Shimano Inc.
Shimano Inc. SHMDF Peers
See (SHMDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHMDF | $149.32 | +0.00% | 13B | 30.97 | $4.82 | +1.39% |
| NCBDY | $17.91 | +0.00% | 45.8B | 19.71 | $0.89 | +0.75% |
| OLCLF | $23.00 | +0.00% | 38.9B | 45.65 | $0.52 | +0.23% |
| OLCLY | $22.97 | -0.01% | 36.4B | 42.66 | $0.52 | +0.35% |
| CUKPF | $25.19 | +13.78% | 36.3B | 16.25 | $1.55 | N/A |
| ANPDY | $300.82 | +0.00% | 33.8B | 16.09 | $18.82 | +2.49% |
| ANPDF | $11.65 | +0.00% | 32.3B | 15.53 | $0.75 | +2.60% |
| NCBDF | $32.20 | +0.00% | 21.7B | 19.04 | $1.79 | +1.40% |
| SMNNY | $14.46 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 29.46 | $0.48 | N/A |
| GMWKF | $223.00 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 31.88 | $7.12 | +2.89% |
Stock Comparison
SHMDF vs NCBDY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, NCBDY has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while NCBDY trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas NCBDY's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCBDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to NCBDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs OLCLF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, OLCLF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while OLCLF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas OLCLF's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OLCLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and OLCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs OLCLY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, OLCLY has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while OLCLY trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas OLCLY's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OLCLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to OLCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs CUKPF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, CUKPF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while CUKPF trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas CUKPF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CUKPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to CUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs ANPDY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, ANPDY has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while ANPDY trades at $300.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas ANPDY's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANPDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to ANPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs ANPDF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, ANPDF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while ANPDF trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas ANPDF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANPDF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and ANPDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs NCBDF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, NCBDF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while NCBDF trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas NCBDF's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCBDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and NCBDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs SMNNY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, SMNNY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while SMNNY trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas SMNNY's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to SMNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs GMWKF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, GMWKF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while GMWKF trades at $223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas GMWKF's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GMWKF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to GMWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs THUPY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, THUPY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while THUPY trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas THUPY's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THUPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and THUPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs LNNGY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, LNNGY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while LNNGY trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas LNNGY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to LNNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs LNNGF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, LNNGF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while LNNGF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas LNNGF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNNGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and LNNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs NINOF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, NINOF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while NINOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas NINOF's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NINOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and NINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs YAMCF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, YAMCF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while YAMCF trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas YAMCF's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YAMCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and YAMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs NINOY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, NINOY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while NINOY trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas NINOY's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NINOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to NINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs YAMCY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, YAMCY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while YAMCY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas YAMCY's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YAMCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to YAMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs THLPF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, THLPF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while THLPF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas THLPF's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THLPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and THLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs TCCHF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, TCCHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while TCCHF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas TCCHF's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCCHF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and TCCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs TOMYY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, TOMYY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while TOMYY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas TOMYY's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOMYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and TOMYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs SNMSF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, SNMSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while SNMSF trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas SNMSF's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNMSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to SNMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs RNDOF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, RNDOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while RNDOF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas RNDOF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNDOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and RNDOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs YONXF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, YONXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while YONXF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas YONXF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YONXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and YONXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs BSFFF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, BSFFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while BSFFF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas BSFFF's P/E ratio is 147.43. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and BSFFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs DTCGF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, DTCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while DTCGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas DTCGF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTCGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and DTCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs MPZAF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, MPZAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while MPZAF trades at $44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas MPZAF's P/E ratio is 75.59. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MPZAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and MPZAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs CLPIF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, CLPIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while CLPIF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas CLPIF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLPIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and CLPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs HRVFF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, HRVFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while HRVFF trades at $58.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas HRVFF's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRVFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and HRVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs HISJF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, HISJF has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while HISJF trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas HISJF's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HISJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and HISJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs DRMMF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, DRMMF has a market cap of 850.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while DRMMF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas DRMMF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and DRMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs TNIEF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, TNIEF has a market cap of 760.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while TNIEF trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas TNIEF's P/E ratio is 55.58. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and TNIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs MPZAY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, MPZAY has a market cap of 758.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while MPZAY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas MPZAY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MPZAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and MPZAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs BTEAF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, BTEAF has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while BTEAF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas BTEAF's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTEAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and BTEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs CTVIF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, CTVIF has a market cap of 725.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while CTVIF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas CTVIF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTVIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and CTVIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs VVCHF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, VVCHF has a market cap of 669M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while VVCHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas VVCHF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VVCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to VVCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs UETMF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, UETMF has a market cap of 622.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while UETMF trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas UETMF's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UETMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and UETMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs SHOFF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, SHOFF has a market cap of 549.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while SHOFF trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas SHOFF's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHOFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and SHOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs CLKXF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, CLKXF has a market cap of 422.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while CLKXF trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas CLKXF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLKXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and CLKXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs OQLGF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, OQLGF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while OQLGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas OQLGF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OQLGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and OQLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs GYYMF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, GYYMF has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while GYYMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas GYYMF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GYYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and GYYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs GBBYF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, GBBYF has a market cap of 288.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while GBBYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas GBBYF's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBBYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and GBBYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs FOCIF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, FOCIF has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while FOCIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas FOCIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FOCIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and FOCIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs PYHOF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, PYHOF has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while PYHOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas PYHOF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PYHOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and PYHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs RPNMF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, RPNMF has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while RPNMF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas RPNMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RPNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and RPNMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs CGROF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, CGROF has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while CGROF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas CGROF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGROF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and CGROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs KICK Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, KICK has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while KICK trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas KICK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KICK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and KICK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs BOLL Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, BOLL has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while BOLL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas BOLL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and BOLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs PMTYF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, PMTYF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while PMTYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas PMTYF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMTYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and PMTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs GFIZF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, GFIZF has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while GFIZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas GFIZF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GFIZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and GFIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs CNLFF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, CNLFF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while CNLFF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas CNLFF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNLFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and CNLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs PRKA Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, PRKA has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while PRKA trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas PRKA's P/E ratio is 47.30. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRKA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and PRKA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs KENS Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, KENS has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while KENS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas KENS's P/E ratio is -26.80. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KENS's ROE of +5.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and KENS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs DSHK Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, DSHK has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while DSHK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas DSHK's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DSHK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to DSHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs PFFEF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, PFFEF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while PFFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas PFFEF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PFFEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and PFFEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs VIRA Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, VIRA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while VIRA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas VIRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIRA's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and VIRA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs TOYRF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, TOYRF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while TOYRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas TOYRF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOYRF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and TOYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs BWMG Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, BWMG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while BWMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas BWMG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BWMG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and BWMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs GTHKF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, GTHKF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while GTHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas GTHKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTHKF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and GTHKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs QRSM Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, QRSM has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while QRSM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas QRSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QRSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and QRSM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs BTDG Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, BTDG has a market cap of 789.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while BTDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas BTDG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to BTDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs BFXXQ Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, BFXXQ has a market cap of 351.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while BFXXQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas BFXXQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFXXQ's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and BFXXQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs SPQS Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, SPQS has a market cap of 342.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while SPQS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas SPQS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPQS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to SPQS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs MSET Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, MSET has a market cap of 304K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while MSET trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas MSET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and MSET have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs TRBX Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, TRBX has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while TRBX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas TRBX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRBX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and TRBX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs VMHG Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, VMHG has a market cap of 160K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while VMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas VMHG's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VMHG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to VMHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs XFTB Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, XFTB has a market cap of 103.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while XFTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas XFTB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XFTB's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and XFTB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs VTMB Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, VTMB has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while VTMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas VTMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VTMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and VTMB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs ECMH Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, ECMH has a market cap of 69.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while ECMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas ECMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECMH's ROE of -78.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and ECMH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs DAAT Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, DAAT has a market cap of 57.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while DAAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas DAAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAAT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and DAAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs ALTD Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, ALTD has a market cap of 49.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while ALTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas ALTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALTD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and ALTD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs OMWS Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, OMWS has a market cap of 46.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while OMWS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas OMWS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMWS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and OMWS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs JMIH Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, JMIH has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while JMIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas JMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JMIH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and JMIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs GLFN Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, GLFN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while GLFN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas GLFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLFN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and GLFN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs LCLP Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, LCLP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while LCLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas LCLP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and LCLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs ROCLF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, ROCLF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while ROCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas ROCLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and ROCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs PRXIQ Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, PRXIQ has a market cap of 793. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while PRXIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas PRXIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRXIQ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and PRXIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs BYDC Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, BYDC has a market cap of 201. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while BYDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas BYDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and BYDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs FTFY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, FTFY has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while FTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas FTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and FTFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs WMGPF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, WMGPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while WMGPF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas WMGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WMGPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and WMGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs TVPC Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, TVPC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while TVPC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas TVPC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TVPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and TVPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs CLVFA Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, CLVFA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while CLVFA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas CLVFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLVFA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and CLVFA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SHMDF vs CLUBQ Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 13B. In comparison, CLUBQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $149.32, while CLUBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.97, whereas CLUBQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLUBQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF and CLUBQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).