HAN-GINS Cloud Technology Equal Weight UCITS ETF
HAN-GINS Cloud Technology Equal Weight UCITS ETF (SKYP.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SKYP.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKYP.L | £915.40 | -0.86% | 16.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IH2O.L | £5,719.50 | +0.95% | 172.5B | N/A | N/A | +1.09% |
| INRG.L | £621.75 | +1.93% | 166.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.20% |
| JMRE.L | £2,744.75 | +0.85% | 117.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PRIW.L | £3,008.63 | +1.36% | 116.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BCHS.L | £10,633.00 | +2.77% | 62.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XGSD.L | £2,709.50 | +0.74% | 57.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.77% |
| LGGG.L | £1,723.40 | +0.55% | 56.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ROBG.L | £1,905.00 | +2.47% | 52.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XSGI.L | £5,418.50 | -0.33% | 27.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SKYP.L vs IH2O.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, IH2O.L has a market cap of 172.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while IH2O.L trades at £5,719.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IH2O.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IH2O.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to IH2O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check IH2O.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs INRG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, INRG.L has a market cap of 166.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while INRG.L trades at £621.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to INRG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to INRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check INRG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs JMRE.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, JMRE.L has a market cap of 117.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while JMRE.L trades at £2,744.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JMRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to JMRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check JMRE.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs PRIW.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, PRIW.L has a market cap of 116.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while PRIW.L trades at £3,008.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIW.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to PRIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check PRIW.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs BCHS.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, BCHS.L has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while BCHS.L trades at £10,633.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BCHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to BCHS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check BCHS.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs XGSD.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, XGSD.L has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while XGSD.L trades at £2,709.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XGSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to XGSD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check XGSD.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs LGGG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, LGGG.L has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while LGGG.L trades at £1,723.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to LGGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check LGGG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs ROBG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, ROBG.L has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while ROBG.L trades at £1,905.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ROBG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to ROBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check ROBG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs XSGI.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, XSGI.L has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while XSGI.L trades at £5,418.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSGI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XSGI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and XSGI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XSGI.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GGRG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GGRG.L has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GGRG.L trades at £3,253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GGRG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GGRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GGRG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs PRIG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, PRIG.L has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while PRIG.L trades at £1,445.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to PRIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check PRIG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs JREG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, JREG.L has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while JREG.L trades at £57.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREG.L's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JREG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to JREG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check JREG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs CECL.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, CECL.L has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while CECL.L trades at £1,648.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CECL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CECL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and CECL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CECL.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs JGRE.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, JGRE.L has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while JGRE.L trades at £4,213.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JGRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to JGRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check JGRE.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs SBUY.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, SBUY.L has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while SBUY.L trades at £4,833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBUY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SBUY.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to SBUY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check SBUY.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs FCSG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, FCSG.L has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while FCSG.L trades at £3,261.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FCSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and FCSG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCSG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GLAB.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GLAB.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GLAB.L trades at £28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLAB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GLAB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GLAB.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GGOV.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GGOV.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GGOV.L trades at £3,890.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGOV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GGOV.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GGOV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GGOV.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs RBE.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, RBE.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while RBE.L trades at £63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to RBE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and RBE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RBE.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GAGU.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GAGU.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GAGU.L trades at £56.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GAGU.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GAGU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GAGU.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs DH2O.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, DH2O.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while DH2O.L trades at £77.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DH2O.L's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DH2O.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to DH2O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check DH2O.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs HVPE.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, HVPE.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while HVPE.L trades at £2,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVPE.L's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HVPE.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to HVPE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check HVPE.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GGRA.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GGRA.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GGRA.L trades at £44.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRA.L's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GGRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GGRA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GGRA.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs IGSU.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, IGSU.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while IGSU.L trades at £84.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSU.L's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGSU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to IGSU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check IGSU.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs IDIN.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, IDIN.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while IDIN.L trades at £35.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDIN.L's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IDIN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to IDIN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check IDIN.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs JREM.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, JREM.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while JREM.L trades at £37.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREM.L's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JREM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to JREM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check JREM.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs MAGI.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, MAGI.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while MAGI.L trades at £36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAGI.L's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MAGI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to MAGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check MAGI.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs PRWU.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, PRWU.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while PRWU.L trades at £33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRWU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRWU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to PRWU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check PRWU.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs IQSA.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, IQSA.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while IQSA.L trades at £88.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQSA.L's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IQSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to IQSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check IQSA.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GLDV.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GLDV.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GLDV.L trades at £36.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDV.L's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GLDV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GLDV.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs V3AL.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, V3AL.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while V3AL.L trades at £6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AL.L's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to V3AL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to V3AL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check V3AL.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs V3AA.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, V3AA.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while V3AA.L trades at £7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AA.L's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to V3AA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to V3AA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check V3AA.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs V3AB.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, V3AB.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while V3AB.L trades at £5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to V3AB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to V3AB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check V3AB.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs JPCT.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, JPCT.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while JPCT.L trades at £47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPCT.L's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JPCT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and JPCT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPCT.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GGRP.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GGRP.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GGRP.L trades at £2,758.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GGRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GGRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GGRP.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs AGT.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, AGT.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while AGT.L trades at £265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGT.L's P/E ratio is 265.00. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AGT.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to AGT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check AGT.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs BBGI.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, BBGI.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while BBGI.L trades at £141.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBGI.L's P/E ratio is 35.45. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BBGI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and BBGI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BBGI.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GBDV.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GBDV.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GBDV.L trades at £26.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBDV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBDV.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GBDV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GBDV.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs BCHN.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, BCHN.L has a market cap of 848.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while BCHN.L trades at £143.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHN.L's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BCHN.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to BCHN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check BCHN.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs APAX.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, APAX.L has a market cap of 790.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while APAX.L trades at £163.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APAX.L's P/E ratio is 163.80. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to APAX.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to APAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check APAX.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs LGGL.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, LGGL.L has a market cap of 771.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while LGGL.L trades at £23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGGL.L's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LGGL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to LGGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check LGGL.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GSCT.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GSCT.L has a market cap of 749.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GSCT.L trades at £170.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSCT.L's P/E ratio is -18.91. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GSCT.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GSCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GSCT.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs ROBO.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, ROBO.L has a market cap of 726.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while ROBO.L trades at £25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROBO.L's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ROBO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to ROBO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check ROBO.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GDIG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GDIG.L has a market cap of 698.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GDIG.L trades at £41.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDIG.L's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GDIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GDIG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs XGDD.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, XGDD.L has a market cap of 675.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while XGDD.L trades at £36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGDD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XGDD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to XGDD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check XGDD.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs EPRA.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, EPRA.L has a market cap of 587.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while EPRA.L trades at £5,512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPRA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EPRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to EPRA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check EPRA.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs QYLD.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, QYLD.L has a market cap of 565.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while QYLD.L trades at £15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLD.L's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to QYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to QYLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check QYLD.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs QYLU.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, QYLU.L has a market cap of 563.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while QYLU.L trades at £21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLU.L's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to QYLU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to QYLU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check QYLU.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs PAVE.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, PAVE.L has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while PAVE.L trades at £43.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAVE.L's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PAVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to PAVE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check PAVE.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs LUXU.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, LUXU.L has a market cap of 492.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while LUXU.L trades at £241.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LUXU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to LUXU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check LUXU.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs SDIU.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, SDIU.L has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while SDIU.L trades at £14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIU.L's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SDIU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to SDIU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check SDIU.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs SDIP.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, SDIP.L has a market cap of 463.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while SDIP.L trades at £7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SDIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to SDIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check SDIP.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs SKYU.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, SKYU.L has a market cap of 458.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while SKYU.L trades at £51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYU.L's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SKYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to SKYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check SKYU.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs PCGH.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, PCGH.L has a market cap of 418.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while PCGH.L trades at £345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCGH.L's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PCGH.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to PCGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check PCGH.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs QYLP.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, QYLP.L has a market cap of 415.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while QYLP.L trades at £11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to QYLP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to QYLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check QYLP.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs PAVG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, PAVG.L has a market cap of 402.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while PAVG.L trades at £31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PAVG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to PAVG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check PAVG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs PCFT.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, PCFT.L has a market cap of 362.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while PCFT.L trades at £213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCFT.L's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PCFT.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to PCFT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check PCFT.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs INFR.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, INFR.L has a market cap of 351.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while INFR.L trades at £2,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to INFR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to INFR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check INFR.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs TRET.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, TRET.L has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while TRET.L trades at £44.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to TRET.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to TRET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check TRET.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GLRE.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GLRE.L has a market cap of 334.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GLRE.L trades at £35.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLRE.L's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GLRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GLRE.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs URNU.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, URNU.L has a market cap of 325.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while URNU.L trades at £22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URNU.L's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to URNU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to URNU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check URNU.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GLRA.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GLRA.L has a market cap of 310.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GLRA.L trades at £20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLRA.L's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GLRA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GLRA.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GSEO.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GSEO.L has a market cap of 250.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GSEO.L trades at £63.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSEO.L's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GSEO.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GSEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GSEO.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GBRE.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GBRE.L has a market cap of 247.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GBRE.L trades at £25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GBRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GBRE.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs URND.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, URND.L has a market cap of 236.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while URND.L trades at £16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to URND.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to URND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check URND.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs EGL.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, EGL.L has a market cap of 231M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while EGL.L trades at £220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGL.L's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EGL.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to EGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check EGL.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs JPLG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, JPLG.L has a market cap of 203M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while JPLG.L trades at £3,280.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPLG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JPLG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to JPLG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check JPLG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs COPX.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, COPX.L has a market cap of 189.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while COPX.L trades at £36.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPX.L's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to COPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to COPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check COPX.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GENE.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GENE.L has a market cap of 188.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GENE.L trades at £1,749.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GENE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GENE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GENE.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs MNP.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, MNP.L has a market cap of 184.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while MNP.L trades at £315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNP.L's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MNP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and MNP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNP.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GOGB.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GOGB.L has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GOGB.L trades at £25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GOGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GOGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GOGB.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs FLXX.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, FLXX.L has a market cap of 112.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while FLXX.L trades at £28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FLXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to FLXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check FLXX.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs FGLR.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, FGLR.L has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while FGLR.L trades at £10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGLR.L's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FGLR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to FGLR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check FGLR.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs FGLS.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, FGLS.L has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while FGLS.L trades at £7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGLS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FGLS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to FGLS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check FGLS.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs JARU.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, JARU.L has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while JARU.L trades at £0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JARU.L's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JARU.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and JARU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JARU.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs CESG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, CESG.L has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while CESG.L trades at £44.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESG.L's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CESG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and CESG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CESG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs 0P00018XAO.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, 0P00018XAO.L has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while 0P00018XAO.L trades at £209.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00018XAO.L's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00018XAO.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and 0P00018XAO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P00018XAO.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs 0P00018XAR.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, 0P00018XAR.L has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while 0P00018XAR.L trades at £239.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00018XAR.L's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00018XAR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and 0P00018XAR.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P00018XAR.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs BUG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, BUG.L has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while BUG.L trades at £15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUG.L's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BUG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and BUG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BUG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GEND.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GEND.L has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GEND.L trades at £13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GEND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GEND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GEND.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GCED.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GCED.L has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GCED.L trades at £18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCED.L's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GCED.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and GCED.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCED.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GEDV.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GEDV.L has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GEDV.L trades at £21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEDV.L's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GEDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GEDV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GEDV.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs PMGR.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, PMGR.L has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while PMGR.L trades at £112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMGR.L's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PMGR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to PMGR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check PMGR.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs FLXG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, FLXG.L has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while FLXG.L trades at £29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FLXG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to FLXG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check FLXG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs FRGE.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, FRGE.L has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while FRGE.L trades at £39.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRGE.L's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FRGE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to FRGE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check FRGE.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs KZG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, KZG.L has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while KZG.L trades at £1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KZG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to KZG.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to KZG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check KZG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs AMAL.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, AMAL.L has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while AMAL.L trades at £10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMAL.L's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AMAL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to AMAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check AMAL.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs METR.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, METR.L has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while METR.L trades at £10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas METR.L's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to METR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and METR.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check METR.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs 0P000185T5.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, 0P000185T5.L has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while 0P000185T5.L trades at £205.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P000185T5.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and 0P000185T5.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P000185T5.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs 0P000185T6.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, 0P000185T6.L has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while 0P000185T6.L trades at £175.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P000185T6.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and 0P000185T6.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P000185T6.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GNOM.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GNOM.L has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GNOM.L trades at £6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNOM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GNOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GNOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GNOM.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs HERU.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, HERU.L has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while HERU.L trades at £15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HERU.L's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HERU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to HERU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check HERU.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs HBKU.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, HBKU.L has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while HBKU.L trades at £11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBKU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HBKU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L and HBKU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HBKU.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs GNOG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, GNOG.L has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while GNOG.L trades at £4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GNOG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to GNOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check GNOG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs HERG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, HERG.L has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while HERG.L trades at £11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HERG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HERG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to HERG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check HERG.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs DRVE.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, DRVE.L has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while DRVE.L trades at £13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRVE.L's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DRVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to DRVE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check DRVE.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs DMAD.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, DMAD.L has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while DMAD.L trades at £11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMAD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DMAD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to DMAD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check DMAD.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs FINX.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, FINX.L has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while FINX.L trades at £10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINX.L's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FINX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to FINX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check FINX.L's competition here
SKYP.L vs DRVG.L Comparison August 2025
SKYP.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYP.L stands at 16.9M. In comparison, DRVG.L has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYP.L is priced at £915.40, while DRVG.L trades at £9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYP.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYP.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DRVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYP.L is less volatile compared to DRVG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYP.L.Check DRVG.L's competition here