SES S.A.
SES S.A. (SGBAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SGBAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGBAF | $6.86 | -3.46% | 2.8B | -62.32 | -$0.11 | +8.13% |
| FJTNF | $27.73 | +0.00% | 5.8B | -42.66 | -$0.65 | +1.24% |
| NPTVF | $21.77 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 17.27 | $1.26 | +1.24% |
| RGLXY | $3.47 | -13.25% | 5.4B | 13.88 | $0.25 | +8.13% |
| RGLXF | $33.18 | +0.00% | 5.1B | 13.60 | $2.44 | +7.53% |
| FJTNY | $11.60 | -0.17% | 5B | -35.15 | -$0.33 | +1.36% |
| ITVPF | $1.11 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 15.86 | $0.07 | +5.88% |
| ITVPY | $10.85 | -1.27% | 4.1B | 16.44 | $0.66 | +6.02% |
| TKOBF | $16.09 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 21.17 | $0.76 | +1.19% |
| TVFCF | $10.20 | +0.00% | 2.2B | 9.90 | $1.03 | +6.69% |
Stock Comparison
SGBAF vs FJTNF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FJTNF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while FJTNF trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas FJTNF's P/E ratio is -42.66. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FJTNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to FJTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check FJTNF's competition here
SGBAF vs NPTVF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NPTVF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while NPTVF trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas NPTVF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPTVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to NPTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check NPTVF's competition here
SGBAF vs RGLXY Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RGLXY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while RGLXY trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas RGLXY's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to RGLXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check RGLXY's competition here
SGBAF vs RGLXF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RGLXF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while RGLXF trades at $33.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas RGLXF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGLXF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to RGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check RGLXF's competition here
SGBAF vs FJTNY Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FJTNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while FJTNY trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas FJTNY's P/E ratio is -35.15. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FJTNY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to FJTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check FJTNY's competition here
SGBAF vs ITVPF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ITVPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while ITVPF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas ITVPF's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITVPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to ITVPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check ITVPF's competition here
SGBAF vs ITVPY Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ITVPY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while ITVPY trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas ITVPY's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to ITVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check ITVPY's competition here
SGBAF vs TKOBF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TKOBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while TKOBF trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas TKOBF's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKOBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to TKOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check TKOBF's competition here
SGBAF vs TVFCF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TVFCF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while TVFCF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas TVFCF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVFCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TVFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check TVFCF's competition here
SGBAF vs THDDY Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, THDDY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while THDDY trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas THDDY's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to THDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check THDDY's competition here
SGBAF vs PBSFY Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PBSFY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while PBSFY trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas PBSFY's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBSFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to PBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check PBSFY's competition here
SGBAF vs TVAHF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TVAHF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while TVAHF trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas TVAHF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVAHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TVAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check TVAHF's competition here
SGBAF vs MTPVY Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MTPVY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while MTPVY trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas MTPVY's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTPVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to MTPVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check MTPVY's competition here
SGBAF vs PBSFF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PBSFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while PBSFF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas PBSFF's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to PBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check PBSFF's competition here
SGBAF vs GETVF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GETVF has a market cap of 980.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while GETVF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas GETVF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GETVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to GETVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check GETVF's competition here
SGBAF vs SKPJY Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SKPJY has a market cap of 513.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while SKPJY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas SKPJY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKPJY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to SKPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check SKPJY's competition here
SGBAF vs STGYF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, STGYF has a market cap of 504.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while STGYF trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas STGYF's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STGYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to STGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check STGYF's competition here
SGBAF vs BECVY Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BECVY has a market cap of 422M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while BECVY trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas BECVY's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BECVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to BECVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check BECVY's competition here
SGBAF vs TVBCY Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TVBCY has a market cap of 238.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while TVBCY trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas TVBCY's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVBCY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to TVBCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check TVBCY's competition here
SGBAF vs TVBCF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TVBCF has a market cap of 182.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while TVBCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas TVBCF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVBCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to TVBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check TVBCF's competition here
SGBAF vs AZTEF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AZTEF has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while AZTEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas AZTEF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZTEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to AZTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check AZTEF's competition here
SGBAF vs TVAGF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TVAGF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while TVAGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas TVAGF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVAGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TVAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check TVAGF's competition here
SGBAF vs EMMS Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EMMS has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while EMMS trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas EMMS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMMS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to EMMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check EMMS's competition here
SGBAF vs LUDG Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LUDG has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while LUDG trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas LUDG's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUDG's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to LUDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check LUDG's competition here
SGBAF vs AOECF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AOECF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while AOECF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas AOECF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AOECF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to AOECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check AOECF's competition here
SGBAF vs PEGX Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PEGX has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while PEGX trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas PEGX's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEGX's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to PEGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check PEGX's competition here
SGBAF vs INCT Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, INCT has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while INCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas INCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to INCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check INCT's competition here
SGBAF vs AITVF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AITVF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while AITVF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas AITVF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AITVF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to AITVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check AITVF's competition here
SGBAF vs TVTV Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TVTV has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while TVTV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas TVTV's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVTV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check TVTV's competition here
SGBAF vs FHLD Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FHLD has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while FHLD trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas FHLD's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHLD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to FHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check FHLD's competition here
SGBAF vs SBSAA Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SBSAA has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while SBSAA trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas SBSAA's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBSAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to SBSAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check SBSAA's competition here
SGBAF vs AUDAQ Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AUDAQ has a market cap of 785.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while AUDAQ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas AUDAQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUDAQ's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to AUDAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check AUDAQ's competition here
SGBAF vs TFBN Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TFBN has a market cap of 648.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while TFBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas TFBN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFBN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to TFBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check TFBN's competition here
SGBAF vs TLDE Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TLDE has a market cap of 626.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while TLDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas TLDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLDE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to TLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check TLDE's competition here
SGBAF vs LPTV Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LPTV has a market cap of 610.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while LPTV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas LPTV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LPTV's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to LPTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check LPTV's competition here
SGBAF vs PSRU Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PSRU has a market cap of 348.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while PSRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas PSRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to PSRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check PSRU's competition here
SGBAF vs MEMI Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MEMI has a market cap of 155K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while MEMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas MEMI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to MEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check MEMI's competition here
SGBAF vs TMGI Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TMGI has a market cap of 112K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while TMGI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas TMGI's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMGI's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check TMGI's competition here
SGBAF vs FONU Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FONU has a market cap of 84.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while FONU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas FONU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FONU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to FONU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check FONU's competition here
SGBAF vs WTKN Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WTKN has a market cap of 59.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while WTKN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas WTKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTKN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to WTKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check WTKN's competition here
SGBAF vs WNRC Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WNRC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while WNRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas WNRC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WNRC's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to WNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check WNRC's competition here
SGBAF vs MNIZ Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MNIZ has a market cap of 932. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while MNIZ trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas MNIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNIZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to MNIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check MNIZ's competition here
SGBAF vs MCTZF Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MCTZF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while MCTZF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas MCTZF's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to MCTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check MCTZF's competition here
SGBAF vs GETVY Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GETVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while GETVY trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas GETVY's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GETVY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to GETVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check GETVY's competition here
SGBAF vs ALLN Comparison July 2025
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $6.86, while ALLN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -62.32, whereas ALLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is more volatile compared to ALLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.Check ALLN's competition here