SETO Holdings, Inc.
SETO Holdings, Inc. SETO Peers
See (SETO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Care Facilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETO | $0.02 | +0.00% | 210.8K | -1.69 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| FSNUY | $12.33 | -0.40% | 111.1B | 22.83 | $0.54 | +2.25% |
| FSNUF | $50.29 | +0.00% | 28.3B | 23.39 | $2.15 | +2.09% |
| FMCQF | $57.56 | +0.00% | 16.9B | 23.69 | $2.43 | +2.84% |
| JDHIY | $5.10 | +0.00% | 16.3B | 28.33 | $0.18 | N/A |
| BDUUY | $32.33 | +0.00% | 12.8B | 28.36 | $1.14 | +2.79% |
| IHHHF | $1.19 | +0.00% | 10.5B | 17.00 | $0.07 | +4.88% |
| JDHIF | $3.23 | +0.00% | 10.3B | 26.92 | $0.12 | N/A |
| BDULF | $0.62 | +0.00% | 9.9B | 20.67 | $0.03 | +3.58% |
| BDUUF | $0.60 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 20.00 | $0.03 | +3.70% |
Stock Comparison
SETO vs FSNUY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, FSNUY has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while FSNUY trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas FSNUY's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSNUY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to FSNUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs FSNUF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, FSNUF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while FSNUF trades at $50.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas FSNUF's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSNUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to FSNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs FMCQF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, FMCQF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while FMCQF trades at $57.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas FMCQF's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FMCQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to FMCQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs JDHIY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, JDHIY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while JDHIY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas JDHIY's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDHIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to JDHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BDUUY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, BDUUY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while BDUUY trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BDUUY's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDUUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to BDUUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs IHHHF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, IHHHF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while IHHHF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas IHHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to IHHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs JDHIF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, JDHIF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while JDHIF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas JDHIF's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDHIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to JDHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BDULF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, BDULF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while BDULF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BDULF's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDULF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to BDULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BDUUF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, BDUUF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while BDUUF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BDUUF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDUUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to BDUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RMSYF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, RMSYF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while RMSYF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RMSYF's P/E ratio is 505.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMSYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to RMSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RMYHY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, RMYHY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while RMYHY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RMYHY's P/E ratio is 574.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMYHY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to RMYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BUGDF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, BUGDF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while BUGDF trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BUGDF's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUGDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to BUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs ANHGY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, ANHGY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while ANHGY trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas ANHGY's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to ANHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BUHPF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, BUHPF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while BUHPF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BUHPF's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUHPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to BUHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MCVEF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, MCVEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while MCVEF trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MCVEF's P/E ratio is 86.22. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCVEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to MCVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs ORPEF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, ORPEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while ORPEF trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas ORPEF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORPEF's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to ORPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MCVEY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, MCVEY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while MCVEY trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MCVEY's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCVEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to MCVEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs TTALF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, TTALF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while TTALF trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas TTALF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTALF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to TTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RYHTY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, RYHTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while RYHTY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RYHTY's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYHTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to RYHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs LWSCF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, LWSCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while LWSCF trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LWSCF's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWSCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to LWSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RHCGF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, RHCGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while RHCGF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RHCGF's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RHCGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to RHCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs LTGHF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, LTGHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while LTGHF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LTGHF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTGHF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to LTGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs LTGHY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, LTGHY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while LTGHY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LTGHY's P/E ratio is -22.64. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTGHY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to LTGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RAFLF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, RAFLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while RAFLF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RAFLF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to RAFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RHKJF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, RHKJF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while RHKJF trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RHKJF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RHKJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to RHKJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RKAGY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, RKAGY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while RKAGY trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RKAGY's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RKAGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to RKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NWKHY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, NWKHY has a market cap of 973.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while NWKHY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NWKHY's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NWKHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to NWKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs EXETF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, EXETF has a market cap of 848.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while EXETF trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas EXETF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXETF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to EXETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs JXFGF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, JXFGF has a market cap of 755.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while JXFGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas JXFGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JXFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to JXFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs WHTCF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, WHTCF has a market cap of 710.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while WHTCF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas WHTCF's P/E ratio is -35.06. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHTCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to WHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs KDGTF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, KDGTF has a market cap of 675.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while KDGTF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas KDGTF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KDGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to KDGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs WFHG Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, WFHG has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while WFHG trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas WFHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WFHG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to WFHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs ORRRY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, ORRRY has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while ORRRY trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas ORRRY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORRRY's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to ORRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BTMDW Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, BTMDW has a market cap of 292.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while BTMDW trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BTMDW's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTMDW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to BTMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs EVGRF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, EVGRF has a market cap of 234.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while EVGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas EVGRF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVGRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to EVGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MKLNF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, MKLNF has a market cap of 217.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while MKLNF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MKLNF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MKLNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to MKLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MFCSF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, MFCSF has a market cap of 215.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while MFCSF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MFCSF's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MFCSF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to MFCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs CHHHF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, CHHHF has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while CHHHF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas CHHHF's P/E ratio is -54.76. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHHHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to CHHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs COLRF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, COLRF has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while COLRF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas COLRF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COLRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to COLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs VTIAF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, VTIAF has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while VTIAF trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas VTIAF's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to VTIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MCIOF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, MCIOF has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while MCIOF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MCIOF's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to MCIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs ASSF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, ASSF has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while ASSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas ASSF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASSF's ROE of -6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to ASSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs KONEF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, KONEF has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while KONEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas KONEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KONEF's ROE of -6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to KONEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs USNU Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, USNU has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while USNU trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas USNU's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USNU's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to USNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs HQDA Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, HQDA has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while HQDA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas HQDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HQDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to HQDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NVLPF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, NVLPF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while NVLPF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NVLPF's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVLPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to NVLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs FPCG Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, FPCG has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while FPCG trades at $1,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas FPCG's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to FPCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs XCRT Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, XCRT has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while XCRT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas XCRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCRT's ROE of +2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to XCRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NUMIF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, NUMIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while NUMIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NUMIF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUMIF's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to NUMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BICX Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, BICX has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while BICX trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BICX's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BICX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to BICX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RHEP Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, RHEP has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while RHEP trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RHEP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RHEP's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to RHEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs GBCS Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, GBCS has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while GBCS trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas GBCS's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBCS's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to GBCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs HLYK Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, HLYK has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while HLYK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas HLYK's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLYK's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to HLYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs RVLWF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, RVLWF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while RVLWF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RVLWF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RVLWF's ROE of +3.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to RVLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs VLXC Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, VLXC has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while VLXC trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas VLXC's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLXC's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to VLXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs GRST Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, GRST has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while GRST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas GRST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRST's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to GRST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs EPWCF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, EPWCF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while EPWCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas EPWCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPWCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to EPWCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs JRSS Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, JRSS has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while JRSS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas JRSS's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRSS's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to JRSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs TOKIF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, TOKIF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while TOKIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas TOKIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOKIF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to TOKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs SMAS Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, SMAS has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while SMAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas SMAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to SMAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MDGP Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, MDGP has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while MDGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MDGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDGP's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to MDGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NOVC Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, NOVC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while NOVC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NOVC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOVC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to NOVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs PHMB Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, PHMB has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while PHMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas PHMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHMB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to PHMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs GNOW Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, GNOW has a market cap of 859.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while GNOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas GNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to GNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MSITF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, MSITF has a market cap of 480K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while MSITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MSITF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to MSITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NXGT Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, NXGT has a market cap of 369.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while NXGT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NXGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NXGT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to NXGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs ARPC Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, ARPC has a market cap of 336.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while ARPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas ARPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARPC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to ARPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs JNHMF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, JNHMF has a market cap of 335K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while JNHMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas JNHMF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNHMF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to JNHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs FCHS Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, FCHS has a market cap of 296.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while FCHS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas FCHS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCHS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to FCHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs KJFI Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, KJFI has a market cap of 278.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while KJFI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas KJFI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KJFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to KJFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs DPAT Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, DPAT has a market cap of 276.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while DPAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas DPAT's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPAT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to DPAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BNYN Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, BNYN has a market cap of 150.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while BNYN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BNYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNYN's ROE of -14.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to BNYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs TPIA Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, TPIA has a market cap of 113.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while TPIA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas TPIA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPIA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to TPIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs AMBD Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, AMBD has a market cap of 85.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while AMBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas AMBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMBD's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to AMBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs GENN Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, GENN has a market cap of 49K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while GENN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas GENN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GENN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to GENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NMHLY Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, NMHLY has a market cap of 41.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while NMHLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NMHLY's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMHLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to NMHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs DRWN Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, DRWN has a market cap of 24K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while DRWN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas DRWN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRWN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to DRWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs HSMD Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, HSMD has a market cap of 19.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while HSMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas HSMD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSMD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to HSMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs SCAL Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, SCAL has a market cap of 17.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while SCAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas SCAL's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to SCAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs CLRD Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, CLRD has a market cap of 13.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while CLRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas CLRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLRD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to CLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs CHCR Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, CHCR has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while CHCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas CHCR's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHCR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to CHCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs ACGI Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, ACGI has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while ACGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas ACGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACGI's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to ACGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NAFS Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, NAFS has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while NAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NAFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAFS's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to NAFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NRTSF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, NRTSF has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while NRTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NRTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRTSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to NRTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs PRMD Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, PRMD has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while PRMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas PRMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRMD's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to PRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MSGP Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, MSGP has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while MSGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MSGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSGP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to MSGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs ERUC Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, ERUC has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while ERUC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas ERUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERUC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to ERUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs SLHPF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, SLHPF has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while SLHPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas SLHPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLHPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to SLHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs WEQL Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, WEQL has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while WEQL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas WEQL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEQL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to WEQL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BBAL Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, BBAL has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while BBAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BBAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBAL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to BBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NMMCF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, NMMCF has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while NMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to NMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs PPRG Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, PPRG has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while PPRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas PPRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPRG's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to PPRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs OHAQ Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, OHAQ has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while OHAQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas OHAQ's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OHAQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to OHAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs BNKL Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, BNKL has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while BNKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BNKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKL's ROE of -7.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to BNKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs MAHN Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, MAHN has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while MAHN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MAHN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAHN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is less volatile compared to MAHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs SLHGF Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, SLHGF has a market cap of 398. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while SLHGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas SLHGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLHGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to SLHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs LHRP Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, LHRP has a market cap of 343. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while LHRP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LHRP's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LHRP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to LHRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs NMSCA Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, NMSCA has a market cap of 275. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while NMSCA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NMSCA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMSCA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to NMSCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.
SETO vs INDR Comparison
SETO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SETO stands at 210.8K. In comparison, INDR has a market cap of 132. Regarding current trading prices, SETO is priced at $0.02, while INDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SETO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas INDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SETO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SETO is more volatile compared to INDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SETO.