ScS Group plc
ScS Group plc SCS.L Peers
See (SCS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCS.L | £270.00 | +0.75% | 95.6M | 22.50 | £0.12 | N/A |
| 0R1O.IL | £204.70 | -0.80% | 1.7T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0K0E.L | £2,504.77 | -0.26% | 127B | 686.05 | £3.65 | N/A |
| 0JVQ.L | £225.60 | -0.75% | 126.4B | 18.32 | £12.31 | +2.01% |
| 0KAB.L | £91.30 | +2.13% | 78B | 2.92 | £31.25 | N/A |
| 0HJL.L | £3,676.00 | -0.11% | 62B | 32.73 | £113.30 | N/A |
| 0LD8.L | £104.73 | +0.09% | 47.6B | 8.65 | £12.11 | +4.31% |
| 0KXO.L | £131.29 | +0.20% | 42.9B | 29.17 | £4.50 | +1.18% |
| 0IC7.L | £114.67 | +0.06% | 24.9B | 11.61 | £9.75 | +2.07% |
| 0LIB.L | £476.34 | +0.28% | 21.4B | 23.64 | £20.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SCS.L vs 0R1O.IL Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0R1O.IL has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0R1O.IL trades at £204.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0R1O.IL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0R1O.IL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0R1O.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0K0E.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0K0E.L has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0K0E.L trades at £2,504.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0K0E.L's P/E ratio is 686.05. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0K0E.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0K0E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0JVQ.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0JVQ.L has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0JVQ.L trades at £225.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0JVQ.L's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0JVQ.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0JVQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0KAB.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0KAB.L has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0KAB.L trades at £91.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0KAB.L's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0KAB.L's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0KAB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0HJL.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0HJL.L has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0HJL.L trades at £3,676.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0HJL.L's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HJL.L's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0HJL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0LD8.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0LD8.L has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0LD8.L trades at £104.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0LD8.L's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0LD8.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0LD8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0KXO.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0KXO.L has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0KXO.L trades at £131.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0KXO.L's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0KXO.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0KXO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0IC7.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0IC7.L has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0IC7.L trades at £114.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0IC7.L's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0IC7.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0IC7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0LIB.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0LIB.L has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0LIB.L trades at £476.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0LIB.L's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0LIB.L's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0LIB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0LXC.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0LXC.L has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0LXC.L trades at £173.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0LXC.L's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0LXC.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0LXC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0IC8.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0IC8.L has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0IC8.L trades at £101.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0IC8.L's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0IC8.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0IC8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0IUX.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0IUX.L has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0IUX.L trades at £127.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0IUX.L's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0IUX.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0IUX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0R18.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0R18.L has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0R18.L trades at £72.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0R18.L's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0R18.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0R18.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0HTQ.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0HTQ.L has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0HTQ.L trades at £71.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0HTQ.L's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HTQ.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0HTQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0IPD.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0IPD.L has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0IPD.L trades at £132.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0IPD.L's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0IPD.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and 0IPD.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs 0JSC.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0JSC.L has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0JSC.L trades at £33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0JSC.L's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0JSC.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0JSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0QVE.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0QVE.L has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0QVE.L trades at £520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0QVE.L's P/E ratio is 116.78. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QVE.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and 0QVE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs 0RCW.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0RCW.L has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0RCW.L trades at £152.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0RCW.L's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RCW.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0RCW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0IIW.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0IIW.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0IIW.L trades at £53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0IIW.L's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0IIW.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0IIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs JD.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, JD.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while JD.L trades at £90.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas JD.L's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to JD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0R32.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0R32.L has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0R32.L trades at £91.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0R32.L's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0R32.L's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0R32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0SOM.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0SOM.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0SOM.L trades at £24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0SOM.L's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0SOM.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0SOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0KTF.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0KTF.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0KTF.L trades at £206.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0KTF.L's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0KTF.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0KTF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs DFIB.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, DFIB.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while DFIB.L trades at £9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas DFIB.L's P/E ratio is -50.94. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DFIB.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and DFIB.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs 0H9G.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0H9G.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0H9G.L trades at £48.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0H9G.L's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0H9G.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0H9G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs FRAS.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, FRAS.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while FRAS.L trades at £676.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas FRAS.L's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRAS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to FRAS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs ROO.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, ROO.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while ROO.L trades at £176.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas ROO.L's P/E ratio is 58.90. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROO.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to ROO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0IQK.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0IQK.L has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0IQK.L trades at £24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0IQK.L's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0IQK.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0IQK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs JET.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, JET.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while JET.L trades at £1,134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas JET.L's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JET.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to JET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs DNLM.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, DNLM.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while DNLM.L trades at £1,141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas DNLM.L's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNLM.L's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to DNLM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0HSU.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0HSU.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0HSU.L trades at £18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0HSU.L's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HSU.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0HSU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0QK3.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0QK3.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0QK3.L trades at £35.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0QK3.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QK3.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0QK3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs SMWH.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, SMWH.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while SMWH.L trades at £1,104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas SMWH.L's P/E ratio is 220.80. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMWH.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to SMWH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs CURY.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, CURY.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while CURY.L trades at £124.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas CURY.L's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CURY.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to CURY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs PETS.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, PETS.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while PETS.L trades at £247.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas PETS.L's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PETS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to PETS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0JRL.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0JRL.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0JRL.L trades at £9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0JRL.L's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0JRL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0JRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs MOON.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, MOON.L has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while MOON.L trades at £221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas MOON.L's P/E ratio is -73.67. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOON.L's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to MOON.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs AO.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, AO.L has a market cap of 551.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while AO.L trades at £97.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas AO.L's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to AO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs THG.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, THG.L has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while THG.L trades at £32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas THG.L's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THG.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to THG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0KDU.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0KDU.L has a market cap of 435.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0KDU.L trades at £7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0KDU.L's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0KDU.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0KDU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs ASC.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, ASC.L has a market cap of 366.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while ASC.L trades at £307.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas ASC.L's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASC.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to ASC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs BOO.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, BOO.L has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while BOO.L trades at £26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas BOO.L's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOO.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to BOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0RA5.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0RA5.L has a market cap of 342.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0RA5.L trades at £1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0RA5.L's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RA5.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and 0RA5.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs HFD.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, HFD.L has a market cap of 326.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while HFD.L trades at £149.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas HFD.L's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HFD.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to HFD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs CARD.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, CARD.L has a market cap of 311.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while CARD.L trades at £89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas CARD.L's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CARD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to CARD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs DEBS.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, DEBS.L has a market cap of 285M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while DEBS.L trades at £20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas DEBS.L's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEBS.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to DEBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0ROF.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0ROF.L has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0ROF.L trades at £11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0ROF.L's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0ROF.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0ROF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs BWNG.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, BWNG.L has a market cap of 185.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while BWNG.L trades at £39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas BWNG.L's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BWNG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to BWNG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0OQX.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0OQX.L has a market cap of 96.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0OQX.L trades at £6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0OQX.L's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0OQX.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and 0OQX.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs 0RP3.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0RP3.L has a market cap of 81.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0RP3.L trades at £2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0RP3.L's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RP3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and 0RP3.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs IGR.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, IGR.L has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while IGR.L trades at £80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas IGR.L's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IGR.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to IGR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs MRK.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, MRK.L has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while MRK.L trades at £61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas MRK.L's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRK.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to MRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs G4M.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, G4M.L has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while G4M.L trades at £233.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas G4M.L's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to G4M.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to G4M.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs PROC.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, PROC.L has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while PROC.L trades at £38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas PROC.L's P/E ratio is 38.10. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PROC.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and PROC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs WRKS.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, WRKS.L has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while WRKS.L trades at £58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas WRKS.L's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRKS.L's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to WRKS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs ANG.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, ANG.L has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while ANG.L trades at £47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas ANG.L's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to ANG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs HRN.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, HRN.L has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while HRN.L trades at £15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas HRN.L's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRN.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to HRN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs SOS.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, SOS.L has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while SOS.L trades at £8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas SOS.L's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to SOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs MTC.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, MTC.L has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while MTC.L trades at £3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas MTC.L's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and MTC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs PODP.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, PODP.L has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while PODP.L trades at £6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas PODP.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PODP.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to PODP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs MMAG.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, MMAG.L has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while MMAG.L trades at £8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas MMAG.L's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMAG.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and MMAG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs SCHO.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, SCHO.L has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while SCHO.L trades at £44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas SCHO.L's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCHO.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to SCHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0DQK.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0DQK.L has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0DQK.L trades at £6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0DQK.L's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0DQK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and 0DQK.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs DISP.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, DISP.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while DISP.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas DISP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DISP.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and DISP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs UBG.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, UBG.L has a market cap of 488.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while UBG.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas UBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UBG.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and UBG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs ITS.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, ITS.L has a market cap of 406.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while ITS.L trades at £0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas ITS.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and ITS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs 0IJU.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0IJU.L has a market cap of 749. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0IJU.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0IJU.L's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0IJU.L's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L and 0IJU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SCS.L vs MYSL.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, MYSL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while MYSL.L trades at £2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas MYSL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MYSL.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SCS.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and MYSL.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SCS.L vs MADE.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, MADE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while MADE.L trades at £0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas MADE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MADE.L's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SCS.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and MADE.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SCS.L vs MEAL.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, MEAL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while MEAL.L trades at £1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas MEAL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEAL.L's ROE of -41.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SCS.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and MEAL.L has daily volatility of N/A.
SCS.L vs 0R3D.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0R3D.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0R3D.L trades at £72.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0R3D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0R3D.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0R3D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs SGI.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, SGI.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while SGI.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas SGI.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGI.L's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to SGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs STU.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, STU.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while STU.L trades at £115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas STU.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STU.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to STU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs 0M1U.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, 0M1U.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while 0M1U.L trades at £72.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas 0M1U.L's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0M1U.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to 0M1U.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.
SCS.L vs DC.L Comparison
SCS.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCS.L stands at 95.6M. In comparison, DC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCS.L is priced at £270.00, while DC.L trades at £137.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.50, whereas DC.L's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SCS.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DC.L's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SCS.L is less volatile compared to DC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCS.L.