Sekisui House, Ltd.
Sekisui House, Ltd. (SKHSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SKHSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Residential Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKHSF | $21.70 | +3.33% | 14.1B | 10.28 | $2.11 | +4.50% |
| SKHSY | $21.08 | -2.99% | 13.7B | 10.08 | $2.09 | +3.67% |
| BTDPF | $4.85 | +0.00% | 6.9B | 34.64 | $0.14 | +4.70% |
| SMFRF | $9.78 | +0.00% | 6B | 7.76 | $1.26 | +11.45% |
| PSMMF | $17.56 | +0.00% | 5.6B | 15.82 | $1.11 | +4.43% |
| PSMMY | $30.53 | +0.02% | 4.9B | 13.80 | $2.21 | +5.25% |
| BKGFF | $49.58 | +0.00% | 4.8B | 9.97 | $4.97 | +7.35% |
| TWODY | $13.52 | +1.50% | 4.8B | 42.17 | $0.32 | +9.02% |
| BKGFY | $9.55 | -0.73% | 4.7B | 9.67 | $0.99 | +5.68% |
| TWODF | $1.30 | -5.52% | 4.6B | 16.25 | $0.08 | +8.94% |
Stock Comparison
SKHSF vs SKHSY Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, SKHSY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while SKHSY trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas SKHSY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKHSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to SKHSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check SKHSY's competition here
SKHSF vs BTDPF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BTDPF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while BTDPF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas BTDPF's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTDPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to BTDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check BTDPF's competition here
SKHSF vs SMFRF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, SMFRF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while SMFRF trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas SMFRF's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to SMFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check SMFRF's competition here
SKHSF vs PSMMF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, PSMMF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while PSMMF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas PSMMF's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSMMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to PSMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check PSMMF's competition here
SKHSF vs PSMMY Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, PSMMY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while PSMMY trades at $30.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas PSMMY's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSMMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to PSMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check PSMMY's competition here
SKHSF vs BKGFF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BKGFF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while BKGFF trades at $49.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas BKGFF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to BKGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check BKGFF's competition here
SKHSF vs TWODY Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, TWODY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while TWODY trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas TWODY's P/E ratio is 42.17. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TWODY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to TWODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check TWODY's competition here
SKHSF vs BKGFY Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BKGFY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while BKGFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas BKGFY's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKGFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to BKGFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check BKGFY's competition here
SKHSF vs TWODF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, TWODF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while TWODF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas TWODF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TWODF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to TWODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check TWODF's competition here
SKHSF vs BLWYF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BLWYF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while BLWYF trades at $34.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas BLWYF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLWYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to BLWYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check BLWYF's competition here
SKHSF vs ANTOF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, ANTOF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while ANTOF trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas ANTOF's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to ANTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check ANTOF's competition here
SKHSF vs BLWYY Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BLWYY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while BLWYY trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas BLWYY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLWYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to BLWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check BLWYY's competition here
SKHSF vs BTDPY Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BTDPY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while BTDPY trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas BTDPY's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTDPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to BTDPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check BTDPY's competition here
SKHSF vs BVHMF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BVHMF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while BVHMF trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas BVHMF's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BVHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to BVHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check BVHMF's competition here
SKHSF vs RDWWF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, RDWWF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while RDWWF trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas RDWWF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDWWF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to RDWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check RDWWF's competition here
SKHSF vs CYRBY Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, CYRBY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while CYRBY trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas CYRBY's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYRBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to CYRBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check CYRBY's competition here
SKHSF vs NNRHF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, NNRHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while NNRHF trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas NNRHF's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NNRHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to NNRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check NNRHF's competition here
SKHSF vs GLVHF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, GLVHF has a market cap of 914.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while GLVHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas GLVHF's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLVHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to GLVHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check GLVHF's competition here
SKHSF vs HOVVB Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, HOVVB has a market cap of 817.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while HOVVB trades at $105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas HOVVB's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOVVB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to HOVVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check HOVVB's competition here
SKHSF vs CNRFF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, CNRFF has a market cap of 207.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while CNRFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas CNRFF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNRFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to CNRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check CNRFF's competition here
SKHSF vs ASNXF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, ASNXF has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while ASNXF trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas ASNXF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASNXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to ASNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check ASNXF's competition here
SKHSF vs NOBH Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, NOBH has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while NOBH trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas NOBH's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOBH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to NOBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check NOBH's competition here
SKHSF vs RKGXF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, RKGXF has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while RKGXF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas RKGXF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RKGXF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to RKGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check RKGXF's competition here
SKHSF vs GFASY Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, GFASY has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while GFASY trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas GFASY's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GFASY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to GFASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check GFASY's competition here
SKHSF vs STHI Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, STHI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while STHI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas STHI's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STHI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to STHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check STHI's competition here
SKHSF vs AVOT Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, AVOT has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while AVOT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas AVOT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVOT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to AVOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check AVOT's competition here
SKHSF vs DREM Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, DREM has a market cap of 964.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while DREM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas DREM's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DREM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to DREM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check DREM's competition here
SKHSF vs DHHXF Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, DHHXF has a market cap of 296.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while DHHXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas DHHXF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DHHXF's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to DHHXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check DHHXF's competition here
SKHSF vs RNVT Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, RNVT has a market cap of 78.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while RNVT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas RNVT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNVT's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is less volatile compared to RNVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check RNVT's competition here
SKHSF vs EGBB Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, EGBB has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while EGBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas EGBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGBB's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to EGBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check EGBB's competition here
SKHSF vs ASCK Comparison August 2025
SKHSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKHSF stands at 14.1B. In comparison, ASCK has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SKHSF is priced at $21.70, while ASCK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKHSF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.28, whereas ASCK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SKHSF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASCK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHSF is more volatile compared to ASCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHSF.Check ASCK's competition here