Shunfeng International Clean Energy Limited
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Limited (SHUNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SHUNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHUNF | $0.00 | +0.00% | 19.3M | -0.38 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| FOJCY | $3.44 | -2.82% | 77.6B | 14.42 | $0.24 | +12.86% |
| CZAVF | $60.10 | +0.00% | 32.3B | 26.59 | $2.26 | +3.67% |
| OEZVF | $78.47 | +0.00% | 27.3B | 13.23 | $5.93 | +4.04% |
| OEZVY | $15.01 | +3.21% | 26.1B | 12.61 | $1.19 | +4.19% |
| TKECY | $4.89 | -2.00% | 24.1B | 22.23 | $0.22 | N/A |
| CEZYY | $18.00 | -0.28% | 19.3B | 15.65 | $1.15 | N/A |
| FOJCF | $17.93 | +3.82% | 16.1B | 14.70 | $1.22 | +11.97% |
| KAEPF | $13.90 | +0.00% | 15.5B | 4.70 | $2.96 | +2.92% |
| CLPXF | $0.85 | +0.00% | 14.6B | 8.50 | $0.10 | +3.73% |
Stock Comparison
SHUNF vs FOJCY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, FOJCY has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while FOJCY trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas FOJCY's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FOJCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to FOJCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check FOJCY's competition here
SHUNF vs CZAVF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CZAVF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CZAVF trades at $60.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CZAVF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CZAVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to CZAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check CZAVF's competition here
SHUNF vs OEZVF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, OEZVF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while OEZVF trades at $78.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas OEZVF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OEZVF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to OEZVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check OEZVF's competition here
SHUNF vs OEZVY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, OEZVY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while OEZVY trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas OEZVY's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OEZVY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and OEZVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OEZVY's competition here
SHUNF vs TKECY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, TKECY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while TKECY trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas TKECY's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TKECY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to TKECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check TKECY's competition here
SHUNF vs CEZYY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CEZYY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CEZYY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CEZYY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CEZYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and CEZYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEZYY's competition here
SHUNF vs FOJCF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, FOJCF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while FOJCF trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas FOJCF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FOJCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to FOJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check FOJCF's competition here
SHUNF vs KAEPF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, KAEPF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while KAEPF trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas KAEPF's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KAEPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to KAEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check KAEPF's competition here
SHUNF vs CLPXF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CLPXF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CLPXF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CLPXF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CLPXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to CLPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check CLPXF's competition here
SHUNF vs KAEPY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, KAEPY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while KAEPY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas KAEPY's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KAEPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to KAEPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check KAEPY's competition here
SHUNF vs DOGEF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, DOGEF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while DOGEF trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas DOGEF's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DOGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to DOGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check DOGEF's competition here
SHUNF vs DNNGY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, DNNGY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while DNNGY trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas DNNGY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DNNGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to DNNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check DNNGY's competition here
SHUNF vs EDRVF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, EDRVF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while EDRVF trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas EDRVF's P/E ratio is -14.63. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EDRVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to EDRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check EDRVF's competition here
SHUNF vs MDDNF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, MDDNF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while MDDNF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas MDDNF's P/E ratio is 114.26. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MDDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to MDDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check MDDNF's competition here
SHUNF vs TKECF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, TKECF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while TKECF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas TKECF's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TKECF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to TKECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check TKECF's competition here
SHUNF vs CLPXY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CLPXY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CLPXY trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CLPXY's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CLPXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and CLPXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPXY's competition here
SHUNF vs BRENF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, BRENF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while BRENF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas BRENF's P/E ratio is -34.15. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRENF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to BRENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check BRENF's competition here
SHUNF vs NOSPF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, NOSPF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while NOSPF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas NOSPF's P/E ratio is 76.36. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NOSPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to NOSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check NOSPF's competition here
SHUNF vs COENF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, COENF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while COENF trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas COENF's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COENF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to COENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check COENF's competition here
SHUNF vs MGHTF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, MGHTF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while MGHTF trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas MGHTF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MGHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to MGHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check MGHTF's competition here
SHUNF vs IFUUF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, IFUUF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while IFUUF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas IFUUF's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IFUUF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to IFUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check IFUUF's competition here
SHUNF vs AGQPF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, AGQPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while AGQPF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas AGQPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AGQPF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and AGQPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGQPF's competition here
SHUNF vs PUPOF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, PUPOF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while PUPOF trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas PUPOF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PUPOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to PUPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check PUPOF's competition here
SHUNF vs NPIFF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, NPIFF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while NPIFF trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas NPIFF's P/E ratio is -107.35. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NPIFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to NPIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check NPIFF's competition here
SHUNF vs CPOIF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CPOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CPOIF trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CPOIF's P/E ratio is 568.64. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CPOIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to CPOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check CPOIF's competition here
SHUNF vs TEPCF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, TEPCF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while TEPCF trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas TEPCF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TEPCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to TEPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check TEPCF's competition here
SHUNF vs DRXGY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, DRXGY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while DRXGY trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas DRXGY's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DRXGY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and DRXGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRXGY's competition here
SHUNF vs DRXGF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, DRXGF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while DRXGF trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas DRXGF's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DRXGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and DRXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRXGF's competition here
SHUNF vs TEPCY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, TEPCY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while TEPCY trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas TEPCY's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TEPCY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to TEPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check TEPCY's competition here
SHUNF vs EDRWY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, EDRWY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while EDRWY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas EDRWY's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EDRWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and EDRWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDRWY's competition here
SHUNF vs EPWDF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, EPWDF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while EPWDF trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas EPWDF's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EPWDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to EPWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check EPWDF's competition here
SHUNF vs TREAY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, TREAY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while TREAY trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas TREAY's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TREAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to TREAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check TREAY's competition here
SHUNF vs TRSWF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, TRSWF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while TRSWF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas TRSWF's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TRSWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to TRSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check TRSWF's competition here
SHUNF vs CGKEF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CGKEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CGKEF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CGKEF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to CGKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check CGKEF's competition here
SHUNF vs BRLXF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, BRLXF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while BRLXF trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas BRLXF's P/E ratio is -357.17. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRLXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and BRLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRLXF's competition here
SHUNF vs INGXF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, INGXF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while INGXF trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas INGXF's P/E ratio is 72.18. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INGXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and INGXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INGXF's competition here
SHUNF vs ALRCF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, ALRCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while ALRCF trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ALRCF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALRCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and ALRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALRCF's competition here
SHUNF vs CGKEY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CGKEY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CGKEY trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CGKEY's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGKEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to CGKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check CGKEY's competition here
SHUNF vs TREAF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, TREAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while TREAF trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas TREAF's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TREAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and TREAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TREAF's competition here
SHUNF vs FSGCY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, FSGCY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while FSGCY trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas FSGCY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FSGCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and FSGCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSGCY's competition here
SHUNF vs STECF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, STECF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while STECF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas STECF's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STECF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to STECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check STECF's competition here
SHUNF vs ENGDF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, ENGDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while ENGDF trades at $36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ENGDF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ENGDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to ENGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check ENGDF's competition here
SHUNF vs SEYMF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, SEYMF has a market cap of 984.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while SEYMF trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas SEYMF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SEYMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to SEYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check SEYMF's competition here
SHUNF vs VLTAF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, VLTAF has a market cap of 924.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while VLTAF trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas VLTAF's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VLTAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to VLTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check VLTAF's competition here
SHUNF vs ERXCF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, ERXCF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while ERXCF trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ERXCF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ERXCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and ERXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERXCF's competition here
SHUNF vs CWPWF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CWPWF has a market cap of 469.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CWPWF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CWPWF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CWPWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to CWPWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check CWPWF's competition here
SHUNF vs LGSXY Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, LGSXY has a market cap of 421M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while LGSXY trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas LGSXY's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LGSXY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to LGSXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check LGSXY's competition here
SHUNF vs OKEPF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, OKEPF has a market cap of 377.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while OKEPF trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas OKEPF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OKEPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and OKEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OKEPF's competition here
SHUNF vs PVLTF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, PVLTF has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while PVLTF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas PVLTF's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PVLTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to PVLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check PVLTF's competition here
SHUNF vs ENLTF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, ENLTF has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while ENLTF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ENLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ENLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to ENLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check ENLTF's competition here
SHUNF vs ATRWF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, ATRWF has a market cap of 262.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while ATRWF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ATRWF's P/E ratio is -425.00. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATRWF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and ATRWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATRWF's competition here
SHUNF vs SMTLD Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, SMTLD has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while SMTLD trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas SMTLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMTLD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to SMTLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check SMTLD's competition here
SHUNF vs RAMPF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, RAMPF has a market cap of 191.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while RAMPF trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas RAMPF's P/E ratio is -18.24. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RAMPF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to RAMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check RAMPF's competition here
SHUNF vs WEGYF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, WEGYF has a market cap of 178.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while WEGYF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas WEGYF's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WEGYF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to WEGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check WEGYF's competition here
SHUNF vs SVMRF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, SVMRF has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while SVMRF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas SVMRF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SVMRF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and SVMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVMRF's competition here
SHUNF vs PHNGF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, PHNGF has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while PHNGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas PHNGF's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PHNGF's ROE of -6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and PHNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHNGF's competition here
SHUNF vs IESVF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, IESVF has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while IESVF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas IESVF's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IESVF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to IESVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check IESVF's competition here
SHUNF vs TDWRF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, TDWRF has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while TDWRF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas TDWRF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TDWRF's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to TDWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check TDWRF's competition here
SHUNF vs SKPGF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, SKPGF has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while SKPGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas SKPGF's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SKPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and SKPGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKPGF's competition here
SHUNF vs SMTLF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, SMTLF has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while SMTLF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas SMTLF's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMTLF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and SMTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMTLF's competition here
SHUNF vs GIPIF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, GIPIF has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while GIPIF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas GIPIF's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GIPIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to GIPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check GIPIF's competition here
SHUNF vs WNDW Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, WNDW has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while WNDW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas WNDW's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WNDW's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to WNDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check WNDW's competition here
SHUNF vs SMAYF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, SMAYF has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while SMAYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas SMAYF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMAYF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to SMAYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check SMAYF's competition here
SHUNF vs CLMOF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CLMOF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CLMOF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CLMOF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CLMOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to CLMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check CLMOF's competition here
SHUNF vs PHIXF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, PHIXF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while PHIXF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas PHIXF's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PHIXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and PHIXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHIXF's competition here
SHUNF vs AZREF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, AZREF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while AZREF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas AZREF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AZREF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and AZREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZREF's competition here
SHUNF vs CLNV Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CLNV has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CLNV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CLNV's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CLNV's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to CLNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check CLNV's competition here
SHUNF vs CWGYF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CWGYF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CWGYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CWGYF's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CWGYF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to CWGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check CWGYF's competition here
SHUNF vs AZLOF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, AZLOF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while AZLOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas AZLOF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AZLOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and AZLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZLOF's competition here
SHUNF vs GEBRF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, GEBRF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while GEBRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas GEBRF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GEBRF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to GEBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check GEBRF's competition here
SHUNF vs RROYF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, RROYF has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while RROYF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas RROYF's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RROYF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to RROYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check RROYF's competition here
SHUNF vs AWSL Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, AWSL has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while AWSL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas AWSL's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AWSL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to AWSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check AWSL's competition here
SHUNF vs MOTNF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, MOTNF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while MOTNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas MOTNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOTNF's ROE of -4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to MOTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check MOTNF's competition here
SHUNF vs ASRE Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, ASRE has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while ASRE trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ASRE's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASRE's ROE of +5.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to ASRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check ASRE's competition here
SHUNF vs TNSTF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, TNSTF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while TNSTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas TNSTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TNSTF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to TNSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check TNSTF's competition here
SHUNF vs NKWFF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, NKWFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while NKWFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas NKWFF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NKWFF's ROE of -8.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to NKWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check NKWFF's competition here
SHUNF vs VGREF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, VGREF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while VGREF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas VGREF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VGREF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and VGREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VGREF's competition here
SHUNF vs FNEC Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, FNEC has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while FNEC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas FNEC's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FNEC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and FNEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNEC's competition here
SHUNF vs PRHL Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, PRHL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while PRHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas PRHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and PRHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRHL's competition here
SHUNF vs VXIT Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, VXIT has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while VXIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas VXIT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VXIT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to VXIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check VXIT's competition here
SHUNF vs PWCO Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, PWCO has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while PWCO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas PWCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PWCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to PWCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check PWCO's competition here
SHUNF vs ALKHF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, ALKHF has a market cap of 803.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while ALKHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ALKHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALKHF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to ALKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check ALKHF's competition here
SHUNF vs NEVE Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, NEVE has a market cap of 746.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while NEVE trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas NEVE's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NEVE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and NEVE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEVE's competition here
SHUNF vs GSFI Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, GSFI has a market cap of 654.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while GSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas GSFI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GSFI's ROE of +7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and GSFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSFI's competition here
SHUNF vs ENCVF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, ENCVF has a market cap of 630.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while ENCVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ENCVF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ENCVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to ENCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check ENCVF's competition here
SHUNF vs MMMW Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, MMMW has a market cap of 431.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while MMMW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas MMMW's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MMMW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to MMMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check MMMW's competition here
SHUNF vs IICN Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, IICN has a market cap of 143.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while IICN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas IICN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IICN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to IICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check IICN's competition here
SHUNF vs VSPC Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, VSPC has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while VSPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas VSPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VSPC's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to VSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check VSPC's competition here
SHUNF vs GEECF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, GEECF has a market cap of 94.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while GEECF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas GEECF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GEECF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to GEECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check GEECF's competition here
SHUNF vs ETRXF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, ETRXF has a market cap of 66.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while ETRXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ETRXF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ETRXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to ETRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check ETRXF's competition here
SHUNF vs PSPW Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, PSPW has a market cap of 54.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while PSPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas PSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PSPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to PSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check PSPW's competition here
SHUNF vs TPII Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, TPII has a market cap of 37.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while TPII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas TPII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TPII's ROE of -22.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and TPII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TPII's competition here
SHUNF vs ARSC Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, ARSC has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while ARSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ARSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARSC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and ARSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARSC's competition here
SHUNF vs CPWR Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CPWR has a market cap of 18.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CPWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CPWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CPWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and CPWR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPWR's competition here
SHUNF vs QSPW Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, QSPW has a market cap of 15.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while QSPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas QSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to QSPW's ROE of -96.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF is less volatile compared to QSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHUNF.Check QSPW's competition here
SHUNF vs ZHYLF Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, ZHYLF has a market cap of 15.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while ZHYLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ZHYLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZHYLF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and ZHYLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZHYLF's competition here
SHUNF vs VENG Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, VENG has a market cap of 12.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while VENG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas VENG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VENG's ROE of -8.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and VENG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VENG's competition here
SHUNF vs VCII Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, VCII has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while VCII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas VCII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VCII's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and VCII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VCII's competition here
SHUNF vs CGEI Comparison August 2025
SHUNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHUNF stands at 19.3M. In comparison, CGEI has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SHUNF is priced at $0.00, while CGEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHUNF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CGEI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SHUNF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHUNF and CGEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGEI's competition here