Schoeller-Bleckmann Oilfield Equipment AG

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, TNRSF has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while TNRSF trades at $19.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas TNRSF's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to TNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check TNRSF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, THNPY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while THNPY trades at $43.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas THNPY's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THNPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to THNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check THNPY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, THNPF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while THNPF trades at $43.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas THNPF's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THNPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to THNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check THNPF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, GZPZY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while GZPZY trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas GZPZY's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GZPZY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to GZPZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check GZPZY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CHOLF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CHOLF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CHOLF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to CHOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CHOLF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SUBCY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SUBCY trades at $19.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SUBCY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUBCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to SUBCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SUBCY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, ACGYF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while ACGYF trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas ACGYF's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACGYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to ACGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check ACGYF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, GZPZF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while GZPZF trades at $147.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas GZPZF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GZPZF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to GZPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check GZPZF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SAPMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SAPMF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SAPMF's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to SAPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SAPMF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, WYGPY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while WYGPY trades at $9.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas WYGPY's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WYGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to WYGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check WYGPY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, WYGPF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while WYGPF trades at $9.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas WYGPF's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WYGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to WYGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check WYGPF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SBFFF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SBFFF trades at $26.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SBFFF's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBFFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to SBFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SBFFF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SBFFY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SBFFY trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SBFFY's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBFFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to SBFFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SBFFY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, TRRVF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while TRRVF trades at $122.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas TRRVF's P/E ratio is 42.52. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRRVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to TRRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check TRRVF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, PRSEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while PRSEF trades at $4.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PRSEF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRSEF's ROE of +11.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to PRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check PRSEF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CIMEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CIMEF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CIMEF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIMEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to CIMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CIMEF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, TGSNF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while TGSNF trades at $7.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas TGSNF's P/E ratio is 44.29. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TGSNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to TGSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check TGSNF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, AKRYY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while AKRYY trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas AKRYY's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AKRYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to AKRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check AKRYY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, AKRTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while AKRTF trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas AKRTF's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AKRTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to AKRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check AKRTF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, MDIKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while MDIKF trades at $18.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas MDIKF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDIKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to MDIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check MDIKF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CESDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CESDF trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CESDF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CESDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to CESDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CESDF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, PGEJF has a market cap of 859M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while PGEJF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PGEJF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGEJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to PGEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check PGEJF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SAWLF has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SAWLF trades at $11.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SAWLF's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAWLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to SAWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SAWLF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, TOLWF has a market cap of 729.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while TOLWF trades at $4.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas TOLWF's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOLWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to TOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check TOLWF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, HNTIF has a market cap of 709.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while HNTIF trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas HNTIF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNTIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to HNTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check HNTIF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, HNTIY has a market cap of 698.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while HNTIY trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas HNTIY's P/E ratio is -24.61. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNTIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to HNTIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check HNTIY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, ATONF has a market cap of 691.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while ATONF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas ATONF's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATONF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to ATONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check ATONF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, PSYTF has a market cap of 661.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while PSYTF trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PSYTF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to PSYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check PSYTF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SHANF has a market cap of 611.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SHANF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SHANF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHANF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to SHANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SHANF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, ATONY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while ATONY trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas ATONY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATONY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to ATONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check ATONY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, AKKVF has a market cap of 327.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while AKKVF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas AKKVF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AKKVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to AKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check AKKVF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CGGYY has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CGGYY trades at $41.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CGGYY's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGGYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to CGGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CGGYY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, TOTZF has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while TOTZF trades at $8.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas TOTZF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOTZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to TOTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check TOTZF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SNVVF has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SNVVF trades at $3.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SNVVF's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNVVF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to SNVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SNVVF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CFWFF has a market cap of 237.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CFWFF trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CFWFF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFWFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to CFWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CFWFF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, DDHLF has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while DDHLF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas DDHLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DDHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to DDHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check DDHLF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, BLYFF has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while BLYFF trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BLYFF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLYFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to BLYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check BLYFF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, JUTOY has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while JUTOY trades at $23.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas JUTOY's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JUTOY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to JUTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check JUTOY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, PDER has a market cap of 190.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while PDER trades at $290.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PDER's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PDER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to PDER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check PDER's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, PKDC has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while PKDC trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PKDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to PKDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check PKDC's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, WFTSF has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while WFTSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas WFTSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFTSF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to WFTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check WFTSF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, PLSDF has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while PLSDF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PLSDF's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLSDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to PLSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check PLSDF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SCEYF has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SCEYF trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SCEYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCEYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to SCEYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SCEYF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, QSEP has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while QSEP trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas QSEP's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QSEP's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to QSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check QSEP's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, POFCY has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while POFCY trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas POFCY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POFCY's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to POFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check POFCY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, ETOLF has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while ETOLF trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas ETOLF's P/E ratio is 57.15. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETOLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to ETOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check ETOLF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, MCCRF has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while MCCRF trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas MCCRF's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCCRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to MCCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check MCCRF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, NSFDF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while NSFDF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas NSFDF's P/E ratio is -62.71. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSFDF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to NSFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check NSFDF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CAWLF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CAWLF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CAWLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAWLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to CAWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CAWLF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, EEYUF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while EEYUF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas EEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EEYUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to EEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check EEYUF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, POFCF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while POFCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas POFCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POFCF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to POFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check POFCF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, GWTI has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while GWTI trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas GWTI's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GWTI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to GWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check GWTI's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, QDRSF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while QDRSF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas QDRSF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QDRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to QDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check QDRSF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, BWTX has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while BWTX trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BWTX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BWTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to BWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check BWTX's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, KLNG has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while KLNG trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas KLNG's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KLNG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to KLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check KLNG's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, WEIIF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while WEIIF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas WEIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEIIF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to WEIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check WEIIF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, FOYJ has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while FOYJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas FOYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FOYJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to FOYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check FOYJ's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, ENGT has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while ENGT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas ENGT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENGT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to ENGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check ENGT's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, HGHAF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while HGHAF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas HGHAF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGHAF's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to HGHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check HGHAF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CGPVF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CGPVF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CGPVF's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to CGPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CGPVF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, BRYFF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while BRYFF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BRYFF's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRYFF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to BRYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check BRYFF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, TAGP has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while TAGP trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas TAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TAGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to TAGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check TAGP's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, OXFCF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while OXFCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas OXFCF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OXFCF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to OXFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check OXFCF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CTNR has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CTNR trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CTNR's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to CTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CTNR's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, TXLZF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while TXLZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas TXLZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TXLZF's ROE of -4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to TXLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check TXLZF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, NWPIF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while NWPIF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas NWPIF's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWPIF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to NWPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check NWPIF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, GLFH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while GLFH trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas GLFH's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLFH's ROE of -12.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to GLFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check GLFH's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SKPO has a market cap of 690.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SKPO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SKPO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKPO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to SKPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SKPO's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, IRIG has a market cap of 440.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while IRIG trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas IRIG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IRIG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to IRIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check IRIG's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SMGI has a market cap of 338.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SMGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SMGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMGI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to SMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SMGI's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, FSEI has a market cap of 145.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while FSEI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas FSEI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FSEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to FSEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check FSEI's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SSOF has a market cap of 139.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SSOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SSOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to SSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SSOF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, IESCF has a market cap of 137.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while IESCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas IESCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IESCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to IESCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check IESCF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, PKDCW has a market cap of 71.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while PKDCW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PKDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKDCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to PKDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check PKDCW's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, GPTC has a market cap of 67.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while GPTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas GPTC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to GPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check GPTC's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, WWNG has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while WWNG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas WWNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WWNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to WWNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check WWNG's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CPYJ has a market cap of 24.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CPYJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CPYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to CPYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CPYJ's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SGUJ has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SGUJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SGUJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGUJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to SGUJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SGUJ's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, TEGR has a market cap of 12.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while TEGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas TEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEGR's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to TEGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check TEGR's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CSSV has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CSSV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CSSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSSV's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to CSSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CSSV's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, AURI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while AURI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas AURI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AURI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to AURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check AURI's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, RTSO has a market cap of 6.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while RTSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas RTSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTSO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to RTSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check RTSO's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SUBB has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SUBB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SUBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to SUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SUBB's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, LNDT has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while LNDT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas LNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNDT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to LNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check LNDT's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CTBG has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CTBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CTBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTBG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to CTBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CTBG's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, BMMCF has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while BMMCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas BMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to BMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check BMMCF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, USEI has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while USEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas USEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USEI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to USEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check USEI's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, PTOG has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while PTOG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas PTOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTOG's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to PTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check PTOG's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, SYNE has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while SYNE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas SYNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SYNE's ROE of -59.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to SYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check SYNE's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, AMCF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while AMCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas AMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to AMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check AMCF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CDVIQ has a market cap of 986. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CDVIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CDVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDVIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to CDVIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CDVIQ's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, POOSF has a market cap of 811. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while POOSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas POOSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POOSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is less volatile compared to POOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check POOSF's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, EHYD has a market cap of 603. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while EHYD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas EHYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EHYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to EHYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check EHYD's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, NNYR has a market cap of 234. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while NNYR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas NNYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNYR's ROE of +56.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to NNYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check NNYR's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, ALRY has a market cap of 116. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while ALRY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas ALRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to ALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check ALRY's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, ISYX has a market cap of 102. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while ISYX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas ISYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to ISYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check ISYX's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, CHMR has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while CHMR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas CHMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to CHMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check CHMR's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, TXGE has a market cap of 57. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while TXGE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas TXGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TXGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to TXGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check TXGE's competition here

SBOEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBOEF stands at 527.5M. In comparison, IOGPQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SBOEF is priced at $33.47, while IOGPQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.30, whereas IOGPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOEF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IOGPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBOEF is more volatile compared to IOGPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOEF.Check IOGPQ's competition here