ShaMaran Petroleum Corp.
ShaMaran Petroleum Corp. SHASF Peers
See (SHASF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHASF | $0.13 | -2.99% | 372.3M | 4.33 | $0.03 | N/A |
| MEYYY | $7.00 | -18.89% | 175.5B | 4.76 | $1.47 | +4.00% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | N/A | 66.8B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $15.00 | +7.53% | 28.4B | 8.02 | $1.87 | +8.16% |
| TRMLF | $46.79 | -0.43% | 17.5B | 19.18 | $2.44 | +5.33% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | N/A | 17B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| IPXHY | $13.17 | -0.15% | 15.8B | 5.35 | $2.46 | +3.22% |
| PEXNY | $7.01 | +0.14% | 13.9B | 5.94 | $1.18 | +7.55% |
| IPXHF | $11.54 | N/A | 13.8B | 4.69 | $2.46 | +4.40% |
| SSLZY | $4.14 | +1.72% | 13.4B | 10.89 | $0.38 | +2.15% |
Stock Comparison
SHASF vs MEYYY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 175.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while MEYYY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs NSTKF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs WOPEF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while WOPEF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs TRMLF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while TRMLF trades at $46.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs DETNF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs IPXHY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while IPXHY trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PEXNY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PEXNY trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs IPXHF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while IPXHF trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs SSLZY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while SSLZY trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs STOSF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while STOSF trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs AETUF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while AETUF trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs NOVKY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs SPGYF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while SPGYF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PTRRY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PTRRY trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs VSOGF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while VSOGF trades at $55.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs MEGEF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while MEGEF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs DKDRF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while DKDRF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PREKF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PREKF trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PMOIF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PMOIF trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs HBRIY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while HBRIY trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs DLKGF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while DLKGF trades at $170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs DELKY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while DELKY trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs OASPW Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PEYUF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PEYUF trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs EERGF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while EERGF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs BTEGF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs JPTXF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while JPTXF trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs BEPTF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while BEPTF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PRMRF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PRMRF trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs NUVSF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while NUVSF trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs ATHOF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while ATHOF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs BCHEY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while BCHEY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs IPCFF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while IPCFF trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PTGIF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PTGIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs FRHLF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while FRHLF trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs AAVVF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while AAVVF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -62.31. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs BIREF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while BIREF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs EFVIF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs DTNOF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while DTNOF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs CRCQW Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs WLLAW Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs CDDRF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while CDDRF trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs KELTF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 986.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while KELTF trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs AOIFF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 945.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while AOIFF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PARXF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 928M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PARXF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs UNEGF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs CWEGF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs BWEFF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 807.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while BWEFF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs KRNGF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 742.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while KRNGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs CRLFF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 727.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while CRLFF trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs SQZZF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 687.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while SQZZF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs AAGEF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs KWTEF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 526.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while KWTEF trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs GFKSY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs RCKHF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 469.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while RCKHF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs GUKYF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 442.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while GUKYF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs DALXF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 438.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while DALXF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs TBNRF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PTALF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 393.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PTALF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs KRNGY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 386.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while KRNGY trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs BKBEF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PTHRF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 382.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PTHRF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs ZPTAF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while ZPTAF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs COPJF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while COPJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PRYGF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PEGIY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs ATUUF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 332.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while ATUUF trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -37.66. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs CEIEF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 327.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while CEIEF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -61.63. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs FECCF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while FECCF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs ENQUF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while ENQUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs TUWLF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 292.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while TUWLF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PESAF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PESAF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs GEGYY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while GEGYY trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs OILSF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 242.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while OILSF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs GEGYF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 233.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while GEGYF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs TUWOY Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while TUWOY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs EXCE Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while EXCE trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs ZNOG Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 209.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while ZNOG trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs ITEEF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs CRNZF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs HZNFF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 195M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while HZNFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PSHIF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs HRCXF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs GASXF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 177.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while GASXF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs RECWF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs IPOOF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while IPOOF trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs ALVOF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 157.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while ALVOF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PNWRF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs KGEIF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs PIFYF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while PIFYF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs CVONF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, CVONF has a market cap of 143.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while CVONF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas CVONF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CVONF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to CVONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs SEUSF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 142.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while SEUSF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -18.95. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs SLGYF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to SLGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs EEGUF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 134M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while EEGUF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs STGAF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, STGAF has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while STGAF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas STGAF's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to STGAF's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to STGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs LNDNF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while LNDNF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs HMENF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, HMENF has a market cap of 122.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while HMENF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas HMENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HMENF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to HMENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs RUBLF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 122.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while RUBLF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.26. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is more volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.
SHASF vs SOCLF Comparison
SHASF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHASF stands at 372.3M. In comparison, SOCLF has a market cap of 119.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHASF is priced at $0.13, while SOCLF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHASF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas SOCLF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, SHASF's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SOCLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHASF is less volatile compared to SOCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHASF.