Sensor Technologies Corp.

SENS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.CN stands at 3.9M. In comparison, IBM.NE has a market cap of 377.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while IBM.NE trades at CA$44.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBM.NE's P/E ratio is 49.76. In terms of profitability, SENS.CN's ROE is -2.00%, compared to IBM.NE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.CN is less volatile compared to IBM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.CN.

SENS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.CN stands at 3.9M. In comparison, GIB-A.TO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while GIB-A.TO trades at CA$143.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIB-A.TO's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, SENS.CN's ROE is -2.00%, compared to GIB-A.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.CN is less volatile compared to GIB-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.CN.

SENS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.CN stands at 3.9M. In comparison, SFTC.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while SFTC.TO trades at CA$24.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTC.TO's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, SENS.CN's ROE is -2.00%, compared to SFTC.TO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.CN is less volatile compared to SFTC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.CN.

SENS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.CN stands at 3.9M. In comparison, CTS.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while CTS.TO trades at CA$5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTS.TO's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, SENS.CN's ROE is -2.00%, compared to CTS.TO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.CN is less volatile compared to CTS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.CN.

SENS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.CN stands at 3.9M. In comparison, ALYA.TO has a market cap of 226.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while ALYA.TO trades at CA$2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALYA.TO's P/E ratio is 228.00. In terms of profitability, SENS.CN's ROE is -2.00%, compared to ALYA.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.CN is less volatile compared to ALYA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.CN.

SENS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.CN stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PBIT.CN has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while PBIT.CN trades at CA$0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBIT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, SENS.CN's ROE is -2.00%, compared to PBIT.CN's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.CN is less volatile compared to PBIT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.CN.

SENS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.CN stands at 3.9M. In comparison, PAID.CN has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while PAID.CN trades at CA$0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, SENS.CN's ROE is -2.00%, compared to PAID.CN's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.CN and PAID.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SENS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.CN stands at 3.9M. In comparison, KNR.NE has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while KNR.NE trades at CA$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNR.NE's P/E ratio is 0.83. In terms of profitability, SENS.CN's ROE is -2.00%, compared to KNR.NE's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.CN is less volatile compared to KNR.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SENS.CN.

SENS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.CN stands at 3.9M. In comparison, DCSI.CN has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while DCSI.CN trades at CA$3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCSI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, SENS.CN's ROE is -2.00%, compared to DCSI.CN's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.CN and DCSI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SENS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.CN stands at 3.9M. In comparison, NERD.CN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while NERD.CN trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NERD.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SENS.CN's ROE is -2.00%, compared to NERD.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.CN and NERD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SENS.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SENS.CN stands at 3.9M. In comparison, NFT.NE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SENS.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while NFT.NE trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SENS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFT.NE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SENS.CN's ROE is -2.00%, compared to NFT.NE's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SENS.CN and NFT.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).