SES S.A.
SES S.A. SGBAF Peers
See (SGBAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGBAF | $6.15 | +1.65% | 2.4B | -1.52 | -$4.05 | +7.85% |
| RGLXY | $3.62 | +13.13% | 5.6B | 19.05 | $0.19 | +9.00% |
| NPTVF | $21.77 | N/A | 5.4B | 17.14 | $1.27 | +0.33% |
| RGLXF | $33.18 | N/A | 5.1B | 13.60 | $2.44 | +9.95% |
| FJTNY | $10.17 | N/A | 4.2B | -29.91 | -$0.34 | +0.81% |
| ITVPY | $11.24 | +0.31% | 4.2B | 7.65 | $1.47 | +5.81% |
| ITVPF | $1.04 | N/A | 3.9B | 7.43 | $0.14 | +6.27% |
| FJTNF | $17.65 | N/A | 3.7B | -26.34 | -$0.67 | +1.94% |
| TKOBF | $16.09 | N/A | 2.6B | 21.17 | $0.76 | +1.19% |
| MTPVY | $16.06 | +16.89% | 2B | 10.29 | $1.56 | +10.19% |
Stock Comparison
SGBAF vs RGLXY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RGLXY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while RGLXY trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas RGLXY's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and RGLXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs NPTVF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NPTVF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while NPTVF trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas NPTVF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPTVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to NPTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs RGLXF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RGLXF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while RGLXF trades at $33.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas RGLXF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGLXF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to RGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs FJTNY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FJTNY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while FJTNY trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas FJTNY's P/E ratio is -29.91. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FJTNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to FJTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs ITVPY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ITVPY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while ITVPY trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas ITVPY's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and ITVPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs ITVPF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ITVPF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while ITVPF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas ITVPF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITVPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to ITVPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs FJTNF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FJTNF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while FJTNF trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas FJTNF's P/E ratio is -26.34. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FJTNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to FJTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs TKOBF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TKOBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while TKOBF trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas TKOBF's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKOBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TKOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs MTPVY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MTPVY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while MTPVY trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas MTPVY's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTPVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and MTPVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs TVAHF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TVAHF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while TVAHF trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas TVAHF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVAHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TVAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs BECVY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BECVY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while BECVY trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas BECVY's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BECVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and BECVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs THDDY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, THDDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while THDDY trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas THDDY's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THDDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to THDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs PBSFY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PBSFY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while PBSFY trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas PBSFY's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and PBSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs PBSFF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PBSFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while PBSFF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas PBSFF's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to PBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs TVFCF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TVFCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while TVFCF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas TVFCF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVFCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs SKPJY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SKPJY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while SKPJY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas SKPJY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKPJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and SKPJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs GETVF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GETVF has a market cap of 980.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while GETVF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas GETVF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GETVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and GETVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs STGYF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STGYF has a market cap of 467.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while STGYF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas STGYF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STGYF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to STGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs TVBCY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TVBCY has a market cap of 184.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while TVBCY trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas TVBCY's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVBCY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TVBCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs TVBCF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TVBCF has a market cap of 182.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while TVBCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas TVBCF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVBCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TVBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs EMMS Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EMMS has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while EMMS trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas EMMS's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMMS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and EMMS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs AZTEF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AZTEF has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while AZTEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas AZTEF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZTEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and AZTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs TMGI Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TMGI has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while TMGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas TMGI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMGI's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs TVAGF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TVAGF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while TVAGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas TVAGF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVAGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TVAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs LUDG Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LUDG has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while LUDG trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas LUDG's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUDG's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and LUDG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs AOECF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AOECF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while AOECF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas AOECF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AOECF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and AOECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs FHLD Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FHLD has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while FHLD trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas FHLD's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHLD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to FHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs PEGX Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PEGX has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while PEGX trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas PEGX's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEGX's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to PEGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs INCT Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, INCT has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while INCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas INCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to INCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs LPTV Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LPTV has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while LPTV trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas LPTV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LPTV's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to LPTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs AITVF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AITVF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while AITVF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas AITVF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AITVF's ROE of +4.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and AITVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs SBSAA Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SBSAA has a market cap of 869.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while SBSAA trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas SBSAA's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBSAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to SBSAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs AUDAQ Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AUDAQ has a market cap of 785.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while AUDAQ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas AUDAQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUDAQ's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to AUDAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs TFBN Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TFBN has a market cap of 648.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while TFBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas TFBN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFBN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TFBN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs TLDE Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TLDE has a market cap of 626.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while TLDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas TLDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLDE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TLDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs TVTV Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TVTV has a market cap of 574.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while TVTV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas TVTV's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVTV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TVTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs PSRU Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PSRU has a market cap of 348.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while PSRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas PSRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and PSRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs MEMI Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MEMI has a market cap of 155K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while MEMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas MEMI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to MEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs FONU Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FONU has a market cap of 84.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while FONU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas FONU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FONU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to FONU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs WTKN Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WTKN has a market cap of 59.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while WTKN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas WTKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTKN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to WTKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs WNRC Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WNRC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while WNRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas WNRC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WNRC's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and WNRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs MNIZ Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MNIZ has a market cap of 356. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while MNIZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas MNIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNIZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to MNIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs GETVY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GETVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while GETVY trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas GETVY's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GETVY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and GETVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs ALLN Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ALLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while ALLN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas ALLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and ALLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs MCTZF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MCTZF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.15, while MCTZF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.52, whereas MCTZF's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and MCTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).