Sativus Tech Corp.
Sativus Tech Corp. SATT Peers
See (SATT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SATT | $0.05 | N/A | 210779.00 | -0.31 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| KYCCF | $443.77 | +0.58% | 107.63B | 39.59 | $11.21 | +0.51% |
| HNHPF | $10.32 | -1.24% | 71.67B | 12.90 | $0.80 | +0.11% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | N/A | 45.23B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +0.17% |
| HXGBF | $10.48 | +3.66% | 26.98B | 26.20 | $0.40 | +1.35% |
| HXGBY | $9.99 | -0.08% | 26.93B | 24.98 | $0.40 | +1.22% |
| MRAAY | $7.15 | +2.58% | 26.63B | 16.63 | $0.43 | +0.73% |
| MRAAF | $13.27 | -11.09% | 24.72B | 15.61 | $0.85 | +2.92% |
| TTDKY | $10.76 | -0.52% | 20.43B | 18.24 | $0.59 | +0.87% |
| TTDKF | $10.26 | +5.84% | 19.46B | 15.78 | $0.65 | +2.00% |
Stock Comparison
SATT vs KYCCF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 107.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while KYCCF trades at $443.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs HNHPF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 71.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while HNHPF trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs HNHAF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs HXGBF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 26.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while HXGBF trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs HXGBY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 26.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while HXGBY trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs MRAAY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 26.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while MRAAY trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs MRAAF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 24.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while MRAAF trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs TTDKY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 20.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while TTDKY trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs TTDKF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 19.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while TTDKF trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs VEMLY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 12.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while VEMLY trades at $43.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs BYDIY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 10.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while BYDIY trades at $231.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs BYDIF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 9.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while BYDIF trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs SNPTF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while SNPTF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs SOTGY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 8.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while SOTGY trades at $81.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs MNBEY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs SHMZF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 6.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while SHMZF trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs MNBEF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while MNBEF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs OMRNY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while OMRNY trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 47.79. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs IBIDF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while IBIDF trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs AUOTY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while AUOTY trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs HRSEF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while HRSEF trades at $121.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs HPHTF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while HPHTF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs KGBLY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while KGBLY trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs SEPJF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while SEPJF trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs VEMLF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs HRIBF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs SEPJY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while SEPJY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs TOPCF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 746.13. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs HPHTY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while HPHTY trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs RNSHF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs TYOYY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while TYOYY trades at $68.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 154.66. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs APELF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs CODAF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs FITGF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while FITGF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs APELY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while APELY trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs AMANF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs VAIAF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT and VAIAF have similar daily volatility (0.20).
SATT vs JELLF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while JELLF trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs NPEGF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while NPEGF trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -148.07. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs NILRF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs JNPKF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while JNPKF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs JPAVF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs BCNAF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while BCNAF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs AITUF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while AITUF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs AUDGF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs ASAAF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 736.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs CAZGF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 692.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while CAZGF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs BCNAY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 600.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while BCNAY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs VARXF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 531.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while VARXF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs JNNDF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs HNMUF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 468.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs KRKNF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 465.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while KRKNF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs JPDYY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs HROEY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while HROEY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs TRUHF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 366.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while TRUHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs NNFTF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs BMNR Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 317.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while BMNR trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs KACPF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 260.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while KACPF trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs TTGPF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 181.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while TTGPF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs SMOPF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs NPTSF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 166.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs CHAEF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs FUBAF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 126.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while FUBAF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -74.42. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs HUDLF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs ENMPF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 119.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while ENMPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs ENMPY Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 110.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while ENMPY trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs IACYF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs IKGPF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs ODYS Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 86.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while ODYS trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs SDIIF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs MPAD Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs ACFN Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 45.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while ACFN trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs SILLF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 44.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while SILLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs AATC Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 39.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while AATC trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs YNVYF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 23.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while YNVYF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs IEHC Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 23.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while IEHC trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs FGRRF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 22.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs ERMG Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs ROBOF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 22.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while ROBOF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs NSCIF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 21.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while NSCIF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs INRD Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs WELX Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 17.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while WELX trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs KESPF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs AAIRF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 12.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while AAIRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs SIGL Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 11.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while SIGL trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs BNSOF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 10.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while BNSOF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs SCND Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 8.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while SCND trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs LCTC Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while LCTC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs ESHSF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs GNCLF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 5.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while GNCLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs ZTSTF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 5.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while ZTSTF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs TNLX Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 4.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while TNLX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs DPLS Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 3.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs RMTD Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RMTD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs TRCK Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 2.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while TRCK trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs MRRYF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs VPER Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 2.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs NXOPF Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 2.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is more volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.
SATT vs VPIM Comparison
SATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATT stands at 210779.00. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SATT is priced at $0.05, while VPIM trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATT is less volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATT.