Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust Limited
Standard Life Investments Property Income Trust Limited SLI.L Peers
See (SLI.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLI.L | $79.00 | -0.75% | N/A | 0.04 | $21.50 | N/A |
| LAND.L | $592.00 | +0.08% | 4.39B | 42.29 | $0.14 | +6.79% |
| BLND.L | $395.40 | +0.30% | 3.95B | 21.97 | $0.18 | +5.79% |
| UTG.L | $807.50 | -0.19% | 3.95B | 8.41 | $0.96 | +4.62% |
| LMP.L | $189.00 | +0.53% | 3.88B | 17.18 | $0.11 | +0.06% |
| LXI.L | $100.80 | +0.70% | 1.73B | -4.58 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| BCPT.L | $104.66 | +9.25% | 734.24M | -14.95 | -$0.07 | +1.26% |
| 0RD8.L | $42.10 | -0.23% | 604.13M | 9.32 | $4.52 | +9.24% |
| PCTN.L | $73.50 | +0.82% | 391.39M | 73.50 | $0.01 | +3.78% |
| CREI.L | $76.20 | -0.52% | 335.93M | 19.05 | $0.04 | +7.87% |
Stock Comparison
SLI.L vs LAND.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LAND.L has a market cap of 4.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while LAND.L trades at $592.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas LAND.L's P/E ratio is 42.29. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAND.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to LAND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs BLND.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BLND.L has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while BLND.L trades at $395.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas BLND.L's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLND.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to BLND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs UTG.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, UTG.L has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while UTG.L trades at $807.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas UTG.L's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UTG.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to UTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs LMP.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LMP.L has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while LMP.L trades at $189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas LMP.L's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LMP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to LMP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs LXI.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, LXI.L has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while LXI.L trades at $100.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas LXI.L's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LXI.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is more volatile compared to LXI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs BCPT.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BCPT.L has a market cap of 734.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while BCPT.L trades at $104.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas BCPT.L's P/E ratio is -14.95. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BCPT.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to BCPT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs 0RD8.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0RD8.L has a market cap of 604.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while 0RD8.L trades at $42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas 0RD8.L's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0RD8.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is more volatile compared to 0RD8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs PCTN.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PCTN.L has a market cap of 391.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while PCTN.L trades at $73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas PCTN.L's P/E ratio is 73.50. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCTN.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to PCTN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs CREI.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CREI.L has a market cap of 335.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while CREI.L trades at $76.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CREI.L's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CREI.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to CREI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs SREI.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SREI.L has a market cap of 253.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while SREI.L trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas SREI.L's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SREI.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to SREI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs CTPT.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CTPT.L has a market cap of 192.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while CTPT.L trades at $82.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas CTPT.L's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CTPT.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLI.L has daily volatility of 1.09 and CTPT.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SLI.L vs AEWU.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AEWU.L has a market cap of 163.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while AEWU.L trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas AEWU.L's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AEWU.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to AEWU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs EPIC.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EPIC.L has a market cap of 145.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while EPIC.L trades at $68.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas EPIC.L's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EPIC.L's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLI.L has daily volatility of 1.09 and EPIC.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SLI.L vs PCA.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PCA.L has a market cap of 63.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while PCA.L trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas PCA.L's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCA.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to PCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs AIRE.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, AIRE.L has a market cap of 59.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while AIRE.L trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas AIRE.L's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AIRE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to AIRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs TOWN.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TOWN.L has a market cap of 58.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while TOWN.L trades at $138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas TOWN.L's P/E ratio is -69.00. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TOWN.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to TOWN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs RLE.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, RLE.L has a market cap of 56.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while RLE.L trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas RLE.L's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RLE.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to RLE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs HCFT.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HCFT.L has a market cap of 31.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while HCFT.L trades at $587.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas HCFT.L's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HCFT.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is more volatile compared to HCFT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs GRIO.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GRIO.L has a market cap of 26.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while GRIO.L trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas GRIO.L's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRIO.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is more volatile compared to GRIO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs API.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, API.L has a market cap of 20.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while API.L trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas API.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to API.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is less volatile compared to API.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.
SLI.L vs 0MTK.L Comparison
SLI.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0MTK.L has a market cap of 6.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI.L is priced at $79.00, while 0MTK.L trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas 0MTK.L's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, SLI.L's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0MTK.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI.L is more volatile compared to 0MTK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.L.