Securitas AB (publ)
Securitas AB (publ) (SCTBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SCTBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCTBF | $16.50 | +0.00% | 9B | 16.67 | $0.99 | +2.83% |
| ASAZF | $41.31 | +0.00% | 43.5B | 28.89 | $1.43 | +1.49% |
| ASAZY | $18.38 | -1.50% | 40.5B | 25.08 | $0.72 | +1.36% |
| SOMLF | $33.35 | +0.00% | 13.5B | 20.21 | $1.65 | +2.01% |
| SCTBY | $16.83 | +0.00% | 9.7B | 17.17 | $0.98 | +2.08% |
| SOMLY | $9.44 | +3.26% | 7.8B | 22.76 | $0.41 | +1.56% |
| SOHGF | $7.85 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 18.69 | $0.42 | N/A |
| LOIMF | $46.65 | +0.00% | 3.1B | 18.08 | $2.58 | +3.09% |
| MRLWF | $6.03 | +3.79% | 474.5M | 86.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| ZDCAF | $4.00 | +3.36% | 443.7M | 400.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SCTBF vs ASAZF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while ASAZF trades at $41.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check ASAZF's competition here
SCTBF vs ASAZY Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while ASAZY trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check ASAZY's competition here
SCTBF vs SOMLF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while SOMLF trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and SOMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMLF's competition here
SCTBF vs SCTBY Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while SCTBY trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to SCTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check SCTBY's competition here
SCTBF vs SOMLY Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while SOMLY trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check SOMLY's competition here
SCTBF vs SOHGF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while SOHGF trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check SOHGF's competition here
SCTBF vs LOIMF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while LOIMF trades at $46.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and LOIMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOIMF's competition here
SCTBF vs MRLWF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, MRLWF has a market cap of 474.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while MRLWF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas MRLWF's P/E ratio is 86.14. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRLWF's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to MRLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check MRLWF's competition here
SCTBF vs ZDCAF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, ZDCAF has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while ZDCAF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas ZDCAF's P/E ratio is 400.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZDCAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and ZDCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZDCAF's competition here
SCTBF vs CRFQF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check CRFQF's competition here
SCTBF vs ICTSF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while ICTSF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and ICTSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICTSF's competition here
SCTBF vs GKPRF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while GKPRF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -24.71. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check GKPRF's competition here
SCTBF vs RSKIA Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while RSKIA trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and RSKIA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSKIA's competition here
SCTBF vs WPNNF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check WPNNF's competition here
SCTBF vs SECUF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while SECUF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is 151.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SECUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to SECUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check SECUF's competition here
SCTBF vs ALXXF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while ALXXF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -28.83. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and ALXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALXXF's competition here
SCTBF vs TZLTF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, TZLTF has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while TZLTF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas TZLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TZLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and TZLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TZLTF's competition here
SCTBF vs PRBCF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while PRBCF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check PRBCF's competition here
SCTBF vs CSTI Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while CSTI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check CSTI's competition here
SCTBF vs VOTDF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check VOTDF's competition here
SCTBF vs LDDFF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while LDDFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +19.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check LDDFF's competition here
SCTBF vs DIGTF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while DIGTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check DIGTF's competition here
SCTBF vs DADTF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while DADTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and DADTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DADTF's competition here
SCTBF vs PLRTF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check PLRTF's competition here
SCTBF vs IWAL Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while IWAL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check IWAL's competition here
SCTBF vs SSECF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while SSECF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and SSECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSECF's competition here
SCTBF vs MACE Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while MACE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MACE's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check MACE's competition here
SCTBF vs ARGL Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while ARGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and ARGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARGL's competition here
SCTBF vs ATWT Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while ATWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to ATWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check ATWT's competition here
SCTBF vs PCPZ Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, PCPZ has a market cap of 956.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while PCPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas PCPZ's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCPZ's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to PCPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check PCPZ's competition here
SCTBF vs WCCP Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 891.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while WCCP trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and WCCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WCCP's competition here
SCTBF vs DTII Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 638K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while DTII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to DTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check DTII's competition here
SCTBF vs VCON Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while VCON trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and VCON have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VCON's competition here
SCTBF vs BLPG Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 420.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while BLPG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to BLPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check BLPG's competition here
SCTBF vs DRNG Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 391.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while DRNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and DRNG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRNG's competition here
SCTBF vs LGTT Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while LGTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGTT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to LGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check LGTT's competition here
SCTBF vs VSYS Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while VSYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to VSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check VSYS's competition here
SCTBF vs PTEFF Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 168.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while PTEFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check PTEFF's competition here
SCTBF vs PSGI Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while PSGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and PSGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSGI's competition here
SCTBF vs SCTY Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while SCTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and SCTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTY's competition here
SCTBF vs GDSI Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while GDSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and GDSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GDSI's competition here
SCTBF vs HCGS Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while HCGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check HCGS's competition here
SCTBF vs MIHL Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while MIHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and MIHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIHL's competition here
SCTBF vs PERL Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 59.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while PERL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and PERL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PERL's competition here
SCTBF vs MGNT Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while MGNT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to MGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check MGNT's competition here
SCTBF vs ABPR Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while ABPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABPR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and ABPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABPR's competition here
SCTBF vs WOAM Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 32.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while WOAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WOAM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to WOAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check WOAM's competition here
SCTBF vs CVAS Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while CVAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVAS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and CVAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CVAS's competition here
SCTBF vs EBWK Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while EBWK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and EBWK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBWK's competition here
SCTBF vs SKVY Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while SKVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKVY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and SKVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKVY's competition here
SCTBF vs EKCS Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 10.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while EKCS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EKCS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check EKCS's competition here
SCTBF vs HWSY Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while HWSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HWSY's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to HWSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check HWSY's competition here
SCTBF vs DIRV Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while DIRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and DIRV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIRV's competition here
SCTBF vs VSYM Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, VSYM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while VSYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and VSYM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSYM's competition here
SCTBF vs GTKP Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, GTKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while GTKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF is less volatile compared to GTKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCTBF.Check GTKP's competition here
SCTBF vs HLCN Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, HLCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while HLCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and HLCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLCN's competition here
SCTBF vs PWLK Comparison March 2026
SCTBF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCTBF stands at 9B. In comparison, PWLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCTBF is priced at $16.50, while PWLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCTBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCTBF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCTBF and PWLK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PWLK's competition here