A. Schulman, Inc.
A. Schulman, Inc. SLMNP Peers
See (SLMNP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLMNP | $870.06 | +3.44% | 25.7B | 956.11 | $0.91 | +6.90% |
| SHECF | $30.18 | -1.69% | 59.2B | 16.23 | $1.86 | +2.38% |
| SHECY | $14.97 | -3.33% | 58.7B | 16.09 | $0.93 | +0.78% |
| BFFAF | $47.94 | -2.05% | 42.8B | 49.94 | $0.96 | +6.02% |
| BASFY | $11.86 | -1.25% | 42.3B | 49.42 | $0.24 | +6.12% |
| TYNPF | $39.28 | -0.96% | 17B | 24.86 | $1.58 | +0.89% |
| AHKSF | $6.55 | N/A | 8.9B | 9.49 | $0.69 | +3.93% |
| AHKSY | $12.82 | -3.70% | 8.8B | 9.29 | $1.38 | N/A |
| IMCDY | $64.50 | -0.07% | 7.6B | 23.03 | $2.80 | +1.68% |
| MTLHF | $5.24 | N/A | 7.5B | 23.82 | $0.22 | +4.16% |
Stock Comparison
SLMNP vs SHECF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while SHECF trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs SHECY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while SHECY trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs BFFAF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while BFFAF trades at $47.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 49.94. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to BFFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs BASFY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while BASFY trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 49.42. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs TYNPF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, TYNPF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while TYNPF trades at $39.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas TYNPF's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYNPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to TYNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs AHKSF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while AHKSF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs AHKSY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while AHKSY trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs IMCDY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while IMCDY trades at $64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs MTLHF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while MTLHF trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to MTLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs GNENF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while GNENF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to GNENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs MTLHY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while MTLHY trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to MTLHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs PECGF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while PECGF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is 42.13. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PECGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to PECGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs PTGCF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while PTGCF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to PTGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs BCHMF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while BCHMF trades at $61.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs SOMMF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while SOMMF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to SOMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs KURRY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while KURRY trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to KURRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs TOSCF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while TOSCF trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to TOSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs NNCHY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while NNCHY trades at $31.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to NNCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs GNENY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while GNENY trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -18.79. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to GNENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs SHWDF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while SHWDF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to SHWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs SHWDY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while SHWDY trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to SHWDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs SOMMY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while SOMMY trades at $11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to SOMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs SVYSF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while SVYSF trades at $35.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to SVYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs KURRF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while KURRF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to KURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs KOYJF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while KOYJF trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to KOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs SLVYY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while SLVYY trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs KPLUY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while KPLUY trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is 959.00. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs INDOY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while INDOY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to INDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs PCHUY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while PCHUY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to PCHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs RBTEF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while RBTEF trades at $975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to RBTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs DENKF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while DENKF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DENKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to DENKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs NPKYY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while NPKYY trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to NPKYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs MXCHF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while MXCHF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to MXCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs NPKYF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs VYTPF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to VYTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs LNZNF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while LNZNF trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to LNZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs FRRSF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, FRRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while FRRSF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas FRRSF's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to FRRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs TOAGF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while TOAGF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to TOAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs BRGAY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to BRGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs MXCHY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 633.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while MXCHY trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to MXCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs SGLFF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 539.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while SGLFF trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to SGLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs TYGIF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while TYGIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to TYGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs CDSAF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to CDSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs NNXPF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 279.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while NNXPF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -41.01. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs CRDE Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLMNP has daily volatility of 3.38 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.
SLMNP vs CNSJF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 183.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to CNSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs BNOW Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to BNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs BLGO Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while BLGO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -20.47. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs HZRGF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while HZRGF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to HZRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs BSWGF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while BSWGF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs PLYR Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while PLYR trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs FGPHF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while FGPHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs CHHYF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while CHHYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs FHELF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs EESE Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while EESE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to EESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs AGTT Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while AGTT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to AGTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs OPCGF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 444.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to OPCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs CHCC Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to CHCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs FLRE Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 22.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to FLRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs LBTI Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LBTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to LBTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs VULC Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to VULC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs AFPW Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to AFPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs NUEC Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs MKDTY Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to MKDTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs RKTE Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs ADKCF Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, ADKCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while ADKCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas ADKCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to ADKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs FIND Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, FIND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while FIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas FIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to FIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs BMRK Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, BMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while BMRK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas BMRK's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMRK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is more volatile compared to BMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.
SLMNP vs ADKIL Comparison
SLMNP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMNP stands at 25.7B. In comparison, ADKIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLMNP is priced at $870.06, while ADKIL trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMNP currently has a P/E ratio of 956.11, whereas ADKIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMNP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADKIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMNP is less volatile compared to ADKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMNP.