Ryohin Keikaku Co., Ltd.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, AONNY has a market cap of 25.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while AONNY trades at $30.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas AONNY's P/E ratio is 131.65. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AONNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to AONNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, SVTMF has a market cap of 19.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while SVTMF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas SVTMF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to SVTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, AONNF has a market cap of 17.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while AONNF trades at $20.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas AONNF's P/E ratio is 103.25. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AONNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to AONNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, SMKUY has a market cap of 10.58B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while SMKUY trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas SMKUY's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMKUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to SMKUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, MAKSY has a market cap of 9.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while MAKSY trades at $9.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas MAKSY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAKSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to MAKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, MAKSF has a market cap of 9.71B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while MAKSF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas MAKSF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAKSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to MAKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, SRGHY has a market cap of 8.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while SRGHY trades at $15.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas SRGHY's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRGHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to SRGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, SRHGF has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while SRHGF trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas SRHGF's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRHGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to SRHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, IMHDF has a market cap of 7.83B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while IMHDF trades at $21.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas IMHDF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMHDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to IMHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, TOKUY has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while TOKUY trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas TOKUY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOKUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to TOKUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, RYKKF has a market cap of 6.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while RYKKF trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas RYKKF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RYKKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to RYKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, DDS has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while DDS trades at $360.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas DDS's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DDS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to DDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, TOKUF has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while TOKUF trades at $9.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas TOKUF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOKUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to TOKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, WLWHF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while WLWHF trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas WLWHF's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WLWHF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to WLWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, JWN has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while JWN trades at $24.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas JWN's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JWN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to JWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, M has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while M trades at $11.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas M's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to M's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to M. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, INREF has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while INREF trades at $29.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas INREF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to INREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, LRENY has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while LRENY trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas LRENY's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LRENY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to LRENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, JFROF has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while JFROF trades at $11.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas JFROF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JFROF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to JFROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, WLWHY has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while WLWHY trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas WLWHY's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WLWHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to WLWHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, SURRY has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while SURRY trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas SURRY's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SURRY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to SURRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, LENTY has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while LENTY trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas LENTY's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LENTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to LENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, SURRF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while SURRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas SURRF's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SURRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to SURRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, PMDKY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while PMDKY trades at $20.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas PMDKY's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMDKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to PMDKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, TKSHF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while TKSHF trades at $5.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas TKSHF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TKSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to TKSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, PGCMF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while PGCMF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas PGCMF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGCMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to PGCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, PPASF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while PPASF trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas PPASF's P/E ratio is 131.98. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPASF's ROE of -2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to PPASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, GDNEF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while GDNEF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas GDNEF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GDNEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to GDNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, PMDKF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while PMDKF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas PMDKF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMDKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to PMDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, RRETY has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while RRETY trades at $6.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas RRETY's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RRETY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to RRETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, PKPYY has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while PKPYY trades at $6.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas PKPYY's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKPYY's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to PKPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, LCMRF has a market cap of 840.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while LCMRF trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas LCMRF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCMRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to LCMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, KSS has a market cap of 748.10M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while KSS trades at $6.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas KSS's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to KSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, EXTO has a market cap of 585.66M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while EXTO trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas EXTO's P/E ratio is 90.25. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXTO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to EXTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, DDT has a market cap of 416.58M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while DDT trades at $26.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas DDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DDT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to DDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, CBDBY has a market cap of 233.89M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while CBDBY trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas CBDBY's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBDBY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to CBDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, CBD has a market cap of 218.06M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while CBD trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas CBD's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBD's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to CBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, WHGPF has a market cap of 184.76M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while WHGPF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas WHGPF's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WHGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to WHGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, LHUAF has a market cap of 69.57M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while LHUAF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas LHUAF's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LHUAF's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to LHUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, NWRLY has a market cap of 53.30M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while NWRLY trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas NWRLY's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWRLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to NWRLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, PKSGY has a market cap of 33.37M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while PKSGY trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas PKSGY's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKSGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to PKSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, HDVTY has a market cap of 4.27M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while HDVTY trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas HDVTY's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HDVTY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to HDVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, VEST has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while VEST trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas VEST's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEST's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to VEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, SRSCQ has a market cap of 101878.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while SRSCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas SRSCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRSCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is less volatile compared to SRSCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, BONTQ has a market cap of 1786.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while BONTQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas BONTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BONTQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to BONTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, LFSYY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while LFSYY trades at $14.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas LFSYY's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFSYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to LFSYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, LFSYF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while LFSYF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas LFSYF's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFSYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to LFSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.

RYKKY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYKKY stands at 9.11B. In comparison, SHLDQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYKKY is priced at $34.36, while SHLDQ trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYKKY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.64, whereas SHLDQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RYKKY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHLDQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RYKKY is more volatile compared to SHLDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYKKY.