Shell plc
Shell plc (RYDAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RYDAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYDAF | $36.40 | -0.27% | 211.7B | 16.18 | $2.24 | +3.91% |
| PCCYF | $0.97 | +2.87% | 220.6B | 7.44 | $0.13 | +6.78% |
| TTFNF | $63.75 | +0.94% | 140.5B | 11.55 | $5.52 | +5.52% |
| SNPMF | $0.57 | +5.20% | 99.7B | 9.86 | $0.06 | +6.74% |
| BPAQF | $5.43 | -4.06% | 86.7B | 140.13 | $0.04 | +5.73% |
| OMVKY | $14.04 | +0.14% | 73.8B | 18.80 | $0.75 | +9.35% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| STOHF | $24.85 | +3.97% | 63B | 8.23 | $3.02 | +9.20% |
| EIPAF | $19.00 | +1.39% | 55.9B | 22.09 | $0.86 | +4.34% |
| LUKOY | $6.96 | -42.00% | 49B | 0.40 | $17.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RYDAF vs PCCYF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 220.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while PCCYF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PCCYF's competition here
RYDAF vs TTFNF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while TTFNF trades at $63.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check TTFNF's competition here
RYDAF vs SNPMF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 99.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while SNPMF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SNPMF's competition here
RYDAF vs BPAQF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while BPAQF trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is 140.13. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check BPAQF's competition here
RYDAF vs OMVKY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while OMVKY trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OMVKY's competition here
RYDAF vs RNFTF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check RNFTF's competition here
RYDAF vs STOHF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while STOHF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check STOHF's competition here
RYDAF vs EIPAF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while EIPAF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check EIPAF's competition here
RYDAF vs LUKOY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check LUKOY's competition here
RYDAF vs PETFF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while PETFF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PETFF's competition here
RYDAF vs PUTRY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while PUTRY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PUTRY's competition here
RYDAF vs GLPEY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while GLPEY trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check GLPEY's competition here
RYDAF vs PUTRF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while PUTRF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PUTRF's competition here
RYDAF vs PSKOF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while PSKOF trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PSKOF's competition here
RYDAF vs REPYY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while REPYY trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check REPYY's competition here
RYDAF vs REPYF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while REPYF trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check REPYF's competition here
RYDAF vs OMVJF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while OMVJF trades at $54.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OMVJF's competition here
RYDAF vs OGFGY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while OGFGY trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OGFGY's competition here
RYDAF vs GLPEF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while GLPEF trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check GLPEF's competition here
RYDAF vs OGFGF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while OGFGF trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OGFGF's competition here
RYDAF vs MGYOY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while MGYOY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check MGYOY's competition here
RYDAF vs OAOFY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OAOFY's competition here
RYDAF vs SLTQY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SLTQY's competition here
RYDAF vs HLPMF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while HLPMF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check HLPMF's competition here
RYDAF vs ISRMF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check ISRMF's competition here
RYDAF vs RTEXF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check RTEXF's competition here
RYDAF vs WDGJY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check WDGJY's competition here
RYDAF vs UNTC Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 282.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while UNTC trades at $28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check UNTC's competition here
RYDAF vs WDGJF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while WDGJF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check WDGJF's competition here
RYDAF vs PXPEF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PXPEF's competition here
RYDAF vs SEGYY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SEGYY's competition here
RYDAF vs UNTCW Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while UNTCW trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check UNTCW's competition here
RYDAF vs ECTM Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while ECTM trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check ECTM's competition here
RYDAF vs OKMN Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while OKMN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OKMN's competition here
RYDAF vs GRGUF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check GRGUF's competition here
RYDAF vs POGS Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while POGS trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check POGS's competition here
RYDAF vs AEDC Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check AEDC's competition here
RYDAF vs TRNX Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check TRNX's competition here
RYDAF vs PEMC Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 29K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PEMC's competition here
RYDAF vs SNVP Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SNVP's competition here
RYDAF vs FRMC Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check FRMC's competition here
RYDAF vs PGAS Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PGAS's competition here
RYDAF vs BNXR Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check BNXR's competition here
RYDAF vs AMNE Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check AMNE's competition here
RYDAF vs NUSPQ Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check NUSPQ's competition here
RYDAF vs RRRI Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check RRRI's competition here
RYDAF vs SNPTY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SNPTY's competition here
RYDAF vs VCOGF Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check VCOGF's competition here
RYDAF vs POGWY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check POGWY's competition here
RYDAF vs SGTZY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SGTZY's competition here
RYDAF vs OJSCY Comparison August 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 211.7B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $36.40, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.18, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OJSCY's competition here