Shimano Inc.
Shimano Inc. SHMDF Peers
See (SHMDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHMDF | $127.76 | N/A | 11.38B | 22.57 | $5.66 | +1.40% |
| NCBDY | $15.79 | -3.07% | 40.89B | 17.74 | $0.89 | +0.17% |
| OLCLY | $22.28 | +0.13% | 36.51B | 42.85 | $0.52 | +0.21% |
| ANPDY | $304.07 | +0.63% | 34.16B | 16.35 | $18.60 | +2.49% |
| ANPDF | $12.10 | N/A | 33.58B | 16.13 | $0.75 | +2.50% |
| OLCLF | $18.82 | N/A | 30.85B | 36.19 | $0.52 | +0.26% |
| CUKPF | $16.77 | -26.45% | 23.95B | 10.82 | $1.55 | N/A |
| NCBDF | $35.20 | +3.83% | 22.43B | 19.56 | $1.80 | +1.35% |
| SMNNY | $13.36 | -2.34% | 11.71B | 27.83 | $0.48 | N/A |
| GMWKF | $211.25 | -0.35% | 6.97B | 29.96 | $7.05 | +2.34% |
Stock Comparison
SHMDF vs NCBDY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, NCBDY has a market cap of 40.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while NCBDY trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas NCBDY's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCBDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to NCBDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs OLCLY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, OLCLY has a market cap of 36.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while OLCLY trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas OLCLY's P/E ratio is 42.85. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OLCLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to OLCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs ANPDY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, ANPDY has a market cap of 34.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while ANPDY trades at $304.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ANPDY's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANPDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to ANPDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs ANPDF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, ANPDF has a market cap of 33.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while ANPDF trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ANPDF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANPDF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to ANPDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs OLCLF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, OLCLF has a market cap of 30.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while OLCLF trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas OLCLF's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OLCLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to OLCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs CUKPF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, CUKPF has a market cap of 23.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while CUKPF trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CUKPF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CUKPF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to CUKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs NCBDF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, NCBDF has a market cap of 22.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while NCBDF trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas NCBDF's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCBDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to NCBDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs SMNNY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, SMNNY has a market cap of 11.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while SMNNY trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas SMNNY's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to SMNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs GMWKF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, GMWKF has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while GMWKF trades at $211.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GMWKF's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GMWKF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to GMWKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs THUPY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, THUPY has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while THUPY trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas THUPY's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THUPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to THUPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs LNNGY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, LNNGY has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while LNNGY trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas LNNGY's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to LNNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs LNNGF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, LNNGF has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while LNNGF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas LNNGF's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNNGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to LNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs YAMCF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, YAMCF has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while YAMCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas YAMCF's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YAMCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to YAMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs THLPF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, THLPF has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while THLPF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas THLPF's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THLPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to THLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs NINOF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, NINOF has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while NINOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas NINOF's P/E ratio is 34.29. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NINOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to NINOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs YAMCY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, YAMCY has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while YAMCY trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas YAMCY's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YAMCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to YAMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs NINOY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, NINOY has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while NINOY trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas NINOY's P/E ratio is 78.67. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NINOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to NINOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs PRKA Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, PRKA has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while PRKA trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas PRKA's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRKA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to PRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs TCCHF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, TCCHF has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while TCCHF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas TCCHF's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCCHF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to TCCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs TOMYY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, TOMYY has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while TOMYY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas TOMYY's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOMYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to TOMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs DTCGF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, DTCGF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while DTCGF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas DTCGF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTCGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to DTCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs SNMSF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, SNMSF has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while SNMSF trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas SNMSF's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNMSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to SNMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs RNDOF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, RNDOF has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while RNDOF trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas RNDOF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNDOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to RNDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs YONXF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, YONXF has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while YONXF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas YONXF's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YONXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to YONXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs BSFFF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, BSFFF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while BSFFF trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas BSFFF's P/E ratio is 147.43. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to BSFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs VVCHF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, VVCHF has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while VVCHF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas VVCHF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VVCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to VVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs MPZAF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, MPZAF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while MPZAF trades at $41.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas MPZAF's P/E ratio is 79.17. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MPZAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to MPZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs HISJF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, HISJF has a market cap of 978.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while HISJF trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas HISJF's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HISJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to HISJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs HRVFF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, HRVFF has a market cap of 877.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while HRVFF trades at $47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas HRVFF's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRVFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to HRVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs CLPIF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, CLPIF has a market cap of 855.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while CLPIF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CLPIF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLPIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to CLPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs TNIEF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, TNIEF has a market cap of 787.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while TNIEF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas TNIEF's P/E ratio is 62.73. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to TNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs MPZAY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, MPZAY has a market cap of 758.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while MPZAY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas MPZAY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MPZAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to MPZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs SHOFF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, SHOFF has a market cap of 728.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while SHOFF trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas SHOFF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHOFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to SHOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs BTEAF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, BTEAF has a market cap of 678.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while BTEAF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas BTEAF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTEAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to BTEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs DRMMF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, DRMMF has a market cap of 581.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while DRMMF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas DRMMF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to DRMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs UETMF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, UETMF has a market cap of 533.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while UETMF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas UETMF's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UETMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to UETMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs CTVIF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, CTVIF has a market cap of 498.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while CTVIF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CTVIF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTVIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to CTVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs OQLGF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, OQLGF has a market cap of 376.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while OQLGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas OQLGF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OQLGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to OQLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs GYYMF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, GYYMF has a market cap of 352.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while GYYMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GYYMF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GYYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to GYYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs CLKXF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, CLKXF has a market cap of 311.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while CLKXF trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CLKXF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLKXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to CLKXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs GBBYF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, GBBYF has a market cap of 283.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while GBBYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GBBYF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBBYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to GBBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs FOCIF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, FOCIF has a market cap of 215.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while FOCIF trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas FOCIF's P/E ratio is 73.40. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FOCIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to FOCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs PYHOF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, PYHOF has a market cap of 144.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while PYHOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas PYHOF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PYHOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to PYHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs RPNMF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, RPNMF has a market cap of 111.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while RPNMF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas RPNMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RPNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to RPNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs CGROF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, CGROF has a market cap of 93.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while CGROF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CGROF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGROF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to CGROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs PMTYF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, PMTYF has a market cap of 75.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while PMTYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas PMTYF's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMTYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to PMTYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs BOLL Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, BOLL has a market cap of 73.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while BOLL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas BOLL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to BOLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs GFIZF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, GFIZF has a market cap of 45.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while GFIZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GFIZF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GFIZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to GFIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs CNLFF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, CNLFF has a market cap of 39.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while CNLFF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas CNLFF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNLFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to CNLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs KENS Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, KENS has a market cap of 22.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while KENS trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas KENS's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KENS's ROE of +5.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to KENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs KICK Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, KICK has a market cap of 16.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while KICK trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas KICK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KICK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to KICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs DSHK Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, DSHK has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while DSHK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas DSHK's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DSHK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to DSHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs PFFEF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, PFFEF has a market cap of 2.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while PFFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas PFFEF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PFFEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to PFFEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs VIRA Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, VIRA has a market cap of 2.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while VIRA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas VIRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIRA's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to VIRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs TOYRF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, TOYRF has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while TOYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas TOYRF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOYRF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to TOYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs GTHKF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, GTHKF has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while GTHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GTHKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTHKF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to GTHKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs QRSM Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, QRSM has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while QRSM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas QRSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QRSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to QRSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs BTDG Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, BTDG has a market cap of 789920.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while BTDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas BTDG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to BTDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs MSET Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, MSET has a market cap of 500077.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while MSET trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas MSET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to MSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs BFXXQ Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, BFXXQ has a market cap of 351796.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while BFXXQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas BFXXQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFXXQ's ROE of -3.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to BFXXQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs SPQS Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, SPQS has a market cap of 244436.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while SPQS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas SPQS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPQS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to SPQS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs VMHG Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, VMHG has a market cap of 176578.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while VMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas VMHG's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VMHG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to VMHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs TRBX Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, TRBX has a market cap of 162288.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while TRBX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas TRBX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRBX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to TRBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs GLFN Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, GLFN has a market cap of 128648.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while GLFN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas GLFN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLFN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to GLFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs XFTB Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, XFTB has a market cap of 103861.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while XFTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas XFTB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XFTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to XFTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs BWMG Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, BWMG has a market cap of 87837.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while BWMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas BWMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BWMG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to BWMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs VTMB Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, VTMB has a market cap of 78341.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while VTMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas VTMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VTMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to VTMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs ECMH Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, ECMH has a market cap of 69557.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while ECMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ECMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECMH's ROE of -78.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to ECMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs DAAT Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, DAAT has a market cap of 57660.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while DAAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas DAAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAAT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to DAAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs ALTD Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, ALTD has a market cap of 49218.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while ALTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ALTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALTD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to ALTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs OMWS Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, OMWS has a market cap of 46300.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while OMWS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas OMWS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMWS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to OMWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs JMIH Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, JMIH has a market cap of 9975.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while JMIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas JMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JMIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to JMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs LCLP Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, LCLP has a market cap of 1794.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while LCLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas LCLP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to LCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs ROCLF Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, ROCLF has a market cap of 1400.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while ROCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas ROCLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to ROCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs PRXIQ Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, PRXIQ has a market cap of 793.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while PRXIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas PRXIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRXIQ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to PRXIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs BYDC Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, BYDC has a market cap of 201.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while BYDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas BYDC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is more volatile compared to BYDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.
SHMDF vs FTFY Comparison
SHMDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHMDF stands at 11.38B. In comparison, FTFY has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, SHMDF is priced at $127.76, while FTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHMDF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.57, whereas FTFY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHMDF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHMDF is less volatile compared to FTFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHMDF.