Schroders plc

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BKAMF has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BKAMF trades at $14.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BKAMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKAMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and BKAMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKAMF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BAMGF has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BAMGF trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BAMGF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAMGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and BAMGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAMGF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BKFAF has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BKFAF trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BKFAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKFAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and BKFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKFAF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BROXF has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BROXF trades at $14.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BROXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BROXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and BROXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BROXF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BXDIF has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BXDIF trades at $8.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BXDIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BXDIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and BXDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BXDIF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BAMKF has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BAMKF trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BAMKF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAMKF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and BAMKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAMKF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BKFPF has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BKFPF trades at $11.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BKFPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKFPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and BKFPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKFPF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IVSXF has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while IVSXF trades at $30.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas IVSXF's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVSXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and IVSXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IVSXF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IVSBF has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while IVSBF trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas IVSBF's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVSBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and IVSBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IVSBF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TGOPF has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while TGOPF trades at $55.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas TGOPF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGOPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and TGOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGOPF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, VNGDF has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while VNGDF trades at $122.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas VNGDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VNGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and VNGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VNGDF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, EQBBF has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while EQBBF trades at $34.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas EQBBF's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQBBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and EQBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EQBBF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PGPHF has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while PGPHF trades at $1,408.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas PGPHF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PGPHF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and PGPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGPHF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TGOPY has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while TGOPY trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas TGOPY's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGOPY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to TGOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check TGOPY's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, LGGNF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while LGGNF trades at $3.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas LGGNF's P/E ratio is 59.92. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LGGNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to LGGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check LGGNF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IHPCF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while IHPCF trades at $60.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas IHPCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHPCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and IHPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IHPCF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AMDUF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while AMDUF trades at $80.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas AMDUF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMDUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and AMDUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMDUF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, STMZF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while STMZF trades at $14.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas STMZF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STMZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to STMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check STMZF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IVTBF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while IVTBF trades at $25.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas IVTBF's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVTBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to IVTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check IVTBF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, JBARF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while JBARF trades at $73.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas JBARF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JBARF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and JBARF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JBARF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IDDTF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while IDDTF trades at $34.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas IDDTF's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDDTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and IDDTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDDTF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, JBAXY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while JBAXY trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas JBAXY's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JBAXY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to JBAXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check JBAXY's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SBHGF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while SBHGF trades at $45.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas SBHGF's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBHGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to SBHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check SBHGF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IDTVF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while IDTVF trades at $31.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas IDTVF's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDTVF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and IDTVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDTVF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, HALFF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while HALFF trades at $147.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas HALFF's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HALFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and HALFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HALFF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, LBGUF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while LBGUF trades at $45.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas LBGUF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBGUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and LBGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBGUF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GBLBY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while GBLBY trades at $8.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas GBLBY's P/E ratio is -101.89. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBLBY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and GBLBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBLBY's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GBLBF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while GBLBF trades at $87.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas GBLBF's P/E ratio is -96.15. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBLBF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and GBLBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBLBF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SFNXF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while SFNXF trades at $320.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas SFNXF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFNXF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and SFNXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFNXF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PSHZF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while PSHZF trades at $56.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas PSHZF's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSHZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to PSHZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check PSHZF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GSCE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while GSCE trades at $31.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas GSCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSCE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and GSCE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSCE's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MGPUF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while MGPUF trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas MGPUF's P/E ratio is -19.20. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGPUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and MGPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGPUF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, STJPF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while STJPF trades at $16.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas STJPF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STJPF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and STJPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STJPF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IGIFF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while IGIFF trades at $35.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas IGIFF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IGIFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to IGIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check IGIFF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ICGUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while ICGUF trades at $27.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas ICGUF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICGUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and ICGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICGUF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, FLIVF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while FLIVF trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas FLIVF's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLIVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and FLIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLIVF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ALITF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while ALITF trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas ALITF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALITF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and ALITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALITF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IVPEF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while IVPEF trades at $131.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas IVPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVPEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to IVPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check IVPEF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DAXXF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while DAXXF trades at $159.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas DAXXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAXXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and DAXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DAXXF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AFOVF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while AFOVF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas AFOVF's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFOVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and AFOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFOVF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, HRGLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while HRGLF trades at $12.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas HRGLF's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HRGLF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to HRGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check HRGLF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, HRGLY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while HRGLY trades at $23.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas HRGLY's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HRGLY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to HRGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check HRGLY's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ONEXF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while ONEXF trades at $82.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas ONEXF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONEXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and ONEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ONEXF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, HSXUF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while HSXUF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas HSXUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSXUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and HSXUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSXUF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ISRPF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while ISRPF trades at $100.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas ISRPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISRPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to ISRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check ISRPF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AZIHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while AZIHF trades at $36.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas AZIHF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AZIHF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and AZIHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZIHF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CCGDF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while CCGDF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas CCGDF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCGDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and CCGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCGDF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SLFPY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while SLFPY trades at $10.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas SLFPY's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLFPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and SLFPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLFPY's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TTBXF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while TTBXF trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas TTBXF's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTBXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and TTBXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTBXF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SLFPF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while SLFPF trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas SLFPF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLFPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and SLFPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLFPF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, VUKEF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while VUKEF trades at $46.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas VUKEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VUKEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to VUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check VUKEF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, REVNF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while REVNF trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas REVNF's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REVNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and REVNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REVNF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, NINTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while NINTF trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas NINTF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NINTF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and NINTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NINTF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, VGDDF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while VGDDF trades at $123.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas VGDDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VGDDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and VGDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VGDDF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, EUZOF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while EUZOF trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas EUZOF's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EUZOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and EUZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EUZOF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, RMGOF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while RMGOF trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas RMGOF's P/E ratio is 100.34. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RMGOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and RMGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RMGOF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, WNDLF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while WNDLF trades at $94.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas WNDLF's P/E ratio is -38.38. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WNDLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and WNDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WNDLF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, VONHF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while VONHF trades at $69.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas VONHF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VONHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and VONHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VONHF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, RITPF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while RITPF trades at $27.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas RITPF's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RITPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and RITPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RITPF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MEIEF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while MEIEF trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas MEIEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MEIEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and MEIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MEIEF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TKKHF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while TKKHF trades at $21.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas TKKHF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKKHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and TKKHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKKHF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AMSPF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while AMSPF trades at $117.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas AMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMSPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to AMSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check AMSPF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PVVLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while PVVLF trades at $47.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas PVVLF's P/E ratio is 119.90. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PVVLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and PVVLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PVVLF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MNKIF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while MNKIF trades at $14.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas MNKIF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNKIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to MNKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check MNKIF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BMMWF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BMMWF trades at $39.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BMMWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BMMWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to BMMWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check BMMWF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IXSRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while IXSRF trades at $6.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas IXSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IXSRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and IXSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IXSRF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, QUILF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while QUILF trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas QUILF's P/E ratio is -73.33. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QUILF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to QUILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check QUILF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BBAGF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BBAGF trades at $37.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BBAGF's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBAGF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to BBAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check BBAGF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CALEF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while CALEF trades at $52.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas CALEF's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CALEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and CALEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CALEF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TKCPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while TKCPF trades at $51.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas TKCPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKCPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and TKCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKCPF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, RTBBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while RTBBF trades at $25.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas RTBBF's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RTBBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and RTBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTBBF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TXEMF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while TXEMF trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas TXEMF's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TXEMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to TXEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check TXEMF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BZSPF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BZSPF trades at $70.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BZSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BZSPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and BZSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZSPF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ISMCF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while ISMCF trades at $665.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas ISMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to ISMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check ISMCF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CRPFY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while CRPFY trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas CRPFY's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRPFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and CRPFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRPFY's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CEVIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while CEVIF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas CEVIF's P/E ratio is -8.71. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEVIF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to CEVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check CEVIF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, JTCPF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while JTCPF trades at $12.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas JTCPF's P/E ratio is -202.75. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JTCPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to JTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check JTCPF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ENDTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while ENDTF trades at $11.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas ENDTF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENDTF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and ENDTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENDTF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, FFXDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while FFXDF trades at $18.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas FFXDF's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FFXDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to FFXDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check FFXDF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, FECHF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while FECHF trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas FECHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FECHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to FECHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check FECHF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, WTNTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while WTNTF trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas WTNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTNTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and WTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTNTF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SFFFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while SFFFF trades at $71.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas SFFFF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFFFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to SFFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check SFFFF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, HNDEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while HNDEF trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas HNDEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HNDEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to HNDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check HNDEF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PPTTF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while PPTTF trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas PPTTF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPTTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and PPTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPTTF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AJMPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while AJMPF trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas AJMPF's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AJMPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and AJMPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AJMPF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, EHITF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while EHITF trades at $10.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas EHITF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EHITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and EHITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EHITF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TGONF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while TGONF trades at $17.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas TGONF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGONF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and TGONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGONF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BHMDF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BHMDF trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BHMDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHMDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and BHMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BHMDF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ISCMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while ISCMF trades at $7.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas ISCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISCMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and ISCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISCMF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AVGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while AVGTF trades at $3.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas AVGTF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to AVGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check AVGTF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BLGFF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BLGFF trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BLGFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLGFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and BLGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLGFF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BWMTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while BWMTF trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas BWMTF's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWMTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and BWMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BWMTF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CYMBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while CYMBF trades at $59.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas CYMBF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CYMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and CYMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYMBF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, RTOBF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while RTOBF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas RTOBF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RTOBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and RTOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTOBF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IHRMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while IHRMF trades at $17.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas IHRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHRMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF is less volatile compared to IHRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNWF.Check IHRMF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, UCPLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while UCPLF trades at $10.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas UCPLF's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UCPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and UCPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UCPLF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IGBSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while IGBSF trades at $7.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas IGBSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IGBSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and IGBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IGBSF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MGLLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while MGLLF trades at $6.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas MGLLF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGLLF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and MGLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGLLF's competition here

SHNWF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHNWF stands at 8.3B. In comparison, FSEN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNWF is priced at $5.33, while FSEN trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.77, whereas FSEN's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, SHNWF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FSEN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNWF and FSEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSEN's competition here