Sandfire Resources Limited

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, SCCO has a market cap of 71.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while SCCO trades at $89.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas SCCO's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCCO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to SCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, FCX has a market cap of 54.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while FCX trades at $37.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas FCX's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FCX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to FCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, ANFGF has a market cap of 23.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while ANFGF trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ANFGF's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANFGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to ANFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, FQVLF has a market cap of 11.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while FQVLF trades at $13.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas FQVLF's P/E ratio is 76.89. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FQVLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to FQVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, JIAXF has a market cap of 8.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while JIAXF trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas JIAXF's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JIAXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to JIAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, AIAGY has a market cap of 7.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while AIAGY trades at $43.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas AIAGY's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIAGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to AIAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, LUNMF has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while LUNMF trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas LUNMF's P/E ratio is 854.00. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LUNMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to LUNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, KGHPF has a market cap of 6.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while KGHPF trades at $32.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas KGHPF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KGHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to KGHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, OZMLF has a market cap of 6.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while OZMLF trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas OZMLF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OZMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to OZMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, MMLTF has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while MMLTF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas MMLTF's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to MMLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, AIAGF has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while AIAGF trades at $87.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas AIAGF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIAGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to AIAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, CSCCF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while CSCCF trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CSCCF's P/E ratio is -33.29. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CSCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to CSCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, HBM has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while HBM trades at $7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas HBM's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HBM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to HBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, ERO has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while ERO trades at $13.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ERO's P/E ratio is 74.44. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ERO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to ERO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, TGB has a market cap of 639.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while TGB trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas TGB's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TGB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to TGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, CAMLF has a market cap of 458.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while CAMLF trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CAMLF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAMLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to CAMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, IPMLF has a market cap of 426.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while IPMLF trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas IPMLF's P/E ratio is -14.63. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPMLF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to IPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, ACMDY has a market cap of 398.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while ACMDY trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ACMDY's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACMDY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to ACMDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, ASCUF has a market cap of 218.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while ASCUF trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ASCUF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASCUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to ASCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, ARREF has a market cap of 204.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while ARREF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ARREF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARREF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to ARREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, AMRZF has a market cap of 183.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while AMRZF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas AMRZF's P/E ratio is -22.39. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMRZF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to AMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, HLGVF has a market cap of 142.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while HLGVF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas HLGVF's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLGVF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to HLGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, LSANF has a market cap of 121.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while LSANF trades at $4.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas LSANF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to LSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, CPPKF has a market cap of 115.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while CPPKF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CPPKF's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPPKF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to CPPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, CPFXF has a market cap of 100.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while CPFXF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CPFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPFXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to CPFXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, HDRSF has a market cap of 51.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while HDRSF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas HDRSF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HDRSF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to HDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, HHLKF has a market cap of 48.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while HHLKF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas HHLKF's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HHLKF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to HHLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, EMTRF has a market cap of 42.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while EMTRF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas EMTRF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMTRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to EMTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, CCOXF has a market cap of 31.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while CCOXF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CCOXF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCOXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to CCOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, NEVDF has a market cap of 31.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while NEVDF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas NEVDF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEVDF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to NEVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, ATCUF has a market cap of 29.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while ATCUF trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ATCUF's P/E ratio is -16.44. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATCUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to ATCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, QCCUF has a market cap of 20.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while QCCUF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas QCCUF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QCCUF's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to QCCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, DRCMF has a market cap of 18.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while DRCMF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas DRCMF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRCMF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to DRCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 17.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while CPPMF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, CPORF has a market cap of 15.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while CPORF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CPORF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPORF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to CPORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, RKCLF has a market cap of 12.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while RKCLF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas RKCLF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RKCLF's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to RKCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, AGLAF has a market cap of 9.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while AGLAF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas AGLAF's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGLAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to AGLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, PNTZF has a market cap of 8.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while PNTZF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas PNTZF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PNTZF's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to PNTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, SLMFF has a market cap of 5.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while SLMFF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas SLMFF's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLMFF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to SLMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, WCUFF has a market cap of 5.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while WCUFF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas WCUFF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WCUFF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to WCUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, USCUF has a market cap of 4.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while USCUF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas USCUF's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USCUF's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to USCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, BZDLF has a market cap of 4.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while BZDLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas BZDLF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BZDLF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to BZDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, BCUFF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while BCUFF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas BCUFF's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCUFF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to BCUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, CPCPF has a market cap of 2.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while CPCPF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CPCPF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPCPF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to CPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, ANGUF has a market cap of 2.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while ANGUF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ANGUF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANGUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to ANGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, CAEN has a market cap of 1.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while CAEN trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CAEN's P/E ratio is 63.10. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to CAEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, FVVSF has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while FVVSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas FVVSF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FVVSF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to FVVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, BRVRF has a market cap of 1.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while BRVRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas BRVRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRVRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to BRVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, INUMF has a market cap of 868714.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while INUMF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas INUMF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INUMF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to INUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, JUBAF has a market cap of 681016.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while JUBAF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas JUBAF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JUBAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is less volatile compared to JUBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, ECMXF has a market cap of 446859.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while ECMXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ECMXF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECMXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to ECMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, AEOMF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while AEOMF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas AEOMF's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEOMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to AEOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.

SFRRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFRRF stands at 2.74B. In comparison, CROJF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SFRRF is priced at $5.97, while CROJF trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFRRF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CROJF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, SFRRF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CROJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFRRF is more volatile compared to CROJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFRRF.