 | +2.19% | 17.3M | 20.24 | $0.01 | +1.42% |
| ASHTF | $74.99 | +3.14% | 31.3B | 21.31 | $3.46 | +1.46% |
| ELEEF | $26.15 | -1.36% | 10.6B | 27.26 | $0.97 | +1.38% |
| ASHTY | $295.24 | +1.66% | 8.1B | 21.38 | $13.82 | +1.46% |
| LZRFY | $6.42 | +6.64% | 6.7B | 15.96 | $0.40 | +4.88% |
| BCVVF | $9.29 | +3.22% | 6.4B | 8.00 | $1.16 | +5.01% |
| TCNRF | $10.32 | +0.00% | 5B | 8.39 | $1.23 | +4.09% |
| SIXGF | $87.36 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 14.02 | $6.23 | +3.58% |
| BRRAY | $5.88 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 11.76 | $0.50 | +2.39% |
| BRRAF | $5.72 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 10.79 | $0.53 | +4.08% |
Stock Comparison
SLNFF vs ASHTF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ASHTF has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while ASHTF trades at $74.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas ASHTF's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASHTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to ASHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check ASHTF's competition here
SLNFF vs ELEEF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ELEEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while ELEEF trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas ELEEF's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELEEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to ELEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check ELEEF's competition here
SLNFF vs ASHTY Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ASHTY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while ASHTY trades at $295.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas ASHTY's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASHTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to ASHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check ASHTY's competition here
SLNFF vs LZRFY Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, LZRFY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while LZRFY trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas LZRFY's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LZRFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to LZRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check LZRFY's competition here
SLNFF vs BCVVF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, BCVVF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while BCVVF trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas BCVVF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCVVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to BCVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check BCVVF's competition here
SLNFF vs TCNRF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, TCNRF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while TCNRF trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas TCNRF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TCNRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to TCNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check TCNRF's competition here
SLNFF vs SIXGF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, SIXGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while SIXGF trades at $87.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas SIXGF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIXGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to SIXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check SIXGF's competition here
SLNFF vs BRRAY Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, BRRAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while BRRAY trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas BRRAY's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRRAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to BRRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check BRRAY's competition here
SLNFF vs BRRAF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, BRRAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while BRRAF trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas BRRAF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRRAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to BRRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check BRRAF's competition here
SLNFF vs AOHLF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, AOHLF has a market cap of 639.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while AOHLF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas AOHLF's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AOHLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to AOHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check AOHLF's competition here
SLNFF vs BDIMF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, BDIMF has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while BDIMF trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas BDIMF's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BDIMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to BDIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check BDIMF's competition here
SLNFF vs CFRLF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CFRLF has a market cap of 346.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while CFRLF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas CFRLF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFRLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to CFRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check CFRLF's competition here
SLNFF vs EOHDF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, EOHDF has a market cap of 278.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while EOHDF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas EOHDF's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EOHDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to EOHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check EOHDF's competition here
SLNFF vs ICHHF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ICHHF has a market cap of 205M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while ICHHF trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas ICHHF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ICHHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to ICHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check ICHHF's competition here
SLNFF vs FSLUF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, FSLUF has a market cap of 87.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while FSLUF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas FSLUF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSLUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to FSLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check FSLUF's competition here
SLNFF vs CTOSW Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CTOSW has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while CTOSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas CTOSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTOSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to CTOSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check CTOSW's competition here
SLNFF vs DWAY Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, DWAY has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while DWAY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas DWAY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DWAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to DWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check DWAY's competition here
SLNFF vs WSHE Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, WSHE has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while WSHE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas WSHE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WSHE's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to WSHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check WSHE's competition here
SLNFF vs AZNVF Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, AZNVF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while AZNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas AZNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AZNVF's ROE of +8.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to AZNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check AZNVF's competition here
SLNFF vs AFDG Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, AFDG has a market cap of 449K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while AFDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas AFDG's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFDG's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is less volatile compared to AFDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check AFDG's competition here
SLNFF vs LEAS Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, LEAS has a market cap of 211.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while LEAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas LEAS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LEAS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to LEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check LEAS's competition here
SLNFF vs BRDSQ Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, BRDSQ has a market cap of 15.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while BRDSQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas BRDSQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRDSQ's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to BRDSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check BRDSQ's competition here
SLNFF vs YAYO Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, YAYO has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while YAYO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas YAYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YAYO's ROE of +7.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to YAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check YAYO's competition here
SLNFF vs HYREQ Comparison August 2025
SLNFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNFF stands at 17.3M. In comparison, HYREQ has a market cap of 314. Regarding current trading prices, SLNFF is priced at $0.21, while HYREQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.24, whereas HYREQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HYREQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLNFF is more volatile compared to HYREQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNFF.Check HYREQ's competition here