SETO Holdings, Inc.
SETO Holdings, Inc. SETO Peers
See (SETO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Care Facilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETO | $0.03 | +142.98% | 366736.00 | -2.94 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| FSNUY | $11.94 | -2.10% | 107.64B | 26.54 | $0.45 | N/A |
| RVLWF | $0.04 | +97.97% | 38.58B | -0.30 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| FSNUF | $37.73 | N/A | 21.25B | 20.85 | $1.81 | N/A |
| FMCQF | $52.25 | N/A | 15.33B | 21.86 | $2.39 | +2.48% |
| BDUUY | $32.33 | N/A | 12.84B | 28.36 | $1.14 | +2.79% |
| BDULF | $0.71 | N/A | 11.28B | 23.67 | $0.03 | +3.13% |
| BDUUF | $0.66 | N/A | 10.49B | 22.00 | $0.03 | +3.36% |
| JDHIY | $3.25 | +100.00% | 10.40B | 18.06 | $0.18 | N/A |
| JDHIF | $3.23 | N/A | 10.33B | 26.92 | $0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SETO vs FSNUY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, FSNUY has a market cap of 107.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while FSNUY trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas FSNUY's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSNUY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to FSNUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RVLWF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, RVLWF has a market cap of 38.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while RVLWF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas RVLWF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RVLWF's ROE of +3.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and RVLWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs FSNUF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, FSNUF has a market cap of 21.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while FSNUF trades at $37.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas FSNUF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSNUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to FSNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs FMCQF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, FMCQF has a market cap of 15.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while FMCQF trades at $52.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas FMCQF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FMCQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to FMCQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BDUUY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, BDUUY has a market cap of 12.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while BDUUY trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas BDUUY's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDUUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to BDUUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BDULF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, BDULF has a market cap of 11.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while BDULF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas BDULF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDULF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to BDULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BDUUF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, BDUUF has a market cap of 10.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while BDUUF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas BDUUF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDUUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to BDUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs JDHIY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, JDHIY has a market cap of 10.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while JDHIY trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas JDHIY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDHIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and JDHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs JDHIF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, JDHIF has a market cap of 10.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while JDHIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas JDHIF's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDHIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to JDHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs IHHHF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, IHHHF has a market cap of 9.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while IHHHF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas IHHHF's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to IHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RMSYF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, RMSYF has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while RMSYF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas RMSYF's P/E ratio is 440.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to RMSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BUGDF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, BUGDF has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while BUGDF trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas BUGDF's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUGDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to BUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RMYHY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, RMYHY has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while RMYHY trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas RMYHY's P/E ratio is 513.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMYHY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to RMYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs ANHGY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, ANHGY has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while ANHGY trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas ANHGY's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and ANHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs BUHPF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, BUHPF has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while BUHPF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas BUHPF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUHPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to BUHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MCVEF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, MCVEF has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while MCVEF trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas MCVEF's P/E ratio is 86.22. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCVEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to MCVEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs ORPEF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, ORPEF has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while ORPEF trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas ORPEF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORPEF's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to ORPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MCVEY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, MCVEY has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while MCVEY trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas MCVEY's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCVEY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to MCVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs TTALF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, TTALF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while TTALF trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas TTALF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTALF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and TTALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs RYHTY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, RYHTY has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while RYHTY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas RYHTY's P/E ratio is -20.14. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYHTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to RYHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RHCGF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, RHCGF has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while RHCGF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas RHCGF's P/E ratio is -20.14. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RHCGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to RHCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs LTGHY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, LTGHY has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while LTGHY trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas LTGHY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTGHY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to LTGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs LTGHF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, LTGHF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while LTGHF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas LTGHF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTGHF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to LTGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs LWSCF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, LWSCF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while LWSCF trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas LWSCF's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWSCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and LWSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs RAFLF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, RAFLF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while RAFLF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas RAFLF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to RAFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RKAGY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, RKAGY has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while RKAGY trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas RKAGY's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RKAGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to RKAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RHKJF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, RHKJF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while RHKJF trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas RHKJF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RHKJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to RHKJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NWKHY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, NWKHY has a market cap of 945.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while NWKHY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas NWKHY's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NWKHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to NWKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs EXETF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, EXETF has a market cap of 857.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while EXETF trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas EXETF's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXETF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and EXETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs JXFGF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, JXFGF has a market cap of 755.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while JXFGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas JXFGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JXFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to JXFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs WHTCF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, WHTCF has a market cap of 737.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while WHTCF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas WHTCF's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHTCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to WHTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs KDGTF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, KDGTF has a market cap of 675.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while KDGTF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas KDGTF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KDGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and KDGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs WFHG Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, WFHG has a market cap of 470.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while WFHG trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas WFHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WFHG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to WFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs ORRRY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, ORRRY has a market cap of 371.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while ORRRY trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas ORRRY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORRRY's ROE of +73.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and ORRRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs BTMDW Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, BTMDW has a market cap of 292.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while BTMDW trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas BTMDW's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTMDW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to BTMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MFCSF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, MFCSF has a market cap of 248.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while MFCSF trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas MFCSF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MFCSF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to MFCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs EVGRF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, EVGRF has a market cap of 237.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while EVGRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas EVGRF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVGRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to EVGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MKLNF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, MKLNF has a market cap of 224.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while MKLNF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas MKLNF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MKLNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and MKLNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs CHHHF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, CHHHF has a market cap of 121.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while CHHHF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas CHHHF's P/E ratio is -39.20. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHHHF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and CHHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs VTIAF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, VTIAF has a market cap of 104.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while VTIAF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas VTIAF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to VTIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MCIOF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, MCIOF has a market cap of 54.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while MCIOF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas MCIOF's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and MCIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs ASSF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, ASSF has a market cap of 45.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while ASSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas ASSF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASSF's ROE of -6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and ASSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs KONEF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, KONEF has a market cap of 44.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while KONEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas KONEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KONEF's ROE of -6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to KONEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs HQDA Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, HQDA has a market cap of 18.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while HQDA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas HQDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HQDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and HQDA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs NVLPF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, NVLPF has a market cap of 16.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while NVLPF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas NVLPF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVLPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and NVLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs USNU Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, USNU has a market cap of 14.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while USNU trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas USNU's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USNU's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to USNU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs FPCG Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, FPCG has a market cap of 10.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while FPCG trades at $1,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas FPCG's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and FPCG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs XCRT Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, XCRT has a market cap of 8.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while XCRT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas XCRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCRT's ROE of +2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to XCRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NUMIF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, NUMIF has a market cap of 8.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while NUMIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas NUMIF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUMIF's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to NUMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BICX Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, BICX has a market cap of 7.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while BICX trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas BICX's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BICX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and BICX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs HLYK Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, HLYK has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while HLYK trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas HLYK's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLYK's ROE of +4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to HLYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs GBCS Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, GBCS has a market cap of 6.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while GBCS trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas GBCS's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBCS's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and GBCS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs RHEP Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, RHEP has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while RHEP trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas RHEP's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RHEP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to RHEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs VLXC Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, VLXC has a market cap of 4.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while VLXC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas VLXC's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLXC's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and VLXC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs EPWCF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, EPWCF has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while EPWCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas EPWCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPWCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to EPWCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs GRST Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, GRST has a market cap of 2.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while GRST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas GRST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRST's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and GRST have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs JRSS Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, JRSS has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while JRSS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas JRSS's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRSS's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to JRSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs TOKIF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, TOKIF has a market cap of 1.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while TOKIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas TOKIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOKIF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to TOKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs SMAS Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, SMAS has a market cap of 1.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while SMAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas SMAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to SMAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MDGP Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, MDGP has a market cap of 1.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while MDGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas MDGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and MDGP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs NOVC Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, NOVC has a market cap of 1.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while NOVC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas NOVC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOVC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and NOVC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs PHMB Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, PHMB has a market cap of 1.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while PHMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas PHMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHMB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to PHMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs GNOW Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, GNOW has a market cap of 859731.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while GNOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas GNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and GNOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs DPAT Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, DPAT has a market cap of 397353.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while DPAT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas DPAT's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPAT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and DPAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs ARPC Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, ARPC has a market cap of 336555.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while ARPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas ARPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARPC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to ARPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NXGT Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, NXGT has a market cap of 332870.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while NXGT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas NXGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NXGT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to NXGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs KJFI Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, KJFI has a market cap of 278854.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while KJFI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas KJFI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KJFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and KJFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs FCHS Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, FCHS has a market cap of 263666.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while FCHS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas FCHS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCHS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to FCHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs JNHMF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, JNHMF has a market cap of 165397.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while JNHMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas JNHMF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNHMF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and JNHMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs HSMD Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, HSMD has a market cap of 153388.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while HSMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas HSMD's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSMD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and HSMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs BNYN Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, BNYN has a market cap of 150549.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while BNYN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas BNYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNYN's ROE of -14.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to BNYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs TPIA Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, TPIA has a market cap of 113827.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while TPIA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas TPIA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPIA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to TPIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs COLRF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, COLRF has a market cap of 108333.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while COLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas COLRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COLRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and COLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs AMBD Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, AMBD has a market cap of 85625.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while AMBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas AMBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to AMBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NMHLY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, NMHLY has a market cap of 41741.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while NMHLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas NMHLY's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMHLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and NMHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs GENN Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, GENN has a market cap of 32696.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while GENN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas GENN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GENN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and GENN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs DRWN Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, DRWN has a market cap of 23978.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while DRWN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas DRWN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRWN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to DRWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs CLRD Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, CLRD has a market cap of 21647.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while CLRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas CLRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLRD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to CLRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs SCAL Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, SCAL has a market cap of 17424.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while SCAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas SCAL's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and SCAL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs CHCR Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, CHCR has a market cap of 11991.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while CHCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas CHCR's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHCR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and CHCR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs ACGI Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, ACGI has a market cap of 10477.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while ACGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas ACGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACGI's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to ACGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs CEVE Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, CEVE has a market cap of 7709.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while CEVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas CEVE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEVE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and CEVE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs NAFS Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, NAFS has a market cap of 7007.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while NAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas NAFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAFS's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and NAFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs PRMD Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, PRMD has a market cap of 5610.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while PRMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas PRMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRMD's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to PRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MSGP Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, MSGP has a market cap of 5191.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while MSGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas MSGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSGP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and MSGP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs MSITF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, MSITF has a market cap of 4800.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while MSITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas MSITF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and MSITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs ERUC Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, ERUC has a market cap of 3915.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while ERUC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas ERUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERUC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to ERUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs SLHPF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, SLHPF has a market cap of 3901.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while SLHPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas SLHPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLHPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to SLHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs WEQL Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, WEQL has a market cap of 3534.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while WEQL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas WEQL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEQL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and WEQL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs BBAL Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, BBAL has a market cap of 3354.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while BBAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas BBAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBAL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and BBAL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs PAOG Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, PAOG has a market cap of 2478.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while PAOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas PAOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAOG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and PAOG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs NMMCF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, NMMCF has a market cap of 2087.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while NMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas NMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to NMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs PPRG Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, PPRG has a market cap of 1580.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while PPRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas PPRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPRG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and PPRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs OHAQ Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, OHAQ has a market cap of 1375.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while OHAQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas OHAQ's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OHAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and OHAQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs BNKL Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, BNKL has a market cap of 1248.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while BNKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas BNKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKL's ROE of -7.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and BNKL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs MAHN Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, MAHN has a market cap of 1211.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while MAHN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas MAHN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAHN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to MAHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs SLHGF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, SLHGF has a market cap of 398.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while SLHGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas SLHGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLHGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and SLHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs LHRP Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, LHRP has a market cap of 340.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while LHRP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas LHRP's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LHRP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and LHRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SETO vs NMSCA Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 366736.00. In comparison, NMSCA has a market cap of 275.00. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.03, while NMSCA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.94, whereas NMSCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMSCA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO and NMSCA have similar daily volatility (0.00).