SportsHero Limited
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SHO.AX
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SHO.AX
SportsHero Limited (SHO.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SHO.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHO.AX | A$0.09 | -20.87% | 81.2M | -9.10 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| REA.AX | A$154.41 | -3.66% | 20.4B | 35.58 | A$4.34 | +1.70% |
| CAR.AX | A$22.54 | -3.63% | 8.5B | 28.90 | A$0.78 | +3.73% |
| DHG.AX | A$4.42 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 55.25 | A$0.08 | +2.44% |
| FDV.AX | A$0.33 | +0.00% | 143.8M | -8.25 | -A$0.04 | N/A |
| ART.AX | A$0.23 | -6.25% | 109.7M | -3.21 | -A$0.07 | N/A |
| TMH.AX | A$0.27 | +3.85% | 86.7M | 13.50 | A$0.02 | N/A |
| RNT.AX | A$0.06 | -1.67% | 68.4M | -5.90 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| GUM.AX | A$0.13 | +0.00% | 40.2M | 12.50 | A$0.01 | N/A |
| RMY.AX | A$0.04 | +7.89% | 27.2M | -4.10 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SHO.AX vs REA.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, REA.AX has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while REA.AX trades at A$154.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas REA.AX's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to REA.AX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to REA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check REA.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs CAR.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, CAR.AX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while CAR.AX trades at A$22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas CAR.AX's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to CAR.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to CAR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check CAR.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs DHG.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, DHG.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while DHG.AX trades at A$4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas DHG.AX's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to DHG.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to DHG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check DHG.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs FDV.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, FDV.AX has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while FDV.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas FDV.AX's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to FDV.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to FDV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check FDV.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs ART.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, ART.AX has a market cap of 109.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while ART.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ART.AX's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to ART.AX's ROE of -5.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to ART.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check ART.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs TMH.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, TMH.AX has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while TMH.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas TMH.AX's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to TMH.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to TMH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check TMH.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs RNT.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, RNT.AX has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while RNT.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas RNT.AX's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to RNT.AX's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to RNT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check RNT.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs GUM.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, GUM.AX has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while GUM.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas GUM.AX's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to GUM.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to GUM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check GUM.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs RMY.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, RMY.AX has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while RMY.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas RMY.AX's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to RMY.AX's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to RMY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check RMY.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs CHL.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, CHL.AX has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while CHL.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas CHL.AX's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to CHL.AX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to CHL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check CHL.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs TNY.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, TNY.AX has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while TNY.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas TNY.AX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to TNY.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to TNY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check TNY.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs FMR.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, FMR.AX has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while FMR.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas FMR.AX's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to FMR.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to FMR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check FMR.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs LVE.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, LVE.AX has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while LVE.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas LVE.AX's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to LVE.AX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to LVE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check LVE.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs FGL.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, FGL.AX has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while FGL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas FGL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to FGL.AX's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to FGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check FGL.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs AFW.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, AFW.AX has a market cap of 94.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while AFW.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas AFW.AX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to AFW.AX's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to AFW.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check AFW.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs ISU.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, ISU.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while ISU.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas ISU.AX's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to ISU.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to ISU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check ISU.AX's competition here
SHO.AX vs NEA.AX Comparison April 2026
SHO.AX plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHO.AX stands at 81.2M. In comparison, NEA.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHO.AX is priced at A$0.09, while NEA.AX trades at A$2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHO.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -9.10, whereas NEA.AX's P/E ratio is -48.84. In terms of profitability, SHO.AX's ROE is +2.65%, compared to NEA.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHO.AX is more volatile compared to NEA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHO.AX.Check NEA.AX's competition here