Sixty Six Capital Inc.
Sixty Six Capital Inc. (SIX.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SIX.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIX.CN | CA$0.05 | -10.00% | 6.6M | 1.13 | CA$0.04 | N/A |
| GS.NE | CA$38.88 | +0.80% | 320B | 15.74 | CA$2.47 | +1.95% |
| GLXY.TO | CA$28.26 | -4.69% | 11B | -33.64 | -CA$0.84 | N/A |
| HUT.TO | CA$62.58 | -4.89% | 6.6B | -20.18 | -CA$2.95 | N/A |
| BITF.TO | CA$2.70 | -1.64% | 1.4B | -14.22 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| CF.TO | CA$11.71 | +2.18% | 1.2B | -5.30 | -CA$2.18 | +2.97% |
| CF-PC.TO | CA$24.55 | +0.99% | 1.1B | 11.34 | CA$2.16 | +2.97% |
| DEFI.NE | CA$0.73 | +7.35% | 231.2M | 71.00 | CA$0.01 | N/A |
| XAU.TO | CA$16.55 | +1.60% | 203.5M | 4.84 | CA$3.33 | N/A |
| CXI.TO | CA$24.50 | +1.32% | 148M | 7.71 | CA$3.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SIX.CN vs GS.NE Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 320B. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while GS.NE trades at CA$38.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check GS.NE's competition here
SIX.CN vs GLXY.TO Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while GLXY.TO trades at CA$28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is -33.64. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check GLXY.TO's competition here
SIX.CN vs HUT.TO Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, HUT.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while HUT.TO trades at CA$62.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas HUT.TO's P/E ratio is -20.18. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HUT.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to HUT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check HUT.TO's competition here
SIX.CN vs BITF.TO Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while BITF.TO trades at CA$2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check BITF.TO's competition here
SIX.CN vs CF.TO Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while CF.TO trades at CA$11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check CF.TO's competition here
SIX.CN vs CF-PC.TO Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, CF-PC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while CF-PC.TO trades at CA$24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas CF-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CF-PC.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN and CF-PC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CF-PC.TO's competition here
SIX.CN vs DEFI.NE Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 231.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while DEFI.NE trades at CA$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is 71.00. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check DEFI.NE's competition here
SIX.CN vs XAU.TO Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, XAU.TO has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while XAU.TO trades at CA$16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas XAU.TO's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to XAU.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to XAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check XAU.TO's competition here
SIX.CN vs CXI.TO Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 148M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while CXI.TO trades at CA$24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN and CXI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CXI.TO's competition here
SIX.CN vs RICH.CN Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while RICH.CN trades at CA$2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN and RICH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RICH.CN's competition here
SIX.CN vs PNP.TO Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 79.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while PNP.TO trades at CA$8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check PNP.TO's competition here
SIX.CN vs BIGG.CN Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while BIGG.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check BIGG.CN's competition here
SIX.CN vs HODL.CN Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, HODL.CN has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while HODL.CN trades at CA$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas HODL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HODL.CN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to HODL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check HODL.CN's competition here
SIX.CN vs BIGG.V Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, BIGG.V has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while BIGG.V trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas BIGG.V's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BIGG.V's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN and BIGG.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIGG.V's competition here
SIX.CN vs BTC.CN Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, BTC.CN has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while BTC.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas BTC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BTC.CN's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to BTC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check BTC.CN's competition here
SIX.CN vs FRNT.V Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while FRNT.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to FRNT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check FRNT.V's competition here
SIX.CN vs SATO.V Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, SATO.V has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while SATO.V trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas SATO.V's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SATO.V's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to SATO.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check SATO.V's competition here
SIX.CN vs MATA.V Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, MATA.V has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while MATA.V trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas MATA.V's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MATA.V's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to MATA.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check MATA.V's competition here
SIX.CN vs HOLD.NE Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, HOLD.NE has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while HOLD.NE trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas HOLD.NE's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HOLD.NE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN and HOLD.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOLD.NE's competition here
SIX.CN vs ARM.CN Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, ARM.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while ARM.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas ARM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ARM.CN's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN and ARM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARM.CN's competition here
SIX.CN vs CODE.CN Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, CODE.CN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while CODE.CN trades at CA$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas CODE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CODE.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN and CODE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CODE.CN's competition here
SIX.CN vs GBC.CN Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while GBC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN and GBC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBC.CN's competition here
SIX.CN vs SPIR.CN Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while SPIR.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +33.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN and SPIR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPIR.CN's competition here
SIX.CN vs BKMT.V Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, BKMT.V has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while BKMT.V trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas BKMT.V's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BKMT.V's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN is less volatile compared to BKMT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIX.CN.Check BKMT.V's competition here
SIX.CN vs FXC.TO Comparison April 2026
SIX.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIX.CN stands at 6.6M. In comparison, FXC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SIX.CN is priced at CA$0.05, while FXC.TO trades at CA$5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIX.CN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.13, whereas FXC.TO's P/E ratio is -73.86. In terms of profitability, SIX.CN's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FXC.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIX.CN and FXC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FXC.TO's competition here