Shell plc

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 462.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while XOM trades at $107.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 241.89B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while CVX trades at $138.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 200.84B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while SHEL trades at $66.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 198.36B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while PCCYF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 131.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while TTE trades at $58.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 129.13B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while TTFNF trades at $58.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 84.31B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while SNPMF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 77.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while BP trades at $29.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -72.61. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 76.98B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while BPAQF trades at $4.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is -70.14. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 72.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while PBR-A trades at $10.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 68.63B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while OMVKY trades at $13.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.77B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 62.96B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while EQNR trades at $23.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 61.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while STOHF trades at $22.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 48.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 44.93B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while E trades at $29.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas E's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 43.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while SU trades at $34.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 41.98B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while EIPAF trades at $14.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 37.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while PBR trades at $11.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 36.28B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while IMO trades at $71.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 29.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while PUTRY trades at $5.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 28.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while PETFF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 26.79B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while PUTRF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 24.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while CVE trades at $13.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 23.42B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while GLPEY trades at $7.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 18.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while PSKOF trades at $16.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while OMVJF trades at $51.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 16.80B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while EC trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 14.62B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while REPYY trades at $12.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 14.47B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while REPYF trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 12.87B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while YPF trades at $32.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 12.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while OGFGF trades at $7.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 11.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while GLPEF trades at $15.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 11.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while OGFGY trades at $6.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while NFG trades at $82.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 178.28. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 6.48B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while MGYOY trades at $4.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while TGS trades at $27.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while HLPMF trades at $7.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while ISRMF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.35M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 255.10M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while UNTC trades at $25.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 220.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while WDGJF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 171.87M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while WDGJY trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 81.08M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while SLNG trades at $4.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 52.40M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while CGBS trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.50M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 13.47M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while SKYQ trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 8.63M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while ECTM trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.10M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while ZEST trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 5.66M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while OKMN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +10.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 3.64M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while UNTCW trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 813338.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while POGS trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204662.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while AEDC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188575.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while TRNX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 26572.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while PEMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20225.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while SNVP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNVP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19370.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while FRMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3614.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while PGAS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2463.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while BNXR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNXR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2150.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while AMNE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1872.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1099.00. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while RRRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, SNPTY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, POGWY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while POGWY trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, SGTZY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, SNP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while SNP trades at $45.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, RDS-A comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, OJSCY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, VCOGF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, RDS-B comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, TELZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while TELZ trades at $25.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.

RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.54B. In comparison, PTR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $34.30, while PTR trades at $46.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.66, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.