Saab AB (publ)

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EADSF has a market cap of 178.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while EADSF trades at $220.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas EADSF's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EADSF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to EADSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check EADSF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EADSY has a market cap of 175.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while EADSY trades at $54.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas EADSY's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EADSY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to EADSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check EADSY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SAFRY has a market cap of 172.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while SAFRY trades at $100.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas SAFRY's P/E ratio is 33.35. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAFRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to SAFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check SAFRY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SAFRF has a market cap of 170.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while SAFRF trades at $405.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas SAFRF's P/E ratio is 33.40. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAFRF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to SAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check SAFRF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, RYCEY has a market cap of 154.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while RYCEY trades at $18.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas RYCEY's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RYCEY's ROE of +7.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to RYCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check RYCEY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, RYCEF has a market cap of 153.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while RYCEF trades at $17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas RYCEF's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RYCEF's ROE of +7.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to RYCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check RYCEF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, RNMBF has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while RNMBF trades at $2,050.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas RNMBF's P/E ratio is 91.31. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RNMBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to RNMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check RNMBF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, RNMBY has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while RNMBY trades at $409.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas RNMBY's P/E ratio is 91.34. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RNMBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to RNMBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check RNMBY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, BAESY has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while BAESY trades at $117.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas BAESY's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAESY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to BAESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check BAESY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, BAESF has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while BAESF trades at $29.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas BAESF's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAESF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to BAESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check BAESF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, FINMY has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while FINMY trades at $34.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas FINMY's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FINMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to FINMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check FINMY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, THLLY has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while THLLY trades at $61.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas THLLY's P/E ratio is 51.47. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THLLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to THLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check THLLY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, THLEF has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while THLEF trades at $304.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas THLEF's P/E ratio is 51.46. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THLEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to THLEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check THLEF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, FINMF has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while FINMF trades at $69.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas FINMF's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FINMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to FINMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check FINMF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SAABF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while SAABF trades at $73.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas SAABF's P/E ratio is 56.38. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAABF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to SAABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check SAABF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NSKFF has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while NSKFF trades at $41.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas NSKFF's P/E ratio is 87.29. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSKFF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to NSKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check NSKFF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DUAVF has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while DUAVF trades at $411.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas DUAVF's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DUAVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to DUAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check DUAVF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, BOMBF has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while BOMBF trades at $12.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas BOMBF's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOMBF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to BOMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check BOMBF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, MTUAY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while MTUAY trades at $234.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas MTUAY's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTUAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to MTUAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check MTUAY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SGGKF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while SGGKF trades at $8.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas SGGKF's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGGKF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to SGGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check SGGKF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SGGKY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while SGGKY trades at $79.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas SGGKY's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGGKY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to SGGKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check SGGKY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, MTUAF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while MTUAF trades at $469.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas MTUAF's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTUAF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to MTUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check MTUAF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, BDRAF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while BDRAF trades at $195.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas BDRAF's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDRAF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to BDRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check BDRAF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, BDRBF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while BDRBF trades at $199.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas BDRBF's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDRBF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to BDRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check BDRBF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, BDRPF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while BDRPF trades at $12.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas BDRPF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDRPF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to BDRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check BDRPF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, HAGHY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while HAGHY trades at $49.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas HAGHY's P/E ratio is 78.83. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAGHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to HAGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check HAGHY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, YSHLF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while YSHLF trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas YSHLF's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YSHLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to YSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check YSHLF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, HNSDF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while HNSDF trades at $95.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas HNSDF's P/E ratio is 75.40. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HNSDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to HNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check HNSDF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ACLLY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while ACLLY trades at $94.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas ACLLY's P/E ratio is 46.32. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACLLY's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to ACLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check ACLLY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ACLIF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while ACLIF trades at $77.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas ACLIF's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACLIF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to ACLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check ACLIF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, FNCNF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while FNCNF trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas FNCNF's P/E ratio is 37.23. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNCNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to FNCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check FNCNF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, MIESY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while MIESY trades at $51.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas MIESY's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIESY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to MIESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check MIESY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, BDRXF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while BDRXF trades at $18.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas BDRXF's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDRXF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to BDRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check BDRXF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, MIESF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while MIESF trades at $45.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas MIESF's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIESF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to MIESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check MIESF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, QNTQY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while QNTQY trades at $28.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas QNTQY's P/E ratio is -14.02. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QNTQY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to QNTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check QNTQY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, MDALF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while MDALF trades at $28.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas MDALF's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDALF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to MDALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check MDALF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, QNTQF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while QNTQF trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas QNTQF's P/E ratio is -12.45. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QNTQF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to QNTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check QNTQF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, AVIJF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while AVIJF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas AVIJF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVIJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to AVIJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check AVIJF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, LSIIF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while LSIIF trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas LSIIF's P/E ratio is 43.75. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LSIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to LSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check LSIIF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ATROB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while ATROB trades at $77.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas ATROB's P/E ratio is -818.33. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATROB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to ATROB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check ATROB's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CMGMY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while CMGMY trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas CMGMY's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMGMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to CMGMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check CMGMY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CMGMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while CMGMF trades at $6.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas CMGMF's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMGMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to CMGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check CMGMF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, AUTLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while AUTLF trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas AUTLF's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AUTLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to AUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check AUTLF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CZGZF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while CZGZF trades at $39.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas CZGZF's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CZGZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to CZGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check CZGZF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, GGRGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while GGRGF trades at $72.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas GGRGF's P/E ratio is -300.46. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGRGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to GGRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check GGRGF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EOPSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while EOPSF trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas EOPSF's P/E ratio is -17.87. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EOPSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to EOPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check EOPSF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, MALJF has a market cap of 900.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while MALJF trades at $15.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas MALJF's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MALJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to MALJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check MALJF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, HERXF has a market cap of 736.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while HERXF trades at $21.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas HERXF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HERXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to HERXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check HERXF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SNIRF has a market cap of 698.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while SNIRF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas SNIRF's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNIRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to SNIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check SNIRF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ASTGY has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while ASTGY trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas ASTGY's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASTGY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to ASTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check ASTGY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, FTGFF has a market cap of 346.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while FTGFF trades at $12.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas FTGFF's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FTGFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to FTGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check FTGFF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, JMCCF has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while JMCCF trades at $9.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas JMCCF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JMCCF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to JMCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check JMCCF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, AERG has a market cap of 282.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while AERG trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas AERG's P/E ratio is -21.07. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AERG's ROE of -9.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to AERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check AERG's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, BUKS has a market cap of 268M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while BUKS trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas BUKS's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BUKS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to BUKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check BUKS's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, MAXQF has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while MAXQF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas MAXQF's P/E ratio is -32.43. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAXQF's ROE of +3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to MAXQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check MAXQF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CNRD has a market cap of 134.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while CNRD trades at $26.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas CNRD's P/E ratio is 334.38. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to CNRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check CNRD's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SAFS has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while SAFS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas SAFS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to SAFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check SAFS's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NORSF has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while NORSF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas NORSF's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NORSF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to NORSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check NORSF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ACCMF has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while ACCMF trades at $11.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas ACCMF's P/E ratio is -29.31. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACCMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to ACCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check ACCMF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, USPCY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while USPCY trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas USPCY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USPCY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to USPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check USPCY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, TIPGF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while TIPGF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas TIPGF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to TIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check TIPGF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, VLTTF has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while VLTTF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas VLTTF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VLTTF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to VLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check VLTTF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, STTLF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while STTLF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas STTLF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to STTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check STTLF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, RLLCF has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while RLLCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas RLLCF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RLLCF's ROE of +7.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to RLLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check RLLCF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NRPI has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while NRPI trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas NRPI's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NRPI's ROE of -17.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to NRPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check NRPI's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, OBTEF has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while OBTEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas OBTEF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OBTEF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to OBTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check OBTEF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, QCKSF has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while QCKSF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas QCKSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QCKSF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to QCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check QCKSF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, OPST has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while OPST trades at $22.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas OPST's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to OPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check OPST's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, AKRRF has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while AKRRF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas AKRRF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKRRF's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to AKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check AKRRF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SNAVF has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while SNAVF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas SNAVF's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNAVF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to SNAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check SNAVF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, FLYLF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while FLYLF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas FLYLF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLYLF's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to FLYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check FLYLF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ETCC has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while ETCC trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas ETCC's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ETCC's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to ETCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check ETCC's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, TIKK has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while TIKK trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas TIKK's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIKK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to TIKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check TIKK's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, XERI has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while XERI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas XERI's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XERI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to XERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check XERI's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, USDR has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while USDR trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas USDR's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USDR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to USDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check USDR's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, BLIS has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while BLIS trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas BLIS's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLIS's ROE of +4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to BLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check BLIS's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DEWY has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while DEWY trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas DEWY's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DEWY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to DEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check DEWY's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, NEXD has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while NEXD trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas NEXD's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to NEXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check NEXD's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PSSR has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while PSSR trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas PSSR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to PSSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check PSSR's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, LLLI has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while LLLI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas LLLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LLLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to LLLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check LLLI's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, MDEX has a market cap of 961.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while MDEX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas MDEX's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDEX's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to MDEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check MDEX's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, PMEA has a market cap of 752.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while PMEA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas PMEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PMEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to PMEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check PMEA's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, HWKE has a market cap of 557.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while HWKE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas HWKE's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HWKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to HWKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check HWKE's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DLRWF has a market cap of 272.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while DLRWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas DLRWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLRWF's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SAABY has daily volatility of 2.40 and DLRWF has daily volatility of N/A.Check DLRWF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, MSNVF has a market cap of 194K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while MSNVF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas MSNVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MSNVF's ROE of -20.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to MSNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check MSNVF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, RNWR has a market cap of 139.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while RNWR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas RNWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RNWR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to RNWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check RNWR's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, CFFMF has a market cap of 118.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while CFFMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas CFFMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to CFFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check CFFMF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, DSUS has a market cap of 65.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while DSUS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas DSUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DSUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to DSUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check DSUS's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, UITA has a market cap of 37.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while UITA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas UITA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UITA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to UITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check UITA's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ASAV has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while ASAV trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas ASAV's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASAV's ROE of +7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to ASAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check ASAV's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, LNGT has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while LNGT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas LNGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNGT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to LNGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check LNGT's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, ADFS has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while ADFS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas ADFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADFS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to ADFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check ADFS's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, SDSS has a market cap of 8K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while SDSS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas SDSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDSS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to SDSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check SDSS's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EPEO has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while EPEO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas EPEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPEO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to EPEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check EPEO's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, BANT has a market cap of 5.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while BANT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas BANT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BANT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to BANT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check BANT's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, BRSI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while BRSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas BRSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRSI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to BRSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check BRSI's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, HSFI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while HSFI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas HSFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to HSFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check HSFI's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, RDEGF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while RDEGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas RDEGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RDEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is less volatile compared to RDEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check RDEGF's competition here

SAABY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAABY stands at 40.2B. In comparison, EKSN has a market cap of 600. Regarding current trading prices, SAABY is priced at $36.96, while EKSN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAABY currently has a P/E ratio of 57.03, whereas EKSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAABY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EKSN's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SAABY is more volatile compared to EKSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAABY.Check EKSN's competition here