Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.

SES.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SES.TO stands at 3.35B. In comparison, WCN.TO has a market cap of 69.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SES.TO is priced at $14.51, while WCN.TO trades at $269.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.44, whereas WCN.TO's P/E ratio is 79.61. In terms of profitability, SES.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WCN.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SES.TO is more volatile compared to WCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES.TO.

SES.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SES.TO stands at 3.35B. In comparison, GFL.TO has a market cap of 23.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SES.TO is priced at $14.51, while GFL.TO trades at $67.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.44, whereas GFL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.97. In terms of profitability, SES.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GFL.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SES.TO is more volatile compared to GFL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES.TO.

SES.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SES.TO stands at 3.35B. In comparison, ANRG.TO has a market cap of 224.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SES.TO is priced at $14.51, while ANRG.TO trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.44, whereas ANRG.TO's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, SES.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANRG.TO's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SES.TO is less volatile compared to ANRG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES.TO.

SES.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SES.TO stands at 3.35B. In comparison, LUX.CN has a market cap of 15.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SES.TO is priced at $14.51, while LUX.CN trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.44, whereas LUX.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SES.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LUX.CN's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SES.TO is more volatile compared to LUX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES.TO.

SES.TO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SES.TO stands at 3.35B. In comparison, BAC.CN has a market cap of 9.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SES.TO is priced at $14.51, while BAC.CN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SES.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.44, whereas BAC.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SES.TO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BAC.CN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SES.TO is more volatile compared to BAC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SES.TO.