Shell plc
Shell plc (RYDAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RYDAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYDAF | $35.73 | -0.56% | 204.2B | 15.91 | $2.19 | +4.03% |
| PCCYF | $0.97 | +1.64% | 218.4B | 7.43 | $0.13 | +28.96% |
| TTFNF | $59.16 | -2.87% | 130.3B | 10.72 | $5.52 | +5.83% |
| SNPMF | $0.57 | +2.25% | 89.9B | 9.54 | $0.06 | +28.02% |
| BPAQF | $5.36 | -2.90% | 83.4B | -76.50 | -$0.07 | +5.89% |
| OMVKY | $13.17 | -4.22% | 69.2B | 13.93 | $0.95 | +11.30% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| STOHF | $25.40 | -4.98% | 64.4B | 8.41 | $3.02 | +17.34% |
| EIPAF | $17.38 | -3.44% | 49B | 18.31 | $0.91 | +4.95% |
| LUKOY | $6.96 | -42.00% | 49B | 0.40 | $17.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RYDAF vs PCCYF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 218.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while PCCYF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PCCYF's competition here
RYDAF vs TTFNF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 130.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while TTFNF trades at $59.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check TTFNF's competition here
RYDAF vs SNPMF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 89.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while SNPMF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SNPMF's competition here
RYDAF vs BPAQF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while BPAQF trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is -76.50. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check BPAQF's competition here
RYDAF vs OMVKY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while OMVKY trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OMVKY's competition here
RYDAF vs RNFTF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check RNFTF's competition here
RYDAF vs STOHF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while STOHF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check STOHF's competition here
RYDAF vs EIPAF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while EIPAF trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check EIPAF's competition here
RYDAF vs LUKOY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check LUKOY's competition here
RYDAF vs PETFF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while PETFF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PETFF's competition here
RYDAF vs GLPEY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while GLPEY trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check GLPEY's competition here
RYDAF vs PUTRF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while PUTRF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PUTRF's competition here
RYDAF vs PUTRY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while PUTRY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PUTRY's competition here
RYDAF vs PSKOF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while PSKOF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PSKOF's competition here
RYDAF vs OMVJF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while OMVJF trades at $54.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OMVJF's competition here
RYDAF vs REPYF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while REPYF trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check REPYF's competition here
RYDAF vs REPYY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while REPYY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check REPYY's competition here
RYDAF vs OGFGY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while OGFGY trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OGFGY's competition here
RYDAF vs GLPEF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while GLPEF trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check GLPEF's competition here
RYDAF vs OGFGF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while OGFGF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OGFGF's competition here
RYDAF vs MGYOY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while MGYOY trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check MGYOY's competition here
RYDAF vs OAOFY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OAOFY's competition here
RYDAF vs SLTQY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SLTQY's competition here
RYDAF vs HLPMF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while HLPMF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 39.13. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check HLPMF's competition here
RYDAF vs ISRMF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check ISRMF's competition here
RYDAF vs RTEXF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check RTEXF's competition here
RYDAF vs WDGJY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 343.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check WDGJY's competition here
RYDAF vs UNTC Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 274.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while UNTC trades at $28.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check UNTC's competition here
RYDAF vs WDGJF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 220M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while WDGJF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check WDGJF's competition here
RYDAF vs PXPEF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PXPEF's competition here
RYDAF vs SEGYY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SEGYY's competition here
RYDAF vs ECTM Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while ECTM trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check ECTM's competition here
RYDAF vs OKMN Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while OKMN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OKMN's competition here
RYDAF vs UNTCW Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while UNTCW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check UNTCW's competition here
RYDAF vs GRGUF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check GRGUF's competition here
RYDAF vs POGS Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 636.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while POGS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check POGS's competition here
RYDAF vs AEDC Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check AEDC's competition here
RYDAF vs TRNX Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check TRNX's competition here
RYDAF vs PEMC Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PEMC's competition here
RYDAF vs SNVP Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SNVP's competition here
RYDAF vs FRMC Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check FRMC's competition here
RYDAF vs PGAS Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check PGAS's competition here
RYDAF vs BNXR Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check BNXR's competition here
RYDAF vs AMNE Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check AMNE's competition here
RYDAF vs NUSPQ Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check NUSPQ's competition here
RYDAF vs RRRI Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check RRRI's competition here
RYDAF vs OJSCY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check OJSCY's competition here
RYDAF vs POGWY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check POGWY's competition here
RYDAF vs VCOGF Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check VCOGF's competition here
RYDAF vs SGTZY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SGTZY's competition here
RYDAF vs SNPTY Comparison July 2025
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 204.2B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $35.73, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.91, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.Check SNPTY's competition here