Sensyne Health plc

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, EMIS.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while EMIS.L trades at £1,922.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMIS.L's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to EMIS.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to EMIS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check EMIS.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0MSD.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while 0MSD.L trades at £41.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0MSD.L's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to 0MSD.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to 0MSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check 0MSD.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, CRW.L has a market cap of 837M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while CRW.L trades at £2,450.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRW.L's P/E ratio is 74.69. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to CRW.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to CRW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check CRW.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, INS.L has a market cap of 199.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while INS.L trades at £829.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INS.L's P/E ratio is 59.21. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to INS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to INS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check INS.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, SMD.L has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while SMD.L trades at £58.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMD.L's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to SMD.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SENS.L has daily volatility of 115.79 and SMD.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check SMD.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, KOO.L has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while KOO.L trades at £155.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOO.L's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to KOO.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to KOO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check KOO.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, RENX.L has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while RENX.L trades at £7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RENX.L's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to RENX.L's ROE of +2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to RENX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check RENX.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, COG.L has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while COG.L trades at £25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COG.L's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to COG.L's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to COG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check COG.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, INHC.L has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while INHC.L trades at £9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INHC.L's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to INHC.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to INHC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check INHC.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, FDBK.L has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while FDBK.L trades at £14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDBK.L's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to FDBK.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to FDBK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check FDBK.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, IQAI.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while IQAI.L trades at £0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQAI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to IQAI.L's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to IQAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check IQAI.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, DVRG.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while DVRG.L trades at £0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVRG.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to DVRG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to DVRG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check DVRG.L's competition here

SENS.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.L stands at 0. In comparison, TRLS.L has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.L is priced at £0.35, while TRLS.L trades at £0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRLS.L's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SENS.L's ROE is -0.57%, compared to TRLS.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.L is more volatile compared to TRLS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.L.Check TRLS.L's competition here