Shyam Century Ferrous Limited
Shyam Century Ferrous Limited (SCFL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SCFL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCFL.BO | ₹26.76 | -6.56% | 5.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VEDL.BO | ₹665.15 | +0.00% | 2.6T | 18.66 | ₹36.05 | +3.42% |
| VEDL.NS | ₹665.35 | +0.00% | 2.6T | 18.67 | ₹36.00 | +3.42% |
| HINDZINC.BO | ₹506.50 | +0.00% | 2.2T | 18.43 | ₹27.93 | +5.63% |
| HINDZINC.NS | ₹506.15 | +0.00% | 2.2T | 18.42 | ₹27.94 | +5.63% |
| MOIL.NS | ₹292.45 | +0.00% | 59.3B | 20.43 | ₹14.27 | +2.38% |
| MOIL.BO | ₹292.50 | +0.00% | 59.3B | 20.43 | ₹14.27 | +2.38% |
| ASHAPURMIN.NS | ₹484.95 | +0.00% | 48B | 12.72 | ₹39.53 | +0.20% |
| ASHAPURMIN.BO | ₹484.25 | +0.00% | 48B | 12.71 | ₹39.50 | +0.20% |
| ORISSAMINE.NS | ₹3,450.30 | +0.00% | 21.6B | -80.81 | -₹44.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SCFL.BO vs VEDL.BO Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VEDL.BO has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while VEDL.BO trades at ₹665.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEDL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VEDL.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to VEDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check VEDL.BO's competition here
SCFL.BO vs VEDL.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VEDL.NS has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while VEDL.NS trades at ₹665.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEDL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VEDL.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to VEDL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check VEDL.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs HINDZINC.BO Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HINDZINC.BO has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while HINDZINC.BO trades at ₹506.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINDZINC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HINDZINC.BO's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to HINDZINC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check HINDZINC.BO's competition here
SCFL.BO vs HINDZINC.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HINDZINC.NS has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while HINDZINC.NS trades at ₹506.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINDZINC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HINDZINC.NS's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to HINDZINC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check HINDZINC.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs MOIL.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MOIL.NS has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while MOIL.NS trades at ₹292.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MOIL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to MOIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check MOIL.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs MOIL.BO Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MOIL.BO has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while MOIL.BO trades at ₹292.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOIL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MOIL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to MOIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check MOIL.BO's competition here
SCFL.BO vs ASHAPURMIN.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASHAPURMIN.NS has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while ASHAPURMIN.NS trades at ₹484.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASHAPURMIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASHAPURMIN.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to ASHAPURMIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check ASHAPURMIN.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs ASHAPURMIN.BO Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASHAPURMIN.BO has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while ASHAPURMIN.BO trades at ₹484.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASHAPURMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASHAPURMIN.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to ASHAPURMIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check ASHAPURMIN.BO's competition here
SCFL.BO vs ORISSAMINE.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ORISSAMINE.NS has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while ORISSAMINE.NS trades at ₹3,450.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORISSAMINE.NS's P/E ratio is -80.81. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORISSAMINE.NS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to ORISSAMINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check ORISSAMINE.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs ORISSAMINE.BO Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ORISSAMINE.BO has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while ORISSAMINE.BO trades at ₹3,451.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORISSAMINE.BO's P/E ratio is -55.98. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORISSAMINE.BO's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to ORISSAMINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check ORISSAMINE.BO's competition here
SCFL.BO vs JGCHEM.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, JGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while JGCHEM.NS trades at ₹332.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to JGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check JGCHEM.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs 20MICRONS.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, 20MICRONS.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while 20MICRONS.NS trades at ₹149.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 20MICRONS.NS's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 20MICRONS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to 20MICRONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check 20MICRONS.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs 20MICRONS.BO Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, 20MICRONS.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while 20MICRONS.BO trades at ₹150.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 20MICRONS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 20MICRONS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to 20MICRONS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check 20MICRONS.BO's competition here
SCFL.BO vs EMAMIPAP.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, EMAMIPAP.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while EMAMIPAP.NS trades at ₹67.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAMIPAP.NS's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMAMIPAP.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to EMAMIPAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check EMAMIPAP.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs SICAGEN.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SICAGEN.NS has a market cap of 973.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while SICAGEN.NS trades at ₹24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SICAGEN.NS's P/E ratio is -164.00. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SICAGEN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to SICAGEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check SICAGEN.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs RAJMET.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RAJMET.NS has a market cap of 953.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while RAJMET.NS trades at ₹3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAJMET.NS's P/E ratio is -43.12. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RAJMET.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to RAJMET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check RAJMET.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs PATSPINLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PATSPINLTD.NS has a market cap of 436M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while PATSPINLTD.NS trades at ₹14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATSPINLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PATSPINLTD.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to PATSPINLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check PATSPINLTD.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs IMPEXFERRO.BO Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IMPEXFERRO.BO has a market cap of 136.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while IMPEXFERRO.BO trades at ₹1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPEXFERRO.BO's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IMPEXFERRO.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to IMPEXFERRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check IMPEXFERRO.BO's competition here
SCFL.BO vs IMPEXFERRO.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IMPEXFERRO.NS has a market cap of 135.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while IMPEXFERRO.NS trades at ₹1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPEXFERRO.NS's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IMPEXFERRO.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to IMPEXFERRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check IMPEXFERRO.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs ARENTERP.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ARENTERP.NS has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while ARENTERP.NS trades at ₹38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARENTERP.NS's P/E ratio is -560.14. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARENTERP.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to ARENTERP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check ARENTERP.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs ARENTERP.BO Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ARENTERP.BO has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while ARENTERP.BO trades at ₹39.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARENTERP.BO's P/E ratio is -557.00. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARENTERP.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to ARENTERP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check ARENTERP.BO's competition here
SCFL.BO vs PRECISION.BO Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PRECISION.BO has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while PRECISION.BO trades at ₹54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRECISION.BO's P/E ratio is -495.41. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PRECISION.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is less volatile compared to PRECISION.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check PRECISION.BO's competition here
SCFL.BO vs METKORE.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, METKORE.NS has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while METKORE.NS trades at ₹0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas METKORE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to METKORE.NS's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to METKORE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check METKORE.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs SEZAL.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SEZAL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while SEZAL.NS trades at ₹5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEZAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SEZAL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to SEZAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check SEZAL.NS's competition here
SCFL.BO vs ORIENTREF.NS Comparison March 2026
SCFL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFL.BO stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ORIENTREF.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCFL.BO is priced at ₹26.76, while ORIENTREF.NS trades at ₹324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORIENTREF.NS's P/E ratio is 53.11. In terms of profitability, SCFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORIENTREF.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFL.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTREF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFL.BO.Check ORIENTREF.NS's competition here