Shell plc
Shell plc RYDAF Peers
See (RYDAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYDAF | $33.41 | +4.24% | 199.2B | 15.26 | $2.19 | +4.21% |
| PCCYF | $0.85 | -0.12% | 205.2B | 6.52 | $0.13 | +7.58% |
| TTFNF | $58.82 | -0.14% | 130.6B | 9.71 | $6.06 | +5.76% |
| SNPMF | $0.53 | -3.77% | 89.1B | 8.83 | $0.06 | +1.27% |
| BPAQF | $4.83 | -0.72% | 75.6B | -68.93 | -$0.07 | +6.57% |
| OMVKY | $13.35 | -0.07% | 69.8B | 14.51 | $0.92 | +2.88% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | N/A | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| STOHF | $23.60 | -3.28% | 64.5B | 7.47 | $3.16 | +4.93% |
| LUKOY | $6.96 | -42.00% | 49B | 0.40 | $17.46 | N/A |
| EIPAF | $15.10 | -4.97% | 44.4B | 17.16 | $0.88 | +6.59% |
Stock Comparison
RYDAF vs PCCYF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 205.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while PCCYF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs TTFNF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 130.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while TTFNF trades at $58.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs SNPMF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while SNPMF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and SNPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs BPAQF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while BPAQF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is -68.93. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs OMVKY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while OMVKY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs RNFTF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and RNFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs STOHF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while STOHF trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs LUKOY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs EIPAF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while EIPAF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and EIPAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs PETFF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while PETFF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and PETFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs PUTRF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while PUTRF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs PUTRY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while PUTRY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and PUTRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs GLPEY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while GLPEY trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs PSKOF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while PSKOF trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and PSKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs OMVJF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while OMVJF trades at $53.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and OMVJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs REPYF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while REPYF trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs REPYY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while REPYY trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs GLPEF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while GLPEF trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and GLPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs OGFGF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while OGFGF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and OGFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs OGFGY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while OGFGY trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and OGFGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs MGYOY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while MGYOY trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs OAOFY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and OAOFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs SLTQY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs HLPMF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while HLPMF trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and HLPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs ISRMF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while ISRMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and ISRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs RTEXF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and RTEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs WDGJY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 343.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and WDGJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs UNTC Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while UNTC trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs WDGJF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while WDGJF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and WDGJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs PXPEF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and PXPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs SEGYY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and SEGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs ECTM Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while ECTM trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs OKMN Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while OKMN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and OKMN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs UNTCW Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while UNTCW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and UNTCW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs GRGUF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and GRGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs POGS Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 814.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while POGS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and POGS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs TRNX Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and TRNX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs AEDC Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 102.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs BNXR Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 41.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs FRMC Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 34.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs PEMC Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and PEMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs SNVP Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs RRRI Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs PGAS Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and PGAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs AMNE Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs NUSPQ Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs POGWY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and POGWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs VCOGF Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and VCOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs SNPTY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYDAF.
RYDAF vs OJSCY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and OJSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RYDAF vs SGTZY Comparison
RYDAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYDAF stands at 199.2B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYDAF is priced at $33.41, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.26, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, RYDAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYDAF and SGTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).