Intouch Holdings Public Company Limited
Intouch Holdings Public Company Limited (SHNUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SHNUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHNUF | $1.20 | +0.00% | 7.8B | 10.00 | $0.12 | +16.13% |
| DTEGF | $39.18 | -0.28% | 189.9B | 13.27 | $2.92 | +2.54% |
| DTEGY | $39.38 | +2.71% | 189.6B | 13.21 | $2.93 | +2.57% |
| SFTBY | $13.26 | -7.37% | 157.7B | 7.91 | $1.75 | +0.88% |
| SFTBF | $28.14 | -2.29% | 156.7B | 7.86 | $3.50 | +0.26% |
| NPPXF | $1.00 | -2.45% | 80.1B | 12.25 | $0.08 | +3.59% |
| NTTYY | $24.46 | -0.12% | 79.5B | 11.86 | $2.05 | +2.90% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMXOF | $1.20 | +20.00% | 72.3B | 15.00 | $0.08 | +1.24% |
| SFBQF | $1.28 | -9.15% | 67.1B | 20.07 | $0.07 | +4.10% |
Stock Comparison
SHNUF vs DTEGF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 189.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while DTEGF trades at $39.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check DTEGF's competition here
SHNUF vs DTEGY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 189.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while DTEGY trades at $39.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check DTEGY's competition here
SHNUF vs SFTBY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while SFTBY trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check SFTBY's competition here
SHNUF vs SFTBF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while SFTBF trades at $28.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check SFTBF's competition here
SHNUF vs NPPXF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while NPPXF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check NPPXF's competition here
SHNUF vs NTTYY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while NTTYY trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check NTTYY's competition here
SHNUF vs AMXVF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check AMXVF's competition here
SHNUF vs AMXOF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AMXOF has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while AMXOF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AMXOF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMXOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to AMXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check AMXOF's competition here
SHNUF vs SFBQF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while SFBQF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check SFBQF's competition here
SHNUF vs AMOVF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check AMOVF's competition here
SHNUF vs KDDIY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while KDDIY trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check KDDIY's competition here
SHNUF vs SNGNF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while SNGNF trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check SNGNF's competition here
SHNUF vs SGAPY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while SGAPY trades at $39.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check SGAPY's competition here
SHNUF vs SOBKY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while SOBKY trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check SOBKY's competition here
SHNUF vs KDDIF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while KDDIF trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check KDDIF's competition here
SHNUF vs ORANY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ORANY has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while ORANY trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas ORANY's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORANY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to ORANY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check ORANY's competition here
SHNUF vs FNCTF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while FNCTF trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check FNCTF's competition here
SHNUF vs CLLNY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while CLLNY trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -128.14. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check CLLNY's competition here
SHNUF vs SCMWY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while SCMWY trades at $92.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check SCMWY's competition here
SHNUF vs SWZCF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while SWZCF trades at $897.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check SWZCF's competition here
SHNUF vs TLGPY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TLGPY trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TLGPY's competition here
SHNUF vs TTRAF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TTRAF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TTRAF's competition here
SHNUF vs AVIFY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while AVIFY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check AVIFY's competition here
SHNUF vs AVIKF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while AVIKF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check AVIKF's competition here
SHNUF vs VODPF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while VODPF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -7.89. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check VODPF's competition here
SHNUF vs CTOWY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while CTOWY trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check CTOWY's competition here
SHNUF vs BTGOF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while BTGOF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check BTGOF's competition here
SHNUF vs TELNF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TELNF trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TELNF's competition here
SHNUF vs TELNY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TELNY trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TELNY's competition here
SHNUF vs CHWRF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while CHWRF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check CHWRF's competition here
SHNUF vs TEFOF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TEFOF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -17.74. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TEFOF's competition here
SHNUF vs MTNOY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while MTNOY trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is 47.46. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check MTNOY's competition here
SHNUF vs TLKMF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TLKMF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TLKMF's competition here
SHNUF vs RCIAF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while RCIAF trades at $39.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check RCIAF's competition here
SHNUF vs KKPNF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while KKPNF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check KKPNF's competition here
SHNUF vs KKPNY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while KKPNY trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check KKPNY's competition here
SHNUF vs VDMCY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while VDMCY trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check VDMCY's competition here
SHNUF vs TLSNY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TLSNY trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TLSNY's competition here
SHNUF vs TLSNF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TLSNF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TLSNF's competition here
SHNUF vs MTNOF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while MTNOF trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check MTNOF's competition here
SHNUF vs TIAIY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TIAIY trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -22.95. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TIAIY's competition here
SHNUF vs TIAJF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TIAJF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.30. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TIAJF's competition here
SHNUF vs AVIVF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check AVIVF's competition here
SHNUF vs AAFRF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while AAFRF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check AAFRF's competition here
SHNUF vs ELMUY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while ELMUY trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check ELMUY's competition here
SHNUF vs TIAOF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TIAOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -19.23. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TIAOF's competition here
SHNUF vs HLTOY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while HLTOY trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check HLTOY's competition here
SHNUF vs VODAF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while VODAF trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check VODAF's competition here
SHNUF vs TLTZY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TLTZY trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TLTZY's competition here
SHNUF vs SJRWF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check SJRWF's competition here
SHNUF vs BCEPF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while BCEPF trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check BCEPF's competition here
SHNUF vs BECEF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while BECEF trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check BECEF's competition here
SHNUF vs TLTZF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TLTZF trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TLTZF's competition here
SHNUF vs TCPFF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TCPFF's competition here
SHNUF vs BCPPF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check BCPPF's competition here
SHNUF vs HKTTY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while HKTTY trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check HKTTY's competition here
SHNUF vs HKTTF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while HKTTF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check HKTTF's competition here
SHNUF vs BCEXF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check BCEXF's competition here
SHNUF vs QBCRF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while QBCRF trades at $39.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check QBCRF's competition here
SHNUF vs DIGBF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check DIGBF's competition here
SHNUF vs QBCAF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while QBCAF trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check QBCAF's competition here
SHNUF vs FRTAY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while FRTAY trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check FRTAY's competition here
SHNUF vs LBRDB Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while LBRDB trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check LBRDB's competition here
SHNUF vs HLTOF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while HLTOF trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check HLTOF's competition here
SHNUF vs TELDY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TELDY trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TELDY's competition here
SHNUF vs AARTY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AARTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check AARTY's competition here
SHNUF vs BZQIY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while BZQIY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check BZQIY's competition here
SHNUF vs BZQIF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while BZQIF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check BZQIF's competition here
SHNUF vs ELMUF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while ELMUF trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check ELMUF's competition here
SHNUF vs MYTEF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while MYTEF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check MYTEF's competition here
SHNUF vs TELDF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TELDF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TELDF's competition here
SHNUF vs PCWLF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while PCWLF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -76.18. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check PCWLF's competition here
SHNUF vs PCCWY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while PCCWY trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -145.80. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check PCCWY's competition here
SHNUF vs MAXSF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check MAXSF's competition here
SHNUF vs AXXTF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check AXXTF's competition here
SHNUF vs TKAGY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TKAGY's competition here
SHNUF vs TRKNY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TRKNY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TRKNY's competition here
SHNUF vs UDIRF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is 33.34. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check UDIRF's competition here
SHNUF vs PHTCF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check PHTCF's competition here
SHNUF vs CUCSF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while CUCSF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check CUCSF's competition here
SHNUF vs PTITF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while PTITF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check PTITF's competition here
SHNUF vs FRTAF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while FRTAF trades at $35.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check FRTAF's competition here
SHNUF vs GTMEY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while GTMEY trades at $26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check GTMEY's competition here
SHNUF vs TFAOF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TFAOF's competition here
SHNUF vs CUCSY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while CUCSY trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check CUCSY's competition here
SHNUF vs PTXKY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while PTXKY trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check PTXKY's competition here
SHNUF vs TCMFF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TCMFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TCMFF's competition here
SHNUF vs MICCF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check MICCF's competition here
SHNUF vs BGAOY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while BGAOY trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check BGAOY's competition here
SHNUF vs IIJIF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while IIJIF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check IIJIF's competition here
SHNUF vs TACYY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TACYY's competition here
SHNUF vs TRKNF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TRKNF's competition here
SHNUF vs HTWSF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HTWSF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while HTWSF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas HTWSF's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HTWSF's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to HTWSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check HTWSF's competition here
SHNUF vs TLGHY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check TLGHY's competition here
SHNUF vs BGAOF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while BGAOF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check BGAOF's competition here
SHNUF vs NZTCF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while NZTCF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check NZTCF's competition here
SHNUF vs ZONNF Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ZONNF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while ZONNF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas ZONNF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZONNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to ZONNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check ZONNF's competition here
SHNUF vs IIJIY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while IIJIY trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check IIJIY's competition here
SHNUF vs SPKKY Comparison February 2026
SHNUF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHNUF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHNUF is priced at $1.20, while SPKKY trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHNUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, SHNUF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHNUF is more volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHNUF.Check SPKKY's competition here