Scottish Re Group Limited
Scottish Re Group Limited (SKRUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SKRUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKRUF | $0.00 | -99.60% | 43.7K | -0.00 | -$0.65 | N/A |
| CILJF | $2.83 | -2.75% | 140.3B | 5.00 | $0.57 | +3.24% |
| PIAIF | $6.82 | +0.00% | 135.8B | 7.66 | $0.89 | +5.21% |
| AAGIY | $37.64 | -1.18% | 98.4B | 15.15 | $2.48 | +2.40% |
| AAIGF | $9.07 | -5.11% | 94.9B | 14.63 | $0.62 | +2.49% |
| PNGAY | $14.25 | -0.42% | 71.6B | 7.94 | $1.79 | +4.94% |
| MNQFF | $13.90 | +0.00% | 53.9B | N/A | N/A | +5.99% |
| CHPXF | $3.65 | +0.00% | 42.2B | 5.89 | $0.62 | +4.08% |
| GWLPF | $16.23 | +0.00% | 35.1B | N/A | N/A | +6.91% |
| GWLIF | $37.62 | +0.08% | 34.9B | 12.54 | $3.00 | +4.45% |
Stock Comparison
SKRUF vs CILJF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, CILJF has a market cap of 140.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while CILJF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CILJF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CILJF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to CILJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check CILJF's competition here
SKRUF vs PIAIF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, PIAIF has a market cap of 135.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while PIAIF trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PIAIF's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to PIAIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and PIAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIAIF's competition here
SKRUF vs AAGIY Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, AAGIY has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while AAGIY trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AAGIY's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAGIY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to AAGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check AAGIY's competition here
SKRUF vs AAIGF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, AAIGF has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while AAIGF trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AAIGF's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to AAIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check AAIGF's competition here
SKRUF vs PNGAY Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, PNGAY has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while PNGAY trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PNGAY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to PNGAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to PNGAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check PNGAY's competition here
SKRUF vs MNQFF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, MNQFF has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while MNQFF trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MNQFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNQFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and MNQFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNQFF's competition here
SKRUF vs CHPXF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, CHPXF has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while CHPXF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHPXF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHPXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and CHPXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHPXF's competition here
SKRUF vs GWLPF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, GWLPF has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while GWLPF trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GWLPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to GWLPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to GWLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check GWLPF's competition here
SKRUF vs GWLIF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, GWLIF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while GWLIF trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GWLIF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to GWLIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to GWLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check GWLIF's competition here
SKRUF vs GRWLF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, GRWLF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while GRWLF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GRWLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to GRWLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and GRWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRWLF's competition here
SKRUF vs FUIZF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, FUIZF has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while FUIZF trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FUIZF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to FUIZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to FUIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check FUIZF's competition here
SKRUF vs PUKPF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, PUKPF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while PUKPF trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PUKPF's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to PUKPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to PUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check PUKPF's competition here
SKRUF vs CHYFF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, CHYFF has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while CHYFF trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHYFF's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHYFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to CHYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check CHYFF's competition here
SKRUF vs DCNSF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, DCNSF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while DCNSF trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DCNSF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to DCNSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to DCNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check DCNSF's competition here
SKRUF vs MNLCF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, MNLCF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while MNLCF trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MNLCF's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNLCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and MNLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNLCF's competition here
SKRUF vs PWCDF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, PWCDF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while PWCDF trades at $40.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PWCDF's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to PWCDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to PWCDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check PWCDF's competition here
SKRUF vs MNUFF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, MNUFF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while MNUFF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MNUFF's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNUFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and MNUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNUFF's competition here
SKRUF vs NWWCF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, NWWCF has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while NWWCF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NWWCF's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to NWWCF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and NWWCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWWCF's competition here
SKRUF vs FUISF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, FUISF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while FUISF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FUISF's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to FUISF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to FUISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check FUISF's competition here
SKRUF vs GRWTF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, GRWTF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while GRWTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GRWTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to GRWTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to GRWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check GRWTF's competition here
SKRUF vs TDHOY Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, TDHOY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while TDHOY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TDHOY's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to TDHOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to TDHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check TDHOY's competition here
SKRUF vs GEHDY Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, GEHDY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while GEHDY trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GEHDY's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to GEHDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and GEHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEHDY's competition here
SKRUF vs TDHOF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, TDHOF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while TDHOF trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TDHOF's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to TDHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and TDHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TDHOF's competition here
SKRUF vs PWFNF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, PWFNF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while PWFNF trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PWFNF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to PWFNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and PWFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PWFNF's competition here
SKRUF vs SLLDY Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, SLLDY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while SLLDY trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SLLDY's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLLDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to SLLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check SLLDY's competition here
SKRUF vs PNXGF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, PNXGF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while PNXGF trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PNXGF's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to PNXGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and PNXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNXGF's competition here
SKRUF vs DLICY Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, DLICY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while DLICY trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DLICY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to DLICY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to DLICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check DLICY's competition here
SKRUF vs SLMAF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, SLMAF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while SLMAF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SLMAF's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLMAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and SLMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLMAF's competition here
SKRUF vs JPPIF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, JPPIF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while JPPIF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JPPIF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to JPPIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and JPPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPPIF's competition here
SKRUF vs DCYHF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, DCYHF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while DCYHF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DCYHF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to DCYHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to DCYHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check DCYHF's competition here
SKRUF vs DCYHY Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, DCYHY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while DCYHY trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DCYHY's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to DCYHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to DCYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check DCYHY's competition here
SKRUF vs CINSF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, CINSF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while CINSF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CINSF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CINSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to CINSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check CINSF's competition here
SKRUF vs CTIHY Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, CTIHY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while CTIHY trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CTIHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to CTIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check CTIHY's competition here
SKRUF vs ELFIF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, ELFIF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while ELFIF trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ELFIF's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELFIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and ELFIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELFIF's competition here
SKRUF vs WWUEY Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, WWUEY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while WWUEY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WWUEY's P/E ratio is 40.05. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to WWUEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and WWUEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWUEY's competition here
SKRUF vs CFIGF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, CFIGF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while CFIGF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CFIGF's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CFIGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to CFIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check CFIGF's competition here
SKRUF vs CFIGY Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, CFIGY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while CFIGY trades at $43.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CFIGY's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CFIGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and CFIGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CFIGY's competition here
SKRUF vs ODMUF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, ODMUF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while ODMUF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ODMUF's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to ODMUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to ODMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check ODMUF's competition here
SKRUF vs JXNFL Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, JXNFL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while JXNFL trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JXNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to JXNFL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and JXNFL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JXNFL's competition here
SKRUF vs SGCFF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, SGCFF has a market cap of 784.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while SGCFF trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SGCFF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to SGCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check SGCFF's competition here
SKRUF vs AELIY Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, AELIY has a market cap of 750.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while AELIY trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AELIY's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to AELIY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to AELIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check AELIY's competition here
SKRUF vs KCLI Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, KCLI has a market cap of 294.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while KCLI trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KCLI's P/E ratio is -63.33. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to KCLI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and KCLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KCLI's competition here
SKRUF vs PKIN Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, PKIN has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while PKIN trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PKIN's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to PKIN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to PKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check PKIN's competition here
SKRUF vs UTGN Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, UTGN has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while UTGN trades at $43.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UTGN's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to UTGN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to UTGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check UTGN's competition here
SKRUF vs YDVL Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, YDVL has a market cap of 106.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while YDVL trades at $35,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YDVL's P/E ratio is -454.55. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to YDVL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to YDVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check YDVL's competition here
SKRUF vs HNRDF Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, HNRDF has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while HNRDF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HNRDF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to HNRDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and HNRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HNRDF's competition here
SKRUF vs CFIN Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, CFIN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while CFIN trades at $7,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CFIN's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to CFIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to CFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check CFIN's competition here
SKRUF vs FLFG Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, FLFG has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while FLFG trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FLFG's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to FLFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to FLFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check FLFG's competition here
SKRUF vs LINSA Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, LINSA has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while LINSA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LINSA's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to LINSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to LINSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check LINSA's competition here
SKRUF vs LINS Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, LINS has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while LINS trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LINS's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to LINS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and LINS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LINS's competition here
SKRUF vs JALC Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, JALC has a market cap of 652.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while JALC trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JALC's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to JALC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and JALC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JALC's competition here
SKRUF vs GWGHQ Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, GWGHQ has a market cap of 228.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while GWGHQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GWGHQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to GWGHQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and GWGHQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWGHQ's competition here
SKRUF vs WNCG Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, WNCG has a market cap of 35K. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while WNCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WNCG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to WNCG's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to WNCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check WNCG's competition here
SKRUF vs GVFGU Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, GVFGU has a market cap of 27. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while GVFGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GVFGU's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to GVFGU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and GVFGU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GVFGU's competition here
SKRUF vs GRTYA Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, GRTYA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while GRTYA trades at $5,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GRTYA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to GRTYA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF is less volatile compared to GRTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKRUF.Check GRTYA's competition here
SKRUF vs ATHLL Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, ATHLL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while ATHLL trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATHLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATHLL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKRUF and ATHLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATHLL's competition here
SKRUF vs AFIPA Comparison July 2025
SKRUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKRUF stands at 43.7K. In comparison, AFIPA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKRUF is priced at $0.00, while AFIPA trades at $40,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKRUF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AFIPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKRUF's ROE is N/A, compared to AFIPA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SKRUF has daily volatility of 0.00 and AFIPA has daily volatility of N/A.Check AFIPA's competition here