SES S.A.
SES S.A. SGBAF Peers
See (SGBAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGBAF | $5.14 | -6.55% | 2.08B | -1.27 | -$4.05 | +9.98% |
| RGLXY | $4.20 | N/A | 6.50B | 17.50 | $0.24 | +4.87% |
| NPTVF | $21.77 | -15.70% | 5.45B | 17.55 | $1.24 | +0.33% |
| RGLXF | $33.18 | -22.69% | 5.13B | 13.60 | $2.44 | +9.41% |
| FJTNY | $9.55 | -12.79% | 4.08B | 14.47 | $0.66 | +0.87% |
| ITVPY | $10.20 | -1.45% | 3.92B | 7.45 | $1.37 | +6.41% |
| FJTNF | $17.65 | +1.44% | 3.67B | 13.27 | $1.33 | +1.94% |
| ITVPF | $0.84 | -17.65% | 3.12B | 6.00 | $0.14 | +7.73% |
| TKOBF | $16.09 | N/A | 2.57B | 21.17 | $0.76 | +1.19% |
| MTPVY | $16.06 | +16.89% | 2.02B | 10.50 | $1.53 | +8.87% |
Stock Comparison
SGBAF vs RGLXY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, RGLXY has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while RGLXY trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas RGLXY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and RGLXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs NPTVF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, NPTVF has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while NPTVF trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas NPTVF's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPTVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to NPTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs RGLXF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, RGLXF has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while RGLXF trades at $33.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas RGLXF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGLXF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to RGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs FJTNY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, FJTNY has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while FJTNY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas FJTNY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FJTNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to FJTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs ITVPY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, ITVPY has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while ITVPY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ITVPY's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to ITVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs FJTNF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, FJTNF has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while FJTNF trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas FJTNF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FJTNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to FJTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs ITVPF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, ITVPF has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while ITVPF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas ITVPF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITVPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to ITVPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs TKOBF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, TKOBF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while TKOBF trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TKOBF's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKOBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TKOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs MTPVY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, MTPVY has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while MTPVY trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MTPVY's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTPVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to MTPVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs BECVY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, BECVY has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while BECVY trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas BECVY's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BECVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and BECVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs TVAHF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, TVAHF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while TVAHF trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TVAHF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVAHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TVAHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs THDDY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, THDDY has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while THDDY trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas THDDY's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THDDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to THDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs PBSFY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, PBSFY has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while PBSFY trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas PBSFY's P/E ratio is -12.80. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to PBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs PBSFF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, PBSFF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while PBSFF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas PBSFF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to PBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs TVFCF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, TVFCF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while TVFCF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TVFCF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVFCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs SKPJY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, SKPJY has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while SKPJY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas SKPJY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKPJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and SKPJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs GETVF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, GETVF has a market cap of 980.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while GETVF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas GETVF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GETVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and GETVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs STGYF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, STGYF has a market cap of 431.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while STGYF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas STGYF's P/E ratio is -35.25. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STGYF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to STGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs TVBCF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, TVBCF has a market cap of 182.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while TVBCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TVBCF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVBCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TVBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs TVBCY Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, TVBCY has a market cap of 165.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while TVBCY trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TVBCY's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVBCY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TVBCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs AZTEF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, AZTEF has a market cap of 55.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while AZTEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas AZTEF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZTEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and AZTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs TVAGF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, TVAGF has a market cap of 33.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while TVAGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TVAGF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVAGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TVAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs EMMS Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, EMMS has a market cap of 18.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while EMMS trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas EMMS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMMS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to EMMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs LUDG Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, LUDG has a market cap of 12.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while LUDG trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas LUDG's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUDG's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to LUDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs AOECF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, AOECF has a market cap of 5.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while AOECF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas AOECF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AOECF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and AOECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs FHLD Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, FHLD has a market cap of 4.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while FHLD trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas FHLD's P/E ratio is 0.60. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FHLD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and FHLD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs LPTV Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, LPTV has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while LPTV trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas LPTV's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LPTV's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and LPTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs PEGX Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, PEGX has a market cap of 3.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while PEGX trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas PEGX's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEGX's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to PEGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs INCT Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, INCT has a market cap of 3.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while INCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas INCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INCT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to INCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs SBSAA Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, SBSAA has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while SBSAA trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas SBSAA's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBSAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to SBSAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs AUDAQ Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, AUDAQ has a market cap of 785317.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while AUDAQ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas AUDAQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUDAQ's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to AUDAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs AITVF Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, AITVF has a market cap of 658878.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while AITVF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas AITVF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AITVF's ROE of +4.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and AITVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs TFBN Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, TFBN has a market cap of 648504.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while TFBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TFBN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFBN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TFBN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs TLDE Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, TLDE has a market cap of 626652.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while TLDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TLDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLDE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TLDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs TVTV Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, TVTV has a market cap of 574548.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while TVTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TVTV's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TVTV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to TVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs PSRU Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, PSRU has a market cap of 348127.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while PSRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas PSRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to PSRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs TMGI Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, TMGI has a market cap of 344996.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while TMGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas TMGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMGI's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and TMGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs MEMI Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, MEMI has a market cap of 155000.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while MEMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MEMI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to MEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs FONU Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, FONU has a market cap of 84769.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while FONU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas FONU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FONU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to FONU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs WTKN Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, WTKN has a market cap of 59867.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while WTKN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas WTKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTKN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to WTKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.
SGBAF vs WNRC Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, WNRC has a market cap of 9836.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while WNRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas WNRC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WNRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF and WNRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SGBAF vs MNIZ Comparison
SGBAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGBAF stands at 2.08B. In comparison, MNIZ has a market cap of 233.00. Regarding current trading prices, SGBAF is priced at $5.14, while MNIZ trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGBAF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas MNIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGBAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNIZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGBAF is less volatile compared to MNIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGBAF.