Schindler Holding AG
Schindler Holding AG SHLRF Peers
See (SHLRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHLRF | $305.92 | N/A | 33.38B | 30.87 | $9.91 | +1.69% |
| RATIY | $46.03 | +13.64% | 209.32B | 37.12 | $1.24 | +1.58% |
| SIEGY | $125.35 | +8.78% | 196.35B | 25.85 | $4.85 | +1.81% |
| SMAWF | $208.12 | +0.35% | 163.34B | 19.67 | $10.58 | +2.18% |
| SBGSY | $49.25 | -0.04% | 138.14B | 28.14 | $1.75 | +2.46% |
| SBGSF | $245.92 | -0.48% | 137.95B | 27.88 | $8.82 | +2.98% |
| RCIT | $2,154.05 | +538512400.00% | 134.04B | -215405.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ATLFF | $17.00 | +14.48% | 90.27B | 27.42 | $0.62 | +1.71% |
| ATLPF | $17.18 | +6.78% | 80.40B | 28.16 | $0.61 | +1.74% |
| ATLCY | $14.88 | +0.15% | 79.04B | 24.39 | $0.61 | +1.49% |
Stock Comparison
SHLRF vs RATIY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 209.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while RATIY trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SIEGY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 196.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SIEGY trades at $125.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SMAWF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 163.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SMAWF trades at $208.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SBGSY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 138.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SBGSY trades at $49.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SBGSF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 137.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SBGSF trades at $245.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs RCIT Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 134.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while RCIT trades at $2,154.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -215405.00. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs ATLFF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, ATLFF has a market cap of 90.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while ATLFF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas ATLFF's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATLFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to ATLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs ATLPF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 80.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while ATLPF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs ATLCY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 79.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while ATLCY trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs ATLKY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 77.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while ATLKY trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs MHVYF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 66.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while MHVYF trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 39.90. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SMNEY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 66.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SMNEY trades at $82.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is 357.52. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SMEGF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 66.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SMEGF trades at $83.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is 361.57. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs KNYJY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 65.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while KNYJY trades at $31.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs WRTBY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 60.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while WRTBY trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SHLAF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 33.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SHLAF trades at $316.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs WEGZY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 32.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while WEGZY trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs KNYJF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 32.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while KNYJF trades at $62.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SDVKF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 27.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SDVKF trades at $22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to SDVKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SDVKY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 27.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SDVKY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs FANUY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 25.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while FANUY trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SMCAY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 23.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SMCAY trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs FANUF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 23.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while FANUF trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SMECF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 22.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SMECF trades at $352.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs NJDCY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 22.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while NJDCY trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs NNDNF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 22.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while NNDNF trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs WEICF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 18.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while WEICF trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs ALFVY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 17.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while ALFVY trades at $42.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs VWDRY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 16.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while VWDRY trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs VWSYF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 16.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while VWSYF trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs ALFVF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 16.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SIELY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SIELY has a market cap of 15.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SIELY trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SIELY's P/E ratio is 182.50. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIELY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SIELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs WEICY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while WEICY trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to WEICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SIELF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 13.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SIELF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs IHICY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 12.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while IHICY trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to IHICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs GCTAF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to GCTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs GCTAY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs WRTBF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 11.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while WRTBF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs VACNY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 11.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while VACNY trades at $37.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs GEAGF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 11.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while GEAGF trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs KWHIY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 10.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while KWHIY trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs IHICF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 10.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while IHICF trades at $68.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs VTTGF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 10.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while VTTGF trades at $341.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs DAIUF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 10.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while DAIUF trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs KWHIF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 9.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while KWHIF trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to KWHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs RTLLF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while RTLLF trades at $812.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SMGZY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 9.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SMGZY trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs DFKCY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while DFKCY trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs TBABF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while TBABF trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs WEGRY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 8.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while WEGRY trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SMGKF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 8.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SMGKF trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs MLSPF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 8.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while MLSPF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is -127.10. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs WEIGF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 7.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while WEIGF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs EBCOY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 7.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while EBCOY trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs IMIAF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 6.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while IMIAF trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to IMIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs FCHRF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while FCHRF trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs HSHZY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 6.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while HSHZY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to HSHZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SPXSF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SPXSF trades at $82.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SPXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SPXSY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SPXSY trades at $41.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SULZF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SULZF trades at $178.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs JPSWY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while JPSWY trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs YOKEY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while YOKEY trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to YOKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs EBCOF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs VLMTY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 5.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while VLMTY trades at $29.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to VLMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs HAIIF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to HAIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs DNGFF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs YOKEF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while YOKEF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs KRNNF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while KRNNF trades at $149.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs HSHIF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while HSHIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs YMATF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while YMATF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs XJNGF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while XJNGF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs VOYJF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while VOYJF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to VOYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SFSLF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SFSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs FLUIF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while FLUIF trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs NRXXY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while NRXXY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 122.86. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs ATSAF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to ATSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs JGHAF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while JGHAF trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to JGHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs BCHHF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while BCHHF trades at $380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs MRRLF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs MICLF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while MICLF trades at $36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs NRDXF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while NRDXF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 105.00. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs RTOXF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while RTOXF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs AALBF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while AALBF trades at $30.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs CYJBF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs NGKIF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while NGKIF trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs KUKAF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to KUKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs FJTCY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while FJTCY trades at $38.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs FLIDF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while FLIDF trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs AMDWF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while AMDWF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SOHVF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SOHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs THKLY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while THKLY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 52.08. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs FLIDY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while FLIDY trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs THKLF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while THKLF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs KRNTY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, KRNTY has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while KRNTY trades at $82.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas KRNTY's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KRNTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to KRNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs SOHVY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while SOHVY trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 508.50. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs IRRHF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, IRRHF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while IRRHF trades at $2,943.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas IRRHF's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to IRRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs MIURF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while MIURF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to MIURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs JGHHY Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is more volatile compared to JGHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.
SHLRF vs KRDXF Comparison
SHLRF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHLRF stands at 33.38B. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SHLRF is priced at $305.92, while KRDXF trades at $271.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHLRF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.87, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, SHLRF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHLRF is less volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHLRF.