SBM Offshore N.V.
SBM Offshore N.V. SBFFY Peers
See (SBFFY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBFFY | $26.98 | +0.00% | 4.7B | 32.51 | $0.83 | +3.61% |
| TNRSF | $18.70 | +7.87% | 20B | 11.40 | $1.64 | +4.44% |
| THNPY | $41.40 | +0.89% | 7.3B | 16.56 | $2.50 | +2.26% |
| GZPZY | $39.35 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 18.05 | $2.18 | +4.19% |
| CHOLF | $0.77 | +0.00% | 6.9B | 7.70 | $0.10 | +4.18% |
| THNPF | $41.26 | +7.25% | 6.7B | 15.45 | $2.49 | +2.51% |
| GZPZF | $147.38 | +0.00% | 5.5B | 14.06 | $10.48 | +5.60% |
| SUBCY | $18.23 | -0.32% | 5.4B | 28.48 | $0.64 | +4.74% |
| SAPMF | $2.72 | +1.78% | 5.3B | 15.99 | $0.17 | +7.04% |
| ACGYF | $15.93 | +0.00% | 4.7B | 24.89 | $0.64 | +4.09% |
Stock Comparison
SBFFY vs TNRSF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TNRSF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while TNRSF trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas TNRSF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TNRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and TNRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs THNPY Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, THNPY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while THNPY trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas THNPY's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THNPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to THNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs GZPZY Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GZPZY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while GZPZY trades at $39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas GZPZY's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GZPZY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and GZPZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs CHOLF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHOLF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CHOLF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CHOLF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to CHOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs THNPF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, THNPF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while THNPF trades at $41.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas THNPF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THNPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and THNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs GZPZF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GZPZF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while GZPZF trades at $147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas GZPZF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GZPZF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to GZPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs SUBCY Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SUBCY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SUBCY trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SUBCY's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUBCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to SUBCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs SAPMF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SAPMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SAPMF trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SAPMF's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and SAPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs ACGYF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ACGYF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while ACGYF trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas ACGYF's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACGYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to ACGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs WYGPF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WYGPF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while WYGPF trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas WYGPF's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WYGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and WYGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs SBFFF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SBFFF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SBFFF trades at $26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SBFFF's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBFFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to SBFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs WYGPY Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WYGPY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while WYGPY trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas WYGPY's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WYGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and WYGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs TRRVF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TRRVF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while TRRVF trades at $125.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas TRRVF's P/E ratio is 43.38. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRRVF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and TRRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs TGSNF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TGSNF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while TGSNF trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas TGSNF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TGSNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to TGSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs AKRTF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AKRTF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while AKRTF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas AKRTF's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKRTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to AKRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs CIMEF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CIMEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CIMEF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CIMEF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIMEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to CIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs AKRYY Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AKRYY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while AKRYY trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas AKRYY's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKRYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to AKRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs MDIKF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MDIKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while MDIKF trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas MDIKF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MDIKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to MDIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs CESDF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CESDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CESDF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CESDF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CESDF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to CESDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs PGEJF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PGEJF has a market cap of 859M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while PGEJF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas PGEJF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGEJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and PGEJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs SAWLF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SAWLF has a market cap of 798M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SAWLF trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SAWLF's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAWLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to SAWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs PSYTF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PSYTF has a market cap of 703.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while PSYTF trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas PSYTF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and PSYTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs SHANF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SHANF has a market cap of 693.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SHANF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SHANF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHANF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to SHANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs ATONF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ATONF has a market cap of 691.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while ATONF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas ATONF's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATONF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to ATONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs HNTIF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HNTIF has a market cap of 646.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while HNTIF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas HNTIF's P/E ratio is -22.78. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HNTIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and HNTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs TOLWF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TOLWF has a market cap of 611.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while TOLWF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas TOLWF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOLWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to TOLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs SBOEF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SBOEF has a market cap of 527.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SBOEF trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SBOEF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBOEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to SBOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs HNTIY Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HNTIY has a market cap of 481.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while HNTIY trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas HNTIY's P/E ratio is -16.94. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HNTIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to HNTIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs ATONY Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ATONY has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while ATONY trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas ATONY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATONY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to ATONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs AKKVF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AKKVF has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while AKKVF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas AKKVF's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKKVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to AKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs CGGYY Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CGGYY has a market cap of 324.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CGGYY trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CGGYY's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGGYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to CGGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs TOTZF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TOTZF has a market cap of 301.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while TOTZF trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas TOTZF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOTZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and TOTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs DDHLF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DDHLF has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while DDHLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas DDHLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DDHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and DDHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs BLYFF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BLYFF has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while BLYFF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas BLYFF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLYFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and BLYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs SNVVF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SNVVF has a market cap of 224.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SNVVF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SNVVF's P/E ratio is -20.60. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNVVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and SNVVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs CFWFF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CFWFF has a market cap of 213M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CFWFF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CFWFF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CFWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to CFWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs JUTOY Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JUTOY has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while JUTOY trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas JUTOY's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUTOY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and JUTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs PDER Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PDER has a market cap of 190.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while PDER trades at $284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas PDER's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PDER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to PDER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs PKDC Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PKDC has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while PKDC trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas PKDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PKDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and PKDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs WFTSF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WFTSF has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while WFTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas WFTSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WFTSF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to WFTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs SCEYF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SCEYF has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SCEYF trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SCEYF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCEYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and SCEYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs POFCY Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, POFCY has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while POFCY trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas POFCY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POFCY's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to POFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs PLSDF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PLSDF has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while PLSDF trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas PLSDF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLSDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to PLSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs ETOLF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ETOLF has a market cap of 101.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while ETOLF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas ETOLF's P/E ratio is 65.30. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ETOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to ETOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs QSEP Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, QSEP has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while QSEP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas QSEP's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QSEP's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to QSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs PRSEF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PRSEF has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while PRSEF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas PRSEF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRSEF's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to PRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs MCCRF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MCCRF has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while MCCRF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas MCCRF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCCRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to MCCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs CAWLF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CAWLF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CAWLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CAWLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAWLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and CAWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs NSFDF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NSFDF has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while NSFDF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas NSFDF's P/E ratio is -42.97. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSFDF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and NSFDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs EEYUF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EEYUF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while EEYUF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas EEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EEYUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to EEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs GWTI Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GWTI has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while GWTI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas GWTI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GWTI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and GWTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs POFCF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, POFCF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while POFCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas POFCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POFCF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to POFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs ENGT Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ENGT has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while ENGT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas ENGT's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENGT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to ENGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs QDRSF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, QDRSF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while QDRSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas QDRSF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QDRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and QDRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs BWTX Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BWTX has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while BWTX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas BWTX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BWTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to BWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs KLNG Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, KLNG has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while KLNG trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas KLNG's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KLNG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to KLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs WEIIF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WEIIF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while WEIIF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas WEIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WEIIF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and WEIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs FOYJ Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FOYJ has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while FOYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas FOYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FOYJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to FOYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs TAGP Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TAGP has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while TAGP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas TAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TAGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to TAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs HGHAF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HGHAF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while HGHAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas HGHAF's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HGHAF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and HGHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs CGPVF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CGPVF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CGPVF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CGPVF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to CGPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs OXFCF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, OXFCF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while OXFCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas OXFCF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OXFCF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and OXFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs BRYFF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BRYFF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while BRYFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas BRYFF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRYFF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and BRYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs CTNR Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CTNR has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CTNR trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CTNR's P/E ratio is 62.62. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to CTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs TXLZF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TXLZF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while TXLZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas TXLZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TXLZF's ROE of -4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to TXLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs GLFH Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GLFH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while GLFH trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas GLFH's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLFH's ROE of -12.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to GLFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs SKPO Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SKPO has a market cap of 690.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SKPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SKPO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKPO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and SKPO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs NWPIF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NWPIF has a market cap of 517K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while NWPIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas NWPIF's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NWPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to NWPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs IRIG Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, IRIG has a market cap of 440.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while IRIG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas IRIG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRIG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to IRIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs SMGI Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SMGI has a market cap of 338.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SMGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SMGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMGI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to SMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs FSEI Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FSEI has a market cap of 145.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while FSEI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas FSEI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FSEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to FSEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs SSOF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SSOF has a market cap of 139.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SSOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SSOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and SSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs IESCF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, IESCF has a market cap of 137.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while IESCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas IESCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IESCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and IESCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs PKDCW Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PKDCW has a market cap of 71.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while PKDCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas PKDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PKDCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to PKDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs GPTC Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GPTC has a market cap of 67.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while GPTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas GPTC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to GPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs WWNG Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WWNG has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while WWNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas WWNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WWNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to WWNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs USEI Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, USEI has a market cap of 26.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while USEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas USEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USEI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to USEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs CPYJ Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CPYJ has a market cap of 24.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CPYJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CPYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to CPYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs SGUJ Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SGUJ has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SGUJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SGUJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGUJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and SGUJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs TEGR Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TEGR has a market cap of 12.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while TEGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas TEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEGR's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and TEGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs CSSV Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CSSV has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CSSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CSSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSSV's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to CSSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs AURI Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AURI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while AURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas AURI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AURI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and AURI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs RTSO Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RTSO has a market cap of 6.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while RTSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas RTSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RTSO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and RTSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs SUBB Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SUBB has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SUBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SUBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to SUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs LNDT Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, LNDT has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while LNDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas LNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LNDT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and LNDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs CTBG Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CTBG has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CTBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CTBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTBG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and CTBG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs BMMCF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BMMCF has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while BMMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas BMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to BMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs PTOG Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PTOG has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while PTOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas PTOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTOG's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to PTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs AMCF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AMCF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while AMCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas AMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to AMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs CDVIQ Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CDVIQ has a market cap of 986. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CDVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CDVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDVIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to CDVIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs POOSF Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, POOSF has a market cap of 811. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while POOSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas POOSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POOSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY is less volatile compared to POOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBFFY.
SBFFY vs EHYD Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EHYD has a market cap of 603. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while EHYD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas EHYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EHYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and EHYD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs SYNE Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SYNE has a market cap of 473. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while SYNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas SYNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYNE's ROE of -59.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and SYNE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs NNYR Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NNYR has a market cap of 234. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while NNYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas NNYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NNYR's ROE of +56.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and NNYR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs ALRY Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ALRY has a market cap of 116. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while ALRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas ALRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and ALRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs ISYX Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ISYX has a market cap of 102. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while ISYX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas ISYX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ISYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and ISYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs CHMR Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHMR has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while CHMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas CHMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and CHMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs TXGE Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TXGE has a market cap of 57. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while TXGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas TXGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TXGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and TXGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBFFY vs IOGPQ Comparison
SBFFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBFFY stands at 4.7B. In comparison, IOGPQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SBFFY is priced at $26.98, while IOGPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBFFY currently has a P/E ratio of 32.51, whereas IOGPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBFFY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IOGPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBFFY and IOGPQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).