SoftBank Corp.
SoftBank Corp. SFBQF Peers
See (SFBQF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFBQF | $1.52 | +4.11% | 72.30B | 21.71 | $0.07 | +3.88% |
| AXTLF | $0.10 | N/A | 28.85T | -11.11 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| DTEGY | $36.40 | +2.52% | 178.39B | 14.45 | $2.52 | +2.89% |
| DTEGF | $35.91 | +1.44% | 175.97B | 14.25 | $2.52 | +3.12% |
| NPPXF | $1.16 | +9.43% | 95.98B | 12.89 | $0.09 | +3.07% |
| CUCSY | $13.06 | +8.29% | 88.90B | 7.42 | $1.76 | +5.80% |
| NTTYY | $26.26 | +1.35% | 87.01B | 13.00 | $2.02 | +1.23% |
| SFTBF | $53.55 | -0.37% | 76.98B | 13.66 | $3.92 | +0.56% |
| SFTBY | $26.82 | -0.92% | 76.71B | 10.20 | $2.63 | +0.18% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.58B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SFBQF vs AXTLF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, AXTLF has a market cap of 28.85T. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AXTLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AXTLF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXTLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to AXTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs DTEGY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 178.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while DTEGY trades at $36.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs DTEGF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 175.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while DTEGF trades at $35.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs NPPXF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 95.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while NPPXF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CUCSY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 88.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CUCSY trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs NTTYY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 87.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while NTTYY trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SFTBF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 76.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SFTBF trades at $53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SFTBY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 76.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SFTBY trades at $26.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AMXVF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs KDDIF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 70.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while KDDIF trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs KDDIY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 69.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while KDDIY trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AMOVF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AARTY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 55.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AARTY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 94.19. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CLLNY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 52.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CLLNY trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -463.50. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SNGNF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 49.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SNGNF trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is -299.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SGAPY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 47.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SGAPY trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is -483.40. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs FNCTF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 37.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while FNCTF trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SCMWY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 33.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SCMWY trades at $65.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLGPY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 33.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLGPY trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SWZCF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 33.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SWZCF trades at $641.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TTRAF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 32.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TTRAF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AVIFY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 27.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AVIFY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AVIKF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 26.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AVIKF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CTOWY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 25.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CTOWY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TEFOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 25.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TEFOF trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -45.60. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CHWRF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 24.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CHWRF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs VODPF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 22.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while VODPF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VODPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BTGOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 20.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BTGOF trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BCEPF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 20.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BCEPF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TELNY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 20.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TELNY trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TELNF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 20.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TELNF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs KKPNF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 17.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while KKPNF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs KKPNY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 17.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while KKPNY trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AVIVF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs HLTOY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while HLTOY trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SJRWF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs ELMUY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 14.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while ELMUY trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs VDMCY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 14.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while VDMCY trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLSNY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLSNY trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs RCIAF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 14.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while RCIAF trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLSNF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLSNF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 35.90. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLKMF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 13.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLKMF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs LBRDB Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 13.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while LBRDB trades at $85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TCPFF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TCPFF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BGAOY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 12.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BGAOY trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs MTNOY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 11.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while MTNOY trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -24.59. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BCPPF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 11.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TELDY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 11.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TELDY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs HKTTY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 11.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while HKTTY trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs VODAF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BECEF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BECEF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs MTNOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 10.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while MTNOF trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLTZY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 9.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLTZY trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs FRTAY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 9.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while FRTAY trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLTZF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 9.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLTZF trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BCEXF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TIAOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 9.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TIAOF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TIAIY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 8.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TIAIY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -23.68. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs DIGBF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TIAJF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs ELMUF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while ELMUF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SHNUF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SHNUF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs HKTTF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while HKTTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SOBKY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SOBKY trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TELDF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TELDF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs MYTEF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs HLTOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while HLTOF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs QBCRF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while QBCRF trades at $27.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs PCCWY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 6.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while PCCWY trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -150.60. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs QBCAF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while QBCAF trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs MAXSF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TRKNF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TRKNY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TRKNY trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs PCWLF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while PCWLF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -67.89. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TKAGY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TCMFF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TCMFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs PHTCF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs GTMEY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AAFRF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AAFRF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs FRTAF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while FRTAF trades at $39.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BZQIF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BZQIF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs UDIRF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while UDIRF trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -79.19. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TFAOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BZQIY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BZQIY trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs IIJIF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while IIJIF trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AXXTF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AXXTF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs IIJIY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while IIJIY trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs MICCF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs PTITF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while PTITF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CUCSF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CUCSF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TACYY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLGHY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs PTTWF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs GMOYF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while GMOYF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs NZTCF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while NZTCF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SPKKY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SPKKY trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CLCMF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BGAOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BGAOF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CHRUF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.30B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CHRUF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -540.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.