Saker Aviation Services, Inc.
Saker Aviation Services, Inc. SKAS Peers
See (SKAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKAS | $8.00 | N/A | 8M | 14.81 | $0.54 | N/A |
| ANYYY | $27.58 | +0.09% | 413.6B | 18.51 | $1.49 | +3.53% |
| ANNSF | $275.92 | +0.60% | 41.4B | 18.47 | $14.94 | +3.52% |
| RYAOF | $27.50 | N/A | 29.2B | 17.97 | $1.53 | +1.35% |
| AIPUF | $1.94 | -3.00% | 27.7B | 48.50 | $0.04 | +0.04% |
| AFLYY | $1.06 | -3.65% | 27.7B | 5.02 | $0.21 | N/A |
| ICAGY | $8.92 | +0.41% | 20.9B | 7.08 | $1.26 | +0.75% |
| BABWF | $4.45 | N/A | 20.9B | 6.64 | $0.67 | +0.74% |
| AIRYY | $15.12 | +10.20% | 17.2B | -252.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| SINGF | $5.66 | +0.71% | 16.8B | 8.58 | $0.66 | +4.92% |
Stock Comparison
SKAS vs ANYYY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ANYYY has a market cap of 413.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ANYYY trades at $27.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ANYYY's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANYYY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to ANYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs ANNSF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ANNSF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ANNSF trades at $275.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ANNSF's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANNSF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to ANNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs RYAOF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, RYAOF has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while RYAOF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas RYAOF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RYAOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and RYAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs AIPUF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, AIPUF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while AIPUF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas AIPUF's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIPUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to AIPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs AFLYY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, AFLYY has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while AFLYY trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas AFLYY's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFLYY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to AFLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs ICAGY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ICAGY has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ICAGY trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ICAGY's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ICAGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to ICAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs BABWF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, BABWF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while BABWF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BABWF's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BABWF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to BABWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs AIRYY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, AIRYY has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while AIRYY trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas AIRYY's P/E ratio is -252.00. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to AIRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs SINGF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, SINGF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while SINGF trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas SINGF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SINGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and SINGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs SINGY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, SINGY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while SINGY trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas SINGY's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SINGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to SINGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs AICAF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, AICAF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while AICAF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas AICAF's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AICAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and AICAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs AIPUY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, AIPUY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while AIPUY trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas AIPUY's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIPUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to AIPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs APTPF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, APTPF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while APTPF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas APTPF's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APTPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to APTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs AEOXF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, AEOXF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while AEOXF trades at $134.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas AEOXF's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEOXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and AEOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs CHKIF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, CHKIF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while CHKIF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CHKIF's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHKIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to CHKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs ARRPY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ARRPY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ARRPY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ARRPY's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARRPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to ARRPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs GPAEF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, GPAEF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while GPAEF trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas GPAEF's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPAEF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and GPAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs CHEAF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, CHEAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while CHEAF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CHEAF's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHEAF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and CHEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs QABSY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, QABSY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while QABSY trades at $35.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas QABSY's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QABSY's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to QABSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs TKHVY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, TKHVY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while TKHVY trades at $74.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas TKHVY's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKHVY's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and TKHVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs QUBSF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, QUBSF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while QUBSF trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas QUBSF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QUBSF's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to QUBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs DLAKF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, DLAKF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while DLAKF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas DLAKF's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLAKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and DLAKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs DLAKY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, DLAKY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while DLAKY trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas DLAKY's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLAKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to DLAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs ASRMF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ASRMF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ASRMF trades at $32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ASRMF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASRMF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to ASRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs ALNPY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ALNPY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ALNPY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ALNPY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALNPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and ALNPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs UZAPF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, UZAPF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while UZAPF trades at $295.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas UZAPF's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UZAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and UZAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs ALNPF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ALNPF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ALNPF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ALNPF's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALNPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and ALNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs JAPSY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, JAPSY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while JAPSY trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JAPSY's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JAPSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to JAPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs CPCAY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, CPCAY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while CPCAY trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CPCAY's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPCAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to CPCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs FLGZY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, FLGZY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while FLGZY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas FLGZY's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to FLGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs CPCAF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, CPCAF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while CPCAF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CPCAF's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPCAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to CPCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs AUKNY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, AUKNY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while AUKNY trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas AUKNY's P/E ratio is 2360.00. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUKNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and AUKNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs JPNRF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, JPNRF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while JPNRF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JPNRF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to JPNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs ACKDF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ACKDF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ACKDF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ACKDF's P/E ratio is 60.71. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACKDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to ACKDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs FPRUY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, FPRUY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while FPRUY trades at $37.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas FPRUY's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FPRUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and FPRUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs FPRUF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, FPRUF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while FPRUF trades at $65.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas FPRUF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FPRUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to FPRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs ESYJY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ESYJY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ESYJY trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ESYJY's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESYJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to ESYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs EJTTF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, EJTTF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while EJTTF trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas EJTTF's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EJTTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to EJTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs GAERF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, GAERF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while GAERF trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas GAERF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GAERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to GAERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs ACDVF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ACDVF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ACDVF trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ACDVF's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACDVF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to ACDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs FGWLF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, FGWLF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while FGWLF trades at $56.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas FGWLF's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FGWLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and FGWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs SPASF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, SPASF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while SPASF trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas SPASF's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPASF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to SPASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs JAIRF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, JAIRF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while JAIRF trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JAIRF's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JAIRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to JAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs JTTRY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, JTTRY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while JTTRY trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JTTRY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JTTRY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to JTTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs AFRAF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, AFRAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while AFRAF trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas AFRAF's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFRAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to AFRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs TAVHY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, TAVHY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while TAVHY trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas TAVHY's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TAVHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and TAVHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs WZZAF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, WZZAF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while WZZAF trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas WZZAF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WZZAF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to WZZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs EIFZF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, EIFZF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while EIFZF trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas EIFZF's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EIFZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to EIFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs ELALF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ELALF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ELALF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ELALF's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELALF's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and ELALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs SEGSF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, SEGSF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while SEGSF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas SEGSF's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEGSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and SEGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs BJCHY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, BJCHY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while BJCHY trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BJCHY's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BJCHY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and BJCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs WZZZY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, WZZZY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while WZZZY trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas WZZZY's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WZZZY's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to WZZZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs BJCHF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, BJCHF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while BJCHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BJCHF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BJCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to BJCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs NWARF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, NWARF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while NWARF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas NWARF's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWARF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to NWARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs AGZNF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, AGZNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while AGZNF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas AGZNF's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGZNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to AGZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs ANZFF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ANZFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ANZFF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ANZFF's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANZFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to ANZFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs GRPAF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, GRPAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while GRPAF trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas GRPAF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRPAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and GRPAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs ANZLY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ANZLY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ANZLY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ANZLY's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANZLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and ANZLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs FNNNF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, FNNNF has a market cap of 649.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while FNNNF trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas FNNNF's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNNNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to FNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs HMCTF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, HMCTF has a market cap of 624.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while HMCTF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas HMCTF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HMCTF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to HMCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs CTTPY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, CTTPY has a market cap of 536.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while CTTPY trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CTTPY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTTPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to CTTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs AIABF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, AIABF has a market cap of 520.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while AIABF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas AIABF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIABF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to AIABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs CHRRF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, CHRRF has a market cap of 403.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while CHRRF trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CHRRF's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHRRF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to CHRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs NOKFF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, NOKFF has a market cap of 354.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while NOKFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas NOKFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOKFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and NOKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs TAWNF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, TAWNF has a market cap of 221.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while TAWNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas TAWNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TAWNF's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and TAWNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs NRSAF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, NRSAF has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while NRSAF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas NRSAF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NRSAF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and NRSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs CEBUY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, CEBUY has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while CEBUY trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CEBUY's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEBUY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and CEBUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs JETMF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, JETMF has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while JETMF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JETMF's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JETMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to JETMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs GOLLQ Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, GOLLQ has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while GOLLQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas GOLLQ's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOLLQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to GOLLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs VIAAY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, VIAAY has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while VIAAY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas VIAAY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIAAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to VIAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs SASBQ Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, SASBQ has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while SASBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas SASBQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SASBQ's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to SASBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs CAJTF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, CAJTF has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while CAJTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CAJTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAJTF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to CAJTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs HRBR Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, HRBR has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while HRBR trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas HRBR's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and HRBR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs LTMAY Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, LTMAY has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while LTMAY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas LTMAY's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTMAY's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to LTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs CEBUF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, CEBUF has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while CEBUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CEBUF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEBUF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS is less volatile compared to CEBUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKAS.
SKAS vs ACAVF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, ACAVF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while ACAVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ACAVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACAVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and ACAVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs NOKPF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, NOKPF has a market cap of 745.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while NOKPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas NOKPF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOKPF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and NOKPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs JETR Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, JETR has a market cap of 648.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while JETR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JETR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JETR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and JETR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs KLMR Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, KLMR has a market cap of 14K. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while KLMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas KLMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLMR's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and KLMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs PACC Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, PACC has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while PACC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas PACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PACC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and PACC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs BPOL Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, BPOL has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while BPOL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BPOL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPOL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and BPOL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs GLUX Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, GLUX has a market cap of 898. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while GLUX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas GLUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLUX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and GLUX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs RHWI Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, RHWI has a market cap of 122. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while RHWI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas RHWI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and RHWI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SKAS vs CHHCF Comparison
SKAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKAS stands at 8M. In comparison, CHHCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKAS is priced at $8.00, while CHHCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKAS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CHHCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKAS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHHCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKAS and CHHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).