Silver Buckle Mines, Inc.
Silver Buckle Mines, Inc. (SBUM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SBUM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Silver Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBUM | $0.13 | +100.00% | 779.9K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DSVSF | $2.38 | +2.15% | 1.9B | -47.80 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| AYASF | $8.75 | +2.82% | 1.2B | -66.92 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| ANPMF | $2.71 | +1.73% | 399.6M | 12.24 | $0.22 | N/A |
| DOLLF | $2.61 | -4.40% | 207.5M | -13.05 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| SLVMF | $0.09 | -5.56% | 156.8M | -8.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BADEF | $0.52 | -0.46% | 134.3M | -10.26 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| GSVRF | $0.20 | -2.65% | 96.1M | -10.07 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| BHLL | $0.09 | +2.35% | 80.8M | -1.25 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| SZSMF | $0.22 | +0.60% | 78.4M | 0.53 | $0.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SBUM vs DSVSF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, DSVSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while DSVSF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSVSF's P/E ratio is -47.80. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to DSVSF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to DSVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check DSVSF's competition here
SBUM vs AYASF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, AYASF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while AYASF trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYASF's P/E ratio is -66.92. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to AYASF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to AYASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check AYASF's competition here
SBUM vs ANPMF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, ANPMF has a market cap of 399.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while ANPMF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANPMF's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to ANPMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to ANPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check ANPMF's competition here
SBUM vs DOLLF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, DOLLF has a market cap of 207.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while DOLLF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOLLF's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to DOLLF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to DOLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check DOLLF's competition here
SBUM vs SLVMF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, SLVMF has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while SLVMF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVMF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to SLVMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM and SLVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLVMF's competition here
SBUM vs BADEF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, BADEF has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while BADEF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BADEF's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to BADEF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to BADEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check BADEF's competition here
SBUM vs GSVRF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, GSVRF has a market cap of 96.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while GSVRF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSVRF's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to GSVRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to GSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check GSVRF's competition here
SBUM vs BHLL Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, BHLL has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while BHLL trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHLL's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to BHLL's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to BHLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check BHLL's competition here
SBUM vs SZSMF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, SZSMF has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while SZSMF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZSMF's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to SZSMF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to SZSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check SZSMF's competition here
SBUM vs KOOYF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, KOOYF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while KOOYF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOOYF's P/E ratio is -16.72. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to KOOYF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to KOOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check KOOYF's competition here
SBUM vs ISVLF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, ISVLF has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while ISVLF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISVLF's P/E ratio is -23.38. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to ISVLF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to ISVLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check ISVLF's competition here
SBUM vs APGOF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, APGOF has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while APGOF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APGOF's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to APGOF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to APGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check APGOF's competition here
SBUM vs SLVRF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, SLVRF has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while SLVRF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVRF's P/E ratio is -19.47. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to SLVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to SLVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check SLVRF's competition here
SBUM vs KUYAF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, KUYAF has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while KUYAF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KUYAF's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to KUYAF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to KUYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check KUYAF's competition here
SBUM vs SVBRF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, SVBRF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while SVBRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVBRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to SVBRF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to SVBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check SVBRF's competition here
SBUM vs RSNVF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, RSNVF has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while RSNVF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSNVF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to RSNVF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to RSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check RSNVF's competition here
SBUM vs AZASF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, AZASF has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while AZASF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZASF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to AZASF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to AZASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check AZASF's competition here
SBUM vs NVDSF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, NVDSF has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while NVDSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDSF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to NVDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to NVDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check NVDSF's competition here
SBUM vs MISVF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, MISVF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while MISVF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MISVF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to MISVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to MISVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check MISVF's competition here
SBUM vs ZCTSF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, ZCTSF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while ZCTSF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCTSF's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to ZCTSF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to ZCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check ZCTSF's competition here
SBUM vs KLSVF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, KLSVF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while KLSVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLSVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to KLSVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM and KLSVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KLSVF's competition here
SBUM vs RSMXF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, RSMXF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while RSMXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSMXF's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to RSMXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to RSMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check RSMXF's competition here
SBUM vs AUNFF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, AUNFF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while AUNFF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUNFF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to AUNFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM and AUNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUNFF's competition here
SBUM vs HAMRF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, HAMRF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while HAMRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAMRF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to HAMRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to HAMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check HAMRF's competition here
SBUM vs SVROF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, SVROF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while SVROF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVROF's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to SVROF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to SVROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check SVROF's competition here
SBUM vs SVTNF Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, SVTNF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while SVTNF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVTNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to SVTNF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM and SVTNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVTNF's competition here
SBUM vs VINS Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, VINS has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while VINS trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VINS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to VINS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM and VINS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VINS's competition here
SBUM vs TNRI Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, TNRI has a market cap of 23.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while TNRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to TNRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM and TNRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNRI's competition here
SBUM vs ISLV Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, ISLV has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while ISLV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISLV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to ISLV's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM and ISLV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISLV's competition here
SBUM vs ASLM Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, ASLM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while ASLM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to ASLM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to ASLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check ASLM's competition here
SBUM vs CHMN Comparison August 2025
SBUM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBUM stands at 779.9K. In comparison, CHMN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SBUM is priced at $0.13, while CHMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBUM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBUM's ROE is N/A, compared to CHMN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBUM is less volatile compared to CHMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUM.Check CHMN's competition here