Shawcor Ltd.
Shawcor Ltd. SCL.TO Peers
See (SCL.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCL.TO | $16.57 | +1.04% | 1.15B | 552.33 | $0.03 | N/A |
| TVK.TO | $170.17 | +2.96% | 3.32B | 45.14 | $3.77 | +0.39% |
| CEU.TO | $6.16 | -1.28% | 1.38B | 8.00 | $0.77 | +2.12% |
| EFX.TO | $9.91 | -0.70% | 1.23B | 11.80 | $0.84 | +1.25% |
| PSI.TO | $11.80 | +0.68% | 937.28M | 13.11 | $0.90 | +4.40% |
| TCW.TO | $4.47 | +0.68% | 842.02M | 8.60 | $0.52 | +4.13% |
| NOA.TO | $24.10 | +0.25% | 715.71M | 15.86 | $1.52 | +1.83% |
| MATR.TO | $9.99 | -3.57% | 622.82M | 14.07 | $0.71 | N/A |
| TOT.TO | $10.30 | +0.78% | 391.93M | 6.82 | $1.51 | +3.60% |
| STEP.TO | $4.08 | +2.77% | 293.69M | 204.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SCL.TO vs TVK.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, TVK.TO has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while TVK.TO trades at $170.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas TVK.TO's P/E ratio is 45.14. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TVK.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is less volatile compared to TVK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs CEU.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CEU.TO has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while CEU.TO trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas CEU.TO's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CEU.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is more volatile compared to CEU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs EFX.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, EFX.TO has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while EFX.TO trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas EFX.TO's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EFX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is less volatile compared to EFX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs PSI.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, PSI.TO has a market cap of 937.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while PSI.TO trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas PSI.TO's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PSI.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is more volatile compared to PSI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs TCW.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, TCW.TO has a market cap of 842.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while TCW.TO trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas TCW.TO's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TCW.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is more volatile compared to TCW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs NOA.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, NOA.TO has a market cap of 715.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while NOA.TO trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas NOA.TO's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NOA.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is less volatile compared to NOA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs MATR.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, MATR.TO has a market cap of 622.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while MATR.TO trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas MATR.TO's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MATR.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is less volatile compared to MATR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs TOT.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, TOT.TO has a market cap of 391.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while TOT.TO trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas TOT.TO's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TOT.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is more volatile compared to TOT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs STEP.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, STEP.TO has a market cap of 293.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while STEP.TO trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas STEP.TO's P/E ratio is 204.00. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STEP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is less volatile compared to STEP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs CFW.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, CFW.TO has a market cap of 289.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while CFW.TO trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas CFW.TO's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFW.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is more volatile compared to CFW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs PSD.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, PSD.TO has a market cap of 132.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while PSD.TO trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas PSD.TO's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PSD.TO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is less volatile compared to PSD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs E.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, E.TO has a market cap of 130.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while E.TO trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas E.TO's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to E.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is less volatile compared to E.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs MCB.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, MCB.TO has a market cap of 100.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while MCB.TO trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas MCB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCB.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is less volatile compared to MCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs SFD.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, SFD.TO has a market cap of 50.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while SFD.TO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas SFD.TO's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SFD.TO's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is less volatile compared to SFD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs ESN.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, ESN.TO has a market cap of 49.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while ESN.TO trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas ESN.TO's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ESN.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is more volatile compared to ESN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs HWO.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, HWO.TO has a market cap of 10.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while HWO.TO trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas HWO.TO's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HWO.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is less volatile compared to HWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.
SCL.TO vs BRY.TO Comparison
SCL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCL.TO stands at 1.15B. In comparison, BRY.TO has a market cap of 6.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SCL.TO is priced at $16.57, while BRY.TO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 552.33, whereas BRY.TO's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, SCL.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRY.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCL.TO is more volatile compared to BRY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCL.TO.