Sekisui House, Ltd.
Sekisui House, Ltd. SKHSF Peers
See (SKHSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Residential Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKHSF | $23.66 | N/A | 15.3B | 10.07 | $2.35 | +3.70% |
| SKHSY | $22.77 | -1.02% | 14.8B | 9.73 | $2.34 | +3.40% |
| BTDPF | $4.97 | N/A | 7.1B | 35.50 | $0.14 | +4.59% |
| SMFRF | $31.17 | N/A | 6.4B | 7.97 | $3.91 | +1.31% |
| TWODY | $16.33 | +0.93% | 5.8B | 19.67 | $0.83 | +7.47% |
| PSMMY | $35.60 | -1.52% | 5.7B | 16.04 | $2.22 | +3.18% |
| BKGFY | $11.49 | -0.11% | 5.7B | 11.49 | $1.00 | +4.08% |
| PSMMF | $17.56 | +0.01% | 5.6B | 15.82 | $1.11 | +3.25% |
| TWODF | $1.52 | +11.76% | 5.4B | 19.00 | $0.08 | +8.09% |
| BKGFF | $54.11 | N/A | 5.4B | 10.71 | $5.05 | +5.87% |
Stock Comparison
SKHSF vs SKHSY Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, SKHSY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while SKHSY trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas SKHSY's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKHSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to SKHSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs BTDPF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BTDPF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while BTDPF trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas BTDPF's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTDPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to BTDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs SMFRF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, SMFRF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while SMFRF trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas SMFRF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to SMFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs TWODY Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, TWODY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while TWODY trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas TWODY's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWODY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to TWODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs PSMMY Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, PSMMY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while PSMMY trades at $35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas PSMMY's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSMMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to PSMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs BKGFY Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BKGFY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while BKGFY trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas BKGFY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKGFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to BKGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs PSMMF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, PSMMF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while PSMMF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas PSMMF's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSMMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to PSMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs TWODF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, TWODF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while TWODF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas TWODF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWODF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to TWODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs BKGFF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BKGFF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while BKGFF trades at $54.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas BKGFF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to BKGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs ANTOF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, ANTOF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while ANTOF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas ANTOF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANTOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to ANTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs BTDPY Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BTDPY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while BTDPY trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas BTDPY's P/E ratio is 43.84. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTDPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to BTDPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs BLWYF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BLWYF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while BLWYF trades at $32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas BLWYF's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLWYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to BLWYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs BLWYY Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BLWYY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while BLWYY trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas BLWYY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLWYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to BLWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs BVHMF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BVHMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while BVHMF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas BVHMF's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BVHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to BVHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs RDWWF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RDWWF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while RDWWF trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas RDWWF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDWWF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to RDWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs CYRBY Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, CYRBY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while CYRBY trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CYRBY's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYRBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to CYRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs NNRHF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, NNRHF has a market cap of 951M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while NNRHF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas NNRHF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNRHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to NNRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs GLVHF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, GLVHF has a market cap of 922.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while GLVHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas GLVHF's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLVHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to GLVHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs HOVVB Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, HOVVB has a market cap of 345.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while HOVVB trades at $105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas HOVVB's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOVVB's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to HOVVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs CNRFF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, CNRFF has a market cap of 183.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while CNRFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CNRFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNRFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to CNRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs ASNXF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, ASNXF has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while ASNXF trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas ASNXF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASNXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to ASNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs NOBH Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, NOBH has a market cap of 91.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while NOBH trades at $28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas NOBH's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOBH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to NOBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs RKGXF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RKGXF has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while RKGXF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas RKGXF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKGXF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to RKGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs GFASY Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, GFASY has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while GFASY trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas GFASY's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GFASY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to GFASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs STHI Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, STHI has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while STHI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas STHI's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STHI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to STHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs AVOT Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, AVOT has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while AVOT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas AVOT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVOT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to AVOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs DREM Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, DREM has a market cap of 727.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while DREM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas DREM's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DREM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to DREM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs DHHXF Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, DHHXF has a market cap of 288.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while DHHXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas DHHXF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHHXF's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to DHHXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs RNVT Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNVT has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while RNVT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas RNVT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RNVT's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to RNVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs EGBB Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, EGBB has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while EGBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas EGBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EGBB's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to EGBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.
SKHSF vs ASCK Comparison
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 15.3B. In comparison, ASCK has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $23.66, while ASCK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas ASCK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASCK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to ASCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.