SGL Carbon SE
SGL Carbon SE (SGLFF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SGLFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGLFF | $4.15 | +0.00% | 507.4M | -4.41 | -$0.94 | N/A |
| SHECF | $30.69 | +9.51% | 57.4B | 16.64 | $1.84 | +2.35% |
| SHECY | $14.40 | -0.07% | 55B | 15.80 | $0.91 | +1.56% |
| BASFY | $12.02 | -2.28% | 42.9B | 100.17 | $0.12 | +5.24% |
| BFFAF | $47.36 | -8.04% | 42.3B | 96.65 | $0.49 | +5.39% |
| SLMNP | $890.00 | +0.00% | 26.3B | 978.02 | $0.91 | +6.74% |
| TYNPF | $37.91 | +11.53% | 16.4B | 24.30 | $1.56 | +0.92% |
| AHKSY | $14.23 | +2.37% | 9.9B | 10.84 | $1.32 | N/A |
| AHKSF | $6.97 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 10.56 | $0.66 | +3.69% |
| GNENF | $3.28 | +0.00% | 8.6B | -23.43 | -$0.14 | +0.63% |
Stock Comparison
SGLFF vs SHECF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while SHECF trades at $30.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check SHECF's competition here
SGLFF vs SHECY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while SHECY trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check SHECY's competition here
SGLFF vs BASFY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while BASFY trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 100.17. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check BASFY's competition here
SGLFF vs BFFAF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while BFFAF trades at $47.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 96.65. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and BFFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BFFAF's competition here
SGLFF vs SLMNP Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while SLMNP trades at $890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 978.02. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to SLMNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check SLMNP's competition here
SGLFF vs TYNPF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, TYNPF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while TYNPF trades at $37.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas TYNPF's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TYNPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to TYNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check TYNPF's competition here
SGLFF vs AHKSY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while AHKSY trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check AHKSY's competition here
SGLFF vs AHKSF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while AHKSF trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check AHKSF's competition here
SGLFF vs GNENF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while GNENF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -23.43. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and GNENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNENF's competition here
SGLFF vs MTLHY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while MTLHY trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to MTLHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check MTLHY's competition here
SGLFF vs MTLHF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while MTLHF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to MTLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check MTLHF's competition here
SGLFF vs PECGF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while PECGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PECGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and PECGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PECGF's competition here
SGLFF vs IMCDY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while IMCDY trades at $54.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check IMCDY's competition here
SGLFF vs GNENY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while GNENY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -24.97. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and GNENY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNENY's competition here
SGLFF vs TOSCF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while TOSCF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to TOSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check TOSCF's competition here
SGLFF vs NNCHY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while NNCHY trades at $35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to NNCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check NNCHY's competition here
SGLFF vs BCHMF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while BCHMF trades at $61.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check BCHMF's competition here
SGLFF vs SOMMF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while SOMMF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to SOMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check SOMMF's competition here
SGLFF vs SHWDY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while SHWDY trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and SHWDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHWDY's competition here
SGLFF vs SHWDF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while SHWDF trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to SHWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check SHWDF's competition here
SGLFF vs PTGCF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while PTGCF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and PTGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTGCF's competition here
SGLFF vs SOMMY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while SOMMY trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and SOMMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMMY's competition here
SGLFF vs KURRY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while KURRY trades at $35.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and KURRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KURRY's competition here
SGLFF vs KURRF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while KURRF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to KURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check KURRF's competition here
SGLFF vs KOYJF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while KOYJF trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to KOYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check KOYJF's competition here
SGLFF vs SVYSF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while SVYSF trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and SVYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVYSF's competition here
SGLFF vs SLVYY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while SLVYY trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check SLVYY's competition here
SGLFF vs INDOY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while INDOY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and INDOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INDOY's competition here
SGLFF vs KPLUY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while KPLUY trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is 767.50. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check KPLUY's competition here
SGLFF vs PCHUY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while PCHUY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and PCHUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCHUY's competition here
SGLFF vs RBTEF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, RBTEF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while RBTEF trades at $922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas RBTEF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RBTEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to RBTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check RBTEF's competition here
SGLFF vs DENKF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while DENKF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DENKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and DENKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DENKF's competition here
SGLFF vs MXCHF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while MXCHF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and MXCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MXCHF's competition here
SGLFF vs NPKYY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while NPKYY trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to NPKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check NPKYY's competition here
SGLFF vs NPKYF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check NPKYF's competition here
SGLFF vs VYTPF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and VYTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VYTPF's competition here
SGLFF vs FRRSF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, FRRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while FRRSF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas FRRSF's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FRRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to FRRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check FRRSF's competition here
SGLFF vs LNZNF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while LNZNF trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and LNZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNZNF's competition here
SGLFF vs TOAGF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while TOAGF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to TOAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check TOAGF's competition here
SGLFF vs BRGAY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and BRGAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRGAY's competition here
SGLFF vs MXCHY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 624.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while MXCHY trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and MXCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MXCHY's competition here
SGLFF vs TYGIF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while TYGIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to TYGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check TYGIF's competition here
SGLFF vs CDSAF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and CDSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDSAF's competition here
SGLFF vs NNXPF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 368.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while NNXPF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -53.95. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check NNXPF's competition here
SGLFF vs CRDE Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SGLFF has daily volatility of 0.00 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRDE's competition here
SGLFF vs CNSJF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 183.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and CNSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNSJF's competition here
SGLFF vs BNOW Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BNOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and BNOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNOW's competition here
SGLFF vs HZRGF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while HZRGF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and HZRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HZRGF's competition here
SGLFF vs BLGO Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while BLGO trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -18.46. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check BLGO's competition here
SGLFF vs BSWGF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while BSWGF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check BSWGF's competition here
SGLFF vs FGPHF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while FGPHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check FGPHF's competition here
SGLFF vs PLYR Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while PLYR trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check PLYR's competition here
SGLFF vs CHHYF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while CHHYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check CHHYF's competition here
SGLFF vs FHELF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check FHELF's competition here
SGLFF vs EESE Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while EESE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and EESE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EESE's competition here
SGLFF vs AGTT Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while AGTT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to AGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check AGTT's competition here
SGLFF vs OPCGF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 437.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and OPCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPCGF's competition here
SGLFF vs CHCC Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and CHCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHCC's competition here
SGLFF vs AFPW Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to AFPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check AFPW's competition here
SGLFF vs FLRE Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 22.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and FLRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLRE's competition here
SGLFF vs LBTI Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LBTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and LBTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBTI's competition here
SGLFF vs VULC Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and VULC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VULC's competition here
SGLFF vs MKDTY Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to MKDTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check MKDTY's competition here
SGLFF vs NUEC Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check NUEC's competition here
SGLFF vs RKTE Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check RKTE's competition here
SGLFF vs BMRK Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, BMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while BMRK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas BMRK's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BMRK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and BMRK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMRK's competition here
SGLFF vs ADKCF Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, ADKCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while ADKCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas ADKCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ADKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and ADKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADKCF's competition here
SGLFF vs FIND Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, FIND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while FIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas FIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF and FIND have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FIND's competition here
SGLFF vs ADKIL Comparison August 2025
SGLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGLFF stands at 507.4M. In comparison, ADKIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGLFF is priced at $4.15, while ADKIL trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.41, whereas ADKIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGLFF's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ADKIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGLFF is less volatile compared to ADKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGLFF.Check ADKIL's competition here