Securitas AB (publ)
Securitas AB (publ) SCTBY Peers
See (SCTBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCTBY | $15.36 | N/A | 8.7B | 15.52 | $0.99 | +2.61% |
| ASAZY | $15.72 | -1.26% | 35.3B | 22.78 | $0.69 | +1.80% |
| ASAZF | $31.72 | +0.01% | 35.2B | 22.99 | $1.38 | +0.89% |
| SOMLF | $38.19 | +14.34% | 15.9B | 22.60 | $1.69 | +1.73% |
| SOMLY | $9.29 | -0.32% | 15.4B | 22.12 | $0.42 | +0.50% |
| SCTBF | $15.35 | +4.07% | 8.4B | 15.51 | $0.99 | +2.63% |
| LOIMF | $39.51 | N/A | 2.6B | 15.68 | $2.52 | +3.65% |
| SOHGF | $5.31 | -80.00% | 2.6B | 17.70 | $0.30 | N/A |
| MRLWF | $4.93 | N/A | 387M | -164.27 | -$0.03 | +31.45% |
| CRFQF | $2.33 | -6.80% | 223.8M | 233.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SCTBY vs ASAZY Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while ASAZY trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs ASAZF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while ASAZF trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs SOMLF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while SOMLF trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to SOMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs SOMLY Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while SOMLY trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs SCTBF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while SCTBF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to SCTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs LOIMF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to LOIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs SOHGF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs MRLWF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, MRLWF has a market cap of 387M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while MRLWF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas MRLWF's P/E ratio is -164.27. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRLWF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to MRLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs CRFQF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs ICTSF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while ICTSF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is -35.45. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs RSKIA Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while RSKIA trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to RSKIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs WPNNF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs GKPRF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while GKPRF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -42.39. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs SECUF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while SECUF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is -174.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SECUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to SECUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs PRBCF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs ALXXF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while ALXXF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to ALXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs LDDFF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while LDDFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs CSTI Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while CSTI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs VOTDF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs DIGTF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while DIGTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs DADTF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while DADTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to DADTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs PLRTF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs IWAL Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while IWAL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs SSECF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while SSECF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to SSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs MACE Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while MACE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs DTII Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 580.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while DTII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to DTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs VCON Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while VCON trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs DRNG Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 522.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while DRNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to DRNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs ATWT Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 480.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while ATWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to ATWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs BLPG Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 453.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while BLPG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to BLPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs LGTT Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while LGTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGTT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to LGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs WCCP Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 351.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while WCCP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs VSYS Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while VSYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to VSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs PSGI Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while PSGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to PSGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs PTEFF Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 117.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while PTEFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs SCTY Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while SCTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to SCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs MGNT Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while MGNT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to MGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs GDSI Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while GDSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to GDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs HCGS Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while HCGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs MIHL Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while MIHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to MIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs SKVY Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while SKVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKVY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to SKVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs ABPR Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while ABPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABPR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to ABPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs WOAM Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 32.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while WOAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WOAM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to WOAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs PERL Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while PERL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to PERL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs EKCS Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 21.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while EKCS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs EBWK Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while EBWK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to EBWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs HWSY Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while HWSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HWSY's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to HWSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs CVAS Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 7.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while CVAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVAS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to CVAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs ARGL Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 741. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while ARGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to ARGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs DIRV Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while DIRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to DIRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs HLCN Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, HLCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while HLCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to HLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs GTKP Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GTKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while GTKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to GTKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs PWLK Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PWLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while PWLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is less volatile compared to PWLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.
SCTBY vs VSYM Comparison
SCTBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBY stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VSYM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBY is priced at $15.36, while VSYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBY currently has a P/E ratio of 15.52, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBY is more volatile compared to VSYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBY.