SEEEN plc
SEEEN plc (SEEN.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SEEN.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEEN.L | £3.50 | +0.00% | 5.1M | -0.88 | -£0.04 | N/A |
| 0A28.L | £68.83 | -0.53% | 260B | 5.71 | £12.05 | +0.15% |
| AUTO.L | £832.40 | -0.53% | 7.1B | 25.59 | £0.32 | +1.21% |
| RMV.L | £823.80 | +0.66% | 6.1B | 30.31 | £0.26 | +0.92% |
| BCG.L | £352.50 | -1.12% | 1.6B | 42.75 | £0.08 | +0.80% |
| MONY.L | £199.00 | -1.39% | 1B | 13.20 | £0.15 | +6.31% |
| VKCO.IL | £4.10 | +6.58% | 972M | -12.06 | -£0.34 | N/A |
| CNIC.L | £123.20 | +1.99% | 357.5M | -123.20 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| TIG.L | £64.00 | -1.08% | 150.2M | 10.42 | £0.06 | +1.22% |
| OTMP.L | £109.08 | +0.07% | 92.8M | -109.08 | -£0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SEEN.L vs 0A28.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, 0A28.L has a market cap of 260B. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while 0A28.L trades at £68.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas 0A28.L's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0A28.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to 0A28.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check 0A28.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs AUTO.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, AUTO.L has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while AUTO.L trades at £832.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas AUTO.L's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AUTO.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to AUTO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check AUTO.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs RMV.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, RMV.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while RMV.L trades at £823.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas RMV.L's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to RMV.L's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to RMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check RMV.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs BCG.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, BCG.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while BCG.L trades at £352.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BCG.L's P/E ratio is 42.75. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BCG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to BCG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check BCG.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs MONY.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, MONY.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while MONY.L trades at £199.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MONY.L's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MONY.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to MONY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check MONY.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs VKCO.IL Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, VKCO.IL has a market cap of 972M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while VKCO.IL trades at £4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas VKCO.IL's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to VKCO.IL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to VKCO.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check VKCO.IL's competition here
SEEN.L vs CNIC.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, CNIC.L has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while CNIC.L trades at £123.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CNIC.L's P/E ratio is -123.20. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to CNIC.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SEEN.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and CNIC.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check CNIC.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs TIG.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, TIG.L has a market cap of 150.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while TIG.L trades at £64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas TIG.L's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to TIG.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to TIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check TIG.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs OTMP.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, OTMP.L has a market cap of 92.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while OTMP.L trades at £109.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas OTMP.L's P/E ratio is -109.08. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to OTMP.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to OTMP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check OTMP.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs MOS.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, MOS.L has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while MOS.L trades at £0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MOS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MOS.L's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to MOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check MOS.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs BBSN.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, BBSN.L has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while BBSN.L trades at £66.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BBSN.L's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BBSN.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to BBSN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check BBSN.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs BOOM.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, BOOM.L has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while BOOM.L trades at £337.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BOOM.L's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BOOM.L's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to BOOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check BOOM.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs NWOR.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, NWOR.L has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while NWOR.L trades at £22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas NWOR.L's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NWOR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to NWOR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check NWOR.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs SMV.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, SMV.L has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while SMV.L trades at £53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SMV.L's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SMV.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SEEN.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and SMV.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check SMV.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs 7DIG.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, 7DIG.L has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while 7DIG.L trades at £0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas 7DIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 7DIG.L's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L and 7DIG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 7DIG.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs DBOX.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, DBOX.L has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while DBOX.L trades at £4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas DBOX.L's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to DBOX.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L and DBOX.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DBOX.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs SCGL.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, SCGL.L has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while SCGL.L trades at £0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SCGL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SCGL.L's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to SCGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check SCGL.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs DISH.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, DISH.L has a market cap of 525.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while DISH.L trades at £0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas DISH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to DISH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L and DISH.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DISH.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs MAIL.IL Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, MAIL.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while MAIL.IL trades at £12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MAIL.IL's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MAIL.IL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to MAIL.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check MAIL.IL's competition here
SEEN.L vs 0XI7.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, 0XI7.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while 0XI7.L trades at £27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas 0XI7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0XI7.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SEEN.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and 0XI7.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check 0XI7.L's competition here
SEEN.L vs IME.L Comparison August 2025
SEEN.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEEN.L stands at 5.1M. In comparison, IME.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEEN.L is priced at £3.50, while IME.L trades at £17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEEN.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas IME.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SEEN.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to IME.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SEEN.L is less volatile compared to IME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEEN.L.Check IME.L's competition here