Sanlam Limited
Sanlam Limited (SLMAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLMAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLMAF | $3.48 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 11.99 | $0.29 | +6.71% |
| PIAIF | $6.82 | +0.00% | 136.7B | 7.66 | $0.89 | +5.21% |
| CILJF | $2.77 | -1.60% | 135.1B | 4.86 | $0.57 | +3.25% |
| AAIGF | $9.36 | +3.31% | 98.2B | 15.13 | $0.62 | +2.40% |
| AAGIY | $36.19 | -2.79% | 95.2B | 14.59 | $2.48 | +2.50% |
| PNGAY | $13.47 | -2.04% | 68.2B | 7.54 | $1.78 | +5.26% |
| MNQFF | $13.90 | +0.00% | 52.6B | N/A | N/A | +5.99% |
| CHPXF | $3.59 | -1.64% | 41.5B | 5.79 | $0.62 | +4.14% |
| GRWLF | $15.45 | +0.00% | 34.9B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| GWLPF | $16.23 | +0.00% | 34.9B | N/A | N/A | +6.90% |
Stock Comparison
SLMAF vs PIAIF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PIAIF has a market cap of 136.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while PIAIF trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PIAIF's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PIAIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to PIAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check PIAIF's competition here
SLMAF vs CILJF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CILJF has a market cap of 135.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while CILJF trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas CILJF's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CILJF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to CILJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check CILJF's competition here
SLMAF vs AAIGF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AAIGF has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while AAIGF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas AAIGF's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AAIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to AAIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check AAIGF's competition here
SLMAF vs AAGIY Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AAGIY has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while AAGIY trades at $36.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas AAGIY's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AAGIY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to AAGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check AAGIY's competition here
SLMAF vs PNGAY Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PNGAY has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while PNGAY trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PNGAY's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNGAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to PNGAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check PNGAY's competition here
SLMAF vs MNQFF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MNQFF has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while MNQFF trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas MNQFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MNQFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and MNQFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNQFF's competition here
SLMAF vs CHPXF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CHPXF has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while CHPXF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas CHPXF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHPXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and CHPXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHPXF's competition here
SLMAF vs GRWLF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GRWLF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while GRWLF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas GRWLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRWLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and GRWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRWLF's competition here
SLMAF vs GWLPF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GWLPF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while GWLPF trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas GWLPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GWLPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to GWLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check GWLPF's competition here
SLMAF vs GWLIF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GWLIF has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while GWLIF trades at $37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas GWLIF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GWLIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to GWLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check GWLIF's competition here
SLMAF vs FUIZF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FUIZF has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while FUIZF trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas FUIZF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FUIZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to FUIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check FUIZF's competition here
SLMAF vs PUKPF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PUKPF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while PUKPF trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PUKPF's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PUKPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to PUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check PUKPF's competition here
SLMAF vs CHYFF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CHYFF has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while CHYFF trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas CHYFF's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHYFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to CHYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check CHYFF's competition here
SLMAF vs DCNSF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DCNSF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while DCNSF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas DCNSF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCNSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to DCNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check DCNSF's competition here
SLMAF vs MNLCF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MNLCF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while MNLCF trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas MNLCF's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MNLCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and MNLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNLCF's competition here
SLMAF vs PWCDF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PWCDF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while PWCDF trades at $40.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PWCDF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PWCDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to PWCDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check PWCDF's competition here
SLMAF vs NWWCF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NWWCF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while NWWCF trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas NWWCF's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWWCF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and NWWCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWWCF's competition here
SLMAF vs MNUFF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MNUFF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while MNUFF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas MNUFF's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MNUFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to MNUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check MNUFF's competition here
SLMAF vs FUISF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FUISF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while FUISF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas FUISF's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FUISF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to FUISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check FUISF's competition here
SLMAF vs GRWTF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GRWTF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while GRWTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas GRWTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRWTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to GRWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check GRWTF's competition here
SLMAF vs TDHOY Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TDHOY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while TDHOY trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TDHOY's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TDHOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to TDHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check TDHOY's competition here
SLMAF vs GEHDY Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GEHDY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while GEHDY trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas GEHDY's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEHDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and GEHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEHDY's competition here
SLMAF vs TDHOF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TDHOF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while TDHOF trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TDHOF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TDHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and TDHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TDHOF's competition here
SLMAF vs PWFNF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PWFNF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while PWFNF trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PWFNF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PWFNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and PWFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PWFNF's competition here
SLMAF vs SLLDY Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SLLDY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while SLLDY trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas SLLDY's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLLDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to SLLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check SLLDY's competition here
SLMAF vs PNXGF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PNXGF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while PNXGF trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PNXGF's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNXGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and PNXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNXGF's competition here
SLMAF vs DLICY Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DLICY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while DLICY trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas DLICY's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLICY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to DLICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check DLICY's competition here
SLMAF vs JPPIF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, JPPIF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while JPPIF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas JPPIF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JPPIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and JPPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPPIF's competition here
SLMAF vs DCYHF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DCYHF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while DCYHF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas DCYHF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCYHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to DCYHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check DCYHF's competition here
SLMAF vs DCYHY Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DCYHY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while DCYHY trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas DCYHY's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCYHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to DCYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check DCYHY's competition here
SLMAF vs CINSF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CINSF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while CINSF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas CINSF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CINSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to CINSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check CINSF's competition here
SLMAF vs CTIHY Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CTIHY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while CTIHY trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas CTIHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to CTIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check CTIHY's competition here
SLMAF vs ELFIF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ELFIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while ELFIF trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ELFIF's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELFIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to ELFIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check ELFIF's competition here
SLMAF vs WWUEY Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WWUEY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while WWUEY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas WWUEY's P/E ratio is 40.05. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WWUEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to WWUEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check WWUEY's competition here
SLMAF vs CFIGF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CFIGF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while CFIGF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas CFIGF's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CFIGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to CFIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check CFIGF's competition here
SLMAF vs CFIGY Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CFIGY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while CFIGY trades at $43.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas CFIGY's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CFIGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and CFIGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CFIGY's competition here
SLMAF vs ODMUF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ODMUF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while ODMUF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ODMUF's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ODMUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to ODMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check ODMUF's competition here
SLMAF vs JXNFL Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, JXNFL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while JXNFL trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas JXNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JXNFL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and JXNFL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JXNFL's competition here
SLMAF vs SGCFF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SGCFF has a market cap of 784.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while SGCFF trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas SGCFF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to SGCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check SGCFF's competition here
SLMAF vs AELIY Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AELIY has a market cap of 750.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while AELIY trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas AELIY's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AELIY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to AELIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check AELIY's competition here
SLMAF vs KCLI Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, KCLI has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while KCLI trades at $30.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas KCLI's P/E ratio is -63.10. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KCLI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and KCLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KCLI's competition here
SLMAF vs PKIN Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PKIN has a market cap of 200.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while PKIN trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PKIN's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PKIN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to PKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check PKIN's competition here
SLMAF vs UTGN Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, UTGN has a market cap of 144.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while UTGN trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas UTGN's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UTGN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and UTGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UTGN's competition here
SLMAF vs YDVL Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, YDVL has a market cap of 106.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while YDVL trades at $35,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas YDVL's P/E ratio is -454.55. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YDVL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to YDVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check YDVL's competition here
SLMAF vs HNRDF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, HNRDF has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while HNRDF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas HNRDF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HNRDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to HNRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check HNRDF's competition here
SLMAF vs CFIN Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CFIN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while CFIN trades at $7,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas CFIN's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CFIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to CFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check CFIN's competition here
SLMAF vs FLFG Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FLFG has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while FLFG trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas FLFG's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to FLFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check FLFG's competition here
SLMAF vs LINSA Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, LINSA has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while LINSA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas LINSA's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LINSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to LINSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check LINSA's competition here
SLMAF vs LINS Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, LINS has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while LINS trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas LINS's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LINS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and LINS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LINS's competition here
SLMAF vs JALC Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, JALC has a market cap of 652.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while JALC trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas JALC's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JALC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and JALC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JALC's competition here
SLMAF vs GWGHQ Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GWGHQ has a market cap of 228.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while GWGHQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas GWGHQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GWGHQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and GWGHQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWGHQ's competition here
SLMAF vs SKRUF Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SKRUF has a market cap of 43.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while SKRUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas SKRUF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKRUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and SKRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKRUF's competition here
SLMAF vs WNCG Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WNCG has a market cap of 35K. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while WNCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas WNCG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WNCG's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to WNCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check WNCG's competition here
SLMAF vs GVFGU Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GVFGU has a market cap of 27. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while GVFGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas GVFGU's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GVFGU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and GVFGU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GVFGU's competition here
SLMAF vs GRTYA Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GRTYA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while GRTYA trades at $5,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas GRTYA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRTYA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF is less volatile compared to GRTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLMAF.Check GRTYA's competition here
SLMAF vs AFIPA Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AFIPA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while AFIPA trades at $40,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas AFIPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFIPA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLMAF has daily volatility of 0.00 and AFIPA has daily volatility of N/A.Check AFIPA's competition here
SLMAF vs ATHLL Comparison August 2025
SLMAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLMAF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ATHLL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLMAF is priced at $3.48, while ATHLL trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ATHLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLMAF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATHLL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLMAF and ATHLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATHLL's competition here