SoftBank Corp.
SoftBank Corp. SFBQF Peers
See (SFBQF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFBQF | $1.52 | -1.12% | 72.5B | 19.04 | $0.08 | +3.87% |
| AXTLF | $0.10 | N/A | 32.4T | -11.11 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| DTEGF | $39.70 | +1.64% | 194.5B | 14.28 | $2.78 | +2.90% |
| DTEGY | $38.90 | +1.10% | 191.2B | 13.99 | $2.78 | +2.92% |
| NTTYY | $27.32 | -1.30% | 90.4B | 13.13 | $2.08 | +1.18% |
| NPPXF | $1.09 | +8.03% | 90.2B | 13.63 | $0.08 | +3.27% |
| CUCSY | $13.06 | +8.29% | 88.9B | 7.42 | $1.76 | +5.77% |
| SFTBY | $25.74 | -0.75% | 73.6B | 9.50 | $2.71 | +0.19% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SFTBF | $49.07 | -1.96% | 70.5B | 9.07 | $5.41 | +0.61% |
Stock Comparison
SFBQF vs AXTLF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, AXTLF has a market cap of 32.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AXTLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas AXTLF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXTLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to AXTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs DTEGF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 194.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while DTEGF trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs DTEGY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 191.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while DTEGY trades at $38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs NTTYY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 90.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while NTTYY trades at $27.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs NPPXF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while NPPXF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CUCSY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CUCSY trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SFTBY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SFTBY trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AMXVF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SFTBF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SFTBF trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AMOVF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs KDDIY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while KDDIY trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs KDDIF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while KDDIF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AARTY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AARTY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CLLNY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CLLNY trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -485.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SGAPY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SGAPY trades at $30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SNGNF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SNGNF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs FNCTF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while FNCTF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLGPY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLGPY trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SCMWY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SCMWY trades at $69.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TTRAF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TTRAF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SWZCF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SWZCF trades at $693.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TEFOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TEFOF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -52.45. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs VODPF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while VODPF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VODPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AVIKF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AVIKF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AVIFY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AVIFY trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CTOWY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CTOWY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CHWRF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CHWRF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BTGOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BTGOF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TELNY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TELNY trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TELNF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TELNF trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs KKPNF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while KKPNF trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs KKPNY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while KKPNY trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs ELMUY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while ELMUY trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLKMF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLKMF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AVIVF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs HLTOY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while HLTOY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs VDMCY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while VDMCY trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLSNF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLSNF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLSNY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLSNY trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs RCIAF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while RCIAF trades at $29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SJRWF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs LBRDB Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while LBRDB trades at $100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs MTNOY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while MTNOY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs MTNOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while MTNOF trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -23.83. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TCPFF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BCPPF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TELDY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TELDY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BCEPF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BCEPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs VODAF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs HKTTY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while HKTTY trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BECEF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BECEF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLTZY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLTZY trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLTZF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLTZF trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TIAIY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TIAIY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -24.74. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BCEXF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TIAJF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs DIGBF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TIAOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TIAOF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs FRTAY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while FRTAY trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs ELMUF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while ELMUF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SHNUF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs HKTTF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while HKTTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SOBKY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SOBKY trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TELDF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TELDF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs QBCRF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while QBCRF trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs QBCAF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while QBCAF trades at $28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs MYTEF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs HLTOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while HLTOF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs PCCWY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while PCCWY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -140.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs MAXSF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TKAGY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs PHTCF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs PCWLF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while PCWLF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -62.76. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AAFRF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AAFRF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TRKNY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TRKNY trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs FRTAF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while FRTAF trades at $39.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs UDIRF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while UDIRF trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -77.57. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BZQIF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BZQIF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs GTMEY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs AXXTF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while AXXTF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BZQIY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BZQIY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TCMFF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TCMFF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CUCSF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CUCSF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TFAOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs IIJIY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while IIJIY trades at $40.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs IIJIF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while IIJIF trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs MICCF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs PTITF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while PTITF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TACYY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TRKNF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BGAOY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BGAOY trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs BGAOF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while BGAOF trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs TLGHY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs PTTWF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs GMOYF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while GMOYF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs SPKKY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while SPKKY trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is more volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs PTXKY Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while PTXKY trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CLCMF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.
SFBQF vs CHRUF Comparison
SFBQF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFBQF stands at 72.5B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFBQF is priced at $1.52, while CHRUF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFBQF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.04, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -540.00. In terms of profitability, SFBQF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFBQF is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFBQF.