Fang Holdings Limited
Fang Holdings Limited (SFUNY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFUNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFUNY | $6.00 | +0.00% | 5.4M | -0.30 | -$19.90 | N/A |
| TCEHY | $67.85 | -3.17% | 616.2B | 23.80 | $2.85 | +0.86% |
| TCTZF | $66.82 | -3.15% | 606.9B | 23.36 | $2.86 | +0.85% |
| PROSY | $11.25 | -1.49% | 129.4B | 10.90 | $1.03 | +0.20% |
| PROSF | $58.64 | +0.00% | 128.2B | 11.36 | $5.16 | +0.19% |
| NAPRF | $314.15 | +0.00% | 50.9B | 10.44 | $30.10 | +0.21% |
| NPSNY | $60.27 | -2.33% | 48.8B | 10.00 | $6.02 | +0.23% |
| KUASF | $9.50 | +1.60% | 41.1B | 19.39 | $0.49 | N/A |
| KSHTY | $1.80 | +0.00% | 39.6B | 18.00 | $0.10 | N/A |
| BAIDF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 30.9B | 8.66 | $1.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SFUNY vs TCEHY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 616.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while TCEHY trades at $67.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check TCEHY's competition here
SFUNY vs TCTZF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 606.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while TCTZF trades at $66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check TCTZF's competition here
SFUNY vs PROSY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 129.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while PROSY trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check PROSY's competition here
SFUNY vs PROSF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while PROSF trades at $58.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check PROSF's competition here
SFUNY vs NAPRF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while NAPRF trades at $314.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to NAPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check NAPRF's competition here
SFUNY vs NPSNY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while NPSNY trades at $60.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check NPSNY's competition here
SFUNY vs KUASF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while KUASF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to KUASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check KUASF's competition here
SFUNY vs KSHTY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while KSHTY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check KSHTY's competition here
SFUNY vs BAIDF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while BAIDF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to BAIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check BAIDF's competition here
SFUNY vs YAHOF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while YAHOF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and YAHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAHOF's competition here
SFUNY vs RPGRF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while RPGRF trades at $153.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to RPGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check RPGRF's competition here
SFUNY vs RPGRY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while RPGRY trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check RPGRY's competition here
SFUNY vs NHNCF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check NHNCF's competition here
SFUNY vs ADEVF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and ADEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADEVF's competition here
SFUNY vs ADEVY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and ADEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADEVY's competition here
SFUNY vs ATDRF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ATDRF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check ATDRF's competition here
SFUNY vs ATDRY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ATDRY trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check ATDRY's competition here
SFUNY vs CSXXY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while CSXXY trades at $48.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 54.25. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and CSXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSXXY's competition here
SFUNY vs RTMVY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while RTMVY trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check RTMVY's competition here
SFUNY vs RTMVF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while RTMVF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and RTMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTMVF's competition here
SFUNY vs SKLTF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while SKLTF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 198.13. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to SKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check SKLTF's competition here
SFUNY vs KKKUF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while KKKUF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to KKKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check KKKUF's competition here
SFUNY vs CHLLF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while CHLLF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is -109.00. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to CHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check CHLLF's competition here
SFUNY vs OOOOF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check OOOOF's competition here
SFUNY vs MEIUF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while MEIUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to MEIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check MEIUF's competition here
SFUNY vs HMNTY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while HMNTY trades at $28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 47.78. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and HMNTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMNTY's competition here
SFUNY vs DHGAF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check DHGAF's competition here
SFUNY vs MLRYY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and MLRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLRYY's competition here
SFUNY vs XINXF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and XINXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XINXF's competition here
SFUNY vs ADBMF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and ADBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADBMF's competition here
SFUNY vs WNWSF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 334.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to WNWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check WNWSF's competition here
SFUNY vs ZGXNF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ZGXNF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check ZGXNF's competition here
SFUNY vs FRRGF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and FRRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRRGF's competition here
SFUNY vs VYGPF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and VYGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VYGPF's competition here
SFUNY vs MECVF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and MECVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MECVF's competition here
SFUNY vs NXCLF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while NXCLF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and NXCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXCLF's competition here
SFUNY vs UUMMF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and UUMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UUMMF's competition here
SFUNY vs OPNDF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while OPNDF trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -133.00. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to OPNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check OPNDF's competition here
SFUNY vs TGRVF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and TGRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGRVF's competition here
SFUNY vs HYPPF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while HYPPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to HYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check HYPPF's competition here
SFUNY vs ZMDTF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ZMDTF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check ZMDTF's competition here
SFUNY vs CKPDY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while CKPDY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to CKPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check CKPDY's competition here
SFUNY vs RSTN Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RSTN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check RSTN's competition here
SFUNY vs CPADF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check CPADF's competition here
SFUNY vs MSEZ Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while MSEZ trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and MSEZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSEZ's competition here
SFUNY vs PXSTF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check PXSTF's competition here
SFUNY vs BBUZ Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while BBUZ trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check BBUZ's competition here
SFUNY vs SABOF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while SABOF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and SABOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SABOF's competition here
SFUNY vs RDLYF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and RDLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RDLYF's competition here
SFUNY vs PRSNF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while PRSNF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and PRSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRSNF's competition here
SFUNY vs NIROF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while NIROF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to NIROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check NIROF's competition here
SFUNY vs EGLXF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while EGLXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check EGLXF's competition here
SFUNY vs GIFX Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while GIFX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check GIFX's competition here
SFUNY vs BMTM Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while BMTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to BMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check BMTM's competition here
SFUNY vs BBTVF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check BBTVF's competition here
SFUNY vs YOOIF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while YOOIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and YOOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YOOIF's competition here
SFUNY vs NUGL Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while NUGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check NUGL's competition here
SFUNY vs FMHS Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while FMHS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to FMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check FMHS's competition here
SFUNY vs CRTDW Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and CRTDW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRTDW's competition here
SFUNY vs LBUY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check LBUY's competition here
SFUNY vs MRNJ Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check MRNJ's competition here
SFUNY vs MRPT Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while MRPT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to MRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check MRPT's competition here
SFUNY vs QQQFF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while QQQFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and QQQFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QQQFF's competition here
SFUNY vs GOGY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and GOGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GOGY's competition here
SFUNY vs LTCP Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to LTCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check LTCP's competition here
SFUNY vs APMLF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 924.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and APMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APMLF's competition here
SFUNY vs SPFYF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 657.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while SPFYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to SPFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check SPFYF's competition here
SFUNY vs CYAP Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and CYAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYAP's competition here
SFUNY vs ILIM Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and ILIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ILIM's competition here
SFUNY vs VMSI Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 506.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and VMSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VMSI's competition here
SFUNY vs RBDC Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to RBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check RBDC's competition here
SFUNY vs DGTHF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 287.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while DGTHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to DGTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check DGTHF's competition here
SFUNY vs LKST Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 247.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to LKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check LKST's competition here
SFUNY vs SEEK Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 144.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to SEEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check SEEK's competition here
SFUNY vs KIWB Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check KIWB's competition here
SFUNY vs QTTOY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 78.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while QTTOY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and QTTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QTTOY's competition here
SFUNY vs ZONX Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to ZONX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check ZONX's competition here
SFUNY vs OTTV Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and OTTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTTV's competition here
SFUNY vs LHGI Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and LHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LHGI's competition here
SFUNY vs SLNM Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to SLNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check SLNM's competition here
SFUNY vs RWRDP Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 30K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to RWRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check RWRDP's competition here
SFUNY vs HUTN Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and HUTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUTN's competition here
SFUNY vs DELCF Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to DELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check DELCF's competition here
SFUNY vs REDFY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and REDFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REDFY's competition here
SFUNY vs BTIM Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and BTIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTIM's competition here
SFUNY vs PIKL Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and PIKL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIKL's competition here
SFUNY vs ISHM Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and ISHM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISHM's competition here
SFUNY vs SHGY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and SHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGY's competition here
SFUNY vs MDAW Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and MDAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDAW's competition here
SFUNY vs LOCM Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and LOCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOCM's competition here
SFUNY vs ROII Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and ROII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROII's competition here
SFUNY vs DATI Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to DATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check DATI's competition here
SFUNY vs LOVLQ Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check LOVLQ's competition here
SFUNY vs ZZLL Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check ZZLL's competition here
SFUNY vs FRFR Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to FRFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check FRFR's competition here
SFUNY vs INTH Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY and INTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INTH's competition here
SFUNY vs ABBY Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check ABBY's competition here
SFUNY vs RAIO Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to RAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check RAIO's competition here
SFUNY vs YITD Comparison August 2025
SFUNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFUNY stands at 5.4M. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, SFUNY is priced at $6.00, while YITD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFUNY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.30, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFUNY's ROE is -0.61%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFUNY is less volatile compared to YITD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFUNY.Check YITD's competition here