Shandong Weigao Group Medical Polymer Company Limited
Shandong Weigao Group Medical Polymer Company Limited SHWGF Peers
See (SHWGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHWGF | $0.66 | N/A | 2.98B | 11.00 | $0.06 | +3.45% |
| SRTOY | $22.63 | +3.88% | 220.14B | 94.27 | $0.24 | +0.16% |
| ESLOF | $293.95 | +0.03% | 134.25B | 51.30 | $5.73 | +1.37% |
| ESLOY | $146.97 | +0.70% | 133.69B | 51.03 | $2.88 | +0.98% |
| MECNY | $88.63 | N/A | 107.68B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SSSGY | $42.51 | N/A | 81.33B | 137.13 | $0.31 | +0.41% |
| SOAGY | $51.87 | +0.95% | 80.58B | 167.32 | $0.31 | +0.15% |
| HOCPF | $127.73 | +7.21% | 43.43B | 31.69 | $4.03 | +0.85% |
| HOCPY | $124.41 | +1.27% | 42.64B | 30.72 | $4.05 | +0.41% |
| TRUMF | $19.90 | +11.24% | 29.35B | 34.91 | $0.57 | +0.89% |
Stock Comparison
SHWGF vs SRTOY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SRTOY has a market cap of 220.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SRTOY trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SRTOY's P/E ratio is 94.27. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRTOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SRTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs ESLOF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, ESLOF has a market cap of 134.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while ESLOF trades at $293.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas ESLOF's P/E ratio is 51.30. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESLOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to ESLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs ESLOY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, ESLOY has a market cap of 133.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while ESLOY trades at $146.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas ESLOY's P/E ratio is 51.03. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESLOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to ESLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs MECNY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, MECNY has a market cap of 107.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while MECNY trades at $88.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas MECNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MECNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to MECNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SSSGY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SSSGY has a market cap of 81.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SSSGY trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SSSGY's P/E ratio is 137.13. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSSGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SSSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SOAGY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SOAGY has a market cap of 80.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SOAGY trades at $51.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SOAGY's P/E ratio is 167.32. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOAGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SOAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs HOCPF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, HOCPF has a market cap of 43.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while HOCPF trades at $127.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas HOCPF's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HOCPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to HOCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs HOCPY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, HOCPY has a market cap of 42.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while HOCPY trades at $124.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas HOCPY's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HOCPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to HOCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs TRUMF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, TRUMF has a market cap of 29.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while TRUMF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas TRUMF's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRUMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to TRUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs TRUMY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, TRUMY has a market cap of 27.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while TRUMY trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas TRUMY's P/E ratio is 34.46. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRUMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to TRUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs RSMDF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, RSMDF has a market cap of 26.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while RSMDF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas RSMDF's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RSMDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to RSMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs CLPBY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, CLPBY has a market cap of 21.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while CLPBY trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas CLPBY's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLPBY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to CLPBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs CLPBF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, CLPBF has a market cap of 21.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while CLPBF trades at $97.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas CLPBF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLPBF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to CLPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SDMHF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SDMHF has a market cap of 21.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SDMHF trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SDMHF's P/E ratio is 93.64. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDMHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to SDMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SAUHY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SAUHY has a market cap of 21.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SAUHY trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SAUHY's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAUHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SAUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SAUHF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SAUHF has a market cap of 20.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SAUHF trades at $131.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SAUHF's P/E ratio is 38.49. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAUHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SAUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SUVPF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SUVPF has a market cap of 15.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SUVPF trades at $259.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SUVPF's P/E ratio is 169.29. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUVPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to SUVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SARTF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SARTF has a market cap of 15.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SARTF trades at $203.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SARTF's P/E ratio is 132.31. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SARTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SARTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs OCPNF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, OCPNF has a market cap of 14.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while OCPNF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas OCPNF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OCPNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to OCPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs FSPKF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, FSPKF has a market cap of 12.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while FSPKF trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas FSPKF's P/E ratio is 159.23. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FSPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to FSPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SSMXF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SSMXF has a market cap of 10.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SSMXF trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SSMXF's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSMXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SSMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SSMXY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SSMXY has a market cap of 10.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SSMXY trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SSMXY's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SSMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs CNVVY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, CNVVY has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while CNVVY trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas CNVVY's P/E ratio is 40.41. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNVVY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to CNVVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs CNVVF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, CNVVF has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while CNVVF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas CNVVF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNVVF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to CNVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs CZMWF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, CZMWF has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while CZMWF trades at $68.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas CZMWF's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CZMWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to CZMWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs CZMWY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, CZMWY has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while CZMWY trades at $67.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas CZMWY's P/E ratio is 34.37. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CZMWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to CZMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs YPHDF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, YPHDF has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while YPHDF trades at $417.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas YPHDF's P/E ratio is 64.90. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YPHDF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to YPHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs FLMNF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, FLMNF has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while FLMNF trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas FLMNF's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLMNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to FLMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs FLMNY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, FLMNY has a market cap of 5.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while FLMNY trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas FLMNY's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLMNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to FLMNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs ADDLF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, ADDLF has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while ADDLF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas ADDLF's P/E ratio is 61.76. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADDLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to ADDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs AHICF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, AHICF has a market cap of 4.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while AHICF trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas AHICF's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHICF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to AHICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SHWGY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SHWGY has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SHWGY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SHWGY's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHWGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SHWGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs ANSLY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, ANSLY has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while ANSLY trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas ANSLY's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANSLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to ANSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs ANSLF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, ANSLF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while ANSLF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas ANSLF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANSLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to ANSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs TCHBF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, TCHBF has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while TCHBF trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas TCHBF's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCHBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to TCHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs GRRMF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, GRRMF has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while GRRMF trades at $73.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas GRRMF's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRRMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to GRRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs TCGGY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, TCGGY has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while TCGGY trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas TCGGY's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCGGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to TCGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs EKTAY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, EKTAY has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while EKTAY trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas EKTAY's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EKTAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to EKTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs EKTAF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, EKTAF has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while EKTAF trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas EKTAF's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EKTAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to EKTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs BOEUF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, BOEUF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while BOEUF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas BOEUF's P/E ratio is 147.37. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOEUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to BOEUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs NPRRF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, NPRRF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while NPRRF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas NPRRF's P/E ratio is 44.74. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to NPRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs TGLVY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, TGLVY has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while TGLVY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas TGLVY's P/E ratio is 69.53. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TGLVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to TGLVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs BITGF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, BITGF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while BITGF trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas BITGF's P/E ratio is 45.52. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to BITGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs PBHDF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, PBHDF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while PBHDF trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas PBHDF's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to PBHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs TDVXF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, TDVXF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while TDVXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas TDVXF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TDVXF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to TDVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs NNCSF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, NNCSF has a market cap of 936.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while NNCSF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas NNCSF's P/E ratio is 102.83. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNCSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to NNCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs KSRBF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, KSRBF has a market cap of 869.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while KSRBF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas KSRBF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSRBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to KSRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SPMXF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SPMXF has a market cap of 550.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SPMXF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SPMXF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPMXF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to SPMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs JNDOF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, JNDOF has a market cap of 531.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while JNDOF trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas JNDOF's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JNDOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to JNDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs HGYMF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, HGYMF has a market cap of 524.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while HGYMF trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas HGYMF's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGYMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to HGYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SAFLY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SAFLY has a market cap of 449.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SAFLY trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SAFLY's P/E ratio is 223.00. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAFLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SAFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs CLHLF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, CLHLF has a market cap of 365.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while CLHLF trades at $61.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas CLHLF's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to CLHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SAFLF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SAFLF has a market cap of 306.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SAFLF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SAFLF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAFLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SAFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs GUERF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, GUERF has a market cap of 281.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while GUERF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas GUERF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUERF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to GUERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs TSNLF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, TSNLF has a market cap of 252.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while TSNLF trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas TSNLF's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSNLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to TSNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs OPSSF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, OPSSF has a market cap of 247.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while OPSSF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas OPSSF's P/E ratio is -26.74. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPSSF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to OPSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs EEOIF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, EEOIF has a market cap of 63.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while EEOIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas EEOIF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EEOIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to EEOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs UEEC Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, UEEC has a market cap of 57.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while UEEC trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas UEEC's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEEC's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to UEEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs IMTH Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, IMTH has a market cap of 21.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while IMTH trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas IMTH's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMTH's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to IMTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs GVDI Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, GVDI has a market cap of 16.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while GVDI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas GVDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GVDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to GVDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs OTCFF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, OTCFF has a market cap of 11.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while OTCFF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas OTCFF's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OTCFF's ROE of +18.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to OTCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs YBGJ Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, YBGJ has a market cap of 9.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while YBGJ trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas YBGJ's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YBGJ's ROE of +3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to YBGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs TEVNF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, TEVNF has a market cap of 7.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while TEVNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas TEVNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEVNF's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to TEVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs BLMHF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, BLMHF has a market cap of 5.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while BLMHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas BLMHF's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLMHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to BLMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs PXMVF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, PXMVF has a market cap of 4.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while PXMVF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas PXMVF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PXMVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to PXMVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs RSCF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, RSCF has a market cap of 4.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while RSCF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas RSCF's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RSCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to RSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs MCDA Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, MCDA has a market cap of 4.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while MCDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas MCDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to MCDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs ECIA Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, ECIA has a market cap of 4.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while ECIA trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas ECIA's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECIA's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to ECIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs CBSC Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, CBSC has a market cap of 3.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while CBSC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas CBSC's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBSC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to CBSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs NSTGQ Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, NSTGQ has a market cap of 3.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while NSTGQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas NSTGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSTGQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to NSTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs TUTH Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, TUTH has a market cap of 1.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while TUTH trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas TUTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TUTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to TUTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs OJSY Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, OJSY has a market cap of 454285.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while OJSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas OJSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OJSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to OJSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs REMI Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, REMI has a market cap of 399920.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while REMI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas REMI's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REMI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to REMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs PDMI Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, PDMI has a market cap of 324879.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while PDMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas PDMI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PDMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to PDMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs WHSI Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, WHSI has a market cap of 182671.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while WHSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas WHSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WHSI's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to WHSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs CEOS Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, CEOS has a market cap of 130610.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while CEOS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas CEOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEOS's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to CEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs QTXB Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, QTXB has a market cap of 118045.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while QTXB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas QTXB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QTXB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to QTXB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs LANZ Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, LANZ has a market cap of 27690.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while LANZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas LANZ's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LANZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to LANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs GMVDF Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, GMVDF has a market cap of 25992.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while GMVDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas GMVDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GMVDF's ROE of +3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to GMVDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs INND Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, INND has a market cap of 20678.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while INND trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas INND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INND's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to INND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs ASFX Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, ASFX has a market cap of 17502.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while ASFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas ASFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to ASFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs MDIT Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, MDIT has a market cap of 8620.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while MDIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas MDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDIT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to MDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs DGEN Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, DGEN has a market cap of 3859.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while DGEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas DGEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGEN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to DGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs LFPI Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, LFPI has a market cap of 2042.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while LFPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas LFPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFPI's ROE of -4.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to LFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs BLFE Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, BLFE has a market cap of 1567.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while BLFE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas BLFE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLFE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to BLFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SVSO Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SVSO has a market cap of 1276.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SVSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVSO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to SVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SEYE Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SEYE has a market cap of 1159.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SEYE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SEYE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEYE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to SEYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs BGMD Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, BGMD has a market cap of 1100.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while BGMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas BGMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BGMD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to BGMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs ADLI Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, ADLI has a market cap of 1039.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while ADLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas ADLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADLI's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to ADLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs VSMD Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, VSMD has a market cap of 801.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while VSMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas VSMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VSMD's ROE of +3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to VSMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs HRAL Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, HRAL has a market cap of 495.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while HRAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas HRAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is less volatile compared to HRAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SDCCQ Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SDCCQ has a market cap of 403.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SDCCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SDCCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDCCQ's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to SDCCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs MICRD Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, MICRD has a market cap of 317.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while MICRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas MICRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MICRD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to MICRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs RGBOQ Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, RGBOQ has a market cap of 97.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while RGBOQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas RGBOQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGBOQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to RGBOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs SECI Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, SECI has a market cap of 31.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while SECI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas SECI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SECI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to SECI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.
SHWGF vs VTEQ Comparison
SHWGF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWGF stands at 2.98B. In comparison, VTEQ has a market cap of 1.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHWGF is priced at $0.66, while VTEQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWGF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.00, whereas VTEQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHWGF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTEQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWGF is more volatile compared to VTEQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWGF.