Showa Denko K.K.
Showa Denko K.K. (SHWDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SHWDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHWDF | $75.47 | +0.00% | 13.7B | 75.47 | $1.00 | +0.55% |
| SHECF | $40.59 | +0.36% | 76.1B | 25.21 | $1.61 | +1.74% |
| SHECY | $19.70 | +2.71% | 73.9B | 24.35 | $0.81 | +1.42% |
| BASFY | $13.73 | +3.62% | 48.9B | 29.91 | $0.46 | +4.56% |
| BFFAF | $54.34 | +4.29% | 48.1B | 29.53 | $1.84 | +4.68% |
| SLMNP | $870.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | 956.04 | $0.91 | +6.90% |
| GNENF | $7.65 | +8.66% | 20.8B | -76.50 | -$0.10 | +0.27% |
| TYNPF | $39.00 | +0.54% | 16.9B | 25.16 | $1.55 | +0.96% |
| AHKSF | $11.65 | +10.24% | 15.8B | 17.92 | $0.65 | +2.29% |
| AHKSY | $19.11 | +0.74% | 13B | 14.84 | $1.29 | +2.46% |
Stock Comparison
SHWDF vs SHECF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while SHECF trades at $40.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check SHECF's competition here
SHWDF vs SHECY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while SHECY trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check SHECY's competition here
SHWDF vs BASFY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while BASFY trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check BASFY's competition here
SHWDF vs BFFAF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while BFFAF trades at $54.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and BFFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BFFAF's competition here
SHWDF vs SLMNP Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while SLMNP trades at $870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 956.04. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and SLMNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLMNP's competition here
SHWDF vs GNENF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while GNENF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -76.50. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to GNENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check GNENF's competition here
SHWDF vs TYNPF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TYNPF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while TYNPF trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas TYNPF's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TYNPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and TYNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYNPF's competition here
SHWDF vs AHKSF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while AHKSF trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check AHKSF's competition here
SHWDF vs AHKSY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while AHKSY trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check AHKSY's competition here
SHWDF vs SHWDY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while SHWDY trades at $69.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 69.44. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and SHWDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHWDY's competition here
SHWDF vs GNENY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while GNENY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -73.30. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and GNENY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNENY's competition here
SHWDF vs MTLHF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while MTLHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and MTLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTLHF's competition here
SHWDF vs MTLHY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while MTLHY trades at $28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and MTLHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTLHY's competition here
SHWDF vs PECGF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while PECGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PECGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and PECGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PECGF's competition here
SHWDF vs BCHMF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while BCHMF trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and BCHMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCHMF's competition here
SHWDF vs IMCDY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while IMCDY trades at $43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check IMCDY's competition here
SHWDF vs SOMMF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while SOMMF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and SOMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMMF's competition here
SHWDF vs SOMMY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while SOMMY trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and SOMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMMY's competition here
SHWDF vs TOSCF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while TOSCF trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and TOSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOSCF's competition here
SHWDF vs NNCHY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while NNCHY trades at $35.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to NNCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check NNCHY's competition here
SHWDF vs INDOY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while INDOY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -43.67. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and INDOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INDOY's competition here
SHWDF vs PCHUY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while PCHUY trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and PCHUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCHUY's competition here
SHWDF vs KURRY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while KURRY trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 76.93. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and KURRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KURRY's competition here
SHWDF vs KOYJF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while KOYJF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and KOYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KOYJF's competition here
SHWDF vs KPLUY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while KPLUY trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check KPLUY's competition here
SHWDF vs KURRF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while KURRF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 67.83. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and KURRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KURRF's competition here
SHWDF vs SVYSF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while SVYSF trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 91.41. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to SVYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check SVYSF's competition here
SHWDF vs SLVYY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while SLVYY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 95.17. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check SLVYY's competition here
SHWDF vs PTGCF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while PTGCF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and PTGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTGCF's competition here
SHWDF vs MXCHF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while MXCHF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to MXCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check MXCHF's competition here
SHWDF vs RBTEF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while RBTEF trades at $1,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and RBTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RBTEF's competition here
SHWDF vs DENKF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while DENKF trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is -23.36. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DENKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to DENKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check DENKF's competition here
SHWDF vs NPKYY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while NPKYY trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and NPKYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPKYY's competition here
SHWDF vs NPKYF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check NPKYF's competition here
SHWDF vs VYTPF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and VYTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VYTPF's competition here
SHWDF vs FRRSF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FRRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while FRRSF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas FRRSF's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to FRRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check FRRSF's competition here
SHWDF vs MXCHY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while MXCHY trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and MXCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MXCHY's competition here
SHWDF vs TOAGF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 950.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while TOAGF trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and TOAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOAGF's competition here
SHWDF vs LNZNF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 939.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while LNZNF trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and LNZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNZNF's competition here
SHWDF vs BRGAY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and BRGAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRGAY's competition here
SHWDF vs SGLFF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 593M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while SGLFF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and SGLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGLFF's competition here
SHWDF vs CDSAF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 387.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and CDSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDSAF's competition here
SHWDF vs CRDE Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SHWDF has daily volatility of 0.00 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRDE's competition here
SHWDF vs TYGIF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while TYGIF trades at $32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and TYGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYGIF's competition here
SHWDF vs NNXPF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 237.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while NNXPF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -26.20. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check NNXPF's competition here
SHWDF vs CNSJF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and CNSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNSJF's competition here
SHWDF vs BNOW Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and BNOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNOW's competition here
SHWDF vs HZRGF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while HZRGF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and HZRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HZRGF's competition here
SHWDF vs BLGO Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while BLGO trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check BLGO's competition here
SHWDF vs FGPHF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while FGPHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check FGPHF's competition here
SHWDF vs BSWGF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while BSWGF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check BSWGF's competition here
SHWDF vs CHHYF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while CHHYF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check CHHYF's competition here
SHWDF vs PLYR Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while PLYR trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check PLYR's competition here
SHWDF vs FHELF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while FHELF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check FHELF's competition here
SHWDF vs EESE Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while EESE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to EESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check EESE's competition here
SHWDF vs AGTT Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while AGTT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to AGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check AGTT's competition here
SHWDF vs OPCGF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 420.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and OPCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPCGF's competition here
SHWDF vs CHCC Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and CHCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHCC's competition here
SHWDF vs AFPW Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to AFPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check AFPW's competition here
SHWDF vs FLRE Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 25K. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and FLRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLRE's competition here
SHWDF vs LBTI Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBTI's ROE of -30.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and LBTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBTI's competition here
SHWDF vs VULC Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to VULC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check VULC's competition here
SHWDF vs NUEC Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check NUEC's competition here
SHWDF vs MKDTY Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and MKDTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKDTY's competition here
SHWDF vs RKTE Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check RKTE's competition here
SHWDF vs BMRK Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while BMRK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas BMRK's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BMRK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and BMRK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMRK's competition here
SHWDF vs FIND Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FIND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while FIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas FIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and FIND have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FIND's competition here
SHWDF vs ADKCF Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ADKCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while ADKCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas ADKCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF and ADKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADKCF's competition here
SHWDF vs ADKIL Comparison March 2026
SHWDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHWDF stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ADKIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHWDF is priced at $75.47, while ADKIL trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 75.47, whereas ADKIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHWDF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADKIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHWDF is less volatile compared to ADKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHWDF.Check ADKIL's competition here